--Steve Ballmer
THE ACTA is a major, but nonetheless secret, plot. Those involved in this profit-elevating, rights-degrading conspiracy prefer to keep it quiet -- almost invisible -- until it's too late. For more people to understand such abuse of the law that's taking place behind their backs, the best one can do is spread the knowledge. We wrote about this yesterday and linked to a chain of related posts [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].
The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) has strongly criticised the secret negotiations concerning the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the package of measures for counteracting infringements of the rights to intangible goods considered by the EU Commission. The foundation considers it particularly questionable that Brussels intends to renegotiate the current liability regulations and exemptions for internet providers in the E-Commerce Directive.
Basically, it's a case of the lady protesting too much: earnestly assuring us that it doesn't intend to bring in a shopping list of legal nasties - criminalisation of infringement, summary injunctions for those *suspected* of infringing, "three strikes and you're out", etc. - but convincing no one.
[...]
And yet, strangely, getting rid of monopolies is something that the people working so feverishly on ACTA simply cannot contemplate - despite all the economic evidence that it is the solution to so many of the the problems they claim to be addressing.
Counterfeiting bad, monopolies good.
--Steve Ballmer
Comments
Robert Millan
2008-11-05 20:12:10
Hidden assertions are very dangerous because the reader tends to take them for granted without judging them. Please think twice before linking to this kind of manipulative articles.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
Roy Schestowitz
2008-11-05 20:16:22
I didn't read the page carefully and I suspect it's being 'brushed up' by those who are behind the ACTA, just as the Phorm people did some months ago (and got caught).