Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Management Has No Plans Other Than Granting Loads of Invalid Patents (e.g. Software Patents) to Pocket Fees and Then Grift/Gamble With the Money

So cool he put his sneakers on; How about a goddamn mask?



Summary: The EPO does not know what the hell it's doing; it's more of that magical festival-like thinking, as if running a patent office is Eurovision

SOME hours ago António Campinos published his latest nonsense (complete with photo ops; warning: epo.org link), reminiscent to the extreme of Benoît Battistelli with his self-promotional puff pieces. Except the appearance, which should take age gaps into account, those two buddies are the same (even the same nationality, French) and they use greenwashing tactics to advocate software patents in Europe -- an illegal agenda. The greenwashing is faking "ethics". They try to associate software with "HEY HI" (AI) and then with "climate". Their text contains "HEY HI" about a dozen times, including right there in the headline/title, e.g. "The role of patents in an AI driven world" (whatever that even means; something to do with "smart" and apparently "climate" too, so "HEY HI" will save the world or whatever). They don't know what they talk about!



"It's quite interesting that even the staff mocks the "strategic plan" of Mr. Campinos, who seems to think that sitting next to people for photo ops (even at a time of this pandemic) is a good idea and a priority."We've long argued that the Office needs to be governed by scientists, not these mindless politicians who name-drop buzzwords and hype.

It's no surprise and not news that the Office routinely violates the law by granting illegal software patents (examiners have no say on the subject; they're forced to follow illegal guidelines). Notice that the Office even calls it "CodeChallenge" (yes, code) and speaks of "coding" when it says:

Last week, the Office announced the winners of the first EPO CodeChallenge during a virtual award ceremony. The finalists took part in a six-week coding competition in which they were asked to use artificial intelligence (AI) to enable the automatic categorisation of climate-related technologies. The event was open to all staff across the EPO and run entirely online.

The coding competition was implemented to enable automation in a particularly important area of patent information: the Y02 and Y04S tagging schemes. The schemes provide a unique source of public information on technologies dedicated to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Two entrants tied in first place: the AITeam (comprising Rodolphe D'Inca, Idir Bakdi, Janis Dingel and Olivier Billet) and Arnaud Wéry. The second place finisher was Leander Hohmann, with the team SNourestani (comprising Sébastien Nourestani, Gonzalo Moro Pérez and Lori Malatesta) completing the podium.


Something something. Hey hi.A "coding competition was implemented"; sounds like code disguised as "computer-implemented". The part about "climate change mitigation" is just classic greenwashing to discourage or gaslight critics. Battistelli used to fancy himself a warrior against terrorism and "Nazis" (which is what he called anything who stood in his way).

Thankfully, staff of the EPO isn't gullible enough; earlier today the staff representation published a rebuttal to a report posted in the EPO's Intranet, basically lying to staff. And last year (2019) the staff's representatives disputed claims made in the EPO's public "news" section regarding a "strategic plan" [PDF].

EPO strategic plan 1

EPO strategic plan 2

EPO strategic plan 3

"Staff survey and contributions of staff representation not reflected," bemoaned the staff's representatives at the time, noting: "The current draft strategic plan promises “motherhood & apple-pie”, i.e. obviously desirable objectives, but without indicating the technical means by which these objectives may be obtained. Moreover, many of these promises are not credible in view of past staff experiences. And most of the plan isn’t strategic at all: the “fundamental questions” identified by the President on the first page are in fact mostly operational and rather basic. The main strategic considerations that we could find are on pages 38 and 39 and concern the cooperation with the national patent offices (NPOs) and the EUIPO. The Administrative Council gave to Mr Campinos the mandate to restore social dialogue. The staff representation has provided input for the strategic plan at an early stage. Yet nothing of importance for staff has been taken on board nor does the plan reflect pertinent messages from the staff survey. The present publication explains how we read Mr Campinos' draft strategic plan..."

A really good patent office strives to improve patent quality; what today's Office does is the equivalent of an academic publication eager to publish every single thing submitted, without bothering with fact-checking or a peer-review process.

A decade ago CIO David Wennergren, of the US Department of Defense, said:

"The continuous and broad peer-review enabled by publicly available source code supports software reliability and security efforts through the identification and elimination of defects that might otherwise go unrecognized by a more limited core development team."


The EPO needs more eyes; examiners need more time.

A publication we released earlier today said that the number of examiners was clearly decreasing while workload and targets increase. This necessarily, by definition, means decrease in quality. It's quite interesting that even the staff mocks the "strategic plan" of Mr. Campinos, who seems to think that sitting next to people for photo ops (even at a time of this pandemic) is a good idea and a priority.

EPO hypocrites

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Bankruptcy
"Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows"
Techrights Does Not Compete With LLM Slop, It Exposes the Bastards, Plagiarists and Scammers Who Do That
People like Scam Altman, still facing a lawsuit from his own sister for sexual abuse against her
 
Links 01/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, "It's FOSS" Still Promoting Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: Simplification and Networks Everywhere
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 31, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 31, 2025
Google Bribes EFF. EFF Promotes LLM Slop as 'Fair Use'. To GAFAM It's a Low-Cost Lobby Hedge.
So the bribes pay off ("slush fund") and the word spreads
Slopwatch: Fake Text and Images, Financial Bubbles, and Scams in "Intelligent" Clothing
Sometimes what they mean by "AI" is just cheap labour somewhere else, as we discussed in IRC a few hours ago
Why Microsoft is Collapsing (Similar to What's Happening at IBM), As Insiders See It
IBM seems like one heck of a mess
Reliable Computing Means Free (Libre) Computing
Sites that want to promote security ought to deal with the biggest issues
Links 31/05/2025: US Court Orders Sides With RFE/RL, War Updates From Ukraine
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/05/2025: ARM Server and power_supply Subsystem
Links for the day
Links 31/05/2025: Slop Stigmatised as Disinformation, Catalyst/Driver of "Death of Communication"
Links for the day
Common Sense 101: Do Not Write Blog Posts Saying You Want to Murder Colleagues (or Yourself)
Only crazy people would think stabbings are a joke
Links 31/05/2025: Microsoft-Connected Builder.ai is a Fraud and US is Purging Students Based on Race/Nationality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Limmat, Doomscrollers, and Arguments Parsing
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 30, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 30, 2025
The "AI" (Slop) Bubble Already Popped, But It's Not an Overnight Collapse
where Microsoft put its money
No More Steven Astorino at IBM, Chatter About Weekly/Nonstop Layoffs at IBM
What happened? Good luck guessing.
Looking at Corruption in Europe, Going Beyond the EPO
Expect a new series to kick off very soon
Slopwatch: Security SPAM and LLM Slop for SEO and FUD Purposes, Perpetually Tarnishing the Perception of Linux and (Open)SSH Security
A lot of this Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) comes from Microsoft and its LLMs
Links 30/05/2025: Google's LLM Slop Pushers Are Killing Journalism and Shira Perlmutter Fails to Stop Bribed Regime From Legalising Plagiarism (in "AI" Clothing)
Links for the day
Links 30/05/2025: Offline Arts and "Threshold of Patience"
Links for the day
Signing Off Serious Lies With a Statement of Truth is No Joking Matter
It's not hard to see what's happening here
Links 30/05/2025: LLM Slop Already Ingests and Vomits Its Own Garbage, Facebook Exec Admits Copyrights a Concern Too
Links for the day
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Result in More Whistleblowers From Microsoft
Microsoft's predatory pricing is further
Slopwatch: Planet Ubuntu Became LLM Slop and Some People Fail to See the Immorality of Plagiarism
it lessens the incentive for people to publish real articles
EPO Poll: 68% Dissatisfied With Quality of Slop (Wrongly Framed as "AI") for Patent Classification
Slop does not work, it's just falsely advertised with extra hype (funded by slop pushers that sponsor the major media)
Big Crowds Gather to Learn About Software Freedom From the Man Who Started GNU/Linux in 1983
"It was a great success"
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025