EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.20.19

Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing ‘Market Share’

Posted in Free/Libre Software at 4:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Partial reply to “Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement” (published two days ago)

Summary: “The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the “free beer” side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the “free beer” part of free software.”

THIS is a guest post. Its stance or views do not necessary reflect or agree with ours.


First, I’d like to share my answer to the title: “Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

“The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers.”No, but yes. It shouldn’t be A dictator, but the (primary) author of each and every project should be, and stay, a dictator.

Should we try to build some kind of community “in the user interest” that drives the free software movement (one or many communities) and we will re-create the Debian case, with a social contract stating (point 4) “Our priorities are our users and free software” but finally get a small set of people dictating how the others should use software. By the developers or simple users does not make any difference, as you state in your post, developers are users. And they are the only ones interested (if excluding those financially interested) in ruling any kind of community.

On the other hand, when the primary author keeps the power over his project, the project keeps its initial direction (the one set by the author at the start), and when another guy wants to do it differently, one makes a fork, with a new name.

When a community takes hold of a piece of software, then the primary target can gets lost and we run into stupid things like current iptables Debian package installing nftables instead… while a “nftable” package should have been created (I think there are many more examples, but this is a recent one I ran into) or companies sneaking in and ruling the project.

Then I do not agree with this point (and according to what you wrote, you do not completely agree, but do not completely disagree either):

“Techies should not dictate the Free software movement. The Free software movement is for Free software users. Not developers.”

“From my experience, users do not care about software freedom, they care about software that they do not even notice, and they are willing to pay for this.”No.

First, as you state, developers are users. And the developers of one tool should always be users of the tool.

And second, and maybe the most important one: users do not care about software or software freedom, and not even much about user freedom.

That’s my everyday experience.

The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the “free beer” side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the “free beer” part of free software.

Should you try to sell either your free software or your time as free software developer in order to feed your family and you become a “f***ing capitalist” to a lot of said free software supporters?

From my experience, users do not care about software freedom, they care about software that they do not even notice, and they are willing to pay for this.

If you start saying “hey, this is open source!” they have already run away, even if you are not selling the software. Maybe because you are “selling” free software advocacy (listen to my free software advocacy and you get a free software).

It’s strange, but if you try to sell an open source product (software or anything else), you do not even sell it to freedom enthusiast.

You even have to pay (at least spend time to ask them) for them to use it.

If you sell or give a product, then people are interested, and it may happen that some of them will be freedom enthusiasts. And as a freedom enthusiast, you can open-source your product.

“Simply using Firefox, LibreOffice or Thunderbird is most of the time asking too much from them.”I learnt it the hard way.

Many many people say they are interested in their freedom, concerned about Google or Microsoft using their data and so on, but when you tell them they can use an alternative like Linux, they fly away.

Simply using Firefox, LibreOffice or Thunderbird is most of the time asking too much from them.

Firefox is widely used not because it’s free or because it protected users’ freedom, but because at one time it had become much better than its competitors, and presented as such, and not as a “freedom-oriented” solution.

There are very few free software users who are not developers, and fighting for them is losing the game, while fighting for us, developers, will bring better software.

At first GNU and Linux had been made by developers for developers. This made it a very powerful system.

As you say, the problem is that companies are now trying to drive open source projects in their interest, and their interest is not freedom, it is users (getting more users).

If we have the same target (or goals), there’s much more chance to have the same results than to get back to freedom concerns.

Well, I think I wrote much more than I thought I would at first, but here it is.

Article’s licence: Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ask
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Alltagz
  • BarraPunto
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Fark
  • Gwar
  • Klickts

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. There's a Lot More to Race and Racism Than Colours (and Names of Colours)

    The push towards speech restrictions is being framed as tolerant people against bigots; in practice, however, there are salient points and angles that media chooses to overlook



  2. Commissioner Thierry Breton, Acting Like a Patent Maximalists' 'Mole' (as Expected All Along), is Now Formally Lying for Team UPC

    The rogue Commissioner who was put there by people in positions of power (to perpetuate their power) is doing exactly what we'd expect from officials who work against the people (like a force of occupation rather than service, as in public service)



  3. The Web is Drying Up, Journalism is Coming to an End

    There's not much of value left in the World Wide Web as a source of news; people's minds are preoccupied with meaningless divisive wars and misinformation spreads rapidly, giving rise to more widespread censorship (in the name of 'protecting' us)



  4. EPO Management Has Hunted Down Journalists and Killed Journalism

    Buying, controlling and even censoring the media isn't that hard when you gather billions of euros from stakeholders (who have nowhere else to go because you have a monopoly in Europe) and enjoy zero oversight/regulatory assessments



  5. [Meme] Reminder: EPO Management Failed to Provide Staff With Facial Masks (as Advised/Required by Law)

    The health of staff of the European Patent Office (EPO) is still at risk; EPO management only cares about patents, not patients (monopolies, not people)



  6. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 15, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, July 15, 2020



  7. Links 16/7/2020: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report, LibreOffice Has Plans, FSF Warns Against 'Online' Voting

    Links for the day



  8. Links 15/7/2020: New PinePhone, GCC 10.2 Release Candidate

    Links for the day



  9. [Humour/Meme] Stop Shaming Free Software Geeks Over What They Wear While They're Coding and Testing

    The corporate media repeatedly shamed Linus Torvalds because he's not wearing a suit and sometimes works in a bathrobe instead; this is the sort of ‘cancel culture’ psyche that looks to remove geniuses and achievers (Torvalds made Linux and Git) based on dumb assertions and superficialities



  10. Free Software as a Tree (It's Hard to Cut Off the Roots)

    Free software is extremely difficult to ban or to eradicate; it's almost inevitable that, by one route or another, 'world domination' will be attained in many sectors



  11. Censorship is for Pussies

    The attempts to remove words that aren’t in any way racist (or even suggestive of racism) are misguided at best; they don’t solve actual problems, but they pretend to be making people feel good (like the activists who push for it; that gives them as sense of power and morality)



  12. Twitter in 2020 is Where Information Comes to Die or to be Corrupted

    Twisting words, lying about the cited articles, declaring people dead (who are still alive!) are just some among the many reasons to quit Twitter and not bother with that noise machine (except maybe in a write-only fashion, copying from elsewhere and never receiving (mis)information from tweets)



  13. Mr. Lovenstein-Derived Joke about Microsoft's WSL (an Attack on GNU/Linux)

    Mr. Lovenstein's cartoon (or someone's modified version of it) about WSL/WSL2 sort of nails it (credit MinceR for the pointer)



  14. [Humour/Meme] Code of Conduct and Language Wars: Another Tool by Which to Oust Community Voices and Poor/Opinionated People of Colour (Because War Must Go On)

    The coup against GNU/Linux isn’t hard to see; Intel and Microsoft viciously attacked poor people in Africa (because they had adopted GNU/Linux) and now they get a say on who to kick out from Linux (based on entirely nontechnical things, including cultural differences)



  15. Links 15/7/2020: Deepin OS Expansion, openSUSE Board Non-Confidence Vote

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 14, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, July 14, 2020



  17. Twist and Turn, Show Us Your Face

    A little poem about digital privacy



  18. The Race to the Bottom of Tech Rights

    Tech rights (not to be confused with Techrights the site) are going down the drain; people are made complicit using fear tactics, having been told a lot of lies about so-called contact-tracing borderline pseudoscience



  19. [Humour/Meme] OIN Wants Us to Make Peace With Software Patents

    The way things stand, OIN is really not interested in solving the patent problem the Free software way; rather, it's looking to impose its own way on the Free software community



  20. The Last Thing Open Invention Network (OIN) Needs Right Now is Public Association With a Patent Trolls' and Software Patents' Propaganda Site

    The Open Invention Network (OIN) seems to be choosing rather odd platforms; the above publisher, a judge-bashing software patents extremist, cannot possibly improve OIN's image (by association)



  21. The EPO's Misleading 'Studies' Are Just More of the Same Perception Management Routines

    EPO management pays sites to publish a bunch of EPO-controlled propaganda; and we've meanwhile noticed that almost everyone in the press team of the EPO has left (to be replaced by the President's confidant)



  22. Links 14/7/2020: More Laptop Models With GNU/Linux and WordPress 5.5 Beta 2 is Out

    Links for the day



  23. Microsoft Has Not Changed at All (Only the Shallow Marketing and Control of What's Left of the Media Has Changed)

    Microsoft wants everybody to come closer so that everybody can be crushed; the tactics are largely the same



  24. The Founder of Black Duck Still Works for Microsoft

    Black Duck‘s founder, Doug Levin from Microsoft, isn’t doing a terrific job hiding his real loyalties and ‘masters’



  25. IRC Proceedings: Monday, July 13, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, July 13, 2020



  26. Links 14/7/2020: Claws Mail 3.17.6 and RSS Guard 3.7.0 Released

    Links for the day



  27. Microsoft Has Put the String “0xBIGBOOBS” Inside Linux (Kernel Driver for Microsoft's Windows-Only Proprietary Software, Formerly a GPL Violation); Reddit (Condé Nast) Bans You For Mentioning Such Things

    In this increasingly crazy atmosphere of mass sanctioning and permanent banning (removing everything or everyone that's perceived to be impolite) even "Linux" forums are banning people who point out Microsoft being a rogue corporation that's attacking GNU/Linux



  28. There's Apparently a New Boss (or Policy) at Red Hat/IBM

    The Fedora project doesn’t seem to care much about free speech, no matter one’s seniority in the project; as the person who relayed it to us has just put it, “they even eat their own.” (Longtime contributors) “He’s not a troll. He’s a contributor who rubbed some people the wrong way and now the banhammer is coming out. Fedora KDE was already collapsing and now it finally will.” (Note: Rex Dieter leads or led this project)



  29. There Cannot be Software Freedom Without Free Speech (Which is Nowadays Being Wrongly and Creatively Conflated With Racism)

    The time to speak out in favour of free speech is now; because the next phase typically involves removal (to be sold as "voluntary") of people whose political views are seen as professionally inadequate (recall what they did to Richard Stallman last September)



  30. [Humour/Meme] 'Offensive' Jokes

    Even humour itself is under attack now; people who cannot take/tolerate cartoons and banter are targeting the stand-up comedians, the cartoonists and so on


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts