Bonum Certa Men Certa

Linux Foundation is Outsourcing Linux Development and Communications to Surveillance Giants

More centralised than distributed, as that's how big sponsors (buying Board seats for 7-figure sums) of the Linux Foundation truly want things to be. It's neither pragmatic nor desirable, but impractical workflows enable control from above, not by peer (like peer review).

Linus Torvalds on using webmail: "I only have a web browser, which is how I read e-mail and a couple of terminal windows open, which is where I end up doing my Git pulls and any coding although the coding part is not that common any more." (Partial transcript)

[video width="480" height="340" webm="" ][/video]

Video download link | original/full

Summary: It seems like Mr. Torvalds, the founder of Linux, has been tragically compelled to use proprietary software for E-mail (the primary means/tool for collaboration around Linux); this concerning trend, however, would be consistent with a lot of what we've been seeing from Jim 'respect Microsoft' Zemlin and his associates at the Board of Directors (proprietary software boosters)

THE Linux Foundation's insistence on the use of Microsoft's proprietary GitHub has long been documented here. It's done in defiance of racist elements of GitHub (it is still getting worse); the so-called 'Linux' Foundation cares about racism as much as it cares about Linux... i.e. a token or symbolic 'care'.

Git has not been abandoned entirely. still uses it, but almost everything else is outsourced to Microsoft (GitHub is proprietary) by the so-called 'Linux' Foundation.

"Git has not been abandoned entirely. still uses it, but almost everything else is outsourced to Microsoft (GitHub is proprietary) by the so-called 'Linux' Foundation."GPL has also not been abandoned entirely. The 'Linux' Foundation almost never adopts it anymore. For Linux there's no other choice (GPLv2). But almost everything else is pushed towards non-reciprocal licensing by the 'Linux' Foundation. In other words, it's made more friendly towards proprietary traps and spyware like chaffbots from Microsoft (Microsoft later blames "open source" for bugs).

There are many other issues that we won't focus on today, including the 'Linux' Foundation abandoning Free software for its own Web sites (this sends a self-defeating message, discrediting the mission statement!) and producing pretty much all the material using proprietary software on proprietary operating systems, no matter how often various productive people blast the Foundation for that. Check who runs the Foundation. They still do this, totally undeterred and un-receptive to constructive criticism. It's Hubris. It's madness.

This morning we explained the situation when it comes to E-mail and communications in general. Back in the old days when I exchanged E-mails with Linus Torvalds he still used Pine (latest and final release in 2005). The 'Linux' Foundation, at least some of its staff, used Microsoft Office. This was evident from message headers. They habitually mailed me.

"Back in the old days when I exchanged E-mails with Linus Torvalds he still used Pine..."What are they using now? Well, it seems like Torvalds uses 'webmail' instead of real E-mail, but is that truly what he chose? Was this imposed on him? Well, 'webmail' is notorious for all sorts of reasons (not just 'offline' reading), including the ability to spy on every action of the user. The 'telemetry' would keep track of what was pressed when, how long things were read for, and sometimes even mouse movements (JavaScript can do that). Think of it as 'Linux' Foundation bosses watching over Torvalds' shoulder as he works from inside his home in Portland. Is that humane? Is this necessary?

With the above trends noted, let's consider E-mail. Only about 15 hours ago I saw the Linux 6.3-rc5 announcement and something stood out as a tad conspicuous. Linus Torvalds did not sign the E-mail with his name as he always does (indented a bit, several whitespaces from the left). I never saw this before, but it was way too minor to make a fuss about. A useful idea would be collect all E-mails for RCs/final releases, then assess if he ever left out his signature before. Basically a survey how many he signed... but I think that's all of them in recent years; I watch them carefully every weekend (usually Sundays) and reproduce them. And no, the subject of this article isn't the signature per se but what that gradually us to; it would come across as being overly pedantic if not "conspiratorial" to obsess over such a minor thing.

"For sure the MX records now point to"What interests us more is what Torvalds nowadays uses for E-mail or what his employer is using. That might help explain a bunch of other things, including this rant from 7.5 years ago ("GOOGLE GMAIL ATE MY LINUX: Gobbled email enrages Torvalds"").

One associate of ours started to "wonder if that was an oversight or what [actually] happened. Have they forced a change in his mail client? Moved to Microsoft Outlook instead of regular mail?"

His colleagues did use Outlook. I saw that a long time ago.

Well, the project was not de-personified (it's still called after the founder, who is a de facto Release Manager who deals mostly with communications and writes some mock/pseudo code in E-mail). As a 'Linux' Foundation Fellow or a Principal Developer, taking charge of only indirectly (a Russian person handles most of the infrastructure; someone from the Ural region), does Torvalds have much of a say on what to use for E-mail in the 'Linux' Foundation (using a trademark he controls)? In a sense, he said they had him use webmail (an old video from the Foundation; clipped above) and one can check the headers of the original messages, relayed outwards from Linux kernel mailing lists (LKML). Last time I exchanged messages with him he was using Pine, but maybe he did change his E-mail client at some point; maybe he never uses Pine anymore. Judging by the latest message and the message headers, there's lots of Google and "the mirrors for LKML seem gone (just see the first few links there)," an associate said.

"If someone out there can confirm that the 'Linux' Foundation outsourced to GMail, that certainly can help. But the evidence above seems almost sufficient.""Someone familiar with mail headers would have to take a look and decide how early Google is involved. It could be that Linus has been forced into GMail but that seems unrealistic to me," the associate added.

For sure the MX records now point to

As MinceR has said today, "doesn't that confirm it?"

And "from here, % dig MX also returns stuff pointing to"

To reproduce this:

$ dig mx | grep -E '^[[:alnum:]]'   253     IN      MX      10 ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.   253     IN      MX      10 ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.   253     IN      MX      1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.   253     IN      MX      5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.   253     IN      MX      5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM.

"In a different list," the associate added, "the MessageIDs indicate that Linus Tovalds is a victim of GMail. So as unrealistic as it may be, it might be the case. Independent confirmation is necessary."

"So what exactly is going on and when did the change occur?"He also used Google+ and a variety of other Google disservices. Using GMail does not seem so improbable; he would not put up a fight or much resistance.

If someone out there can confirm that the 'Linux' Foundation outsourced to GMail, that certainly can help. But the evidence above seems almost sufficient.

"If it can be confirmed," the associate noted, "it would be important to note that LF is no longer self-hosting and one could then speculate about using inefficient web-mail in place of highly efficient (relatively speaking) clients. I'm not familiar enough with mail setup or mail headers to make more than suspicions. However the above lines could be useful if checked by someone sufficiently knowledgeable."

"Torvalds has already said, on official record/video in fact, that he uses webmail, probably not Zimbra or something that's Free software or partially "Open Source"."The latest message from Torvalds does not specify the client used in its headers, unlike headers of other messages. It's fair to say that's strange as those used to be very basic fields, albeit not quite mandatory.

"The big question would be the clients," the associate said. "It is all but impossible to use anything other than GMail's own web-mail client. The LKML list might not have enough unredacted detail on the clients though. [...] Web mail is very clumsy, awkward, and slow to use. People like it for those reasons though because all the soporific clicking is comforting as they get no work done...

Remember that Linux kernel development still uses E-mail (for good reasons). So what exactly is going on and when did the change occur?

An associate said "it would be essential to note which year Linus Torvalds via the Linux Foundation was forced into GMail and when (if) he was forced into webmail. No one would voluntarily use web-mail for managing patches."

Based on the above-cited article, that may have happened years ago. Torvalds has already said, on official record/video in fact, that he uses webmail, probably not Zimbra or something that's Free software or partially "Open Source". Probably not some Web mirror/archive either.

“No one would voluntarily use web-mail for managing patches.”
      --Techrights Associate
"Modern" webmail is good for "monitoring" (bossing) staff with "telemetry" (JavaScript is not "optional" after projects like Horde or like SquirrelMail got deprecated; the latter has had no release in 12 years). In most cases, webmail is like Slack, but it is not "Real-Time" (like IRC is); the fallbacks for JavaScript-free interfaces were also deprecated in recent years, e.g. by Twitter and Outlook 'web' access. Obtrusive interfaces have become harder is not impossible to dodge.

Webmail "is a poor way of skimming through and triaging messages," our associate said, whereas a proper mail client has none of these issues. Webmail "does farm clicks as [webmail's] victims "emit behaviors" for Google to monetise..."

Several years ago full-time Microsoft employees who had entered the Board (Microsoft just bought some seats) lobbied/pushed to move Linux, the kernel, to Microsoft's GitHub. That caused somewhat of an uproar and never happened at the end. Now that GitHub has had several waves of layoffs (the media barely mentioned it) we hope that such nefarious moves won't be re-attempted.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Security Isn't the Goal of Today's Software and Hardware Products
Any newly-added layer represents more attack surface
Godot 4.2 is Approaching, But After What Happened to Unity All Game Developers Should be Careful
We hope Unity will burn in a massive fire and, as for Godot, we hope it'll get rid of Microsoft
Purge of Software Freedom and Its Voices
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Links 25/09/2023: Patent News and Coding
some remaining links for today
Steam Deck is Mostly Good in the Sense That It Weakens Microsoft's Dominance (Windows)
The Steam Deck is mostly a DRM appliance
SUSE is Just Another Black Cat Working for Proprietary Giants/Monopolies
SUSE's relationship with firms such as these generally means that SUSE works for authority, not for community, and when it comes to cryptography it just follows guidelines from the US government
IBM is Selling Complexity, Not GNU/Linux
It's not about the clients, it's about money
Birthday of Techrights in 6 Weeks (Tux Machines and Techrights Reach Combined Age of 40 in 2025)
We've already begun the migration to static
Linux Foundation: We Came, We Saw, We Plundered
Linux Foundation staff uses neither Linux nor Open Source. They're essentially using, exploiting, piggybacking goodwill gestures (altruism of volunteers) while paying themselves 6-figure salaries.
Linux Too Big to Be Properly Maintained When There's an Incentive to Sell More and More Things (Complexity and Narrow Support Window)
They want your money, not your peace of mind. That's a problem.
Modern Web Means Proprietary Trash
Mozilla is financially beholden to Google and thus we cannot expect any pushback or for Firefox to "reclaims the Web" a second time around
GNU/Linux Has Conquered the World, But Users' Freedom Has Not (Impediments Remain in Hardware)
Installing one's system of choice on a device is very hard, sometimes impossible
Another Copyright Lawsuit Against Microsoft (or its Proxy) for Misuse of Large Works by Chatbot
Some people mocked us for saying this day would come; chatbots are a huge disappointment and they're on very shaky legal ground
Privacy is Not a Crime, Reporting Hidden Facts Is Not a Crime Either
the powerful companies/governments/societies get to know everything about everybody, but if anyone out there discovers or shares dark secrets about those powerful companies/governments/societies, that's a "crime"
United Workforce Always Better for the Workers
In the case of technology, it is possible that a lack of collective action is because of relatively high salaries and less physically-demanding jobs
GNOME and GTK Taking Freedom Away From Users
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
GNOME is Worse Today (in 2023) Than When I Did GTK Development 20+ Years Ago
To me it seems like GNOME is moving backward, not forward, mostly removing features and functionality rather than adding any
HowTos Are Moving to Tux Machines
HowTos (or howtos) are very important in their own right, but they can easily distract from the news and howtos are usually quite timeless or time-insensitive
Proprietary Panda: Don't Be Misled by the Innocent Looks of Ubuntu (and Microsoft Canonical)
Given the number of disgruntled employees who leave Canonical and given Ubuntu's trend of just copying whatever IBM does in Fedora, is there still a good reason to choose Ubuntu?
Debian GNU/Linux is a Fine Operating System, But What if People Die Making It for Somebody's Corporate/Personal Gain?
Will companies that exploited unpaid volunteers ever be held accountable for loss of life, caused by burnout, excessive work, or poverty?
Links 24/09/2023: 5 Days' Worth of News (Catchup)
Links for the day
Leftover Links 24/09/2023: Russia, COVID, and More
Links for the day
Forty Years of GNU and the Free Software Movement
by FSF
Gemini and Web in Tandem
We're already learning, over IRC, that out new site is fully compatible with simple command line- and ncurses-based Web browsers. Failing that, there's Gemini.
Red Hat Pretends to Have "Community Commitment to Open Source" While Scuttling the Fedora Community (Among Others)
RHEL is becoming more proprietary over time and community seems to boil down to unpaid volunteers (at least that's how IBM see the "community")
IBM Neglecting Users of GNU/Linux on Laptops and Desktops
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Personal Identification on the 'Modern' Net
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Not Your Daily Driver: Don't Build With Rust or Adopt Rust-based Software If You Value Long-Term Reliance
Rust is a whole bunch of hype.
The Future of the Web is Not the Web
The supposedly "modern" stuff ought to occupy some other protocol, maybe "app://"
YouTube Has Just Become Even More Sinister
The way Google has been treating the Web (and Web browsers) sheds a clue about future plans and prospects
Initial Announcement of GNU (for Gnu's Not Unix) on September 27, 1983
History matters
Upgrade and Migration Status
Git is working, IPFS is working, IRC is working, Gemini is working
Yesterday in the 'Sister Site', Tux Machines (10 More Stories)
Scope-wise, many stories fit neatly into both sites, but posting the same twice makes no sense logistically
The New Techrights Will be Much Faster
A prompt response to FUD is important. It's time-sensitive.
Slanderous Media Campaigns Trying to Link Linux to 'Backdoors'
Backdoors are typically things that exist by design or get added intentionally (ask Microsoft!), but when it comes to "Linux" in the media the rules are different
The Spamification of GNU/Linux News Sites (or the Web as a Whole) and Why It's Time to Move on, Writing More Stories and Analysis
If you are an enthusiastic Free software user, consider setting up a blog or GemLog (Gemini log)
Techrights is Upgrading
Over the next few days Techrights will be archiving over 40,000 older pages
YouTube Was Never Free Hosting and It Turns Hard-Working People Into Hostages
An accusation, with presumed guilt, seems sufficient for some
The Right to Strike Underutilised by Workers in the Technology Sector
Geeks need to learn how to strike, too.
Welcome to the New Techrights
Looking ahead, we'll probably produce more stories than before because lessening the underlying complexity lets us focus on substance
A Short History of Content Management Systems or Data Shuffles in Boycott Novell and Techrights
In 2006 the site was 'purely' WordPress
GNU Turns 40 This Coming Week
4 decades of "4 Freedoms" show the world that the original definition withstood the test of time