02.15.18

Gemini version available ♊︎

Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:25 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Bavarian State Parliament due to debate motion about the EPO Boards of Appeal

Bavarian State Parliament debate

Summary: An upcoming debate about Battistelli’s attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter

A preliminary discussion is scheduled to take place at the next sitting of the EU Affairs Committee of the Bavarian State Parliament at 12:30 on Tuesday 20 February 2018.

It is expected that the motion will then be forwarded for a debate before a plenary session of the Parliament some time within the next couple of weeks.

An image of the motion (in German) is shown above along with an English translation below.

Bavarian State Parliament

17th Parliamentary Term 06.02.2018 Printed matter 17/20577

Motion

Dr. Hubert Aiwanger, Florian Streibl, Prof. (Univ. Lima) Dr. Peter Bauer, Dr. Hans Jürgen Fahn, Thorsten Glauber, Eva Gottstein, Joachim Hanisch, Johann Häusler, Dr.. Leopold Herz, Nikolaus Kraus, Peter Meyer, Prof. Dr. Michael Piazolo, Bernhard Pohl, Gabi Schmidt, Dr. Karl Vetter, Jutta Widmann, Benno Zierer and parliamentary group (FREIE WÄHLER)

Safeguard the independence of the Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Office

The State Parliament wishes to adopt the following resolution:

The State Government [of Bavaria] is called upon to advocate at federal and European level the adoption of measures within the European Patent Office to safeguard the independence of the Boards of Appeal and thus to ensure effective legal protection.

Explanatory statement:

A number of documented incidents, as set out below, raise serious doubts about the independence of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO). The apparent loss of legal certainty requires action as soon as possible.

1. On 6 December 2017, the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organisation (ILOAT) ruled that a judge of the Boards of Appeal who had been unlawfully suspended was to be immediately reinstated in his official position, that the house ban imposed on him was to be lifted and that compensation for damages was to be paid (Judgments Nos. 3958 and 3960). In doing so, the ILOAT confirmed that the involvement of the EPO President was detrimental to the independence of the Boards of Appeal, because he had acted as both party and advisor to the Disciplinary Body for the EPO judges in internal disciplinary proceedings. This gives rise to the criticism that insufficient attention was paid to the separation of powers in this regard. After all a suspension by the Administrative Council can only be formally take place if the Enlarged Board of Appeal makes a proposal to that effect. At the time in question, however, after the Office Administration had made a written intervention in the ongoing proceedings, the judicial body refused to do so due to this interference and terminated the proceedings without a proposal. Even after the Geneva judgement of December 2017, the Administration initially refused the unlawfully suspended judge access to the EPO premises. Only after some delay did the President of the Boards of Appeal grant the right of entry but his competence was limited to announcing this for the premises in Haar. Ultimately, the unjustly suspended judge was prevented from exercising his – intrinsically independent – judicial position until the end of his term of office.

2. Leading lawyers, such as the former Federal Constitutional Court judge Prof. Dr. Siegfried Broß, have long questioned the independence of the Boards of Appeal. For example, in an interview with the specialist journal JUVE on 29 October 2015, he pointed out that the Boards of Appeal could not be recognised as having the character of a court of law quality, given that there was an obvious overlap in terms of staffing between the President of the Office and the supervision of the Boards of Appeal. In the meantime, a reform of the Boards of Appeal was initiated by the summer of 2016 which resulted in the spatial separation of the Boards of Appeal by moving to Haar at the end of 2017. However, there was no fundamental change to the administrative structure: the President remains the head of both the administration and the Boards of Appeal. In this way, he continues to have influence both in terms of staffing and resources.

3. At least partly due to this background, there are a number of constitutional complaints against decisions of the EPO pending before the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) in which the legal structure of the proceedings before the Boards of Appeal is alleged to be unconstitutional (see the BVerfG’s Annual Preview 2017): Az. 2 BvR 2480/10, Az. 2 BvR 421/13, Az. 2 BvR 756/16, Az. 2 BvR 786/16). Without trying to anticipate a final court decision at this juncture, it at least deserves to be noted that, for diverse reasons, several complainants have had serious reservations from a constitutional perspective about the rule-of-law conformity of the proceedings and have thus felt compelled to submit their concerns to the Federal Constitutional Court. Accordingly, this development provides additional confirmation of the findings set forth under 1 and 2. A particular highlight in this regard is the recent request by the Federal Constitutional Court to the German President not to sign off the implementing laws for the European Unitary Patent. This occurred against the background of a successful application for a temporary injunction (Case No. 2 BvR 739/17), which is likely to raise concerns about the rule of law in proceedings before the EPO. Finally, the question of the independence of the Boards of Appeal will also have a significant impact on the proposed Unitary Patent should the EPO be entrusted with the issuing of patents with unitary effect despite the existing deficiencies in the system of legal protection.

The aforementioned shortcomings in this area clearly create considerable uncertainty because, it is feared that both definitively rejected patent applications and finally revoked patents can no longer be examined by independent judges. Hence, important fundamental questions arise about the constitutional conformity of the appeal structures in the EPO. This is why the state government must take appropriate action at federal and European level so that the existing deficiencies in the system of legal protection are redressed and the prestige of this international organisation is not subject to further damage.

They hopefully understand the importance and urgency of this matter.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] EPO Administrative Council Believing EPO-Bribed 'Media' (IAM Still Shilling and Lying for Cash)

    IAM continues to do what brings money from EPO management and Team UPC, never mind if it is being disputed by the patent examiners themselves



  2. The EPO's Mythical “Gap” Has Been Found and It's Bonuses for People Who Use Pure Fiction to Steal From Patent Examiners

    The phony president who has the audacity to claim there's a budget gap is issuing millions of euros for his enablers to enjoy; weeks ahead of the next meeting of national delegates the Central Staff Committee (CSC) tells them: "Events show that the delegations’ concerns about functional allowances have materialised. The lack of transparency and inflation of the budget envelope gives rise to the suspicion that high management is pursuing a policy of self-service at the expense of EPO staff, which is difficult to reconcile with the Office’s claimed cost-saving policy, and to the detriment of the whole Organisation."



  3. Video: Making the Internet a Better Place for People, Not Megacorporations

    Following that earlier list of suggested improvements for a freedom-respecting Internet, here's a video and outline



  4. Links 30/11/2021: KDE Plasma 5.23.4, 4MLinux 38.0, Long GitHub Downtime, and Microsoft's CEO Selling Away Shares

    Links for the day



  5. A Concise Manifesto For Freedom-Respecting Internet

    An informal list of considerations to make when reshaping the Internet to better serve people, not a few corporations that are mostly military contractors subsidised by the American taxpayers



  6. Freenode.net Becomes a 'Reddit Clone' and Freenode IRC is Back to Old Configurations After Flushing Down Decades' Worth of User/Channel Data and Locking/Shutting Out Longtime Users

    Freenode is having another go; after “chits” and “jobs” (among many other ideas) have clearly failed, and following the change of daemon (resulting in massive loss of data and even security issues associated with impersonation) as well as pointless rebrand as “Joseon”, the domain Freenode.net becomes something completely different and the IRC network reopens to all



  7. Jack Dorsey's Decision is a Wake-up Call: Social Control Media is Just a Toxic Bubble

    The state of the World Wide Web (reliability, preservation, accessibility, compatibility etc.) was worsened a lot more than a decade ago; with social control media that’s nowadays just a pile of JavaScript programs we’re basically seeing the Web gradually turning into another Adobe Flash (but this time they tell us it’s a “standard”), exacerbating an already-oversized ‘bubble economy’ where companies operate at a loss while claiming to be worth hundreds of billions (USD) and generally serve imperialistic objectives by means of manipulation like surveillance, selective curation, and censorship



  8. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 29, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, November 29, 2021



  9. Links 29/11/2021: NuTyX 21.10.5 and CrossOver 21.1.0

    Links for the day



  10. This Apt Has Super Dumbass Powers. Linus Sebastian and Pop_OS!

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  11. [Meme] Trying to Appease Provocateurs and Borderline Trolls

    GNU/Linux isn’t just a clone of Microsoft Windows and it oughtn’t be a clone of Microsoft Windows, either; some people set themselves up for failure, maybe by intention



  12. Centralised Git Hosting Has a Business Model Which is Hostile Towards Developers' Interests (in Microsoft's Case, It's an Attack on Reciprocal Licensing and Persistent Manipulation)

    Spying, censoring, and abusing projects/developers/users are among the perks Microsoft found in GitHub; the E.E.E.-styled takeover is being misused for perception manipulation and even racism, so projects really need to take control of their hosting (outsourcing is risky and very expensive in the long run)



  13. Links 29/11/2021: FWUPD's 'Best Known Configuration' and Glimpse at OpenZFS 3.0

    Links for the day



  14. President Biden Wants to Put Microsofter in Charge of the Patent Office, Soon to Penalise Patent Applicants Who Don't Use Microsoft's Proprietary Formats

    The tradition of GAFAM or GIAFAM inside the USPTO carries on (e.g. Kappos and Lee; Kappos lobbies for Microsoft and IBM, whereas Lee now works for Amazon/Bezos after a career at Google); it's hard to believe anymore that the USPTO exists to serve innovators rather than aggressive monopolists, shielding their territory by patent threats (lawsuits or worse aggression) and cross-licensing that's akin to a cartel



  15. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part VIII — Mr. Graveley's Long Career Serving Microsoft's Agenda (Before Hiring by Microsoft to Work on GitHub's GPL Violations Machine)

    Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley was promoting .NET (or Mono) since his young days; his current job at Microsoft is consistent with past harms to GNU/Linux, basically pushing undesirable (except to Microsoft) things to GNU/Linux users; Tomboy used to be the main reason for distro ISOs to include Mono



  16. Dr. Andy Farnell on Teaching Cybersecurity in an Age of 'Fake Security'

    By Dr. Andy Farnell



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, November 28, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, November 28, 2021



  18. Links 29/11/2021: Linux 5.16 RC3 and Lots of Patent Catch-up

    Links for the day



  19. By 2022 0% of 'News' Coverage About Patents Will Be Actual Journalism (Patent Litigation Sector Has Hijacked the World Wide Web to Disseminate Self-Promotional Misinformation)

    Finding news about the EPO is almost impossible because today’s so-called ‘news’ sites are in the pockets of Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos, and their cohorts who turned the EPO into a hub of litigation, not science; this is part of an international (worldwide) problem because financial resources for journalism have run out, and so the vacuum is filled/replaced almost entirely by Public Relations (PR) and marketing



  20. Trying to Appease Those Who Never Liked Free Software or Those Who Blindly Loved All Patent Monopolies to Begin With

    It’s crystal clear that trying to appease everyone, all the time, is impossible; in the case of the EPO, for example, we hope that exposing Team Battistelli/Campinos helps raise awareness of the harms of patent maximalism, and when speaking about Free software — whilst occasionally bashing the alternatives (proprietary) — we hope to convince more people to join the “Good Fight”



  21. Links 28/11/2021: Laravel 8.73 Released, GitHub Offline for Hours

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 27, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 27, 2021



  23. Links 27/11/2021: Nvidia’s DLSS Hype and Why GNU/Linux Matters

    Links for the day



  24. [Meme] Linus Gabriel Sebastian Takes GNU/Linux for a (Tail)'Spin'

    If you’re trying to prove that GNU/Linux is NOT Windows, then “haha! Well done…”



  25. GNU/Linux is for Freedom and It'll Gain Many Users When (or Where) People Understand What Software (or Computing) Freedom Means

    Software that respects people's freedom (and by extension privacy as well) is an alluring proposition; those who choose to try GNU/Linux for the wrong reasons are likely the wrong target audience for advocates



  26. Amid Reports of Microsoft's Competition Crimes in Europe...

    European companies are complaining, but they seem to overlook the principal aspect of an imperialistic system with bottomless pockets (almost 30 trillion dollars in debt already; US national debt soared again last month); Microsoft is shielded by a political system with military (“defence”) as bailout budget to help cushion international expansion for data grab and technical leverage, as we've seen in the case of EPO (this is all political, not technical, and should thus be treated as a political/corruption issue)



  27. Is Linus Trolling the GNU/Linux Community?

    This new video responds to what many sites have been provoked into amplifying



  28. Links 27/11/2021: Tux Paint 0.9.27 and SeaMonkey 1.1.19 in EasyOS

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] Keeping Our Distance From Microsoft

    The OSI is the dagger, the Linux Foundation is the knife, and many others are the sword by which Microsoft tries to get into the very heart of GNU/Linux and extinguish the Free software movement



  30. Microsoft Edge Encourages Indebted Americans to Guilt-spend Just in Time for Christmas

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts