EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing ‘Market Share’

Posted in Free/Libre Software at 4:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Partial reply to “Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement” (published two days ago)

Summary: “The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the “free beer” side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the “free beer” part of free software.”

THIS is a guest post. Its stance or views do not necessary reflect or agree with ours.

First, I’d like to share my answer to the title: “Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

“The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers.”No, but yes. It shouldn’t be A dictator, but the (primary) author of each and every project should be, and stay, a dictator.

Should we try to build some kind of community “in the user interest” that drives the free software movement (one or many communities) and we will re-create the Debian case, with a social contract stating (point 4) “Our priorities are our users and free software” but finally get a small set of people dictating how the others should use software. By the developers or simple users does not make any difference, as you state in your post, developers are users. And they are the only ones interested (if excluding those financially interested) in ruling any kind of community.

On the other hand, when the primary author keeps the power over his project, the project keeps its initial direction (the one set by the author at the start), and when another guy wants to do it differently, one makes a fork, with a new name.

When a community takes hold of a piece of software, then the primary target can gets lost and we run into stupid things like current iptables Debian package installing nftables instead… while a “nftable” package should have been created (I think there are many more examples, but this is a recent one I ran into) or companies sneaking in and ruling the project.

Then I do not agree with this point (and according to what you wrote, you do not completely agree, but do not completely disagree either):

“Techies should not dictate the Free software movement. The Free software movement is for Free software users. Not developers.”

“From my experience, users do not care about software freedom, they care about software that they do not even notice, and they are willing to pay for this.”No.

First, as you state, developers are users. And the developers of one tool should always be users of the tool.

And second, and maybe the most important one: users do not care about software or software freedom, and not even much about user freedom.

That’s my everyday experience.

The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the “free beer” side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the “free beer” part of free software.

Should you try to sell either your free software or your time as free software developer in order to feed your family and you become a “f***ing capitalist” to a lot of said free software supporters?

From my experience, users do not care about software freedom, they care about software that they do not even notice, and they are willing to pay for this.

If you start saying “hey, this is open source!” they have already run away, even if you are not selling the software. Maybe because you are “selling” free software advocacy (listen to my free software advocacy and you get a free software).

It’s strange, but if you try to sell an open source product (software or anything else), you do not even sell it to freedom enthusiast.

You even have to pay (at least spend time to ask them) for them to use it.

If you sell or give a product, then people are interested, and it may happen that some of them will be freedom enthusiasts. And as a freedom enthusiast, you can open-source your product.

“Simply using Firefox, LibreOffice or Thunderbird is most of the time asking too much from them.”I learnt it the hard way.

Many many people say they are interested in their freedom, concerned about Google or Microsoft using their data and so on, but when you tell them they can use an alternative like Linux, they fly away.

Simply using Firefox, LibreOffice or Thunderbird is most of the time asking too much from them.

Firefox is widely used not because it’s free or because it protected users’ freedom, but because at one time it had become much better than its competitors, and presented as such, and not as a “freedom-oriented” solution.

There are very few free software users who are not developers, and fighting for them is losing the game, while fighting for us, developers, will bring better software.

At first GNU and Linux had been made by developers for developers. This made it a very powerful system.

As you say, the problem is that companies are now trying to drive open source projects in their interest, and their interest is not freedom, it is users (getting more users).

If we have the same target (or goals), there’s much more chance to have the same results than to get back to freedom concerns.

Well, I think I wrote much more than I thought I would at first, but here it is.

Article’s licence: Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New

  1. Understanding Thierry Breton: What Thierry Did Next...

    "Whether by coincidence or not, when Atos announced in 2010 that it would acquire Siemens’ IT unit, it was the 32-year-old Macron at Rothschild who advised Breton on the deal."

  2. Links 20/11/2019: HONOR MagicBook With GNU/Linux, Coreboot 4.11, GNU Health Patchset 3.6.1

    Links for the day

  3. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, November 19, 2019

  4. EPO Geared Towards Financial Exploitation of Europe Instead of Serving Europe

    For the financial benefit of law firms and patent offices (they profit from processing loads of patents and lawsuits) Europe is being reverted back to Medieval Times when exercising invention and free thought (or free coding) was a luxury of the rich alone

  5. Microsoft and IBM Are the Patent Trolls, They Won't Protect Us From Trolls

    "Microsoft has no taste" and IBM has no taste, either; they're lying to our collective face together with OIN and the 'Linux' Foundation

  6. How Ralph Nader Put It

    Ralph Nader on money in politics

  7. ZDNet (CBS) Associates GNU/Linux Users With ISIS

    Response to "US student was allegedly building a custom Gentoo Linux distro for ISIS," just published by ZDNet and composed by their biggest troll, Catalin Cimpanu

  8. Understanding Thierry Breton: Noël Forgeard and His “Golden Parachute”

    The end of the first half of the Breton series; in this particular part we continue to cover the EADS scandal and the second half of this series will include the EPO connections (the vote in a plenary for Breton's nomination is due 27/11)

  9. Links 19/11/2019: Zswap's B-Tree Search Implementation, WordPress 5.2.4

    Links for the day

  10. We've Already Entered the Era When Patents Should be Presumed Invalid

    The abundance of low-quality patents may mean short-term profits for patent offices and law firms; but we know at whose expense they are profiting and the legitimacy of patent systems suffers as a result

  11. Jean-Luc Breton

    Breton a champion of obstruction and obfuscation

  12. Understanding Thierry Breton: Insider-Trading Scandal at EADS

    Although Breton was not directly implicated in the insider trading scandal itself he did come under fire in 2007 for the role he played in a side-show to the main story, namely the payment of a generous € 8.5m severance package to Noël Forgeard when the EADS co-CEO was compelled to resign in June 2006.

  13. Startpage is Not Denying Its Betrayal of Privacy, It is Just Being Evasive

    They can't call you a liar if you issue a non-denying 'denial'; the "Roll Safe Think About It" meme seems applicable here

  14. Guest Post: Open Source is Not Free Software

    "If you look at human history, you can see lots of similar ideas, movements, intellectuals who are affected by the power of the ruling class like this."

  15. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, November 18, 2019

  16. Links 19/11/2019: HPC Focus and LibreOffice 6.4 Beta

    Links for the day

  17. Understanding Thierry Breton: “Rhodiagate” and the Vivendi Universal Affair

    When the "Rhodia affair" became the "Breton affair"

  18. Links 18/11/2019: Last Linux RC, OSMC Updated

    Links for the day

  19. What GitHub is to Open Source

    Lots of prisoners inside GitHub

  20. Openwashing Institutionalised NPEs (OIN) and Software Patents With Notorious Managers From the EPO

    There’s a strong push for software patents in Europe (basically fake European Patents on abstract ideas) and IAM leads/participates in it with help from OIN, Grant Philpott (EPO) and — maybe soon — Breton (EU)

  21. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, November 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, November 17, 2019

  22. Links 17/11/2019: Slax Beta and Arch Conf 2019 Report

  23. Understanding Thierry Breton: The “Cost-Killer” Tries to Tame the National Debt

    The oligarchic policy of Thierry Breton at Bercy

  24. Reactions to Last Week's Thierry Breton Hearing

    Nobody is particularly impressed by Thierry Breton except those who know little about him (and he contributes to this lack of knowledge by obstructing, omitting, and misleading)

  25. The Open Invention Network Has Become a Guard Dog of (Some) Patent Trolls and It Misrepresents Us Under the Guise of 'Open Source'

    The Open Invention Network (OIN), in collaboration with Fraunhöfer, is promoting software patents and all sorts of other nonsense as part of ‘open’ standards in a new paper sponsored by the EU and edited by the former EPO Chief Economist Nikolaus Thumm (not Battistelli's choice); this is another reminder of the fact that OIN misrepresents Free/Open Source software (FOSS) developers and their interests

  26. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 16, 2019

  27. Unitary Patent is Dead Partly Because the EPO Demonstrated That EPC is Being Routinely Violated, Illegal Patents Granted

    Some elements of Team UPC have given up, whereas others try to push the lie that Unitary Patent/Unified Patent Court (UPC) is not an EU thing and that therefore everything is fine

  28. USPTO Rewards Microsoft for Corruption at ISO by Teaching People Proprietary OOXML and Promoting Its Use

    The world's most important patent office promotes Microsoft lock-in, revealing not only corporate bias but also highlighting ways in which Microsoft crimes continue to pay off

  29. No, Startpage is Not Dutch Anymore

    Startpage is still clinging onto perceptions rather than truths; it means that Startpage isn't just betraying privacy but it's also dishonest and untrustworthy

  30. Understanding Thierry Breton: Chirac's Entrepreneurial “Joker”

    Minister in charge of the public treasury was not a career politician but an “entrepreneur” with a proven track-record as a financial wizard and “cost-killer”

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts