The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Withdrawing (temporarily) from the debian project



Shaya,

I have now been a developer for about a year (I started sometime in
December a year ago).  My observations are similar to yours in that
there is some unnecessary bickering on the lists.  However, I do think
that some of it is useful (some of the posts in the "purity"
discussion anyway).

Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il> writes:

> In a way I agree with phil.  I remember when I joined being a developer with
> debian 2 summers ago.  I originally downloaded debian caused it looked like
> a nice dist.  Was a good ELF environemnt, and was pretty open.  I origianlly

I originally got it because it was the only one supporting kernel
2.0.  It seemed to always have the newest software.  We have kinda
slipped on that since then....  However, I think the quality is higher.

> When I was talking with the author of linuxconf, he was telling me that the
> main reason he aims linuxconf at redhat and slackware (now, I guess, mostly
> at Redhat) is because with those systems, you know what's going to be on
> them.  i.e. Sendmail, Apache....  With debian, we can have sendmail, smail,
> exim, zmailer, Apace, boa..... Choice isn't a bad thing, but it can detract

This is VERY, VERY good!  This means that I use sendmail here at home,
where I need its power for my various types of mail transport needed
(two UUCP feeds and a SMTP feed).  It also means that on a 386 in the
corner, exim can be used because not a lot of configurability it
needed for some machines.

> from the overwell cohesivness of the dist.  We have to have a good method of
> getting rid of the chaf and maybe make it harder for people to become
> "developers"  but not contributers.  An idea would be to make it so that
> anyone can package a package (like now), but to let it be included in the
> dist.  One "developer" has to agree to adopt the package and maintain it.
> If a package gets orphaned, and their are other packages that do the same
> job as it, if no one is willing to maintain it, it gets moved out of the
> main dist.  We need a formalized method of pruning the dist. 

What we need is a better way of getting updates to the orphaned
packages list.

> >Try to have fun.
> 
> that's the main thing we are all here for, isn't it?  Everybody should
> remember that and not take everything so seriously.  There's a place for
> seriousness and a place for having fun, and we should make time for both,
> but not at the expense of either.

-- 
John Goerzen          | Developing for Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming    | Debian GNU/Linux is a free replacement for
jgoerzen@complete.org | DOS/Windows -- check it out at www.debian.org.
----------------------+----------------------------------------------
Find out how to avoid all those pesky crashes, lockups, application errors,
and slow applications at http://www.debian.org -- Debian can replace Windows
95 with a much more stable operating system.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .