Projection Tactics - Part I: What is "Serious Harm"? Or Whose?
It's a matter of perspective, lawfare narrows things down selectively
Yesterday or the day before that we mentioned how someone's spouse publicly accused the thin-skinned person of breaking the dog's limbs. We can't say if that's true or not, just that it was said in public by the person who shared a home (after matrimony). But you see, if a spouse accuses you of doing this to dogs, that would be a "serious harm" to your reputation, right?
This was one hour ago:
Speaking for myself, as a person who is opinionated perhaps, this is irritating. When I first saw the prior tweets it seemed like serious physical harm had been done. I had heard similar stories from others, including high-profile people. In this case, admitting a trans person to forced (involuntary) "care" just a few months after Donald Trump's Microsoft-sponsored inauguration seems... slightly transphobic (or at the very least exceptionally opportunistic flip-flopping).
Is someone trying to 'restart' or reboot (hopefully not 'secure boot') his life after his spouse unloads more and more dirt on him?
In Part II we'll say more. █