07.09.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

Racism in Technology (and Who Typically Lectures Us About the Subject)

Posted in GNU/Linux at 11:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Don’t allow corporations and their front groups hijack the voices (and causes) of real victims

Star trek Enterprise: We've consulted our council about people of colour; You don't speak for people of colour

Summary: Racism is a real problem; some approaches to tackling racism, however, can also be problematic and those who take the lead ‘on behalf’ of victims tend to be opportunistic and privileged few (piggybacking others’ grievances to further advance their financial agenda)

Racism in technology is real. It’s real universally. Racism is everywhere. Not just in technology and not just in Free software (contrary to libelous myths spread by opponents of software freedom). Racism is typically defined as viewing or categorising people based on race (or appearances associated with a race) rather than objective merit. Appearances are blinding due to survival/tribal instincts, leading one to trusting those who look alike (like oneself). In nature it sometimes means sticking around one’s own species, based on perceived kinship; cannibalism or murder of one’s own kind, after all, isn’t good for a species’ long-term survival. Cooperation rewards a species better.

“It’s often said that recognising that a problem exists is the first step.”When talking about races, however, we don’t speak of speciation. We’re all the same, except some superficialities such as skin pigmentation, keratin levels and so on. Those things typically depend on climatic trend, as they vary depending on where one settled and how long for (how many generations). Different conditions lead to different adaptations, both physical and mental.

Denial that racism still exists seems irrational if not overly optimistic/idealistic. Racism doesn’t need to be expressed and shown openly/publicly. Some is closeted, which means it’s “coming out” behind closed doors. We’ve probably all witnessed some folks who without the presence of those whom they mock diverge into derogatory impersonations and politically-incorrect views. Those things are also commonplace in social control media (typically anonymous accounts) and rampant in YouTube channels — more of which Google has been cracking down on lately.

Technology is somewhat unique in the sense that it can exacerbate or conversely help tackle racism (even if by censorship — the way Google does; Facebook is under intense pressure to do the same).

“Consider, for instance, how the Linux Foundation exploited “BLM” while hiring not a single African-American person (in a country where 13.4% identify as African-American).”Revolving issues pertaining to racism would require more than recruiting “for diversity” (based on quotas) and removing words that supposedly alienate developers and users. Twitter is apparently cracking down even on the term “dummy value” as if the word dummy in its own right should become impermissible in some contexts.

It’s often said that recognising that a problem exists is the first step. Then it’s necessary to understand its true nature, then how to address it. At the moment it feels like we’re well past the denial stage, i.e. people generally accept that institutional racism exists. What sometimes follows, however, is misguided albeit well-meaning at best.

Consider, for instance, how the Linux Foundation exploited “BLM” while hiring not a single African-American person (in a country where 13.4% identify as African-American). Later on those 'masters' of the Foundation lecture us on institutional racism. Look at the bloody mirror!

To be clear, hiring people just because of their race or gender might not help, either. In fact, hiring people who perform poorly (as women or as an ethnic minority) can contribute to stigma associated with women or those ethnic minorities. And it helps neither equality nor opportunity. It becomes like a cautionary tale, leading to reluctance to repeat.

I don’t claim to have answers to these problems; in fact, there are no easy (‘slam dunk’) answers. To claim otherwise is probably to be arrogant and dishonest. Right now, based on my experience, one key problem is that consultation is done by and among the privileged; it’s like nobody bothers asking actually repressed groups what they think. Look how Intel, which attacks Africans, is quick to exploit “BLM”. And it’s shallow enough for anyone out there to see…

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

A Single Comment

  1. Canta said,

    July 10, 2020 at 12:33 pm

    Gravatar

    This issue has been quite present last weeks here in Techrights. I’ve been mostly silent about it, because I didn’t agree with the editorial line at the time (showing the hypocrisy around it, mocking that hypocrisy, calling for rational critique, and so on), and didn’t wanted to fight over it. This new post feels much more confortable for me, so I’ll let some note, hoping to add something to its questions.

    My position: I hate merit. I find it inhumane (as in “contrary to human rights”), and therefore contrary to Free Software standards. I believe merit do a lot of harm in society, and I call for a strong critique against it.

    Merit has its place, we all know that: you can’t just pick anyone from the street and put her to work on hardware design; that just doesn’t work, period. Yet, merit is also a bad metric, as nobody is always 100% productive (we all have our moments of strength and weakness), our jobs are not some kind of competence (they’re a right, and something we do to pay the bills), lots of things may happen to us in the middle of our lives (we don’t have less “merit” for having childs, or a sick mom/dad), and so on. By merit alone, all organizations would be an insane battle royale between peers, as we already see in lots of enterprises or academic circles (“publish or perish” is nothing new). And if it were for merit alone, we would have never used an unfinished/minimal libre software instead of some hegemonic windows version for the same taks, as the later most likely has more funcionalities already working as expected by our peers: on the contrary, we are the ones boycotting fully functional software, because it’s not about that kind of “merit”.

    But let’s stay on the academy example for a second. Academy makes knowledge. Even when there is merit around making knowledge, that’s not the point of knowledge: it’s to understand the universe. That knowledge is what future generations will use to further understand what’s going on everywhere, and what other people around the world will use to build the things that will transform it into something else (hopefully a better world). That’s not about merit, but about collaboration. That’s not about working our asses off, but about trying to help. It’s about being part of it, not about trying to be the best, or even “better”.

    Merit is frequently being used with a bad Darwin interpretation of “survival of the fittest”. Most assholes quoting that mean something in the lines of “we should all fight each other, to see who’s the stronger”. But Darwin meant something very different: he observed that life adapts because it’s diverse, and that without that diversity it would perish at the first sudden big environmental change. Darwin doesn’t call for competence, but for diversity.

    This are the kind of places from where I can defend the use of Codes of Conduct, where I consider many silly discussions about terminology as valid and serious, and also what distances me from some last weeks posts. Diversity is not only desirable because it’s politically correct: it’s absolutely vital in order to adapt. And sensible people is nothing other than that: just people, like we are.

    Also, I’ve been very scared the last… 15 years?… realizing corporate forces are actually very good at posing as “good guys”. It doesn’t matter how many crimes they commit, they’ll find a way to look like a cute kitty. We need to face it: corporations are political powehouses. They are able to bend entire sovereign wills: they buy countries and global organizations like nothing.

    We (Free Software movement, as part of Human Rights movements) are weak against that kind of monsters, and are in no position of taking this diversity and working issues lightly. Our enemies are already poweful enough for us to leave this issues for them to handle as they please, so I just can’t mock gender or race discussions from an activist point of view. Which doesn’t mean I actually can’t find many of those discussions silly or even funny: I do, and I frequently laugh reading some political arguments.

    And I also agree there’s lots of corporate hypocrisy and/or lies: but that’s not the point of political issues, that’s just corporations playing their corporate interests. Techrights is strong in showing that side of corporate agenda, but it seems to struggle when dealing with people siding those sides. I believe this last post is the way to go: telling we have doubts, telling we don’t know exactly what to do, telling we’re trying to be respectful yet there’s noise in the air we need to clean. That’s sincere, and serious, while being also critical.

    And regarding the last two paragraphs: I believe positive discrimination may be cool to some extent, but yeah, it has its limits. Yet, I don’t worry so much about the limits or consequences of those techniques, but about their focus: I believe we need political diversity, not just biological diversity. As I agree with you that there are no “slam dunk” answers, and I believe never will, those answers should rise from the people itself. And for that, we need to make politics more explicit.

    I don’t care that much if SystemD is made by an albino black transgender bald woman in a wheelchair (which I’ll actually find a nice thing to happen), as I care about their political stances and guidelines (which are frequently disguised as technological). If SystemD tries to take over an entire ecosystem, I’m worried about the ecosystem and not about the SystemD developers attributes. Political (as in “related to others”) guidelines should be explicit, clear, and an object of constant public scrutiny. Political analysis should be a central part of our communities, and that’s where this issues should be discussed with its own rules and ways (different from the “this code sucks” from Linus, or the “it’s free software therefore is ethic” from RMS). Gender and race goes there, as well as “where does this software is being used” and “who finances us”.

    Our communities have fallen over a “init system debate”, where I believe it was in fact a political debate. There’s no “technical vs political” here, they’re just different aspects of the same stuff (as happens with enviromental discussions, which involves issues from energy physics to poverty). Merit often gets in the middle of it, usually pushing for corporate agendas.

    Merit is also so lousy, that metaphysical stuff like “purity” can also be turn as a form of merit, and thus cancel culture. That way, reference figures like RMS or Linus turns into single points of failure: if they’re invalid in some way, they’re invalid in every way. So merit is in the very core of the worlwide divissive political climate we’re living in decades so far, with no happy consequence anywhere. We need to take distance from merit, and embrace other values.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 3/12/2021: Nitrux 1.7.1 and Xen 4.16 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Links 2/12/2021: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Alpha, Qt Creator 6

    Links for the day



  3. The EPO's “Gender Awareness Report”

    There’s a new document with remarks by the EPO’s staff representatives and it concerns opportunities for women at the EPO — a longstanding issue



  4. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 01, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 01, 2021



  5. EPO Staff Committee Compares the Tactics of António Campinos to Benoît Battistelli's

    The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO talks about EPO President António Campinos, arguing that “he seems to subscribe to the Manichean view, introduced by Mr Battistelli…”



  6. Prof. Thomas Jaeger in GRUR: Unified Patent Court (UPC) “Incompatible With EU Law“

    The truth remains unquestionable and the law remains unchanged; Team UPC is living in another universe, unable to accept that what it is scheming will inevitably face high-level legal challenges (shall that become necessary) and it will lose because the facts are all still the same



  7. Links 1/12/2021: LibrePlanet CFS Extended to December 15th and DB Comparer for PostgreSQL Reaches 5.0

    Links for the day



  8. EPO Cannot and Will Not Self-Regulate

    The term financialisation helps describe some of the activities of the EPO in recent years; see Wikipedia on financialisation below



  9. [Meme] Germany's Licence to Break the Law

    Remember that the young Campinos asked dad for his immunity after he had gotten drunk and crashed the car; maybe the EPO should stop giving diplomatic immunity to people, seeing what criminals (e.g. Benoît Battistelli) this attracts; the German government is destroying its image (and the EU’s) by fostering such corruption, wrongly believing that it’s worth it because of Eurozone domination for patents/litigation



  10. EPO Dislikes Science and Scientists

    The EPO's management has become like a corrupt political party with blind faith in money and monopolies (or monopoly money); it has lost sight of its original goals and at this moment it serves to exacerbate an awful pandemic, as the video above explains



  11. Links 1/12/2021: LibreOffice 7.3 Beta, Krita 5.0, Julia 1.7

    Links for the day



  12. Links 1/12/2021: NixOS 21.11 Released

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 30, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, November 30, 2021



  14. Links 1/12/2021: Tux Paint 0.9.27 and WordPress 5.9 Beta

    Links for the day



  15. [Meme] EPO Administrative Council Believing EPO-Bribed 'Media' (IAM Still Shilling and Lying for Cash)

    IAM continues to do what brings money from EPO management and Team UPC, never mind if it is being disputed by the patent examiners themselves



  16. The EPO's Mythical “Gap” Has Been Found and It's Bonuses for People Who Use Pure Fiction to Steal From Patent Examiners

    The phony president who has the audacity to claim there's a budget gap is issuing millions of euros for his enablers to enjoy; weeks ahead of the next meeting of national delegates the Central Staff Committee (CSC) tells them: "Events show that the delegations’ concerns about functional allowances have materialised. The lack of transparency and inflation of the budget envelope gives rise to the suspicion that high management is pursuing a policy of self-service at the expense of EPO staff, which is difficult to reconcile with the Office’s claimed cost-saving policy, and to the detriment of the whole Organisation."



  17. Video: Making the Internet a Better Place for People, Not Megacorporations

    Following that earlier list of suggested improvements for a freedom-respecting Internet, here's a video and outline



  18. Links 30/11/2021: KDE Plasma 5.23.4, 4MLinux 38.0, Long GitHub Downtime, and Microsoft's CEO Selling Away Shares

    Links for the day



  19. A Concise Manifesto For Freedom-Respecting Internet

    An informal list of considerations to make when reshaping the Internet to better serve people, not a few corporations that are mostly military contractors subsidised by the American taxpayers



  20. Freenode.net Becomes a 'Reddit Clone' and Freenode IRC is Back to Old Configurations After Flushing Down Decades' Worth of User/Channel Data and Locking/Shutting Out Longtime Users

    Freenode is having another go; after “chits” and “jobs” (among many other ideas) have clearly failed, and following the change of daemon (resulting in massive loss of data and even security issues associated with impersonation) as well as pointless rebrand as “Joseon”, the domain Freenode.net becomes something completely different and the IRC network reopens to all



  21. Jack Dorsey's Decision is a Wake-up Call: Social Control Media is Just a Toxic Bubble

    The state of the World Wide Web (reliability, preservation, accessibility, compatibility etc.) was worsened a lot more than a decade ago; with social control media that’s nowadays just a pile of JavaScript programs we’re basically seeing the Web gradually turning into another Adobe Flash (but this time they tell us it’s a “standard”), exacerbating an already-oversized ‘bubble economy’ where companies operate at a loss while claiming to be worth hundreds of billions (USD) and generally serve imperialistic objectives by means of manipulation like surveillance, selective curation, and censorship



  22. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 29, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, November 29, 2021



  23. Links 29/11/2021: NuTyX 21.10.5 and CrossOver 21.1.0

    Links for the day



  24. This Apt Has Super Dumbass Powers. Linus Sebastian and Pop_OS!

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  25. [Meme] Trying to Appease Provocateurs and Borderline Trolls

    GNU/Linux isn’t just a clone of Microsoft Windows and it oughtn’t be a clone of Microsoft Windows, either; some people set themselves up for failure, maybe by intention



  26. Centralised Git Hosting Has a Business Model Which is Hostile Towards Developers' Interests (in Microsoft's Case, It's an Attack on Reciprocal Licensing and Persistent Manipulation)

    Spying, censoring, and abusing projects/developers/users are among the perks Microsoft found in GitHub; the E.E.E.-styled takeover is being misused for perception manipulation and even racism, so projects really need to take control of their hosting (outsourcing is risky and very expensive in the long run)



  27. Links 29/11/2021: FWUPD's 'Best Known Configuration' and Glimpse at OpenZFS 3.0

    Links for the day



  28. President Biden Wants to Put Microsofter in Charge of the Patent Office, Soon to Penalise Patent Applicants Who Don't Use Microsoft's Proprietary Formats

    The tradition of GAFAM or GIAFAM inside the USPTO carries on (e.g. Kappos and Lee; Kappos lobbies for Microsoft and IBM, whereas Lee now works for Amazon/Bezos after a career at Google); it's hard to believe anymore that the USPTO exists to serve innovators rather than aggressive monopolists, shielding their territory by patent threats (lawsuits or worse aggression) and cross-licensing that's akin to a cartel



  29. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part VIII — Mr. Graveley's Long Career Serving Microsoft's Agenda (Before Hiring by Microsoft to Work on GitHub's GPL Violations Machine)

    Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley was promoting .NET (or Mono) since his young days; his current job at Microsoft is consistent with past harms to GNU/Linux, basically pushing undesirable (except to Microsoft) things to GNU/Linux users; Tomboy used to be the main reason for distro ISOs to include Mono



  30. Dr. Andy Farnell on Teaching Cybersecurity in an Age of 'Fake Security'

    By Dr. Andy Farnell


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts