Predatory EULA on chip
One exciting recent bit of news is all about Asustek extending the reach of Splashtop and putting it on pretty much every motherboard. This means that tens of millions of PCs are expected to have Linux installed down at the core, essentially (yet arguably) running it as the 'default' operating system.
As rudimentary as Splashtop may be at the moment, this could be the start of something greater that will be extended and improved over time. Splashtop also had its kernel patches released to the public (according to Phoronix), so other hardware makers are likely to follow suit. Phoenix has already found itself on a similar boat and Phoenix' ubiquity is nothing to sneeze at.
In yesterday's news, The Inquirer made the following
important observation:
Asus to ship all motherboards with Linux
[...]
And, for many casual computer users who make use of web-based applications exclusively, Splashtop Linux might be all the operating system they ever need.
This becomes truer as time goes by. An increasing number of applications become Web-based. Not everyone would use them, but some might. Some will.
Splashtop receives a lot of publicity at the moment, but it's arguably small potatoes compared to
Phoenix HyperSpace, which was described here:
Phoenix Technologies' new HyperSpace is an instant-on environment for laptops, letting users launch a browser or other apps with booting into the OS.
Today, Phoenix Technologies introduced a firmware product called HyperSpace, which allows PCs to run a number of applications separate from the operating system. What that means is that if you use a PC equipped with HyperSpace, you will be able to quick-boot your notebook into a secure Linux environment, where you can use Web browsers like FireFox and pre-loaded Web-aware apps like Google Earth, Picasa, and the like.
[...]
Also, since HyperSpace is a Linux-based platform, Windows viruses won't affect it.
As Beta News put it at the time,
"New Phoenix BIOS will run Linux apps when Windows fails."
The basic concept is that an embedded Linux OS will accompany the core system firmware or BIOS, allowing instant-on applications to be run from it at any time.
Even Dell expressed some optimism and showed its enthusiasm about such disruptive technologies at the time, but let's quickly look at Microsoft's
apparent reaction.
BIOS maker Phoenix Technologies Ltd.'s plans to market a new application platform the company claims will solve a number of problems endemic to Microsoft's Windows platform might be taken as a provocative gesture at their longtime partner. But Redmond's immediate reaction was nonchalant.
On Monday, the Milpitas, Calif. software maker announced Hyperspace, a Linux-based virtualization platform that will let OEMs bundle cut-down versions of popular open-source software that end users will be able to access instantly, even without booting Windows.
Based on such report you would think that Microsoft does not care, wouldn't you? However, this
new article brings back memories:
Splashtop is not the only such product on the market. A year ago, BIOS vendor Phoenix Technology launched HyperSpace, an equivalent that has yet to turn up on PCs in any numbers. Microsoft's view on the movement to embed cut-down operating systems is not known, but Phoenix did launch a pre-emptive strike against it to stop it blocking HyperSpace using restrictive Vista end-user license agreements (EULAs). Microsoft relented.
An antitrust complaint from Phoenix Technology, an eternal Microsoft partner (or so it thought) forced the monopoly to fix the anti-competitive EULA of Windows Vista. Microsoft tried to characterise this change as goodwill and a nice gesture, essentially changing the story which was originally told and claiming credit (even glory) for being abusive. The press underplayed this fiasco, but Mary Jo Foley was
rather disgusted.
But the real reason for Microsoft’s capitulation became clear on March 7 via a new joint-status report in the Microsoft-Department of Justice case. It turns out BIOS maker Phoenix Technologies (a long-time Microsoft partner) filed a complaint with antitrust regulators about Microsoft’s virtualization restrictions.
Microsoft has tried to manipulate the virtualisation market in a variety of ways [
1,
2,
3] because it had fallen so far behind. Microsoft insulted many people's intelligence when it claimed that a EULA could or could not define the level of security of the O/S, limited by editions of Windows, i.e. featureset being b/locked.
This wasn't the first time that Microsoft lied or twisted excuses about 'security' in order to be anti-competitive. Recall
the OOXML/file types incident for example.
Speaking of which, OOXML is still a secret
as Microsoft continues to disobey rules. Charles complaint about this only
a couple of days ago and now he's now joined by Bob Sutor, not just Rob Weir, among others.
Will it [OOXML] ever be available? Does anyone care? Do any rules apply to this at all? What are the excuses for this? Just like almost ever other aspect of this particular process, dangerous exceptions and precedents are being set.
To sum up, here we have another case study exemplifying total disregard, market abuse, distortion of stories and a strategic fight against Linux, which escapes the media's attention.
⬆
Comments
whatever
2008-05-16 05:26:12
Roy Schestowitz
2008-05-16 05:49:22
Maybe this just wasn't stressed clearly enough or maybe it's a case of deficient reading comprehension skills. Either way, this was reversed only after pressure.
Alex H.
2008-05-16 12:16:24
Victor Soliz
2008-05-16 12:33:52
Roy Schestowitz
2008-05-16 12:45:13
Microsoft proxies or parties that it hires (ECMA has Microsoft as a customer for example).
Microsoft has spent a lot of money trying to buy this standard. Can it not afford to bribe a little more to make the process quicker? Oh, well... I guess hurrying up _at this stage_ isn't actually serving its needs. Now it can just urinate on all the formalities.
And that's just why everyone loves Microsoft. :-)
Nikolas Koswinkle
2008-05-16 13:09:44
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
AlexH
2008-05-16 13:33:18
The output of the BRM is instructions to the editor on how to change the text. The editor puts the final text today, and JTC1 is supposed to distribute it.
It seems a little bit churlish to blame Microsoft for that, unless anyone has evidence that they're holding the process up?
It's not really in their interest to hold it up whichever side you butter your toast.
Alex G
2008-05-16 17:03:30
Maarten
2008-05-16 20:35:05
Don
2008-05-16 20:48:10
You seem to be unable to read or understand English. Try carefully reading this story again. There are people here who can help you to understand some of the big words, and also help you to learn how to expand your vocabulary to include more than four-letter words. If you are in fact a kindergarten student, please disregard this comment and enjoy your nap-time this afternoon. Have fun playing your Windows games!
nix
2008-05-16 20:53:18
Jose_X
2008-05-16 21:08:12
UhOhXML is dog poo. He said ..She said.. The standard is full of problems. There will be no interoperability. Monopolysoft poo-poo'd all over the place, and people will never regard it as anything but another gross example of Monopolysoft lack of ethics (I know, "ethics" is a word that doesn't exist in some people's mind when it comes to $$$). Well, actually, it won't be like just any other such example. Monopolysoft went too far this time.
What's this I hear? Another drop falling into the Monopolysoft expense bucket? Why yes, yes it is. http://www.digistan.org/hague-declaration Just a few more days left to sign up.
Penguin Pete
2008-05-16 23:12:55
Keep up the good work, and never mind the asstroturfers! Many of us are counting on you!
rob enderle
2008-05-17 01:06:50
This would have been ideal for my mom but she's running an EEE with Linux Mint now.
zack
2008-05-17 01:39:23
www.finedigg.com/computer/
nerdd.net | news and opinion
2008-05-17 11:02:30
\r\nTo sum up, here we have another case study exemplifying total disregard, market abuse, distortio...
LinuxIsFun
2008-05-17 11:54:18
T Patterson
2008-05-17 20:29:41
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2445
Roy Schestowitz
2008-05-17 20:38:56
http://www.osnews.com/comments/19745
Victor Soliz
2008-05-17 23:25:51
But let's stop talking about software patents here, they are after all mythical everywhere, and if MS began trying toget Linux users to pay them, I would still use Linux and not pay them.
The real problem, and that's were your link is soo right is the whole "follow the leather" philosophy that has plagued Novell and is clear in Miguel Icaza's blog. For some reason they are pushing so hard for Linux to become an imitator of MS technologies, instead of making actual innovation, whether intentionally or not, this will render Linux a second class citizen.
Victor Soliz
2008-05-17 23:26:49
Roy Schestowitz
2008-05-17 23:36:33