01.25.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and ‘House Arrests’ to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:38 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Video download link

Summary: The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing

THE Central Staff Committee of the EPO bemoans the state of things, and rightly so! Benoît Battistelli left a mess at the Office and António Campinos isn’t tidying things up. He makes things yet more messy and senior staff leaves (usually early retirement) as quality collapses.

“Last week the representatives circulated a document about exploitation of the pandemic to lower the time spent on each application (or “product”), compelling examiners to work from home from dusk till dawn.”Office insiders have already demonstrated the nosedive; but the management suppresses such insiders, wrongly assuming the problem will magically go away by making the messengers go away.

Last week the representatives circulated a document about exploitation of the pandemic to lower the time spent on each application (or “product”), compelling examiners to work from home from dusk till dawn. We’ve decided to reproduce this document with slight redaction/s:

Munich, 22.01.2021
sc21004cp – 0.2.1/1.3.3

Target setting in DG1 for 2021

Even more business than usual during a pandemic

Dear Colleagues,

The target setting exercise for 2021 will be completed by 31 January. Many colleagues have had increased individual targets compared to 2020 with unreachable objectives imposed on them. This comes in sharp contrast with the promises made by Mr Campinos.

A “holistic” approach?

In his Communiqué of 2 December 2020, Mr Campinos promised a “holistic approach for goal setting”. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, holistic means “dealing with or treating the whole of something or someone and not just a part”. The exercise in DG1 is actually “reductionist”. Examiners are merely imposed a productivity objective decided by the Administration and without any justification apart from the usual untenable principle that one should continuously at least be more productive than the year before. The timeliness objectives are as far-reaching as no late priority 2 or 3 files by the end of the year with no regard as to whether it is attainable or meaningful. The behaviour objectives mention that examiners are expected to learn to accept diverging opinions in contradiction with the top-down process of the current goal setting.

More business than usual during a pandemic?

In his Communiqué of 8 January 2021, Mr Campinos announced that a review of the (individual) targets would take place in order to take the effects of the pandemic into account1. Nevertheless, the prevailing principle is still “do more”. This trend is sustained by a still competition-based rewarding exercise which disregards completely the circumstances of each individual during the pandemic.

Unattainable Objectives vs Performance Assessment

The Guide to Performance Development 2020/2021 published on 10 December 2020 states that the goals must be SMART and attainable. This guide was published after the first round of discussion of objective setting in June/July 2020. Obviously, now

____
1 “Any colleague affected by the pandemic in a way that might necessitate a review of their targets should speak to their line manager.”


management hides behind the outcome of this first round of discussion in order not to change anything.

The Guidelines on performance development (Circular 366)2 state that performance assessment is absolute, i.e. specific levels of performance are expected. However, management does not disclose what these levels are and carefully hides the ranges of performance allowed around these levels. Section IV sets out the roles and the responsibilities: “[t]he employees are responsible for meeting the expectations discussed with their manager (….) and are expected to contribute proactively to the goal setting”. It is clear that unattainable objectives should not be set and that there will be consequences at the time of assessment.

Our advice: Be very cautious

For the above reasons, we recommend that you be conservative and realistic when estimating your performance for 2021 and do not commit to unattainable objectives for which you alone will be responsible and will have to bear the consequences.

In order to avoid a negative performance assessment at the end of the year, we suggest that you carefully estimate the impact of the pandemic on your daily work and any other personal circumstances that you can already foresee for this year and set yourself a reasonable target (this is also in line with the Communiqué of 8 January 2021). Bear in mind that the agreement you will reach with your line manager will be regarded as a common approach, and not as a managerial request.

In fact, in uncertain times like in the current pandemic, nobody can predict the likelihood of achieving a particular outcome. Discussing objectives seems reasonable, but committing to a target is not. [Redacted]

Take care of yourselves and your loved ones.

Your staff representation

____
2 https://extra2019.internal.epo.org/sites/codex/documents/english.pdf


[Redacted]

Speaking for myself, as a home worker (for about 14 years now), I’ve not seen any increases in expectation/demands of “productivity”. Employers have no right whatsoever to exploit this pandemic to increase an expectation of time spent on work-related tasks/’remote working’ (e.g. converting time previous spent commuting into time spent on toil/work). We saw some complaints from inside Microsoft which said this was done there; imagine being paid for a 9-5 job when in fact working 8-6 (adding up the time of travel, but putting additional work strain on people). I heard from people inside Microsoft who wake up at 4AM or 5AM to start working.

Life is about much more than work and making money. A life spent just working is a life without time to actually use or enjoy that money. By the time people retire from work they’re very much limited in what they can physically do.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 21/10/2021: MX Linux 21 and Git Contributors’ Summit in a Nutshell

    Links for the day



  2. [Meme] [Teaser] Miguel de Icaza on CEO of Microsoft GitHub

    Our ongoing series, which is very long, will shed much-needed light on GitHub and its goals (the dark side is a lot darker than people care to realise)



  3. Gemini Protocol and Gemini Space Are Not a Niche; for Techrights, Gemini Means Half a Million Page Requests a Month

    Techrights on gemini:// has become very big and we’ll soon regenerate all the pages (about 37,500 of them) to improve clarity, consistency, and general integrity



  4. 'Satellite States' of EPO Autocrats

    Today we look more closely at how Baltic states were rendered 'voting fodder' by large European states, looking to rubber-stamp new and oppressive measures which disempower the masses



  5. [Meme] Don't Mention 'Brexit' to Team UPC

    It seems perfectly clear that UPC cannot start, contrary to what the EPO‘s António Campinos told the Council last week (lying, as usual) and what the EPO insinuates in Twitter; in fact, a legal challenge to this should be almost trivial



  6. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States

    How unlawful EPO rules were unsurprisingly supported by Benoît Battistelli‘s friends in Baltic states; António Campinos maintained those same unlawful rules and Baltic connections, in effect liaising with offices known for their corruption (convicted officials, too; they did not have diplomatic immunity, unlike Battistelli and Campinos)



  7. Links 21/10/2021: GIMP 2.99.8 Released, Hardware Shortages, Mozilla Crisis

    Links for the day



  8. How Oppressive Governments and Web Monopolists Might Try to Discourage Adoption of Internet Protocols Like Gemini

    Popular movements and even some courageous publications have long been subverted by demonisation tactics, splits along unrelated grounds (such as controversial politics) and — failing that — technical sabotage and censorship; one must familiarise oneself with commonly-recurring themes of social control by altercation



  9. [Meme] Strike Triangulations, Reception Issues

    Financial strangulations for Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations”? The EPO will come to regret 2013…



  10. [Meme] Is Saying “No!” to Unlawful Proposals Considered “Impolite”?

    A ‘toxic mix’ of enablers and cowards (who won’t vote negatively on EPO proposals which they know to be unlawful) can serve to show that the EPO isn’t a “social democracy” as Benoît Battistelli liked to call it; it’s just a dictatorship, currently run by the son of a person who actually fought dictatorship



  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 20, 2021



  12. [Meme] EPO Legal Sophistry and Double Dipping

    An imaginary EPO intercept of Administrative Council discussions in June 2013...



  13. Links 21/10/2021: PostgreSQL JDBC 42.3.0 and Maui Report

    Links for the day



  14. [Meme] [Teaser] “Judge a Person Both by His Friends and Enemies”

    Fervent supporters of Team Battistelli or Team Campinos (a dark EPO era) are showing their allegiances; WIPO and EPO have abused staff similarly over the past decade or so



  15. 'Cluster-Voting' in the European Patent Office/Organisation (When a Country With 1.9 Million Citizens Has the Same Voting Power as a Country With 83.1 Million Citizens)

    Today we examine who has been running the Finnish patent office and has moreover voted in the EPO during the ballot on unlawful "Strike Regulations"; they voted in favour of manifestly illegal rules and for 8.5 years after that (including last Wednesday) they continued to back a shady regime which undermines the EPO's mission statement



  16. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord

    The Finnish outpost has long been strategic to the EPO because it can help control the vote of four or more nations; evidence suggests this has not changed



  17. [Meme] Living as a Human Resource, Working for Despots

    The EPO has become a truly awful place/employer to work for; salary is 2,000 euros for some (despite workplace stress, sometimes relocation to a foreign country)



  18. Links 20/10/2021: New Redcore Linux and Hospital Adoption of GNU Health

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 19, 2021



  20. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day



  21. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)



  22. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site



  23. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)



  24. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)



  25. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc

    We start our investigation of how countries in northern Europe ended up voting on the unlawful “Strike Regulations” at the EPO and why



  26. Proof That Windows “11” is a Hoax

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  27. Firefox Becomes as Morally Reprehensible as Apple, Facebook, or Uber

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  28. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap



  30. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts