Shooting the Messenger Using Bribes and Secrecy Bonds
More official link (misuse of money to alter behaviour/decision/judgement/outcome):
THE Sirius Open Source saga will resume rather soon, so it seems appropriate to take note of the above story at this time.
Where to begin?
This past week or so the world learned that "extremism researcher Joan Donovan" is accusing Facebook of "Pressuring Harvard to Fire" her, according to how Futurism framed it (we linked to the original, seminal page last weekend). Mark Zuckerberg is bribing, as usual, via his wife's bogus 'charity'. So much for "philanthropy". "Beginning in 2018," CNN wrote, "Donovan worked for the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government" and she says "she was pushed out of her job after college faced pressure from Facebook..."
"Joan Donovan, a leading scholar of online-disinformation campaigns, is going public about why she believes she was recently forced out," the Chronicle Of Higher Education said (we had more links about this in our bi-daily News Roundups).
Remember that the same so-called "philanthropy" sponsors some Python projects and programming-related organisations. It is a force of corrupting influence. There are strings attached, including obligatory thank-yous.
Microsoft, which fancies NDAs not just for employees and clients (to silence them, to prevent criticism), does many of the same things. In 2019, i.e. nearly half a decade ago, Bill Gates - albeit through his fake "philanthropy" - compelled my boss to sign an NDA [1, 2, 3] and apparently he does that a lot at a colossal scale.
How deep do these scandals go and who will be found culpable or held accountable? We seem to live in a world where accountability for the rich and well-connected barely exists anymore. They control (bribe) "our" politicians, who will never prosecute them. █