The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: voting system

Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com> writes:

> I've been thinking about this issue a lot lately.  I think the problem
> is more complex than writing a simple vote tallying system.  How is the
> wording of the proposal choosen?  Once something is voted on, how is it
> implemented?  By volunteers?  By managerial fiat?  By Divine
> intervention?  Do we vote on the implementation too?

All that is secondary, and it seems you've replied to yourself:

> One thing is clear: mailing lists don't provide facilities to discover
> what the silent majority is thinking about.  And thus the direction of
> the project's members is never clear.

A voting system is at minimum a barometer of developer sentiment.


Guy