11.05.19

The EPO Instructs European Examiners to Grant Junk Patents on Algorithms (Maths and Stats)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:08 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

After rushed consultation with the litigation ‘industry’ that nowadays controls the EPO (and increasingly the USPTO as well)

You told me that my 'AI' patent was worth something. Relax, here at the EPO everything AI' is purrrre gold; in European court it's junk.

Summary: The departure from patent law and arrival at extraterritorial patent blackmail means that legal duels have been swapped or deprecated in favour of illegal ‘settlements’ (over illegal patents)

THE LAW does not seem to matter. Caselaw does not matter either. Judges? Look what Battistelli did to them (and António Campinos has shielded Battistelli over it for well more than a year). It’s worse than embarrassing; it’s a colossal fiasco that European media — with rare exceptions — refuses to even talk about.

“It’s worse than embarrassing; it’s a colossal fiasco that European media — with rare exceptions — refuses to even talk about.”In the US, the capital of patent trolls, Iancu openly mocks 35 U.S.C. § 101 (i.e. the law) and in Europe the EPO grants software patents in defiance of the EPC. Phillips & Leigh, flinging a bunch of self-promotional pieces into Mondaq lately, has just cited the European Patent Convention, but the EPO violates it every day in order to fake ‘production’. To quote:

Under European law the test for whether a patent discloses enough is whether it “disclose(s) the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art” [Article 83 European Patent Convention]. This is interpreted as meaning not that the patent application has to provide a blueprint for the invention, that can be slavishly followed with guarantee of success: but that the skilled person with a reasonable degree of experimentation can put it into effect.

One has to note that these law firms never speak of the fact that the EPO basically disregarded the EPC years ago. It’s still in a state of gross noncompliance, but nobody is being held accountable for it. Nobody! This has become a shameful display not just for the Organisation but for the whole Union. This complete lack of oversight has led to the granting of hundreds of thousands (maybe a quarter million!) invalid patents, i.e. European Patents not compliant w.r.t. EPC. Every day we see new examples of the EPO promoting illegal software patents (or patents on maths/stats), this time under the guise of something called “websummit” (yes, an insult to the WWW which only thrived in defiance of such patents). “If you’re going to #websummit,” they tweeted yesterday, “you cannot miss the panel discussion on “Patenting the future: The next big invention” on 6 November! See you there!”

See who’s there; those are proponents of software patents. One of them has like a hundred (probably more) European Patents on maths and the EPO showers such people with awards. As of days ago (end of last week) the EPO moreover changed its guidelines, without bothering with a legal process at all, allowing examiners to grant patents on maths/stats (even encouraging if not forcing them to).

“This complete lack of oversight has led to the granting of hundreds of thousands (maybe a quarter million!) invalid patents, i.e. European Patents not compliant w.r.t. EPC.”“Changes in EPO Guidelines of Examination,” as the lawyers’ site put it, have officially come into effect. Who wrote that? A massive proponent of software patents, a litigation giant, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP. This firm’s Sanam Habib and Maeve O’Flynn are celebrating illegal guidelines by which EPO allows itself to break the law, the EPC, and grant software patent disguised as “hey hi” (AI). To quote the relevant portion:

Last year, to be in line with the ever growing area of artificial intelligence (AI), the Guidelines added a brand new section for AI. This year the EPO has updated the section relating to patentability of AI and machine learning, and mathematical methods to clarify that “term such as ‘support vector machine’, ‘reasoning engine’ or ‘neural network’ may, depending on the context, merely refer to abstract models or algorithms and thus do not, on their own, necessarily imply the use of a technical means. This has to be taken into account when examining whether the claimed subject-matter has a technical character as a whole (Art. 52(1), (2) and (3))”.

Classifying text documents solely in respect of their textual content is not regarded as per se a technical purpose, but a linguistic one. Care needs to be taken in the presentation of the technical purpose of semantic AI systems.

Shouldn’t they clarify that such patents are likely worthless in actual courts? No, of course not! That might scare away potential clients from Finnegan, which makes millions if not billions of dollars from such scammy practices, enabled in part by heavy lobbying. Finnegan pays a lot of money to the EPO’s propaganda outlets (such as IAM), expecting something in return.

What’s in this for the general public and software professionals? Nothing but trouble.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2019/11/05/maths-and-stats-swpats/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 17, 2021



  2. Tolerating the Intolerant and Lacking Tolerance for Opposing Views

    The person who shouted...



  3. Letter of Support for Richard Stallman - Doing Better in Community

    "How do you support someone you’ve known for years who is unfairly attacked and publicly maligned?"



  4. Richard Stallman on Rejecting Workplace Bureaucracy in the 1970s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains what inspired him to get involved in non-software matters



  5. Renata Avila: Trying to Understand the Lynching of Stallman

    Reproduced from the original



  6. Breaking News: EDPS Admits That It is Powerless to Investigate Claims of GDPR Non-compliance at the EPO

    Nobody is truly in charge at the EDPS (and in Europe at large); they say EPO is "company" and all one can do is kindly ask the EPO itself to obey the law and stop outsourcing European data to American military contractors



  7. Links 17/4/2021: Linux 5.13 in Sight, Holland Warming up to Free Software

    Links for the day



  8. Richard Stallman Vilified by Those Who Don't Know Him, Says Sylvia Paull

    Republished "In Support of Richard Stallman"



  9. [Meme] Linux Foundation Can't Use Linux

    Two examples from yesterday, highlighting what a bunch of hypocrites run the marketing operation now disguised as ‘research’; Jason Perlow from Microsoft signed/published this newsletter highlight from the failing “Linux” Foundation — a foundation that calls itself “Linux” while its newsletter is still hosted by Microsoft Windows+proprietary IIS and this latest report is made with proprietary software on a Mac



  10. [Meme] Haters Gonna Hate, Don't Apologise to a Libelling Mob

    As was already pointed out before, you cannot appease a mob by talking back to it, certainly not by issuing an apology (putting oneself in a position of weakness)



  11. What the EPO Has 'Normalised' in Europe...

    Under the cover of 'new normal', Europe's second-largest institution crushes the law and crushes its own staff



  12. Lots of Information in Sight, But Minimal Distraction

    How I keep focused on reading and writing whilst at the same time keeping an eye on important incidents, such as DDOS attacks and urgent messages coming in



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, April 16, 2021



  14. Hate Letter Against FSF (Concern Trolls): 1415 Committers, Letter in Support of FSF (With Its Founder Back): 5116

    Taking into account people who asked for their names to be removed from the defamatory hate letter (inciting people, based on falsehoods), it's not impossible that the support letter really triples or quadruples it in terms of number of signatures



  15. Richard Stallman: Sharing is Good... We Need to Legalise It

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains his take on copyright and the artificial restriction being used against sharing



  16. Nadine Strossen and Hannah Wolfman-Jones Rebut Accusations Against Stallman and Choose Him as Coauthor

    "Here are her thoughts and the response she received from Nadine, extracted verbatim with their permission from the original article"



  17. Links 17/4/2021: GNOME 40 in Tumbleweed, Devuan 4.0 Alpha, Kate Editor Makes a Leap

    Links for the day



  18. EPO Staff Union Takes the EPO 'to Court' (the ILO's Tribunal, as the EPO Cannot be Taken to a Proper Court)

    The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Committees are preparing a legal battle over unlawful and unjust measures taken collectively against hard-working (overworked during pandemic) members of staff; the European public should support them



  19. The Latest Anti-RMS Coup Attempt Targets the GNU Project (Because the FSF Coup Has Clearly Failed) by Infringing and Disregarding Trademark Conventions

    A fake "GNU" (not the original GNU, just riding the coattails of the name "GNU") is trying to find/gain traction and we must oppose it because it's an extension of the very same coup attempt (same plotters) that manufactured a whole bunch of libel to incite people and blackmail the Free Software Foundation (FSF)



  20. Links 16/4/2021: Mozilla Dumping FTP, Corporations Still Concern-Trolling FSF

    Links for the day



  21. The EFF Attacks Software Freedom and Promotes Fake Privacy Linked to Microsoft

    Only weeks after attacking Software Freedom (the ad hominem way, which is easier) the EFF endorses a Microsoft-linked privacy abuse, misframing it as some sort of privacy champion



  22. Richard Stallman on How Corporate Media Limits What People Are Allowed to Think and Say (Updated)

    What the founder of the FSF told yours truly a number of years ago about the behaviour of corporate (funded and controlled by corporations) media



  23. Exposing Hard Truths is the First Step or the Path Towards Justice

    A reflection and a moment taken to set aside tribalism (shallow differences based on allegiances of personal comfort), for we need look back at actual facts — however inconvenient at times — and consider the reality of the situation



  24. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 15, 2021



  25. [Meme] Laundering Bribes as 'Cooperation Money'

    Germany has financial interest in ensuring that EPO abuses carry on and nobody holds the EPO accountable



  26. Articles in Support of Richard Stallman

    Reproduced with permission



  27. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 20: Taking Stock

    Benoît Battistelli's legacy at the EPO is a legacy of corruption and cover-up; we take stock of how illegality was defended and persists to this day



  28. Links 15/4/2021: Zorin OS 16 Beta and Pushing Linux to GitHub- and Microsoft-Connected Rust

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] Enemies With Common Interests

    The Software Freedom Movement (or Free Software Movement) has many enemies; some of them just hide in the shadows or speak out through shadowy front groups/NGOs that they semi-officially sponsor



  30. [Meme] Germany's Red Cash Cow

    EPO brings a lot of money to the German state. But at what cost to citizens and Germany’s public image?


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts