Threats Issued to Daniel Pocock Having Launched the JuristGate Web Site Which Covers Financial Fraud in "Legal Insurance" Clothing
The Swiss government has already admitted that it was fraud, it tried to keep it under the radar for a few years; now - in order to save face - they try to suppress critics/victims and honest people who talk about what happened
In the UK, we have the SRA, but it hardly actually does anything until it is way too late [1, 2]. This was in the news yesterday:
-
SRA reprimanded for SSB Law blunders
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has received a formal censure for its handling of the collapse of SSB Law – just the second time such a sanction has been issued.
The Legal Services Board said the censure was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the failings identified in an independent report published last year, as well as the profound detriment suffered by consumers.
The only other time the LSB has taken such an approach came in 2018 when the Law Society was sanctioned for its non-compliance with the rules around separation with the SRA.
-
Solicitors' regulator censured over failures to protect SSB Law consumers
It is similar to what happened in Switzerland, impacting tens of thousands of people and businesses, effectively defrauded by a pyramid scheme disguised as "legal insurance."
Based on this latest post, there are attempts to take down the site, just like prior sites which covered Swiss corruption. Switzerland as a country does not tolerate criticism. It has strict secrecy laws. Why?
Freedom of speech on the Net is an illusion. It's not about truth or falsity, it's about who's willing to spend a million dollars on lawyers to game the system.
Is our world governed by laws or by rich corporations (or nations/superpowers) with well-connected lawyers/politicians? █