The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Restructuring of the Debian Project



On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:

> From: Mike Neuffer <mike@i-Connect.Net>
> > No, it is not that the other packages should not be tested.
> > It is that the core should not be released if there are problems.
> > 
> > It is a MUST for the core and a less restrictive situation for the rest.
> > 
> > The core ensures that you have _functional_ machine _without_ conflicts
> > and problems. The additional packages must of course also be tested,
> > but are a "second tier".
>  
> I agree with all of the above without seeing any need to
> restructure the base into a monolithic-source-tree system
> under a core group.

Right, a monolitic-source-tree will not necessarily bring more quality.
However it has other advantages/inconvenients that have already been 
discussed here. 

	Cordialement,

--
-     ** Linux **         +-------------------+             ** WAW **     -
-  vincent@debian.org     | RENARDIAS Vincent |          vincent@waw.com  -
-  Debian/GNU Linux       +-------------------+      http://www.waw.com/  -
-  http://www.debian.org/           |            WAW  (33) 4 91 81 21 45  -
-                                   |         Luminy  (33) 4 91 82 85 32  -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------