The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: voting system

'Guy Maor wrote:'
>
>Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com> writes:
>
>> I've been thinking about this issue a lot lately.  I think the problem
>> is more complex than writing a simple vote tallying system.  How is the
>> wording of the proposal choosen?  Once something is voted on, how is it
>> implemented?  By volunteers?  By managerial fiat?  By Divine
>> intervention?  Do we vote on the implementation too?
>
>All that is secondary, and it seems you've replied to yourself:

WRT to Bruce's comment that his questionnaire is a good expedient, I
agree.  I'm merely trying to point out that this is a complex problem.

However I disagree that all my comments are secondary, my first
question about the wording of the questions is MOST critical.  The
wording of a question /will/ slant the votes.  A quickly thrown
together questionnaire will tell a lot about its authors state of mind.
I'm glad Bruce made his draft questionnaire public.  This is the only
way to work out the glitches in the wording of the questions.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com, cjf@onit.net     |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf       |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller