Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Leak: Staff of the EPO Challenging Unattainable 'Targets' That Are "in Breach of the EPC" (European Patent Convention)

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Feb 14, 2024,
updated Feb 14, 2024

Target setting 2024

A few months ago EPO workers sent a lot of mail challenging the unreasonable and illegal demands set by Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos, basically misapplying rules to illegally grant patent monopolies solely "for profit" (at whose expense?) and it now seems safe to publish the instructions sent to examiners (for the most part). There was a suggested template of mail to send, either to Line Managers or higher ups.

Here is the message sent by SUEPO TH committee (the union leaders in Dutch territories) at the end of November:

Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO)

INTERNATIONALE GEWERKSCHAFT IM EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMT
STAFF UNION OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE
UNION SYNDICALE DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS

Ortssektion Den Haag
Local section The Hague
Section locale La Haye

28 November 2023
su23016hp

Target setting 2024 - Avoid committing to unattainable objectives

Dear colleagues,

The target setting exercise for 2024 has started.

The 2023 Mercer & Wyman financial study (see p.99/145, figure 12) seems to point to a targeted 2.1% productivity increase in the Patent Granting Process (PGP). The information we are receiving from our colleagues is far more drastic, with requested increases of up to 100% (!) for some individuals.

It appears therefore that the intention is again to impose even higher individual targets than those of 2023 when objectives were already unreachable for many, if they were not to risk their health or compromise quality standards.

According to the intranet publication of 22.11.20231: "Staff and managers alike are kindly invited to engage in collaborative discussions and ensure that goals are entered in the tool before the end of the yea ". When estimating your performance for 2024, we recommend that you be conservative and realistic and avoid committing to unattainable objectives for which you alone will be deemed to be responsible and will have to bear the consequences, in 2024 and beyond.

Don’t forget your health: if your work is having negative effects on your health (exhaustion, stress, sleeping problems, headaches, musculo-squeletal issues…) consult your general practitioner services and report it to your manager and to OHS.

Discussing objectives is reasonable, but committing to a target imposed on you is not. If you nevertheless feel obliged to commit to an imposed target and do not agree with the objectives set, inform your direct manager in writing – possibly using the template below. This is important to protect yourself against a potential negative performance appraisal.

If you feel that you are being put under pressure by your manager or you feel you need any advice don’t hesitate to contact us or your staff representation.

Relevant publication: Increase in capacity for 2024, CSC, 14.11.2023

Kind regards, Your SUEPO TH committee

_____
1 Performance development cycle 2024, 22.11.2024

One can imagine many messages like the following were sent in November and December:

ANNEX: template email to manager, please use only the parts which apply to you, delete and / or adapt the rest.

Dear xxxx,

On _______ my (final) quantitative objectives were set at ____ [products]. As in the past, I commit to working to the best of my abilities in 2024. However, with regard to the proposed objectives for 2024, presently I cannot commit to those objectives for the following reasons:

- The objectives set correspond to an increase of production/productivity of +___% compared to 2023 so I cannot commit to accomplishing them;

- I do not know how my achieved objectives will be evaluated in 2024 - 2025; I was neither informed about the consequences of this evaluation, nor to which part of the Service Regulations the evaluation refers to;

- My working days seem not to be properly calculated. My Parental Leave/ Home Leave / Unpaid Leave were not deducted from the total working days;

- The many hours expected to be spent in training, (team) meetings, system disturbances, etc… which in my case amount to ____ days [put a number if you can make an estimation] have also not been taken into consideration;

- Since the implementation of the new “active search division”, I have been given extra tasks but no extra time budget. It could be that in 2024, further new tasks will be required of me without me being given time to fulfil them. This is likely to further prevent me from reaching my objectives;

- I have been given the following new tasks [please make a list of tasks] which did not previously fall within my job description [if available, make a reference to your job description], and for which I have not been given neither training nor time [adapt if necessary];

- The working tools have not evolved in a way which could help me increase productivity since 2023 and apart from a few procedural modifications without consequence on productivity, nothing has changed in the way I am supposed to perform my work since last year, when my target was __ [please fill in];

- The ratio Search / Actions without point / Grants is influenced by management decisions and/or change of work priority during the year, all of which are beyond my control;

- The files in Search/Examination allocated to me could come from technical fields outside my Area of Competence, as it happened already in the past OR as already announced by team manager/ director/ COO;

- I can neither know nor predict my personal circumstances in 2024. As mentioned above, you can of course continue to count on me to work to the best of my abilities in 2024, as I always have;

- I have been told that I need to increase my production / productivity by X% in order to “pay” for the salary adjustment I am likely to be receiving in January 2024 as a result of salary indexation. Salary indexation is only meant to adjust my income to the increased cost of living and is irrelevant to objective setting.

- [For examiners] My intention to work together with the team to achieve good results may find its natural limits in my duty to deliver quality products under the EPC. If management expects me to go beyond this limit by delivering products which do not necessarily meet the requirements of the EPC, I expect written instructions to do so, so that the responsibility for the quality of these products and the consequences thereof will not be placed at my door.

- [For other functions] My intention to work together with the team to achieve good results may find its natural limits in my duty to deliver quality work which fulfils the requirements of my job description. If management expects me to go beyond this limit by delivering work which does not necessarily meet the requirements of my job description, I expect written instructions to do so, so that the responsibility for the quality of my work and the consequences thereof will not be placed at my door.

Best regards
[your name]

It's hard to guess just how many messages like these were sent, but that matters a lot because they try to curb the bubble that includes many European software patents.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

UEFI 9/11 Aftermath - Part III: Mr. 'Secure Boot' (Shim) and His Fake 'Holiday' (Sending My Wife and I Threatening E-mails on 9/11)
despite being on holiday, according to him, he finds time to instruct lawyers to contact my wife
Ron Wyden: Microsoft Should be Held Accountable for Security Breaches (He Has Said This for Years Already, It Never Happens)
Negative media coverage isn't a fine and it does nothing to compensate Microsoft's billions of victims
Disable 'Secure Boot' (If It Lets You)
it doesn't put you in control
Longtime Red Hat Staff: Maybe Just Disable 'Secure Boot'
A refreshing take from Adam Williamson
A Dozen Observations About "UEFI 9/11" Deflections
What we are expected to see, tentatively
The World's Richest Ponzi Scheme (Faking Value Using Net Waste)
The higher they go the harder they fall
We Could Dual-Boot Back in the 1990s, Why Has This Become So Difficult?
And prone to breakage
 
Slopwatch: Linux Plagiarism, Slopfarms Still Infesting Google News, Many Images Are Fake
Google is promoting plagiarism
"This Morning Might Turn Out to be an Interesting One for System Admins Who Haven't Updated Their Devices' Secure Boot Certificate" (If They Reboot)
Who asked for this anyway?
Gemini Links 12/09/2025: Metric System, Dumping Windows, and Software Architecture is Dead
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 11, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 11, 2025
Microsoft Admits the Workers Have Lost Trust (Endless Layoffs, 12-13 Rounds of Layoffs This Year), So Now It's Trotting out Its Peter Bright-Like Media Prop Jordan Novet
What they don't want people to pay attention to right now
Links 11/09/2025: Windows TCO and Russian Drones Invading Poland (EU/NATO)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 11/09/2025: xkcd, misfin, and Alhena 5.3.2
Links for the day
Repetition of Last Summer (Microsoft Breaking Dual-Boot Systems)
UEFI 9/11 is about to kick in
UEFI 'Secure Boot' Boiling Frogs (Cannot Turn Off 'Secure Boot')
"MSI laptop is locked on Secure Boot and doesn't allow me to turn it off"
UEFI 9/11 Aftermath - Part IV: The 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' and His 'Hideout' Holiday (Retreat From Reality)
Let's keep an eye on what matters
UEFI 9/11 Aftermath - Part II: "The SecureBoot Thing Got Out of Hand."
The next few weeks might be... interesting
UEFI 9/11 Aftermath - Part I: "I Believe This Affects Thousands of Devices... Because Multiple Devices I Checked, Whether Client or Server [...] Affected."
Most people aren't even aware that this is happening or about to happen
The UEFI 9/11 - Part X - An Outline of the Series About Microsoft Sabotaging GNU/Linux (With Ramifications to Unfold Online in Coming Weeks as People Reboot)
Today is UEFI 9/11 (9/11/2025)
Culture of silence: Ubisoft harassment convictions, Mozilla, Sylvestre Ledru & Debian make no comment
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 11/09/2025: "Hey Hi" Ponzi Schemes at Oracle (Unpaid Contracts) and Cindy Cohn is Leaving the EFF
Links for the day
Gemini Links 11/09/2025: Playdate Console, Dichotomy between the Real and the Digital
Links for the day
The Microsoft AstroTurfing and Microsoft-Led Blame-Shifting Tactics Are Ahead of Us
Of course it has nothing to do with security, it's about control, i.e. them controlling everything
Celebrating Assassination is Bad Because It Legitimises Assassination of the People You Like, Too
Condoning or even celebrating political assassinations is bad optics (and taste)
Being Conditioned to Accept Unreliable Computer Systems That Fail With Black Screen of Death (BSoD)
Welcome to 2025
Slopwatch: Google News is Still Promoting Many Fake Articles About "Linux", in Effect Rewarding Misinformation and Plagiarism
things continue to deteriorate
New Series: The Coup Against GNU/Linux Has Begun
today, this year in particular, we shall also focus on Secure Boot, which is sold based on a lie and tortures many computer user
New Paper on "BYOVD, but in firmware. Signed UEFI shells, vulnerable modules offer new paths for Secure Boot bypasses."
One might say digital "security theatre"
Links 11/09/2025: Oracle Layoffs, Drunk Pilots in Japan Airlines, US-Korea Tensions Grow
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 10, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Xubuntu Site Compromised
Let's hope it is not a security breach
Links 10/09/2025: Retaliation at Facebook and Microsoft Reveals Almost 100 Security Holes
Links for the day
Gemini Links 10/09/2025: Annihilation of Self, The Future Eaters, and Leaving Academia
Links for the day
They Say That People Are Afraid of or Worried About "Hey Hi", But the Worriers Should be the Fools Who Invested in It
At the end of the day nobody should worry more than those who invested their money in this bubble
Harassment evidence: franceinfo's Clara Lainé report on Ubisoft prosecution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 10/09/2025: Microsoft Layoffs in "RTO" Clothing and Windows TCO, GitHub TCO
Links for the day
Blaming Everything on China
TikTok works for China. GAFAM works for fascists.
People Get Tired of "Hey Hi" (AI), Unlike the Subservient Money-Obsessed Media That Gets Paid to Pretend This Bubble Still Matters
"crash will be way bigger than dot.com burst in 90s. and that was Internet, actually transformative technology, not this expensive AI toy with direct dependency on the energy input which is not scalable"
Brett Wilson LLP Accepts That the Serial Strangler From Microsoft Filed a Case That Also Implicates My Wife (Everything is Connected)
They used to pretend that there were two separate cases
10 Reasons to Disable (or Enable) UEFI Secure Boot
Tomorrow the "trusted corporation" Microsoft will see a certificate expire
Gemini Links 10/09/2025: Hospital and Large Feeds
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, September 09, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, September 09, 2025
The Bluewashing of Red Hat is Being Completed, Many Staff Understand They'll be Made Redundant
Jim AllowHurst (Whitehurst) is meanwhile promoting Microsoft's agenda from within other companies
Throwing Away "Old" Computers (Mozilla and Other Climate Deniers)
Mozilla is not leftist