The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: voting system

'sacampbe@mercator.math.uwaterloo.ca wrote:'
>
>It has been brought up before that we need a system for voting
>on issues. I'm still bogged down with the changes to the web pages,
>but this is important enough that I will put some time into it.
>If anyone knows of a program for this, I'd appreciate hearing about it.

I've been thinking about this issue a lot lately.  I think the problem
is more complex than writing a simple vote tallying system.  How is the
wording of the proposal choosen?  Once something is voted on, how is it
implemented?  By volunteers?  By managerial fiat?  By Divine
intervention?  Do we vote on the implementation too?

Sorry, I don't have any answers yet :(

One thing is clear: mailing lists don't provide facilities to discover
what the silent majority is thinking about.  And thus the direction of
the project's members is never clear.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com, cjf@onit.net     |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf       |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller