Gemini version available ♊︎

OOXML Believed to be on Path to a Loss at ISO (ITNews) (Updated)

Posted in Formats, IBM, ISO, Microsoft, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument, Oracle, Red Hat, Standard, SUN at 6:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Marbux has just mailed us this pointer, suggesting that OOXML is unlikely to be approved, at least judging by the following early assessment:

With less than two days to go before the International Standards Organization (ISO) decides on whether or not to approve Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML), lovers and haters of the format are intensifying their arguments for a last hurrah.


For OOXML to be approved, at least two thirds of the participating countries need to have voted in favour of the format, and no more than one quarter of the total number of votes can be negative.

As things stand, numbers are not looking good for Microsoft. 18 countries have voted in favour of OOXML, and 14 countries have voted against it. Nine countries, including Australia, have chosen to abstain from the vote.

The is some more new coverage of Document Freedom Day, including this report which ends with:

“But [OOXML] fails the test for an Open Standard in various ways, including an unclear legal status as well as inclusion of and reference to proprietary technologies. It has all signs of a vendor-specific format that only Microsoft will be able to implement completely,” the group writes on its site.

If you are interested in OpenOffice.org, be aware that its Web site has just had a major redesign. Also, you may wish to see this new feature walkthrough of version 2.4.0.

When updating extensions, OpenOffice.org will launch the web browser to the appropriate web pages for more convenient updating. Extensions can have non-geeky-looking display names, but if the publisher omits the display name, the geeky-looking filename is used instead. Extension publishers can include links to their sites and to release notes.

Personally, I never use office suites (I’m more of a LATEX person), but knowing how OpenOffice.org eliminates barriers to Free software adoption, I am willing to help promote it. ODF is supported by dozens of applications from many different vendors (whom Sun/IBM/Red Hat/Oracle/Google did not have to pay/bribe, unlike Microsoft). ODF is not to be confused or seen as analogous to OpenOffice.org.

Update: Marbux adds the following good bits, which he permitted us to share in public.

Even if DIS-29500 (“OOXML”) is approved by JTC 1, that is not the end of file format war; it is only the beginning. Under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (“ATBT’), international standardization is merely *preparation” for decisions to adopt technical regulations at the regional/national/local level. See sections 2.4 and 2.6. And what do we find in section 2.2?

Members shall ensure that technical regulations are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade.

So even if Microsoft wins the “prepared” stage, it still has to win the “adopted or applied” phases.

Similarly, under the Agreement on Government Procurement (“AGP”), Article VI sections 1 and 2, we find:

1. Technical [procurement] specifications laying down the characteristics of the products or services to be procured, such as quality, performance, safety and dimensions, symbols, terminology, packaging, marking and labelling, or the processes and methods for their production and requirements relating to conformity assessment procedures prescribed by procuring entities, shall not be prepared, adopted or applied with a view to, or with the effect of, creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade.

2. Technical specifications prescribed by procuring entities shall, where appropriate:

(b) be based on international standards, where such exist; otherwise, on national technical regulations(3), recognized national standards(4), or building codes.

Note that the footnotes I have omitted from the original text directly paraphrase ATBT definitions.

While the requirement that technical specifications be based on international standards in section 2 would seem to create tension in the context of OOXML with the section 1 prohibition against procurement specifications that create unnecessary obstacles to international trade, traditional legal analysis would call for resolving that tension by looking to the purpose of the Agremeement. So under my interpretation, the prohibition in section 1 would trump section 2. But I caution that this is an issue the WTO dispute resolution process has yet to rule on.

Both the AGP and the ATBT apply to every level of government in signatory nations. So, e.g., in the Massachusetts situation, the battle was over a technical regulation that was also to be used as a procurement specification. Hence the decision was subject to both treaties.

Think of the “prepared, adopted, or applied” phrase as a three-phase test that has to be applied by governments at every step of the way, in their NB positions, in their national standards decisions, in their state standards decisions, in their municipal standards decisions, in their procurement decisions.

In other words, OOXML approval at JTC 1 is simply phase 1. There are myriad battles yet to come even if OOXML survives JTC 1. All subject to challenge by individual nations in the WTO dispute resolution process. The AGP also requires that competitors be provided with a judicial review remedy on procurement decisions by each signatory nation, although in the U.S., Congress in ratifying the Uruguay Round Agreements (includes both AGP and ATBT), declined to acquiesce to this provision in regard to state governments, a reservation of dubious legality because of the AGP and ATBT’s “all or nothing” provisions for accession to the agreements.

I’ll note here that government procurement of software as a service is governed by a third treaty, the General Agreement on Trade in Services. But I’ll save that discussion for another day.

So short story: The fight ain’t over ’til the fat lady sings. Microsoft can be knocked out in Round 1 and lose the war at JTC 1, but at best it can only survive into Round 2. I.e., the best Microsoft can do is win a battle, not the war. That is why I have not been worrying too much about what happens at JTC 1. The real war is in the government software market, in the potentially thousands of technical regulation and procurement specification battles. And it will not be the big vendors making those decisions. It will be their customers.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.


  1. CoolGuy said,

    March 28, 2008 at 7:46 am


    Microsoft thinks that it can buy it way out of everything

    Passing such a broken specification as a ISO standard will be a laugh in the face of ISO. Their reputation will be over.

    Hope this does not happen.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 7:48 am


    ISO’s reputation will be in tatters regardless, having seen how the system was abused thus far.

  3. Victor Soliz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:13 am


    I think leaving ISO’s image broken is MS’ plan B.

  4. Jeff Waugh said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:25 am


    Ah, no reference at all to the person most quoted in this article? Of course not, that would not serve Roy’s current and previous conspiracy theories, misleading accusations and insinuations. Not surprising in the least.

  5. Victor Soliz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:29 am


    I guess you mean that not wanting OOXML to be an ISO is a misleading conspiracy theory…. Hmmn that’s quite a bad statement to make.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:45 am


    Jeff, the accusation was never that you want OOXML approved (unlike Miguel) but that your actions were wrong… as well as the sense of defeatism. If OOXML is slammed at ISO, who would have the last laugh? Bruce and his prediction (regarding OOXML) applies here as well.

    At the end of the day, for the benefit of us all, let’s not fight over this. It’s truly a distraction. We need to fight OOXML, not fight each other. Sadly, fighting OOXML turned out to be more of a case of fighting crime and corruption, not fighting over technical merits, which would have been an easier battle to pick.

  7. Jeff Waugh said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:51 am


    My actions were “wrong”? “Defeatism”? Hilarious. More interplanetary tangentialism from Roy. Just make sure you don’t say anything to limit your next conspiracy theory escapade — and definitely don’t veer off into dangerous areas such as the truth, rational thought or reasonableness!

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:55 am


    You encouraged (or at least defended) intervention in that ‘Microsoft Club-for-Hire’ called ECMA International, whose former head is now a Microsoft lobbyist working for CompTIA and pushing for OOXML around the world, as well as in the press.

  9. Victor Soliz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 8:57 am


    BTW Finland voted yes, because “it would make ISO develop OOXML and not MS” Looks like Durasau’s remarks are working, lame.

    Gnome’s actions were wrong for aiding OOXML adverts during the critical ISO approval process. Try to keep the discussion serious instead of avoiding statements by ridiculing them. (BTW Are you really Jess? I remember Jeff used to post including an URI)

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 28, 2008 at 9:02 am


    Yes, it’s him, Victor. home.waugh.id.au

  11. Robert Millan said,

    March 28, 2008 at 6:55 pm


    CoolGuy, I think ISO’s reputation will be broken beyond repair if they accept OOXML, but otherwise they could always reform, fixing all the flaws that got them into this nasty situation, and still preserve their honor (at least from my viewpoint).

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. Links 6/12/2021: LibreOffice Maintenance Releases, Firefox 95 Finalised

    Links for the day

  2. “Wintel” “Secure” uEFI Firmware Used to Store Persistent Malware, and Security Theater Boot is Worthless

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission

  3. No Linux Foundation IRS Disclosures Since 2018

    The publicly-available records or IRS information about the Linux Foundation is suspiciously behind; compared to other organisations with a "tax-exempt" status the Linux Foundation is one year behind already

  4. Jim Zemlin Has Deleted All of His Tweets

    The Linux Foundation‘s Jim Zemlin seems to have become rather publicity-shy (screenshots above are self-explanatory; latest snapshot), but years ago he could not contain his excitement about Microsoft, which he said was "loved" by what it was attacking. Days ago it became apparent that Microsoft’s patent troll is still attacking Linux with patents and Zemlin’s decision to appoint Microsoft as the At-Large Director (in effect bossing Linus Torvalds) at the ‘Linux’ Foundation’s Board of Directors is already backfiring. She not only gets her whole salary from Microsoft but also allegedly protects sexual predators who assault women… by hiring them despite repeated warnings; if the leadership of the ‘Linux’ Foundation protects sexual predators who strangle women (even paying them a salary and giving them management positions), how can the ‘Linux’ Foundation ever claim to represent inclusion and diversity?

  5. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part IX — Microsoft's Chief Architect of GitHub Copilot Sought to be Arrested One Day After Techrights Article About Him

    Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley has warrant for his arrest, albeit only after a lot of harm and damage had already been done (to multiple people) and Microsoft started paying him

  6. The Committee on Patent Law (PLC) Informed About Overlooked Issues “Which Might Have a Bearing on the Validity of EPO Patents.”

    In a publication circulated or prepared last week the Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO explains a situation never explored in so-called 'media' (the very little that's left of it)

  7. Links 6/12/2021: HowTos and Patents

    Links for the day

  8. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 05, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 05, 2021

  9. Gemini Space/Protocol: Taking IRC Logs to the Next Level

    Tonight we begin the migration to GemText for our daily IRC logs, having already made them available over gemini://

  10. Links 6/12/2021: Gnuastro 0.16 and Linux 5.16 RC4

    Links for the day

  11. Links 5/12/2021: Touchpad Gestures in XWayland

    Links for the day

  12. Society Needs to Take Back Computing, Data, and Networks

    Why GemText needs to become 'the new HTML' (but remain very simple) in order for cyberspace to be taken away from state-connected and military-funded corporations that spy on people and abuse society at large

  13. [Meme] Meanwhile in Austria...

    With lobbyists-led leadership one might be led to believe that a treaty strictly requiring ratification by the UK is somehow feasible (even if technically and legally it's moot already)

  14. The EPO's Web Site is a Parade of Endless Lies and Celebration of Gross Violations of the Law

    The EPO's noise site (formerly it had a "news" section, but it has not been honest for about a decade) is a torrent of lies, cover-up, and promotion of crimes; maybe the lies are obvious for everybody to see (at least EPO insiders), but nevertheless a rebuttal seems necessary

  15. The Letter EPO Management Does Not Want Applicants to See (or Respond to)

    A letter from the Munich Staff Committee at the EPO highlights the worrying extent of neglect of patent quality under Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos; the management of the EPO did not even bother replying to that letter (instead it was busy outsourcing the EPO to Microsoft)

  16. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 04, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 04, 2021

  17. EPO-Bribed IAM 'Media' Has Praised Quality, Which Even EPO Staff (Examiners) Does Not Praise

    It's easy to see something is terribly wrong when the people who do the actual work do not agree with the media's praise of their work (a praise motivated by a nefarious, alternate agenda)

  18. Tux Machines is 17.5 Years Old Today

    Tux Machines -- our 'sister site' for GNU/Linux news -- started in 2004. We're soon entering 2022.

  19. Approaching 100

    We'll soon have 100 files in Git; if that matters at all...

  20. Improving Gemini by Posting IRC Logs (and Scrollback) as GemText

    Our adoption of Gemini and of GemText increases; with nearly 100,000 page requests in the first 3 days of Decembe (over gemini://) it’s clear that the growing potential of the protocol is realised, hence the rapid growth too; Gemini is great for self-hosting, which is in turn essential when publishing suppressed and controversial information (subject to censorship through blackmail and other ‘creative’ means)

  21. Links 4/12/2021: IPFire 2.27 Core Update 162 and Genode OS Framework 21.11

    Links for the day

  22. Links 4/12/2021: Gedit Plans and More

    Links for the day

  23. Links 4/12/2021: Turnip Becomes Vulkan 1.1 Conformant

    Links for the day

  24. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 03, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, December 03, 2021

  25. Links 4/12/2021: EndeavourOS Atlantis, Krita 5.0.0 Beta 5, Istio 1.11.5, and Wine 6.23; International Day Against DRM (IDAD) on December 10th

    Links for the day

  26. Another Gemini Milestone: 1,500 Active Capsules

    This page from Balázs Botond plots a graph, based on these statistics that now (as of minutes ago) say: “We successfully connected recently to 1500 of them.” Less than a fortnight ago more than 1,800 capsules overall were registered by Lupa, almost quadrupling in a single year

  27. [Meme] António Campinos and Socialist Posturing

    Staff of the EPO isn’t as gullible as António Campinos needs it to be

  28. António Campinos as EPO President is Considered Worse Than Benoît Battistelli (in Some Regards) After 3.5 Years in Europe's Second-Largest Institution

    The EPO's demise at the hands of people who don't understand patents and don't care what the EPO exists for is a real crisis which European media is unwilling to even speak about; today we share some internal publications and comment on them

  29. Media Coverage for Sale

    Today we're highlighting a couple of new examples (there are many other examples which can be found any day of the year) demonstrating that the World Wide Web is like a corporate spamfarm in "news" clothing

  30. Links 3/12/2021: GNU Poke 1.4 and KDDockWidgets 1.5.0

    Links for the day

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts