EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.06.18

‘Reformist’ Campinos Seems to be Accelerating EPO Layoffs by Removing Without Warning Staff That’s Perceived as Not Loyal Enough

Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 9:39 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Recent (on the “professional incompetence” of António Campinos): ‘Efficiency’ in Action: António Campinos is Sending Jobs Abroad, Then Gagging Critics

Rule of Law and respect for staff: more of the same

Summary: The mask of Campinos is slipping only a couple of days after people return from their summer vacation (Campinos officially started his job in July, i.e. during this vacation)

THE WOLF in charge of the EPO has just howled. There’s a purge. It’s becoming rather clear that nothing really changed at the EPO except the layoffs [1, 2]. The following letter got ‘leaked’ to us by one of its recipients around lunchtime. It was sent out some time this morning and here’s what it said:

6 September 2018
su18016hp

Rule of Law and respect for staff: more of the same

Dear SUEPO Members, dear Colleagues,

We regret to inform you that on Tuesday, 4 September 2018, an examiner working in The Hague was dismissed following a procedure before the Joint Committee on Article 52 and 531.

Our colleague has been working at the EPO for more than 10 years. His daughter started at the European School of The Hague only last week. On Monday he was still working. On Tuesday he arrived at the office only to discover that his badge had been deactivated. He became aware of his immediate dismissal when he came to work and went to the reception desk to enquire about his badge problem.

We happened to bump into our colleague as he was being escorted out by two security guards in the evening after he had been given the opportunity to collect his personal items.

The (immediate) dismissal of our colleague raises many questions:

First, in our view at present any dismissal based on Article 52 ServRegs is fundamentally flawed. On 20 July 2018 the Central Staff Committee (CSC) sent a letter to the new President addressing exactly this problem. The CSC pointed out to Mr Campinos that the Office had not met its obligation to define procedures for the implementation of Art 52 ServRegs, contrary to the requirements of Article 52(1), and stated that an ad hoc procedure, defined on a case-by-case basis (if any) cannot be (seen to be) fair to the concerned colleagues.

The CSC also appealed to him to put all pending cases on ice until fair procedures are defined2. This clearly did not happen. So, was the President ill-advised when he took the decision to dismiss the colleague?

___
1 The “Joint Committee on Articles 52 and 53″ deals in particular with “professional incompetence” (Art. 52 ServRegs).


Second, the specific circumstances of this case raise additional questions.

According to the regulations in force the notice period for our dismissed colleague is 9 (nine) months. Why has management deemed necessary to give immediate effect to the dismissal?

Why did management choose dismissal instead of e.g. classification into a lower group or downgrading? Was our colleague offered another position in the organisation before considering such a drastic measure as dismissal?

Why did management wait until the very last possible moment to inform our colleague3 and made him go through the humiliating steps described above? Is the Office going to provide adequate financial compensation for the dismissal with immediate effect, including health insurance coverage, pension contributions, payment of school fees?

The President has invited The Hague staff to an inauguration party for New Main on Friday. It should be a time to celebrate. Instead, there is now a cloud of uncertainty and fear. The SUEPO Committee is scheduled4 to have a meeting with Mr Campinos on Friday afternoon – this case will definitely come to the table.

We will keep you posted of any further developments.

Your SUEPO Committee

___
2 In the absence of clear, fair and transparent procedures, the Joint Committee simply cannot do its work as it must according to the requirements of Art. 52 ServRegs.
3 According to Article 53b, paragraph (4), the President shall take a reasoned decision within two
months of the date of receipt of the Joint Committee’s opinion.
4 Since Monday 3 September, i.e. before the dismissal.

Quite an event for SUEPO to have its likely first meeting with the President (after more than two months on the job!) over…

With an attitude like this, Battistelli’s construction site, adjacent to the old building (and still with the cranes on top of it), might also see people voluntarily falling off. This is a ‘third-world’ employment and HR set of standards. Maybe this is what Bergot and Campinos can joke about (in French of course) up in his private pub in Munich.

This letter (above) was mentioned at around midday today because IPPro Patents wrote about this ugly dismissal and SUEPO then mentioned the situation by just linking to this. No further comment; no public comment…

From the IPPro Patents article, which repeats somewhat of a smear in the headline: (“controversial ‘incompetence’ provisions,” it says; “professional incompetence” is a widely misused (and insulting) term that we mentioned many times before; it’s totally meaningless and it has even been used as an excuse for dismissing staff for developing/suffering disabilities while on the job).

The European Patent Office (EPO) has dismissed another employee under new provisions in its service regulations that allow dismissals based on “professional incompetence”.

[...]

In a message to members of the SUEPO, the union explained that the employee had been working at the EPO for more than 10 years.

The message added: “His daughter started at the European School of The Hague only last week.”

“On Monday he was still working. On Tuesday he arrived at the office only to discover that his badge had been deactivated. He became aware of his immediate dismissal when he came to work and went to the reception desk to enquire about his badge problem.”

“We happened to bump into our colleague as he was being escorted out by two security guards in the evening after he had been given the opportunity to collect his personal items.”

SUEPO called article 52 “fundamentally flawed” and noted that the EPO’s Central Staff Committee (CSC) had sent a letter on 20 July to the Campinos addressing this problem.

According to SUEPO, the CSC had pointed out to Campinos that the office “had not met its obligation to define procedures for the implementation of article 52 of the service regulations, contrary to the requirements of article 52(1), and stated that an ad hoc procedure, defined on a case-by-case basis (if any) cannot be (seen to be) fair to the concerned colleagues”.

[...]

Finally, SUEPO asked why the management of the office waited until the “very last possible moment to inform our colleague” and made him go through the “humiliating steps” described in its message.

“Is the office going to provide adequate financial compensation for the dismissal with immediate effect, including health insurance coverage, pension contributions, payment of school fees?”

IPPro Patents also published (a very short while ago) this article about UPC’s failure in Poland — a subject which Team UPC doesn’t like to talk about. We wrote about a rare admission that UPC is rotting away (this morning) and now not there’s this:

Ewa Skrzydło-Tefelska, partner at Polish firm Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak, says that Poland’s IP system is compatible with all other European states bar one aspect—Poland has refused to join Europe’s Unitary Patent system.

She says that Poland declined after initially accepting the system because “participation in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) would be detrimental for Polish small- and medium-sized enterprises”.

[...]

Skrzydło-Tefelska highlights that both Polish IP specialists and authorities are of the view that the UPC “is not an accomplished legislation. Comparing it to the EU trademark, the UPC is an empty shell, because there is practically no material patent law in it.

This is correct. We don’t believe that UPC (in any form) will ever see the light of day and any illusions that Campinos will turn things around at the EPO have just been shattered by his own actions. He’s a wolf (or lobo) as insiders pointed out this week.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. EPO Grants Fake European Patents -- Including Software Patents -- and European Courts Keep Rejecting These

    The demise of the legitimacy or perceived validity of European Patents is measurable and the system isn't the same anymore; the EPO makes no effort to change this for the better, either



  2. Nobody But Patent Trolls and Litigators Will Benefit From the Corruption of the European Patent Office

    IAM, EPO leadership, Iancu and the rest of these raiders are enabling corruption and facilitating or supporting a racket; that money they collect comes at the expense of future victims of their "clients" or "customers" (that's what they call applicants, to whom they grant dubious monopolies as a matter of urgency)



  3. WSL is a Misleading Acronym/Name Because There's No Linux in It, It's Just Windows

    When Microsoft says "Linux" (as in "Microsoft loves Linux") what it actually means is Windows and/or Azure



  4. Links 16/2/2019: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, PyCharm 2019.1 EAP 4

    Links for the day



  5. Outline/Index of the Alexandre Benalla/Battistelli Scandal

    Our writings about the scandals implicating Benalla and the European Patent Office (EPO)



  6. Reading Techrights on a Mobile Device Running Android

    A new Android app for reading this site is being tested



  7. Links 14/2/2019: “I Love Free Software Day” and Mesa 19.0 RC4 Released

    Links for the day



  8. “EPO Lawlessness Again”

    Blackberry uses bogus European Patents (on software) for lawsuits; "all of them pure software patents. Patents on programs for computers as such," as Müller puts it



  9. Unitary Patent (UPC) is All About Imposing Patent Maximalists' Ideology of Greed and Self Interest on Courts in the Name of 'Unification' or 'Consistency' or 'Community'

    Pushers of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are upset that they don’t always get their way when independent judges get to decide; as it turns out, many European Patents are just fake patents, more so under António Campinos



  10. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part V: Mediapart Explains the 'Raid' Attempt, Reporters Without Borders Involved

    Mediapart, an investigative site that unearths a lot of incriminating things about Battistelli's former bodyguard Alexandre Benalla, was the target of a raid attempt some weeks ago



  11. Links 13/2/2019: Tails 3.12.1, MongoDB Being Dumped

    Links for the day



  12. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part IV: Suspected Offenses of Forgery and Possible Falsification

    In a very underworld fashion, Benalla continues to break the law and create yet more scandals



  13. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part III: Mars, France Close Protection (Benalla's Family), and Russian Oligarchy

    An article which examines the business background of Benalla, the outrageous salaries, the severance indemnity pay, and contract with a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin



  14. Links 13/2/2019: Plasma 5.15.0 and a Look at Linux Mint Debian Edition Cindy

    Links for the day



  15. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part II: Fishing Expedition for Sources in the Alexandre Benalla 'Underworld' Scandal

    An utter lack of respect for the privacy of the media and of its sources, in the name of protecting the privacy of those convicted of crimes, as seen in France just like the European Patent Office



  16. Innovating the Idea That Software Patents (Monopolies on Algorithms) Are Covering 'Artificial' 'Intelligence' (AI and ML as Loopholes)

    Patent law firms around the world love this new trick, which is framing software that makes decisions as "AI" (magically rendering it patent-eligible only in offices but not in courts, which the EPO hopes to replace/override anyway)



  17. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part I: Destruction of Evidence by Alexandre Benalla

    The Alexandre Benalla scandal carries on, deepening even further than before and causing raids of the media; will the EPO be implicated and held accountable too?



  18. Links 12/2/2019: PyPy 7.0.0, HHVM 4.0.0 and CVE-2019-5736

    Links for the day



  19. USPTO Director Iancu Works for Anti-SCOTUS (Against Section 101) Lobbyists

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office Director Andrei Iancu is becoming to the patent system what Ajit Pai is to the FCC or to the broadband industry; there appears to be intentional vandalism and total disregard for the rule of law



  20. Gross Violations of the EPC at the European Patent Office as Principal Priority Turns Against Science and Technology

    What good is the law if violation of the European Patent Convention (EPC) is so routine at today’s European Patent Office (EPO), which exploits its immunity to operate outside the rule of law and pursue nothing but cash (selling patents/monopolies that are invalid in courts)?



  21. European Patent Office's Exploitation of the 'AI' Catchphrase/Buzzword to Grant Patents on Algorithms in Defiance of the Rules, the Law, and Common Sense

    In clear violation of the EPC (i.e. more of the same from the EPO) software patents are being actively promoted and law being bypassed or worked around



  22. Microsoft's Patent Trolls Are Still Suing Microsoft's Rivals to Help Sell Microsoft

    The ‘new’ Microsoft boils down to the patent equivalent of the copyright case of SCO (funded by Microsoft)



  23. The American Software Patents Lobby Has Died

    Voices of US law firms (i.e. patent maximalists) have become quieter and rarer; applications for US patents have decreased in number, patent litigation numbers have collapsed entirely, and patent maximalists have moved on



  24. Links 10/2/2019: Linux 5.0 RC6, Project Trident 18.12 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  25. Corrupt Battistelli Paid a Fortune (EPO Budget) for Outlaw/Rogue 'Bodyguards' From Firm Linked to Russian Oligarch Iskander Makhmudov

    Mediapart continues to shed more light on the shady firm behind Alexandre Benalla, whom Battistelli hired to break the law and secretly bring firearms to the EPO



  26. Which Microsoft?

    The inconsistencies between public statements of Microsoft and private discussions/actions



  27. António Campinos Will Never Hold Battistelli Accountable for His Crimes Because He Too Profits From These

    The EPO isn't just Europe's second-largest institution but also quite possibly Europe's largest criminal enterprise, whose ringleaders have enjoyed and exploited diplomatic immunity to escape prosecution



  28. 25,000 Blog Posts and Record Traffic

    At a pace of nearly 2,000 posts per year (since 2006) we continue to grow and can use readers' help



  29. Jim Zemlin's PAC Keeps Raising Money From Microsoft

    The Open Source Definition's author as well as various Free/Open Source software (FOSS) luminaries warn of an attack on FOSS ("efforts to undermine the integrity of open source”); it's not too hard to see who participates in it or enables such attacks



  30. Links 9/2/2019: Linux 4.4.174 and GTK+ No More (Now Just GTK)

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts