Video download link | md5sum 14465828ca92c288291ae67c65b1e719



Summary: The Lithuanian patent office and its officials (past and present) are mentioned one last time and we explain why that matters

THE above is a video about part 16 of the current series. We'll look at Latvia tomorrow, but today we finish looking at Lithuania.

We discuss the background of the people who ran Lithuania's patent office for over half a decade as they don't seem to have professional experience in patents or sciences. Not that's it's so atypical, even in much larger patent offices.

"These people aren't qualified, they lack the professional background, and they're mostly imposters in costumes like suits, whose language skills are vastly inferior to the examiners'."Towards 2 minutes from the start I suddenly also realised that today marks 2 months since Judgment no. 4430 [PDF] at ILO-AT. We've mentioned it four weeks after and over a month (five weeks) after. We're still waiting for any updates like a blog post or anything like that (it's no longer the summer holiday, so no such excuses can be accepted anymore). Maybe EPO management hopes that nobody will notice (the media isn't helping [1, 2, 3]) or even become aware of what Benoît Battistelli's did and how António Campinos covered up for him (for over 3 years; he's still keeping some of his cohorts, who are in turn protected by the rogue Administrative Council). These people aren't qualified, they lack the professional background, and they're mostly imposters in costumes like suits, whose language skills are vastly inferior to the examiners'. ⬆