EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.15.20

The Result of a Patent Office That Destroyed Patent Quality and Departed From the Underlying Law (Which Was Supposed to Govern and Be Enforced)

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 10:25 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What the European Patent Office’s (EPO) results that are reported by António Campinos — and Battistelli before him — tell us is how many monopolies they granted; these results say nothing about legal validity or legitimacy of these monopolies, enshrined by gross misuse of authority and violation of the law

Patent quality collapsed. It's OK, we'll use a fine-tooth comb to come up with positive-sounding spin.

Summary: We take a close look at what the EPO has just claimed about last year’s performance and how media covered it (very shallow, almost facts-free and heavy on buzzwords)

WE will soon complete 6 years of in-depth EPO coverage. We started in summer of 2014. A lot has happened since then and many bogus European Patents have been granted since (almost always more than in prior years).

Patent examiners are smart people. They’re not so easy to bamboozle and indoctrinate. They generally know what patents really are. Patents are not just some numbers added to plastics and moulds. A patent isn’t the same thing as an invention. Surely examiners know the intricate economics of monopolies and how they shape both society and industry. There’s nothing ‘God-given’ about it and patent law will be supported by the public (popular consent) as long as it successfully justifies itself, demonstrating that it remains true to its original goals.

” There’s nothing ‘God-given’ about it and patent law will be supported by the public (popular consent) as long as it successfully justifies itself, demonstrating that it remains true to its original goals.”I myself never applied for a patent, partly because I’m a coder and partly because there’s no point to it (costs aside); it’s often an employer (i.e. a manager and some legal team) suggesting if not imposing the pursuit of patents as though they’re trophies. Corporate exclusivity is what they are.

Published the other day at “The Fish Site” as well as separately at FeedNavigator.com was information about an impending objection to a European Patent granted by the Office some time ago. To quote the former article:

BioMar is challenging a decision by an Olso court to fine it 16.5 million kroner, plus costs, for infringement of a patent held by STIM (formerly Europharma) relating to its SuperSmolt technology.

[...]

BioMar is appealing the judgement despite the fact that it does not affect the company’s right to continue to produce and sell its current product portfolio for smoltification. And two other leading feed companies have challenged STIM’s patent at the European Patent office (EPO).

There’s a lot of money at stake and the main question is, was this patent/application properly examined?

“I myself never applied for a patent, partly because I’m a coder and partly because there’s no point to it (costs aside); it’s often an employer (i.e. a manager and some legal team) suggesting if not imposing the pursuit of patents as though they’re trophies. Corporate exclusivity is what they are.”Hours ago Watchtroll published an article entitled “Federal Circuit Affirms Board Finding That Customedia Patents Are Directed to an Abstract Idea,” reminding us that loads of software patents and other dubious patents that USPTO examiners should not have granted are thrown out by higher courts like the Federal Circuit, sometimes following appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rather than lower courts. The inter partes reviews (IPRs) are having the desired effect.

It is with that in mind that we should examine the supposed “growth” at the USPTO (noted weeks ago) and EPO, based on nothing but patents granted and so-called ‘demand’ (for easy-to-get monopolies, even if courts later undo these monopolies). This isn’t manufacturing, it’s just paperwork.

The remainder of this post strives to be an almost exhaustive literature (or media) review, based on the so-called ‘results’ of the EPO. Since everything boils down to puff pieces we shall look at things from a sceptical and independent eye. We’ve found not a single article that we can recommend as everything just ‘reads from the script’ of EPO press releases/announcements. We’ve become accustomed to that.

Let’s ask ourselves a simple question and go back to the basic, OK?

What is the EPO? It’s an office staffed by Europeans.

“It is with that in mind that we should examine the supposed “growth” at the USPTO (noted weeks ago) and EPO, based on nothing but patents granted and so-called ‘demand’ (for easy-to-get monopolies, even if courts later undo these monopolies).”Does it also work for Europeans?

That’s debatable.

Companies that are not even European get a 'fast lane'. Who is this system for then? Maybe it’s more of a class thing than a regional thing. Many suspect so and there are facts or evidence on their side.

A few days ago the EPO wrote: “These were the most active companies in terms of patenting at the EPO in 2019.”

Go ahead and count how many of these are based in Europe. Go ahead…

The press release said, in the title: “Demand for European patent protection from UK inventors and companies continues to rise” (but this one is tailored for the UK as if the system exists in a vacuum and British companies face no risks from it; it’s a double-edged sword).

“Go ahead and count how many of these are based in Europe. Go ahead…”Here’s the Irish puff piece along with another, which was retweeted by the EPO. It is one of two Irish puff pieces we were able to locate; articles like these ones won’t tell readers that the EPO just lowered the patent(ing) bar, granting illegal patents. Actually fact-checking and doing analysis would not be part of ‘the script’. The headlines are “Medical and computer technologies drivers of growth for Irish patent applications at the European Patent Office” and “Patent applications filed from Republic at record high,” but what’s clearly missing here is a yardstick not cherry-picked by the EPO itself.

Telecompaper later published this article to say: “The EPO Patent Index 2019 shows a jump in patent applications in the fields of digital communications (+19.6%) and computer technology (up 10.2%).”

Notice those domains/disciplines; they’re being shrewd with words. Watchtroll’s James Nurton went with “EPO Applications Up 4%, Led by Digital Communication and Computer Technology” and another Watchtroll article had the headline “Huawei Tops EU Patent Applicants,” (EU???) revealing the weak fact-checking processes at Watchtroll. It’s just pure propaganda and they’re notoriously connected to EPO management.

Another new headline , this one from Law360, said “US Cos. Again Lead European Patent Filers Thanks To AI, 5G” (the EPO’s overuse and misuse of silly hype waves like “5G” show that the EPO is nowadays run by rather clueless people).

“The considerable majority of European Patents don’t even go to Europe.”When EPO managers and Law360 say “hey hi” (AI) they mean illegal software patents that the EPO should be suspended for abusively granting in defiance of the EPC. Notice how focused they are on the US and Huawei (China) rather than Europe. The considerable majority of European Patents don’t even go to Europe. To quote the portion outside the paywall: “Companies and inventors based in the United States were once again the top applicants for European patents in 2019, with new growth spurred by 5G and artificial intelligence technologies, according to data released Thursday by the European Patent Office. About a quarter of the 181,406 patent applications submitted to the EPO in 2019 were from U.S. filers, with United Technologies, Qualcomm and General Electric leading the pack. The EPO noted particular growth in the areas of computer technology, which includes many AI-related inventions, and digital communications, like those involving 5G.”

Seems to be good for few American billionaires, who call their software “AI-related inventions,” having capitalised on bogus guidelines from António Campinos, the man who like his appointer never wrote a single line of code and just name-drops buzzwords to compensate for it.

One Dutch site which uses English as its language said “Dutch rank 4th in EPO patent applications” (applications, not grants) and World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR), nowadays a megaphone of EPO propaganda, spoke of “AI patents” (it’s even in the headline). “Hey hi” (AI) just means software patents or illegal patents that the EPO should not be granting (but examiners are being forced to grant anyway). These numbers are in some sense faked numbers, based on the violation of underlying laws. EPO policy nowadays mimics China’s. Patent scope likewise and alike.

“These numbers are in some sense faked numbers, based on the violation of underlying laws. EPO policy nowadays mimics China’s.”And speaking of China, the EPO wrote: “The increase in applications at the EPO in 2019 was mainly fuelled by the strong increase in filing volumes from China, the US and South Korea…” (not Europe)

This was accompanied by puff pieces such as “Huawei applies for most patents in Europe” and “EPO: Huawei tops 2019 patent application ranking” (Taiwan News, but it is just Deutsche Welle (DW) reprinted). DW (English) did no actual investigation. Nothing.

What we see here is the “European” (by name) Patent Office working against Europeans (more risk of lawsuits from foreign nations, conglomerates and trolls). The above-mentioned article from the US attributes the growth to software patents. “Thanks To AI,” said the headline, or in other words thanks to illegal algorithm monopolies that the Office illegally granted. “The EPO noted particular growth in the areas of computer technology, which includes many AI-related inventions, and digital communications,” it said.

Illegal patents and fake patents make up much of the “growth”. Also non-European applications.

“The Germans are made to think that it’s a win for Germany, the Brits think that it’s good for Britain and Irish media celebrates this as some sort of achievement for Ireland (not just lawyers stationed there).”But retweeted by the EPO in German was a misleading narrative like this one. The Germans are made to think that it’s a win for Germany, the Brits think that it’s good for Britain and Irish media celebrates this as some sort of achievement for Ireland (not just lawyers stationed there). Fake growth in monopolies isn’t something to be cheered for. Collapse of patent quality is something to be condemned.

Also retweeted by the EPO was this nonsense (article that parrots EPO talking points) composed by a patent maximalist, Susan Decker, whom we mentioned here before. “Huawei increases its footprint in Europe,” it said, “filing more patent applications there than any other company last year…”

What’s for Europe to gain from it?

Separately, retweeted by EPO PR people was this CIPA tweet that said: “The @EPOorg has reported growth of nearly 7% in UK applications in 2019.”

Notice how they try to make it sound like a British achievement. Lawyers in London know it may mean more business (litigation) for them. The Office lowered patent quality, broke the law, granted illegal patents and now these thugs from CIPA are celebrating this. Even invalid patents is something they’d make money from; this is why they love the abuses of the EPO. Today’s EPO works for the litigation maniacs, not for actual inventors.

“Lawyers in London know it may mean more business (litigation) for them.”Who needs substance when all one needs is a bunch of buzzwords and lawsuits?

This tweet retweeted by the EPO spoke of “#5G and #AI as drivers of growth” [sic] (fake patents for fake growth) and the EPO itself tweeted: “Digital communication saw the strongest growth in #patent applications in 2019 (+19.6% over 2018), overtaking #medtech (+0.9%), which had been the most patent-active technology since 2006.”

The whole thing is being summed up using buzzwords like “medtech”, along with other terms we explained here before. The names are deliberately genetic enough to encompass things well outside scope of patenting.

The initial tweet, citing the official page (warning: epo.org link), said: “The #EPOPatentIndex 2019 is out! A new all-time high in demand for patent protection (4% growth) & #digitaltechnologies take the lead in applications filed at the EPO Full details…”

Guess what they mean by #digitaltechnologies (the new “CII”).

It’s a patent-printing operation of abstract patents. “According to the EPO Patent Index 2019,” says the official page, “the surge in the fields of digital communication (+19.6%) and computer technology (+10.2%) is fuelling the sustained growth in patent filings”

“They drive (or crash) the Office right into the ground.”So now it becomes “computer technology” and “digital communication” (very generic).

To better understand how those patents get granted one might wish to see internal leaks like this one of Roberto Vacca.

No wonder examiners are so upset; they’re not doing proper examination anymore, instead chasing quotas and targets to maintain fake growth for fake leaders and their cabel of unqualified friends. They drive (or crash) the Office right into the ground.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The Internet Archive Doesn't Forget, Whereas the Internet and the Web Forget Very Fast

    World Wide Web history is grossly undervalued and preservation of such history (e.g. by the Wayback Machine) is taken for granted by far too many people; the robber barons of today benefit the most from erosion of collective memory as they get to rewrite the past to suit their present and future interests



  2. Environmentalism and Free Software Can be Viewed as Closely Connected and Help One Another

    Modest lifestyles are an overlapping pattern in the Free software community and green activists; there's room for alliances and collaboration, bettering society by reducing consumption and discouraging voyeurism



  3. Free (as in Freedom) Software + Social Control Media ≠ Free Speech

    Speaking through middlemen and private platforms is bad enough (that gives others unjust power over speech); to claim that because the underlying platform is free/libre software it therefore becomes a non-issue is also dishonest



  4. António Campinos: President or Quasi-Autocratic Corporate Puppet?

    The culture of oppression — and censorship of evidence of oppression — is what today’s EPO is all about; the EPO learned how to better avoid (or block) negative publicity without actually changing its ways; and due to unprecedented speech restrictions you won’t hear that from SUEPO



  5. The Media Continues to Ignore Corruption of António Campinos

    António Campinos has Croatian scandals on his lap; the obedient media, however, refuses to even talk about it (or uses COVID as an excuse to write nothing on the subject, as some journalists have told us)



  6. A Call for Patent Sanity

    The public's call for reform is motivated by improved understanding of today's debased patent system and how out-of-order (detached from its original mission statement) it has gotten; patent maximalism, if it does not completely unravel this whole system, severely discredits it



  7. Declassified US Army Field Manuals Explain Microsoft's Public Relations Strategy (Similar to Selling Imperialism to the Occupied)

    The misuse of public broadcast to brainwash the public is well understood and thoroughly exploited by both Microsoft and the Gates Foundation (which sells this ridiculous lie that the world’s richest people speak for and fight for the poorest, i.e. those impoverished by endless greed)



  8. IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 10, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, July 10, 2020



  9. Links 11/7/2020: Slackel 7.3 Openbox, Kiwi TCMS 8.5, Librem 5 Dogwood Update 3

    Links for the day



  10. Education Without Free Software is Training or Indoctrination

    Kids need to decide for themselves what they want to do and what they wish to use when they grow up; schools need to provide general tools and the mental capacity to make good decisions (rather than make these decisions for the kids, sometimes at the behest of foreign monopolists)



  11. Links 10/7/2020: Wayland-Info, diffoscope 151 and Tor 0.4.4.2-alpha

    Links for the day



  12. European FRAND (Related to SEP) Proponent and Famed Programmer Comes to Realise That It's Actually a “Scam”

    Even people who have long promoted the practice of mandatory "licensing" (in effect patent tax one is unable to work around) are apparently changing their minds and their tune



  13. Not Even a Single Corporate Journalist Has Written Anything About These Very Important Bits of News

    Constant propaganda from patent maximalists has long infested the media, which is sometimes controlled and even bribed to set the tone and the agenda; important developments are being tucked away and require very deep digging for ordinary citizens to find



  14. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 09, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, July 09, 2020



  15. Racism in Technology (and Who Typically Lectures Us About the Subject)

    Racism is a real problem; some approaches to tackling racism, however, can also be problematic and those who take the lead 'on behalf' of victims tend to be opportunistic and privileged few (piggybacking others' grievances to further advance their financial agenda)



  16. Links 10/7/2020: Debian 8 Long Term Support EOL, Mobian Project, Mesa 20.1.3

    Links for the day



  17. [Humour] COVID-19 is Very, Very Afraid of Human Beings Making More Monopolies Instead of Fighting Together

    The European Patent Office (EPO) to the rescue! Fighting a dangerous pandemic one profitable monopoly at a time!



  18. The News is Never 'Slow', It's Just Journalism That's Slowing Down (and Investigative Journalism Coming Under Attack)

    A mix of censorship and subtle mind control contribute to misinformed societies that shape their perception or misunderstanding of the world based on false measures of authority (where money can determine what is true and what is untrue); many topics remain completely untouched, leading to apathy in a vacuum; it's very much applicable to international organisations, which are presumed benign by virtue of being multi-national or supranational



  19. Social Control Media is About Social Control and If It Doesn't Ban You It'll Shut Down Everyone's Account (One Day)

    It’s time to leave the ‘Internet rot’ which is social control media well behind us; blogging and RSS/XML may seem like a thing of the past, but they may as well become the future (again; if we make the correct and informed choices)



  20. Microsoft's Fingers in Every Pie: The Cult Mentality That Society Needs to Become Wary of

    Microsoft and its co-founder (pretending to do his for-profit 'charity' via the Gates Foundation) are trying to control the world; in the process they've moved to control even their most potent competitor, according to Gates himself, which is GNU/Linux



  21. Links 9/7/2020: Google’s Open Usage Commons, GNOME 3.36.4, Neptune 6.5

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 08, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, July 08, 2020



  23. Links 8/7/2020: SUSE to Acquire Rancher Labs, Btrfs as Default in Fedora, Qt Creator 4.12.4

    Links for the day



  24. Yes, Master

    When the Linux Foundation tells us to tone down our language we ought to remember what kind of hypocritical stance these people have (note: the above have nothing to do with slavery, either)



  25. Fraunhofer is Again Evergreening Software Patents to Maintain Its Codecs Cartel, Forcing Everyone to Pay to View/Stream Multimedia Files

    The roller-coaster of software patents on multimedia isn't stopping; we know the culprits who can be named for perpetuating this injustice



  26. [Humour/Meme] Focusing on the Bombings and Who's Included in the Bombings

    Supremacist agenda disguised as "tolerant and inclusive" is still objectionable supremacist agenda



  27. Manners Are a Good Thing. The Yardstick or the Standard of Manners Changes Over Time.

    Entirely legitimate grievances of African-Americans are being exploited by people who aren’t even African-American (and usually don’t speak for African-Americans) to warp the debate from one about software ethics and technical issues, not to mention war crimes of companies that employ many programmers, to something which is unlikely to really help African-Americans (also, they don't employ any African-Americans)



  28. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 07, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, July 07, 2020



  29. Links 8/7/2020: Huawei’s GNU/Linux PC, Sparky 5.12, and Endless OS 3.8.4 Released

    Links for the day



  30. [Humour] Television Channels That Don't Speak of Real Looting But Participate in Looting

    People may need to look beyond (or outside) the television screen to grasp what's going on


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts