Nobody Denies That SecureBoot Will Cause Problems After September 11
Crossposted from Tux Machines as the said site is down for at least 12 hours already)
A few hours ago in the sister site I published Part VII of a series about UEFI.
It's a bit difficult to contain my bemusement if not amusement, seeing what happened to the principal culprit, who is lying to the UK High Court (with a "Statement of Truth" no less!) while publicly advocating drugs and blackmailing people, including my wife.
Some days ago he asked people to sort of place bets on nothing going wrong with UEFI 'secure boot' after September 11. Imagine the embarrassing admission when he then said there were no takers (a shot in one's own foot); then his site - the site where he posted this (and where he's the main user) - went offline. It has been offline for many hours already. He already has a history taking down that site to avoid embarrassment (to dodge scrutiny, to hide his writings).
"The dangerous part will be how Microsoft media spins the event," a friend told me about what will happen later this week to 'secure boot', adding that "prebunking is essential in this case, among others."
He said about Garrett: "It's mostly him to blame for UEFI / Restricted Boot even being a thing at all."
Indeed.