"We're not saying there's such an expectation wrt GitHub, but as we saw in Godot Engine there tends to be an expectation that C# and .NET will be boosted in GitHub (and that's an explicit goal of the money)."Blender is not invulnerable to bribes though, e.g. through Blender's Development Fund. Last month it was Microsoft (they buy influence over the project this way) and now it's Mono pushers (Unity). What next? Will demands be made? What strings are being attached to this month's payment? We're not saying there's such an expectation wrt GitHub, but as we saw in Godot Engine there tends to be an expectation that C# and .NET will be boosted in GitHub (and that's an explicit goal of the money). These aren't donations; Microsoft's shareholders aren't donating money, as they clearly want something in return. We previously wrote about how Microsoft was bribing projects ("helping" them) to defect to GitHub, entrapping their developers and users in Microsoft territories with Microsoft accounts.
"It's not a donation; it's more like an investment in the VC sense. It's about control."Yesterday in IRC we researched the state of Blender wrt GitHub and we reached out by E-mail to another person who had "checked Blender several times in the past." (For this purpose)
"I believe it was always a mirror," he told us. "Any project can mirror free software. it's a non-issue. nothing that can be done but to make the software less free."
We're going to keep our eyes on Blender and see what Microsoft (and its Mono pushers) want in return from Blender. It's not a donation; it's more like an investment in the VC sense. It's about control. ⬆