The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: on to-do lists

Bruce said:
> It's a good point that the bug list can be considered a to-do list
> with 2000 entires. It is, however, a _reactive_ list. We need a
> _proactive_ list as well.

I strongly agree.  Sven's "Work Needing" did that job with respect to
whole packages, but there are issues which fall into the area of
improvements on current packages which aren't bugs, and which may
not have been reported because (for example) only the maintainer knows 
about them.  These could (perhaps, should) be listed in the package's
TODO list.  (If there's a policy _requiring_ a TODO list, then I'm unaware
of it, and in any case, I don't know how testers could be expected to
verify its accuracy.)

So here's a suggestion:  create a publicly accessible "ToDo" list similar 
to the Bug List.  This could be seeded with the "Work Needing" list, and 
that would take some burden off of Sven.  It might even clarify the Bug List
and make it seem somewhat more manageable, by limiting it only to items
which render the packages non-functional to some degree.

Susan 

P.S.  Shall we continue this on debian-devel?