EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.12.17

The Hogwash Begins: Patent Microcosm’s Media Pretends Campinos is Anything But Battistelli’s French Succession Plan

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

UPC push expected to carry on under the ‘unitary’ or ‘unifying’ Campinos, who was chosen in an ‘Angolan’ fashion

Order of succession
Reference: Order of succession

Summary: A survey of media coverage regarding António Campinos, the French person whom Benoît Battistelli selected as his successor at the EPO

YESTERDAY we wrote about the EPO musical chairs. It’s like they’re not even hiring for qualifications but for each other’s work/career ladder and job security.

“Apropos musical chairs,” one reader wrote to us, there’s a deeper story to it. To quote:

More about musical chairs

According to internal sources from within Battistelli’s trusted circle with the to prepare the election of “his” candidate, Battistelli would have visited the Belgian Delegation with A. Campinos to make following deal: Belgian supports Campinos at the EPO and in exchange France supports Belgian Christian Archambeau (former PD HR at EPO, A.K.A. “Magnum” for his pronounced taste for both moustache and Ferraris) at the head of EUIPO in replacement of Campinos.

Nothing can beat la Famiglia

We have long shown that Campinos was selected by Battistelli and groomed for succession (rather than elected by the AC, which seems to have gotten things in reverse and accepted Battistelli as its ‘king’, at least delegates of small countries). This might be expected from some countries like Zimbabwe, not an institution that is based in Bavaria.

“We have long shown that Campinos was selected by Battistelli and groomed for succession (rather than elected by the AC, which seems to have gotten things in reverse and accepted Battistelli as its ‘king’, at least delegates of small countries).”The media coverage of Campinos’ upcoming appointment/tenure is disturbing, but we expected this. They nonchalantly treat him like a “blank slate”, conveniently ignoring all sorts of things. Here is how Lexology put it this week (revealing what Juve had said in German): “Campinos to EPO? – German legal magazine JUVE is reporting that António Campinos, the current head of the EUIPO, is set to be elected president of the European Patent Office (EPO). Claiming to have heard from the EPO’s board of directors, it is understood the search for a new EPO president has “produced few suitable candidates”, with Campinos expected to be selected today and to succeed president Benoît Battistelli from July next year. Our sister title IAM understands that the other candidate for the role is Cuno Tarfusser of Italy, who is a judge at the ICC and has no IP background. “Hard to see anything other than a clear Campinos win,” is the general consensus – and, if true (update: it’s true and here’s our analysis), it will be a hefty loss for the EUIPO, and speculation is already underway about who will fill his shoes in Alicante…”

“The media coverage of Campinos’s upcoming appointment/tenure is disturbing, but we expected this.”“Our sister title IAM,” it says. We didn’t even know about this connection. Either way, EUIPO is an EU institution and the EPO makes the EU look very, very bad. Even though the EPO is totally detached from the EU — however there are occasional overlaps — the EU/EC could intervene in many ways. Why doesn’t it?

SUEPO has already picked a few more headlines about it, e.g. in German and in English [1, 2]. The latter is using multiple domains (they’re a marketing spam site too, as we shall show in the weekend). There were also mentions in some other roundups, often just quoting the EPO’s official announcement from Wednesday morning. “His five-year term will start on 1 July 2018,” it says. Well, if the Office even survives this long (as some insiders have said they have doubts)…

“Even though the EPO is totally detached from the EU — however there are occasional overlaps — the EU/EC could intervene in many ways.”Could Campinos be the last ever EPO President?

Looking at some patents-centric news [sic] sites (they’re mostly marketing and lobbying), we were disgusted, but that did not surprise us at all. Such utterly shallow coverage (parroting the EPO) is what they often do; nothing about the scandals or connections surrounding Campinos. Nothing at all. There’s a back story (or back room story) to how Campinos got his job at the EPO, but patent ‘news’ sites won’t mention it. Obviously they won’t. What’s for them to gain from it? They prefer to keep their relationship with the EPO. The EPO already threw millions of euros at European media for PR or repetition of official narratives, such as Jesper Kongstad ‘retiring’. He joined the private sector only a few days after his premature end of term at EPO and DKPTO. Jesper Kongstad did not even wait a week to expose/debunk his own lies about ‘retirement’. This makes us ever more certain that what we heard was true (he had been sacked/forced out). Here is his official new page (as seen less than two weeks ago he was still at the EPO/DKPTO). No ‘cool-off’ period?

To make matters worse, see last night’s Managing IP post which is Michael Loney’s roundup. To quote: “Interview: Jesper Kongstad, former chair of the EPO…” (paywall)

Yes, go ahead and groom him already. Like you have done before (for Campinos also).

“Jesper Kongstad did not even wait a week to expose/debunk his own lies about ‘retirement’.”What is this? They call themselves media?

IP Watch‘s William New, for a change, wrote that “Campinos ran against one other candidate, Cuno Tarfusser, an Italian judge at the International Criminal Court, according to sources. Some watchdogs seeking change in the organisation have raised concern about a close relationship between Campinos and Battistelli.”

He alludes to us (“watchdogs”). This only person (a single candidate) who ran against Battistelli’s pick for President gave an illusion of choice. We previously wrote about other applications, which simply got rejection as ineligible (not even considered).

Is this what we ought to expect from job openings in the 21st century in Bavaria? This is nepotism disguised as a “choice”. Remember that for a long time there was no candidate at all other than Campinos.

“Is this what we ought to expect from job openings in the 21st century in Bavaria? This is nepotism disguised as a “choice”.”We were also appalled to see the coverage from WIPR. It’s total whitewash with the headline “Campinos the ‘sensible’ choice [sic] to replace Battistelli as EPO president” (like there was much “choice”).

Watch what WIPR did in order to compose this ‘report’. Only the patent microcosm was asked about it (request for comment). The whole article is just a bunch of praises from patent maximalists.

Incredible and noteworthy is the fact that after Battistelli had set up an old friend to be successor, WIPR approached for a comment the firm that Battistelli hired to bully me. They asked this firm for an opinion on this! They don’t quote the guy called “Capone” (real name) but another one, “Marshall” (not from Marshall/Martial Law but Fieldfisher). Here it is:

Joshua Marshall, associate at Fieldfisher, said the role has previously gone to French, German, British, Swiss and Dutch nationals, so this is a significant step in terms of diversification and a “tremendous accolade” for Campinos and Portugal generally.

He added that Campinos has been credited with providing a more efficient and engaged service, making IP more accessible and user-friendly for smaller businesses.

“It is hoped he will bring the same pragmatism and dynamism to the EPO. However, the role will not be without its challenges, particularly regarding the pending implementation of the unitary patent following Brexit and the role of London in hosting the Unified Patent Court (UPC),” Marshall said.

This is UPC promotion by Fieldfisher, for its own interests. What a racket!

“So basically, a cabal of self-serving patent firms is preemptively sucking up to Campinos.”We have seen very similar (to to above) quotes in Managing IP, so they must be reusing E-mails when receiving inquiries from the ‘media’.

“CIPA enjoys a positive and productive relationship with the EPO,” says a man from IP Kat about himself (in case anyone still wonders why IP Kat refuses to cover EPO scandals).

In their own words:

Tim Moss, chief executive of the UK IPO, said: “I welcome the election of António Campinos as the new EPO President. From his time as Executive Director of the EUIPO, he brings with him a wealth of experience and knowledge of both the challenges and the opportunities that the global IP system presents. The UK IPO looks forward to working with him and his team during his tenure.”

Stephen Jones, President of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, said: “CIPA enjoys a positive and productive relationship with the EPO and we look forward to this continuing under the leadership of Mr Campinos, who brings with him great experience of the global IP system. We wish him every success in his new role.”

So basically, a cabal of self-serving patent firms is preemptively sucking up to Campinos. Yes, just as we expected all along.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 16/8/2018: MAAS 2.4.1, Mesa 18.2 RC3

    Links for the day



  2. USPTO Craziness: Changing Rules to Punish PTAB Petitioners and Reward Microsoft for Corruption at ISO

    The US patent office proposes charging/imposing on applicants that are not customers of Microsoft a penalty; there’s also an overtly and blatantly malicious move whose purpose is to discourage petitions against wrongly-granted (by the USPTO) patents



  3. The Demise of US Software Patents Continues at the Federal Circuit

    Software patents are rotting away in the United States; it remains to be seen when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will truly/fully honour 35 U.S.C. § 101 and stop granting such patents



  4. Almost Two Months After the ILO Ruling Staff Representative Brumme is Finally Back on the Job at EPO

    Ion Brumme gets his position at the EPO back, owing to the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization (ILO-AT) ruling back in July; things, however, aren't rosy for the Office as a whole



  5. Links 15/8/2018: Akademy 2018 Wrapups and More Intel Defects

    Links for the day



  6. Antiquated Patenting Trick: Adding Words Like 'Apparatus' to Make Abstract Ideas Look/Sound Like They Pertain to or Contain a 'Device'

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) still maintains that abstract ideas are not patent-eligible; so applicants and law firms go out of their way to make their ideas seem as though they're physical



  7. Open Invention Network (OIN) Member Companies Need to Become Unanimous in Opposition to Software Patents

    Opposition to abstract software patents, which even the SCOTUS and the Federal Circuit nowadays reject, would be strategically smart for OIN; but instead it issues a statement in support of a GPL compliance initiative



  8. President Battistelli 'Killed' the EPO; António Campinos Will 'Finish the Job'

    The EPO is shrinking, but this is being shrewdly disguised using terms like "efficiency" and a low-profile President who keeps himself in the dark



  9. Links 14/8/2018: Virtlyst 1.2.0, Blender 2.8 Planning Update, Zorin OS 12.4, FreeBSD 12.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  10. Berkheimer Changed Nothing and Invalidation Rates of Abstract Software Patents Remain Very High

    Contrary to repetitive misinformation from firms that 'sell' services around patents, there is no turnaround or comeback for software patents; the latest numbers suggest a marginal difference at best — one that may be negligible considering the correlation between expected outcomes and actions (the nature of risk analysis)



  11. Lockton Insurance Brokers Exploiting Patent Trolls to Sell Insurance to the Gullible

    Demonstrating what some people have dubbed (and popularised) "disaster capitalism", Lockton now looks for opportunities to profit from patent trolls, in the form of "insurance" (the same thing Microsoft does)



  12. Patent Lawyers Writing Patent Law for Their Own Enrichment Rather Than for Innovation

    We have become detached from the original goals and come to the point where patent offices aren't necessarily run by people qualified for the job of advancing science and technology; they, unlike judges, only seem to care about how many patents get granted, irrespective of their quality/merit



  13. Links 13/8/2018: Linux 4.18 and GNU Linux-libre 4.18 Arrive

    Links for the day



  14. PTAB is Loathed by Patent Maximalists Because It Can Potentially Invalidate Thousands of Software Patents (More Than Courts Can Handle)

    The US patent system has become more resistant to software patents; courts, however, are still needed to invalidate such patents (a potentially expensive process) because the USPTO continues to grant these provided some fashionable buzzwords/hype waves are utilised (e.g. "facial recognition", "blockchain", "autonomous vehicles")



  15. Gene Quinn and 'Dallas Innovates' as Couriers of Agenda for Patent Trolls Like iPEL

    Failing to hide their real purpose and malicious agenda, sites whose real purpose is to promote a lot of patent litigation produce puff pieces, even for patently unethical trolls such as iPEL



  16. Software Patents, Secured by 'Smart' and 'Intelligent' Tricks, Help Microsoft and Others Bypass Alice/Section 101

    A look at the use of fashionable trends and buzzwords to acquire and pass around dubious software patents, then attempting to guard these from much-needed post-Alice scrutiny



  17. Keep Boston (and Massachusetts in General) From Becoming an Infestation Zone for Patent Litigation

    Boston, renowned for research and innovation, has become somewhat of a litigation hotbed; this jeopardises the state's attractiveness (except perhaps to lawyers)



  18. Links 12/8/2018: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, Mesa 18.1.6 Release Notice, New Linux Imminent

    Links for the day



  19. Thomas Massie's “Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2018” (RALIA) Would Put the US Patent System in the Lions' (or Trolls') Mouth Again

    An anti-§ 101 and anti-PTAB bill from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) strives to remove quality control; but by handing the system back to patent trolls he and his proponents simply strive to create more business of litigation, at the expense of innovation



  20. EPO-Style Problem-Solution: Tackling Backlog by Granting Lots of Low-Quality (Bogus) European Patents, Causing a Surge in Troll/Frivolous Litigation

    The EPO's lack of interest in genuine patent quality (measuring "quality" in terms of speed, not actual quality) may mean nothing but a litigation epidemic; many of these lawsuits would be abusive, baseless; those harmed the most would be small businesses that cannot afford a legal defense and would rather settle with those who exploit questionable patents, notably patent trolls



  21. Links 11/8/2018: PGP Clean Room 1.0, Ring-KDE 3.0.0, Julia 1.0

    Links for the day



  22. Propaganda Sites of Patent Trolls and Litigators Have Quit Trying to Appear Impartial or Having Integrity

    The lobbying groups of patent trolls (which receive money from such trolls) carry on meddling in policy and altering perception that drives policy; we present some new examples



  23. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Still Try to Undermine Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), Refusing to Accept Patent Quality

    The patent maximalists in the United States, seeing that the USPTO is moving away from patent maximalism, is desperate for a turnaround; prominent patent maximalists take it all out on PTAB



  24. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement is Paralysed, So Team UPC is Twisting Old News

    Paralysis of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) means that people are completely forgetting about its very existence; those standing to benefit from it (patent litigation firms) are therefore recycling and distorting old news



  25. Patents as Profiteering Opportunities for Law Firms Rather Than Drivers of Innovation for Productive Companies

    A sample of news from yesterday; the patent microcosm is still arguing about who pays attorneys’ fees (not whether these fees are justified) and is constantly complaining about the decline in patent litigation, which means fewer and lower attorneys’ fees (less work for them)



  26. Links 9/8/2018: Mesa 18.2 RC2, Cockpit 175, WPA-2 Hash Cracking

    Links for the day



  27. Patent Maximalists -- Not Reformers -- Are the Biggest Threat to the Viability of the Patent System and Innovation

    Those who strive to infinitely expand patent scope are rendering the patent system obsolete and completely losing sight of the very purpose of the patent system, whose sanity US courts and lawmakers gradually restore (one ruling and one bill at a time)



  28. WeMove.EU Tackles Low Patent Quality at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The breadth of European Patents, which now cover even nature itself, worries public interest groups; Team UPC, however, wants patent scope to expand further and António Campinos has expressed his intention to further increase the number of grants



  29. Links 8/8/2018: KDE Neon for Testing, New LibreOffice Release, Dart 2.0

    Links for the day



  30. Links 7/8/2018: TCP Vulnerability in Linux, Speck Crypto Code Candidate for Removal

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts