EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

08.01.17

90% of WIPR Readers Give Up Hope on Unitary Patent (UPC) in the UK, But Team UPC Keeps Lying About It

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 5:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Bristows EPO

Summary: UPC boosters carry on promoting the illusion of UPC inevitability (even in the UK), in clear defiance of common sense and basic professional integrity

SURVEYS from WIPR are not everything to go by (they typically involve people in the patent ‘industry’), even though in the past they showed anything but UPC optimism. The latest survey apparently attracted the “second highest number of responses ever for a WIPR survey,” but we’ll come to that in a moment.

The UPC is not desirable to the UK. Firms in the UK (not law firms but firms that actually make things) object to it.

“The UPC is not desirable to the UK. Firms in the UK (not law firms but firms that actually make things) object to it.”In relation to the article mentioned on Monday (behind a paywall), one EPO insider wrote that: “Apparently Mr Hufschmid is one of the EPO Inventors awarded in Venice this year!”

Battistelli, whose name is apparently Italian, chose Italy for his latest PR charade. Will Italy also take Britain’s place? Many Brits seems to think so. Even Brits who are in the patent/litigation ‘industry’ and would prefer to believe otherwise.

Translations would, in the meantime, also be appreciated for this new article in German (it has just mentioned the good chances of Antonio Campinos as the next EPO President, bringing it under “EU” umbrella — like the EUIPO Campinos is from — in the form of UPC).

“…Campinos is already heading the rebranded (for EU) EUIPO and he is from a southern European country, more like Battistelli.”“Campinos is spoken of as worse,” one person noted (Campinos compared to Battistelli). Another added, “if humanly possible.”

Campinos is Portuguese and we wrote many articles about him and his immunity (scandal from Portugal).

Either way, Campinos is already heading the rebranded (for EU) EUIPO and he is from a southern European country, more like Battistelli.

Italy might soon be chosen as a substitute for the UK in the UPC, according to what mostly British patent practitioners believe. To quote this latest from WIPR:

Nearly 90% of WIPR readers believe that Milan would be a good fit for the Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) central division seat should it be moved from London, according to a recent survey.

The seat, which is due to hear cases on chemistry, including pharmaceuticals and human necessities, is expected to be based in London, but this has been thrown into doubt following the Brexit vote.

These are the five top reasons that readers, who provided the second highest number of responses ever for a WIPR survey, think Milan would be a good replacement for London.

It certainly looks as though, based on various WIPR surveys (not just the above), there’s no faith in the UK ever entering the UPC. But Kingsley Egbuonu, living in another parallel universe in London and working for the pro-UPC Managing IP (they have spent years promoting the UPC), does not mention what actually happened in the middle of July (Team UPC certainly noticed, but decided to mislead by omission) and pretends all is fine for the UPC in the UK. Watch yesterday’s “progress [sic] report” from him (the part below is not behind paywall):

UK consents to UPC Agreement (UPCA) Protocol and will resume legislative procedure for UPCA ratification in the autumn, UPC IT team seeks user input, and Germany’s legislative steps for ratification criticised

UK consents to UPCA Protocol

The UK has deposited its instrument of acceptance to be bound by the UPCA Protocol. This Protocol allows parts of the UPCA which concern the court’s organisational structure, personnel and infrastructure to come into force early [...]

What a spectacular spin. And no mention about what happened in British politics 2 weeks ago? How come?

“Do they keep their head deep inside the sand or are they willfully lying, hoping that the lies can give the UPC some momentum?”Egbuonu wasn’t alone. Innofy’s weird “headline” that’s just a two-sentence statement was also released yesterday: “The Unitary Patent system is currently expected to start in the first quarter of 2018. Naturally, we will keep you updated as soon as any further news is released.”

Andrew Clarke sounds as deluded (maybe self-deluding) as Bristows.

Are they not paying attention to what has been happening? Do they keep their head deep inside the sand or are they willfully lying, hoping that the lies can give the UPC some momentum?

Currently, at the EPO, there is a growing crisis of governance and patent rules/scope. See one of the latest comments in IP Kat (from yesterday):

One of the aspects that have so far not been discussed is whether it would be legitimate for the Administrative Council to change the EPC with a retroactive effect: the change in the Rules is not to be applied to alle applications filed after the change, but to all applications and even patents pending before the EPO.

Normally, a change in law will not place a party in a worse situation. What has happened now is comparable by a parliament saying that all new cars should have safety belts, which not only would apply to newly sold cars, but also would apply to cars that have been sold so far and which are still driving on the roads. From now on, cars that are halted by the police and do not have safety belts will be removed from the road.

If this hypothetical car situation would become real, everybody would protest, even if it was felt that having obligatory safety belts was a good idea. Now, since it only affects a minimum number of companies/people apparently such a limitation of rights is gladfully accepted.
From my perspective, I would vote that the EPO (or the European Commission) would compensate holders of these kind of patents (and/or applicants that filed these patents before the change of law) would compensate for loss of patent right (and consequently loss of income).

A response to this said that “the vast majority of those cases will have been filed in the knowledge that patentability of products of biological processes was uncertain. They took that risk, and for a small amount of time (between the G decision and the EU notice) things looked good, but surely compensation should not be available in these circumstances.”

“The EPC itself is in a crisis and much of this causes the constitutional panic in Germany.”“To my mind,” added another comment, “this would have been an excellent topic of discussion at a Conference organised under Article 4a EPC. It seems like big legal issues like this where the AC is in danger of acting ultra vires would be the ideal subject for discussion.”

The EPC itself is in a crisis and much of this causes the constitutional panic in Germany.

We don’t believe that the UPC is going anywhere; neither do people who work in the field. But to some people (and their employer) it’s all about money, not truth or accuracy.

“We are very concerned that Team UPC — much like Team Battistelli — has become so detached from facts that it’s dangerous not only to itself but to everyone in the surrounding area.”The Philippines, a country with very few EPs, has a new example of this, courtesy of Shilpi Saxena Jr from Khurana and Khurana. Watch yesterday’s promotional puff piece; only days after a similar self-promotional piece about Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH). The truth of the matter is, the country is pretty irrelevant to the EPO, yet Battistelli used it in a desperate effort to make it seem like he’s “winning” (the Trump way).

We are very concerned that Team UPC — much like Team Battistelli — has become so detached from facts that it’s dangerous not only to itself but to everyone in the surrounding area. In the case of the UK, the British industry is greatly harmed by the likes of Bristows.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Looking for Explanations About Samsung's DeX and Other FOSS Initiatives Being Canned

    DeX was primarily a threat to the desktop/laptop monopoly of Microsoft, so its sudden abandonment — without even an explanation — continues to attract speculations



  2. EPO Will Need a Lot More Than Photo Ops and Hoax 'Studies' to Restore the Perception of Lawfulness

    Battistelli‘s illegal attacks on European Patent Office (EPO) judges have tarnished any impression that the EPO serves justice and the current regime torpedoes an assessment of these attacks; EPO workers understand that to follow guidelines from the management may be a breach of the EPC



  3. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  4. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  6. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  7. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  8. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  9. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  10. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  11. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  12. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  13. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  14. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  15. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  16. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  17. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  18. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  19. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  21. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  22. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  23. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  24. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  25. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  26. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  27. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  28. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  29. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  30. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts