EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.25.18

António Campinos Goes to UPC-Hostile Country, UPC Continues to Languish and Team UPC Carries on Pushing for Software Patents in Europe (Courts Also)

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 4:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

António Campinos for UPC
Source

Summary: The Unified Patent Court (UPC) fantasy has fizzled, but those striving to interject software patents agenda into Europe from the back door (e.g. labeling these “AI” or ignoring the stance of actual courts) aren’t giving up just yet

TODAY will be mostly about USPTO matters (major things have just happened), but before we turn to that, let’s look at the latest developments at the European Patent Office (EPO).

Yesterday, for the first time in a long time, the EPO did not bombard Twitter with software patents advocacy (typically 2-4 times per day, even more so lately). Even though software patents in Europe aren’t allowed “as such”, today’s EPO is quite blatantly ignoring even its own rules, in the name of so-called ‘production’ targets.

Days ago António Campinos went to a nation that opposes the Unitary Patent, a Trojan horse for software patents in European courts (not just patent offices). One of the large nations that oppose the Unitary Patent (there are several, including Poland) is Spain and “[d]uring his official visit to Spain last week, President Campinos met with Ministers to discuss how to further strengthen the patent system and support innovation and economic growth,” according to the EPO’s tweet. From the corresponding article, which merely continues this tweet: (warning: epo.org link)

During his first official visit to Spain last week, EPO President António Campinos met with Ministers to discuss how to further strengthen the patent system and support innovation and economic growth. Meetings on Monday were held with the Spanish Minister of Industry, Trade and Tourism, María Reyes Maroto Illera, the Undersecretary for Industry, Trade and Tourism and President of the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO), Fernando Valdés Verelst, and the Director General of the SPTO, José Antonio Gil Celedonio.

“Unitary Patent” or “UPC” isn’t mentioned. The EPO too seems to have come to grips with the Unitary Patent’s death (Campinos hasn't mentioned it in over two months). But Team UPC is still in denial; it is pushing UPC agenda as well as other malicious things. As a pro-UPC site put it yesterday:

In-house and private practice lawyers discussed driverless cars, protection strategies in a digital world, compulsory licences, the UPC and FRAND at the European Patents Forum in Paris

UPC is also mentioned in this new press release and a tweet from Bristows, which links to Alan Johnson. He speaks of a document that “sets out the [no 'Brexit' deal] scenarios as currently foreseen, the implications, and the actions for business and other stakeholders, concluding by recommending that businesses seek legal advice on how these arrangements could affect their business model or Intellectual Property rights.”

One can interpret “recommending that businesses seek legal advice” as “go pay Bristows some money for flawed or intentionally-misleading advice on UPC.”

Team UPC has no remnants of credibility by now. Every prediction it had given turned out to be false. The British Law Gazette‘s Michael Cross then published about this under the headline “Government admits ‘no deal’ could mean exit from patent court” (misleading headline).

No, you cannot “exit” something you never entered in the first place (and which does not even exist, either!). Quoting Cross:

New advice from Whitehall on the consequences for a ‘no deal’ exit from the European Union concedes for the first time that this could mean withdrawal from the embryonic 25-nation Unified Patent Court. Until now the government has insisted that the court, part of which is due to be based in Aldgate Tower, London, was not an EU institution and therefore would be unaffected by Brexit.

However a notice issued today by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy states that the UK will have to ‘explore whether it would be possible to remain within the Unified Patent Court and unitary patent systems in a ‘no deal’ scenario’.

The note also points out that there is still a possibility that the court may come into being in any case as ratification by Germany – which is subject to a court challenge – is still outstanding. ‘If the Unified Patent Court is never fully ratified, the domestic legislation to bring it into force will never take effect in the UK.’

Team UPC will carry on misinterpreting government documents to spread the infamous two lies.

Marks & Clerk (Team UPC) has long lied about software patents (to make ‘sales’) and this morning we saw Marks & Clerk’s Stéphane Ambrosini giving misleading advice on software patents in Luxembourg because patent courts would not honour these. Here is the relevant part:

In view of the lack of examination during the Luxembourgish application procedure, notionally all software inventions can be patented in the jurisdiction.

However, to achieve a stronger presumption of validity, embodiments of patented software inventions should exhibit a further technical effect, analogously to the legal test practised under the European Patent Convention. In practice, this means a concrete effect achieved by the software beyond the conventional physical interactions between the program and the computer on which it is run.

That still does not give it presumption of validity; European courts (not UPC) do not view software patents favourably. We have been tracking these matters for well over a decade. Going back to Team UPC’s favourite platform, watch these patent zealots promoting software patents in Europe under the guise of “AI”: (calling algorithms that)

Directors from the European Patent Office gave guidance at this year’s European Patent Forums in Munich and Paris on how inventors can successfully patent their artificial intelligence or machine learning solutions

Well, “AI” is merely a buzzword and one that the EPO habitually promotes as a cover for software patents in Europe. As for “machine learning”, we’ll deal with that in another post later today.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Microsoft Attempting to Destroy the Careers of Its Critics, Including Free Software Proponents

    Microsoft isn't changing and has not changed; the tactics described above are still being used, even by its "Open Source" (or "Open at Microsoft") people, who did this to me



  2. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  3. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  4. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  5. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  6. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  7. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  8. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  9. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  10. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  11. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  12. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  13. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  14. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  15. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  16. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  17. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  18. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  19. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  20. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  21. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  22. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  23. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  24. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  25. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  26. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  27. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  28. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  29. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  30. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts