10.20.19

European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

Posted in America, Deception, Europe, Patents at 2:53 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

So software is just A.I. or hey hi!

Summary: The world’s patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents

ALL the patent maximalists have left now is numbers. Lots and lots of numbers. Big numbers. A number of what exactly? Patents. Yes, entries on some computer system. One single computer in an ordinary desk can contain all those entries. A supercomputer can generate this much text in less than one second. What good are patents whose quality doesn’t matter? Whose practical utility is questionable? What does this system even strive for? Ask WIPO, whose sole obsession is seeing a rise in numbers, even if much of that rise is attributable to low-quality patents from China — patents that WIPO staff cannot even grasp because few people there can read Mandarin!

“Ask WIPO, whose sole obsession is seeing a rise in numbers, even if much of that rise is attributable to low-quality patents from China — patents that WIPO staff cannot even grasp because few people there can read Mandarin!”WIPO is a symptom of a broader problem because today’s leadership of the European Patent Office (EPO) and Trump’s chosen leadership for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are truly appalling. Not only Iancu by the way! António Campinos — like Battistelli — totally lacks background in science, yet he has the audacity to meddle in legal cases regarding the fate of software patents in Europe (yes, he has already meddled in an upcoming legal case). Can Mr. Campinos even explain how a computer works? Are his computer skills limited to use of Microsoft Office? Regardless, António Campinos continues to post pointless photo ops while breaking the law every single day. He just proves that he’s no different; he’s another Battistelli. He still ‘rides’ his ‘grace period’.

The latest EPO puff piece mentions Cambodia (warning: epo.org link) with no European Patents at all [1, 2]. It’s about EPO and WIPO, best known to WIPO employees for its abuses against employees. “To strengthen international co-operation on patents,” the EPO wrote, “a delegation from the EPO met with representatives of IP offices from around the world on the fringes of the Assemblies of the Member States of the WIPO in Geneva last week and signed a number of agreements.”

In the carefully-prepared statement which glorifies Campinos (less qualified than most EPO examiners!) the EPO has also just amplified the "hey hi" hype: “EPO representatives also participated in an event organised by WIPO Director General Francis Gurry at which the implications of Artificial Intelligence for the global intellectual property system were discussed.”

“António Campinos continues to post pointless photo ops while breaking the law every single day. He just proves that he’s no different; he’s another Battistelli.”There are two aspects to this buzzword in the context of patents; one is automatically-generated patent applications (using algorithms) and another is patents on algorithms with some “logic” in them (that would be pretty much every algorithm with a conditional statement, i.e. a decision, in it). This is more of that sickening propaganda of the UN/WIPO. They seem to have become so fascinated by if not obsessed with fashionable buzzwords — to the point where they’ve facilitated patents on just about anything. This problem is well recognised inside and outside patent offices, but few seem courageous enough to talk about it, especially in the media which is by far the biggest culprit (mindlessly spreading these buzzwords and superficial hype).

One need not look far to find those complicit in the scourge of misinformation. Days ago at IP Kat Hayleigh Bosher published some nonsense about “Artificial Intelligence”, saying that “Chapter 2 focuses more specifically on the unique factors of AI, elaborating on AI as a legal phenomenon.”

AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI…

“This problem is well recognised inside and outside patent office, but few seem courageous enough to talk about it, especially in the media which is by far the biggest culprit (mindlessly spreading these buzzwords and superficial hype).”Just keep repeating that nonsense…

The lawyers are totally exploiting buzzwords and hype to further their litigation agenda

Here’s another new example of patent hype with “hey hi” slant, this time in the Wall Street Journal ( Jared Council’s “Can an AI System Be Given a Patent?”) and a new cartoon (“‘Artificial’ Intelligence”). Over at Law360 they’re disguising bogus, bunk, fake software patents as “hey hi!” (“Self-Driving Vehicles’ Neural Networks Present IP Conundrum”). To quote: “Artificial intelligence has been dubbed the fourth industrial revolution. In part, the development of AI has been spurred by our desire for automation, and there is no better nexus of these two areas than in the automotive industry, where the holy grail of automation is self-driving, or autonomous, vehicles.

“The lawyers are totally exploiting buzzwords and hype to further their litigation agenda ““There are already vehicles available that implement a degree of automation — Tesla Inc. was first to market with its autopilot feature, and many of the more traditional manufacturers are following suit with their own implementations.”

Notice the addition of another buzzword in the first sentence: “fourth industrial revolution.”

The EPO paid European media to spread this nonsense as well; it even made abbreviations for it (4IR, not TFIR). Then it bragged — in inward and outward publications — that the South Korean media copied or rather parroted this propaganda (we covered that at the time). It’s important to take note of the patent offices’ active role in dissemination of such nonsense.

They’re then calling “hey hi” any algorithms with some “logic” in them. They rewrite examination guidelines accordingly, knowing that applicants would get the request for algorithm monopolies OK’ed by the examiners, as per the new guidelines (applicants also get major discounts if they're Microsoft customers with OOXML).

“They’re then calling “hey hi” any algorithms with some “logic” in them.”Notice what’s happening at the USPTO right now. Michael Borella, a proponent of software patents (litigation is his ‘business’), writes about the Office crafting new tricks for getting fake patents or software patents courts would almost certainly throw out. So does Dennis Crouch, a longtime proponent of software patents with ties to Watchtroll. To quote Borella: “Under Dir. Iancu, the USPTO has taken a seemingly broader view of eligibility than the Supreme Court, albeit much narrower than before Bilski, Alice, and Mayo. In January 2019, the PTO published a set of Patent Eligibility Guidance (2019 PEG). On October 17, 2019, the PTO released a new set of revisions based upon public comments. “All USPTO personnel are expected to follow the guidance.””

So just like at the EPO he compels examiners to basically break the law or deviate from caselaw; those guidelines are likely not legal. Iancu, the corrupt Trump appointee, 'does a Battistelli' by deviating from the law. Here’s more from Borella and his colleagues:

Early today, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office released an update to its January 2019 Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance. Unlike the January Guidance, which represented a significant change in how the USPTO applies § 101 in examination and PTAB proceedings, this October Update is primarily an effort to clarify issues brought up by public comments on the January Guidance. While not exactly much ado about nothing, the October Update provides few changes to USPTO’s stance on § 101.

The USPTO basically breaks the law. Responding to a tweet from Crouch, Benjamin Henrion wrote [1, 2]: “When does someone submit them to court? This is reopening the floodgates of software patents without a mandate. Better copy the European Patent Convention art52 exceptions, including computer programs.”

“Welcome to the post-law patent regime. It no longer even pretends to adhere to law.”“The EPO brags about copying its flagrant violations of the law to other continents,” I responded, “America included…”

So the EPO’s “hey hi” hype has officially spread to the USPTO, as was the practice of basically ignoring courts and ignoring the law. They grant illegal patents.

Speaking of buzzwords like “AI” and “4IR”, how about other hype waves? Just several days ago Frances Wilding and David Lewin (Haseltine Lake Kempner LLP) published in Mondaq (original [PDF]) this “Review Of Blockchain Patenting At The EPO” and to quote:

The two charts show similar paths of increase in the numbers concerned, though the numbers for European patent applications are on a smaller scale. So far a total of just over 400 European patent applications which mention the term “blockchain” anywhere have been published and just over 190 European patent applications which mention the term “blockchain” in the claims have been published. It seems reasonable to expect that further European “blockchain” applications will feed continued growth in published European patent applications even beyond the estimate made for the full year of 2019.

Liars and charlatans are riding hype waves and set up events to hype up these things even further in the context of patents; throw some words like “blockchain” into a patent application and patents on algorithms are magically ‘OK’? Welcome to the post-law patent regime. It no longer even pretends to adhere to law.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/1/2021: Google Tightens the Screws on Chromium, VideoLAN VLC 3.0.12

    Links for the day



  2. IBM Panics and Resorts to 'Customer Retention' Tactics With Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

    IBM 'frees' RHEL but with limitations that can restrict growth of small companies (or subject them to financial barriers, originally unforeseen)



  3. Recent Techrights Articles About President Joe Biden

    Instead of writing yet more stuff about the latest US president, let's look back at what we wrote in recent weeks/months



  4. Links 20/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 RC2 and the RHEL Contingency

    Links for the day



  5. InteLeaks – Part XXIII: Intel Paying for Bogus 'Research' 'Insights' Which Merely Seek to Justify Outsourcing to Microsoft and Imposing Microsoft's Proprietary Software on Free Software Developers

    Intel's preference for Microsoft monopoly (an imposed/top-down decision) was seemingly certified by so-called 'consultants' and 'analysts' from the outside rather than the inside, basically manufacturing a false perception of consent after managers had already made up their minds



  6. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part V: How FSF Secrecy Ended Up Insulting People, Alienating Trans Developers

    Having just uploaded this introductory video, we delve into the backstory or the real reason the FSF sank into somewhat of a crisis with the trans community almost half a decade ago



  7. InteLeaks – Part XXII: Bubbles and Buzzwords, No Substance at Intel's Internet of Things (IoT) Group (IOTG)

    The video above is continuation of the previous part about a document full of superficial buzzwords (not technical jargon anywhere), in effect recommending to managers that they blindly follow trends and cargo cults (such as Clown Computing) and not what’s most suitable for technical excellence



  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 19, 2021



  9. Links 20/1/2021: WireGuard for pfSense and New US President

    Links for the day



  10. Links 19/1/2021: Krita 4.4.2 Released and JingOS Hype

    Links for the day



  11. Team UPC Keeps Pretending That UPCA Can Still be Resurrected (Even Without the UK, Which is Strictly a Requirement)

    The latest distortion of facts regarding the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement (UPCA) as seen from the lens of people who seek to profit from such distortion



  12. 'Ethical Source' is Not Ethical and Not a Movement But a Misguided Self-Serving PR Stunt

    Something which is neither enforceable nor ethical is being promoted by profoundly unethical media in the pockets of large corporations



  13. InteLeaks – Part XXI: Intel Seeking Advice From a Bunch of Clowns (Harbor 'Research')

    A firm called Harbor 'Research' is making dubious recommendations to Intel; as shown in the above video, there's also an obsession with buzzwords (typically suggestive of a lack of technical grasp/understanding)



  14. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 18, 2021



  15. The US Election Was Not Rigged, But the Nomination Process Was (Undermined to Maintain Control by Oligarchy)

    Cheating/driving the left out of the Democratic Party seems like a longstanding tradition and we know who stands to gain from it; moreover, problems remain in the voting process because it's controlled by secret code of companies like Microsoft (in spite of the openwashing)



  16. InteLeaks – Part XX: Redacted (for Names Only) Release of Intel File About Developer eXperience (DX) Meddling in GNU/Linux

    Today (or tonight) we release the first 'phase' of InteLeaks in a sensibly redacted form; coming up next is a surprise from Team Microsoft



  17. Sites in Bed With the EPO and UPC 'Covering' the 'News' Without Mentioning Any of the Overt Abuses

    It is rather sad that blogs like IP Kat have turned into proponents of abusive EPO management and Team UPC increasingly resorts to lying using pseudonyms (to avert criticism and accountability); much of the rebuttal or response that’s hinged on reality/facts can only be found in comments, which are still subjected to a face-saving moderation process (conducted by Team UPC)



  18. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part IV: Stories From the Depths of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    To reduce or alleviate suspicions and a potential of mistrust the FSF needs to become more transparent and liberate information (such as the real reason Bradley Kuhn left, as noted in the previous part)



  19. Links 18/1/2021: GNU Radio 3.9, Wikipedia at 20

    Links for the day



  20. InteLeaks – Part XIX: Intel's Web 'Experts' Seen as Microsoft Champions Dealing With the Platform Microsoft is Looking to Destroy

    Things aren't rosy at Intel because the hires aren't suitable for the job of documenting and/or presenting GNU/Linux-centric products (whose target audience is Free software developers)



  21. Adding Images as Characters to the Daily Bulletins of Techrights

    Our daily bulletins now have inside them coarse graphics, depicted using characters alone, and the tool used to generate them announced a new release earlier today; we showcase some of its features (in a new video)



  22. Links 18/1/2021: Weekly Summaries and Linux 5.11 RC4

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 17, 2021



  24. The Oligarchs' Parties Will Never Choose the Side of Software Freedom Because Free Software Cannot Bribe Officials

    The tough reality is that next week's (or this coming week's, depending on what Sunday counts as) inauguration ceremony is partly symbolic as all the same and important issues remain largely untouched, for corporations control almost everything of significance



  25. COVID-19 Has Actually Helped Software Freedom Due to Financial and 'Spare Time' Factors

    Developers and users are increasingly exploring what the Free software world has to offer; this is actually measurable and it contradicts claims to the contrary



  26. Future Plans and Using Videos to Complement Text

    Remarks on recent and impending site changes; We are not replacing text with video, we're just trying to enhance the presentation a bit, especially where visuals help make a point or where browsing through Web sites (or leaks) is more suitable than static, linear presentation



  27. InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation

    There appears to be a severe crisis at Intel; they cannot recruit scientists (or those whom they recruited are walking away) and as a result the company produces bad products with poor documentation (or highly defective chipsets that top-notch marketing cannot compensate for); in this video we walk through some examples of how studies are being conducted (as already noted in Part XVII)



  28. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part III: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seems More Like a Victim of Destabilisation Campaigns

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), which turns 36 later this year, is looking to raise money that helps support the GNU Project, soon 38 years old and likely the most important Free software project to exist (ever)



  29. Links 17/1/2021: EasyOS on Raspberry Pi and GNU libsigsegv 2.13

    Links for the day



  30. InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams

    A look inside Intel explains what holds back the technical team, which bemoans the lesser technical people getting in the way and not even using the product that they are writing about


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts