EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.04.18

Software Patents Are Still Being Rejected in the United States (New Examples), But the Anti-Alice Lobby Goes on

Posted in America, Patents at 3:40 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Ears wide shut

Ears shut

Summary: The situation in the US is becoming unbearable for those who put all their eggs in the software patents basket; in the meantime, however, more attempts are being made to change the law

THE US patent office gradually moves away from software patents. It makes it harder to get any. That does not mean that applicants can’t find ways around Section 101. Earlier this week we found this article about a new patent. “Face-tracking sensors and sophisticated software would manage the display so that you saw a realistic blended picture from any angle,” it said. Another article said: “Amazon acquired Body Labs last year, an AI-software and computer vision company that once touted its ability to create 3D models of human bodies in motion and then dress them in virtual outfits…”

Here we go again with buzzwords like “AI” and “VR”. These help opportunists get past the restrictions and receive software patents. Amazon has had truly notorious software patents, some of which we covered here before.

What’s noteworthy is that courts, unlike the patent office, aren’t tolerating software patents. Lawyers know that. We regularly see anti-Section 101 rants from law firms that profited from software patents. Here’s a new rant from Jeremy Anapol and Maria Anderson. What they’re basically doing, with polite language, is constant complaining about Section 101/Alice. We have become accustomed to that.

Charles Bieneman has just written about yet another software patent which bites the dust, owing to Alice. To quote:

Implementing a process in a highly technical environment will not necessarily save patent claims challenged under the Alice abstract idea test, as illustrated in Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc., No. C16-1919 RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 14, 2017). In this case, the court dismissed, under FRCP 12(b)(6), a complaint of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941, directed to a “method of restricting software operation within a license limitation,” even though the claimed method was implemented in the sophisticated technical environment of a computer BIOS system.

[...]

The plaintiff argued that, as in Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., the claims here were directed to improving operation of a computer. But, considering the claims under the first prong of the Alice abstract idea test, the court thought these patent claims were more like those at issue in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Corp., where the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to storage of electronic files were patent-ineligible.

[...]

Turning to the second prong of the Alice test, the plaintiff, citing BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. ATT Mobility LLC., argued that claim 1 recited in unconventional arrangement of admittedly known parts by reciting “using an agent to software licensing verification structure in the BIOS, and then actually verifying a program using that verification structure.” But the court disagreed that this was an inventive concept overcoming the claimed abstract idea. The claim simply recited storing data in a pre-existing memory.

It must be pretty stressful to depend on software patents. They’re very weak; they’re not worth the risk.

Here we have the patent troll Dominion Harbor calling a “cheat sheet” something it plans to bypass Alice with.

Last year, as we noted quite recently, the Federal Circuit smashed software patents using Alice. There was just about no decision truly antagonising Alice. None! Here’s the so-called ‘cheat sheet’ [1, 2] which lists all important decisions (those which can be cited in the future):

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S 2017 PRECEDENTIAL SECTION 101 CASES:
1. Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. True Health Diagnostics LLC., 859 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
2. Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services, 859 F.3d 1044 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
3. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., 850 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
4. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co., 850 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
5. Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc., 851 F.3d 1275 (Fed. Cir. 2017), panel rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, 870 F.3d 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
6. RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., 855 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
7. Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, 868 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
8. Secured Mail Solutions LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc., 873 F.3d 905 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
9. Smart Systems Innovations, LLC v. Chicago Transit Authority, 873 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
10. Thales Visionix Inc. v. United States, 850 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
11. Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications., LLC, 874 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
12. Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corp., 867 F.3d 1253 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

We have covered most of the above. These were frustrating to the patent microcosm.

So what is the patent microcosm going to do? It will play dirty, as usual, and attempt to change the law. As the FFII’s President put it yesterday: “The great return of Software Patents in US, yet another bill written by the patent industry.”

“Such bills would not pass,” I assured him, “but those behind such bills want us to believe otherwise…”

Section 101 is becoming the norm as it is; it has not been changed for a long time. One new message said: “The Chisum Patent Academy will dig into these 2017 Sec 101 #patent eligibility cases (and other notable topics) at our upcoming March seminars in #Houston and #Cincinnati. To register, visit https://chisum-patent-academy.com/ https://twitter.com/ChisumOnPatents/status/948198698919571456 …”

Yeah, sure, they will try to undermine Section 101, but that doesn’t mean they will succeed. So will Watchtroll, who just can’t help obsessing over years-old decisions. Watchtroll wrote this week: “I again continue to wish for patent eligibility reform in Congress that would overrule Mayo, Myriad and Alice.”

Keep on wishing. It’s another one of those “Patent Wishes for 2018″; Check out “New Year’s Resolutions For The U.S. Patent System” by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner LLP (greedy law firm). The author tries to interject lobbying agenda into the USPTO’s alleged “resolutions” and it’s just the tired old anti-Alice and anti-Mayo. To quote: “It’s been nearly six years since the Supreme Court called the patent eligibility of diagnostic methods into question in Mayo v. Prometheus, and two and a half years since the Federal Circuit twisted the knife with its decision in Ariosa v. Sequenom. The USPTO issued guidelines to help stakeholders navigate the newly treacherous § 101 terrain, but when even the Patent Trial and Appeal Board doesn’t let applicants follow those narrow paths, it’s no surprise that individual examiners find roadblocks where none used to be.”

That the USPTO actually improved patent quality isn’t a bad thing. Unless one is in the litigation ‘business’ (like Foley & Lardner LLP)…

Jeff Lindsay on Twitter, citing Watchtroll, wrote this: “When USPTO employees start claiming to be “judges” or even “chief judges” as they strike down 90% of granted patents, we have a serious arrogance issue that is harming innovation & property rights in the US. See “Nightmares” in this @IPwatchdog article: https://lnkd.in/fhw9mmg”

No, USPTO workers claim no such thing. Their job is inherently judging applications. Lindsay set up a straw man (argument) here. We assume he’s alluding to PTAB. The ‘professional’ PTAB bashers, cowboys such as Paul Morinville, are again (over at Watchtroll) attacking the Supreme Court. Their desperation is quite revealing. They just don’t want to obey the law and they attempt to change it by shaming judges, courts etc.

Banner & Witcoff’s Ernest V. Linek and Brian Emfinger have meanwhile written about Alice and it seems like they too aren’t honest. If patent law firms were honest (they’re not), they’d say software patents are de facto dead and not worth pursuing in courts anymore. This is what they said:

As non-traditional venues see more patent litigation in the aftermath of TC Heartland and Cray, time will tell if further distinctions emerge between district courts’ treatment of challenges to subject-matter eligibility and the various motions for disposing of patent infringement claims on that basis.

The venue doesn’t matter that much, especially once cases are brought before the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit no longer tolerates software patents.

Perhaps the most worrying thing here is that people with zero experience in software are advocating software patents. Consider Watchtroll as a prime example of it; it’s like a think tank that’s hiring writers to promote software patents — a subject they neither understand nor affects them professionally. See, in Watchtroll no tech/legal background is needed; “Somewhere near the end of 2011,” Steve Brachmann admitted the other day, ” I responded to an ad that was left on Craigslist. A website called IPWatchdog.com was looking for a writer to contribute content on Apple’s patenting activities…”

Promoting litigation and software patents. That’s the only objective. Taking something which is hot in the news and then spinning that — somehow — as regarding patents. That is a Watchtroll kind of lunacy. Watch what Brachmann wrote the other day; Watchtroll outdoes itself with the patently absurd assertion that we can’t quite go to space without software patents. “Benefits of NASA Space Directive on Mars could be Limited by Uncertain Software, Biotech Patentability,” says the headline. We’re speechless. Such is the intellectually-dishonest nature of Watchtroll nowadays.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 16/12/2018: DXVK 0.94, WordPress 5.0.1, Fuchsia SDK

    Links for the day



  2. Immunity of the European Patent Office Has Helped Shield Dangerous Thugs From Justice

    The Topić case is set to resume in Croatia as Topić runs out of diplomatic immunity he long enjoyed (and exploited) at the European Patent Office



  3. Patent Law Firms' War on Facts and Constant Lying About Unitary Patent

    The Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC) has failed; this, however, is no excuse for constantly lying and it's a problem more people ought to speak about because it stigmatises lawyers as self-serving liars, not a legitimate source of honest legal advice



  4. EPO Chief Economist Yann Ménière Keynote Speaker at Patent Trolls-Funded Event Set Up by the Patent Trolls' Lobby

    The EPO continues to align itself not only with the interests of patent trolls (even those from another continent) but also with the trolls themselves, causing great embarrassment and confusion over the goals/motivations of the Office



  5. The European Patent Organisation (EPO) Loses Legitimacy If (or When) Christoph Ernst Becomes Subservient to António Campinos

    The structural deficiencies of the EPO, where separation of powers does not quite exist, is further pronounced by the imminent role of Christoph Ernst, who gets 'demoted' from pseudo-boss of Campinos to a mere assistant of his



  6. Links 15/12/2018: Cockpit 184, Vivaldi 2.2, Krita 4.1.7 Released

    Links for the day



  7. Links 13/12/2018: IRS Migration, GNOME 3.31.3 Released

    Links for the day



  8. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions Still Uncontroversial Unless One Asks the Patent Maximalists

    Contrary to what the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has claimed, PTAB is liked by companies that actually create things and opposition to PTAB comes from power brokers of the Koch brothers, law firms, and trolls (including those who foolishly repeat them)



  9. Latest Talk From IBM’s Manny Schecter Shows That IBM Hasn't Changed and After the Red Hat Takeover It'll Continue to Promote Software Patents

    IBM's hardheaded attitude and patent aggression unaffected by its strategic acquisition of a company that at least claimed to oppose software patents (whilst at the same time pursuing them)



  10. The European Patent Troll Wants as Much Litigation as Possible

    Patent quality is a concept no longer recognisable at the European Patent Office; all that the management understands is speed and PACE, which it conflates with quality in order to register as much cash as possible before the whole thing comes crashing down (bubbles always implode at the end)



  11. António Campinos Turns His 'Boss' Into His Lapdog, Just Like Battistelli and Kongstad

    The European Patent Organisation expects us to believe that Josef Kratochvíl will keep the Office honest while his predecessor, the German who failed to do anything about Battistelli's abuses, becomes officially subservient to António Campinos



  12. Links 12/12/2018: Mesa 18.3.1 Released, CNCF Takes Control of etcd

    Links for the day



  13. EPO Trust, Leadership and Commitment

    "Trust, leadership and commitment" is the latest publication from EPO insiders, who in the absence of free speech and freedom of association for the union/representation are an essential spotlight on EPO abuses



  14. Links 11/12/2018: Tails 3.11, New Firefox, FreeBSD 12.0

    Links for the day



  15. Number of Filings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Highest in Almost Two Years

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs), which [cref 113718 typically invalidate software patents by citing 35 U.S.C. § 101], are withstanding negative rhetoric and hostility from Iancu



  16. With 'Brexit' in a Lot of Headlines Team UPC Takes the Unitary Patent Lies up a Notch

    Misinformation continues to run like water; people are expected to believe that the UPC, an inherently EU-centric construct, can magically come to fruition in the UK (or in Europe as a whole)



  17. The EPO Not Only Abandoned the EPC But Also the Biotech Directive

    Last week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first placeLast week's decision (T1063/18, EPO Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04) shows that there's still a long way to go before the Office and the Organisation as a whole fulfil their obligation to those who birthed the Organisation in the first place



  18. Patents on Abstract Things and on Life (or Patents Which Threaten Lives) Merely Threaten the Very Legitimacy of Patent Offices, Including EPO

    Patent Hubris and maximalism pose a threat or a major risk to the very system that they claim to be championing; by reducing the barrier to entry (i.e. introducing low-quality or socially detrimental patents) they merely embolden ardent critics who demand patent systems as a whole be abolished; the EPO is nowadays a leading example of it



  19. Links 10/12/2018: Linux 4.20 RC6 and Git 2.20

    Links for the day



  20. US Courts Make the United States' Patent System Sane Again

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and other factors are making the patent system in the US a lot more sane



  21. Today's USPTO Grants a Lot of Fake Patents, Software Patents That Courts Would Invalidate

    The 35 U.S.C. § 101 effect is very much real; patents on abstract/nonphysical ideas get invalidated en masse (in courts/PTAB) and Director Andrei Iancu refuses to pay attention as if he's above the law and court rulings don't apply to him



  22. A Month After Microsoft Claimed Patent 'Truce' Its Patent Trolls Keep Attacking Microsoft's Rivals

    Microsoft's legal department relies on its vultures (to whom it passes money and patents) to sue its rivals; but other than that, Microsoft is a wonderful company!



  23. Good News: US Supreme Court Rejects Efforts to Revisit Alice, Most Software Patents to Remain Worthless

    35 U.S.C. § 101 will likely remain in tact for a long time to come; courts have come to grips with the status quo, as even the Federal Circuit approves the large majority of invalidations by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) panels, initiated by inter partes reviews (IPRs)



  24. Florian Müller's Article About SEPs and the EPO

    Report from the court in Munich, where the EPO is based



  25. EPO Vice-President Željko Topić in New Article About Corruption in Croatia

    The Croatian newspaper 7Dnevno has an outline of what Željko Topić has done in Croatia and in the EPO in Munich; it argues that this seriously erodes Croatia's national brand/identity



  26. The Quality of European Patents Continues to Deteriorate Under António Campinos and Software Patents Are Advocated Every Day

    The EPC in the European Patent Office and 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the USPTO annul most if not all software patents; under António Campinos, however, software patents are being granted in Europe and the USPTO exploits similar tricks



  27. Team UPC is Still Spreading False Rumours in an Effort to Trick Politicians and Pressure Judges

    Abuses at the European Patent Office, political turmoil and an obvious legislative coup by a self-serving occupation that produces nothing have already doomed the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); so now we deal with complete fabrications from Team UPC as they're struggling to make something out of nothing, anonymously smearing opposition to the UPC and anonymously making stuff up



  28. Patents on Life and Patents That Kill the Poor Would Only Delegitimise the European Patent Office

    After Mayo, Myriad and other SCOTUS cases (the basis of 35 U.S.C. § 101) the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is reluctant to grant patents on life; the European Patent Office (EPO), however, goes in the opposite direction, even in defiance of the European Patent Convention



  29. EPO 'Untapped Potential'

    "Campinos is diligently looking for ways to further increase the Office’s output without increasing the number of examiners," says the EPO-FLIER team



  30. Links 9/12/2018: New Linux Stable Releases (Notably Linux 4.19.8), RC Coming, and Unifont 11.0.03

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts