EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.01.08

Exploring the BECTA-Microsoft Relationship

Posted in Europe, Microsoft at 7:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

BECTA’s mischiefs with Microsoft are a serious issue that was covered here before, e.g. in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. This morning we did some more research and came up with the following interesting findings.

We thought it would be interesting to see how many former Softies there are inside BECTA as it would make good business sense for Microsoft to push their ex-employees everywhere they can. Kent LEA, for example, are busy adopting everything Microsoft as fast as they can.

“We thought it would be interesting to see how many former Softies there are inside BECTA…”So we decided get a list of BECTA seniors and then do some googling for each. That, we assumed, would be handy in identifying suspicious appointments. Members of the board are listed here and those who attended a recent meeting [PDF] are: Andrew Pinder, John Roberts, Graham Moore, Stephen Gill, Derek Wise Stephen Crowne, Niel McLean, Tony Richardson, Ian Adams, Alan Cowie, Jane Williams, John Landeryou, Mark Wallbank, Roger Parr, Leigh Fish, John Newbigin, and Doug Brown.

On the agenda in that May 2008 meeting:

“Board members explored how Becta should engage with Microsoft, and secure benefits on behalf of the education sector, particularly around flexibility and price; and how the Board should support the Executive in the planned discussions with Microsoft.”

It also says: “Action: A small group of the Board (John Roberts, Steve Gill, Graham Moore and Andrew Pinder) to support the Executive in its discussions with Microsoft…”

Finally: “Summing up, the Chairman said the Board was broadly content with progress so far. The forthcoming meeting with Microsoft was an important opportunity to deal with the outstanding issues.”

Why is Free software hardly explored? We’ll come to this in a moment.

It is worth adding that they do not tell taxpayers how much is being paid to Microsoft. Part of the agreement is that it must remain secret in order to prevent comparisons or backlash. However, for purposes of public procurement it’s not only ludicrous but also illegal.

School boyHeading this body is Andrew Pinder, whose Wikipedia biography contains to a link to an article (“Government Gateway is not a ‘Microsoft puppet’”) where he tries to dissociate himself from Microsoft.

Here is how he describes “Open Source” in one context or another:

“Typically [teachers who run IT] would be people who have a real passion about Open Source — as if open source is any different from any other software — it’s just the pricing structure is different, that’s all. ”

He also compares it to a religion:

“It’s a religion, it’s a real belief, and again they have a belief about bits of technology that are going to change things. What they don’t do, however, is organize things properly.”

A known Microsoft puppet [1, 2, 3], the Yankee Group, uses similar analogies. Its founder, Howard Anderson Framingham, wrote in an article last year: “Open source is not a movement; it’s a religion. It is a set of principles and practices that let everyone share non-existent or semi-existent intellectual property. Remember the Communist Manifesto: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” It is this generation’s Woodstock.”

There seems to a shared foundation of open source insults and smears.

Going back to Andrew Pinder, Wikipedia states: “In this role, he gave a speech at the CBI in November 2001,[3] and spoke at a Microsoft-sponsored Government Leaders Conference in Seattle in April 2002, where he famously announced that the government’s target of putting all services online by 2005 could cost 800,000 public sector employees their jobs.[4]”

Also: “He oversaw the rushed implementation in 2001 of the Government Gateway, a project for putting all the government services on-line, which was built by Microsoft in just 15 weeks and initially locked out all browsers except Microsoft’s own Internet Explorer.

“The deal also involved Microsoft using UK government intellectual property to build products for other governments in order to recoup some of the costs of building the technology. The rate of return was to the tune of 22% of their gross sales of the intellectual property, which Pinder hoped would “give us quite a lot of money”.[6]”

“This makes BECTA seem a tad hostile towards Freedom, which it describes as “religion” instead.”Another BECTA board member, Ralph Tabberer, is seen in this article where he states: “We are looking forward to a productive working relationship with Microsoft over the next three years and we will work closely together…”

To sum up, as Wikipedia puts it, “The current chairman of Becta holds the view that “open source is [no] different from any other software — it’s just the pricing structure is different, that’s all. But [its supporters] have a passion. It’s a religion, it’s a real belief.”[2]”

Overall, it’s disappointing. This makes BECTA seem a tad hostile towards Freedom, which it describes as “religion” instead. It prefers training children for one foreign monopolist's pipeline rather than have them acquire actual skills. Education is about skills. If there is any clannish pattern here (“religion” so to speak), it appears to be this type of cronyism that’s so prevalent in BECTA’s decision-making.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. aeshna23 said,

    December 1, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Gravatar

    As a general philosophical point, I think we should reserve religion to ideologies that involve some combination of God or gods, prayer, afterlife or reincarnation, and institutional structure. We also need to get sophisticated enough to say that some non-religious ideologies like Marxism, Naziism, Libertarianism, racism, and contemporary anti-racism are lunatic and only serve to cause suffering. Even trying to imagine a serious argument against free software I don’t think it would qualify so much as non-religious ideology as much as just an enthusiasm. I admit I love my enthusiasm for it.

  2. Josh Bell said,

    December 1, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    Gravatar

    It seems that anyone who has ever worked for Microsoft and then leaves to go to a new company or form a new company must be doing so Microsoft has a presence so they can force their software on others. At least that what it seems like from this site. I guess even the janitors who leave Microsoft must be people that will push MS software. After all they have been exposed to these nasty people.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 1, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    Gravatar

    No, but if evidence can be shown, then people can draw conclusions.

  4. Josh Bell said,

    December 1, 2008 at 10:48 pm

    Gravatar

    How can people draw conclusions when you state opinion as fact?

    We thought it would be interesting to see how many former Softies there are inside BECTA as it would make good business sense for Microsoft to push their ex-employees everywhere they can. Kent LEA, for example, are busy adopting everything Microsoft as fast as they can.

    That’s your quote. To me you state this as a fact not for anyone to draw any conclusion other than Microsoft pushes their employees to other companies to pollute those companies.

  5. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 10:11 am

    Gravatar

    I think the ends don’t necessarily jive with the means that Roy is suggesting. Is there a possibility that Microsoft actively pushes their own employees out the door to other companies to push their wares and agenda? I guess it’s possible, but generally speaking just a matter of opinion.

    I’d guess that most people, and we’ll just say management for the sake of argument, leave for new challenges, better pay, or whatever. Their pushing or at least the perceived pushing of Microsoft’s wares on wherever they land could very well be because that’s all they know, for better or worse.

  6. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft hires no-hopers fresh out of school. They have no tech skills or they would be aware of the company and its products. The main draw, marketed by MS itself, is the draw of the quick buck. Those more ambitious and less skilled, gravitate towards management where dogma is more important than reality-based work.

    So, after a number of years, with lots and lots of dogma and *zero* real-word engineering or computing experience, these lice jump to a new host and begin doing the only thing they know how: peddling MS dogma and blocking Internet technologies.

    C’mon, do you think anyone with any length of time at MS is going to *ever* mention or, less likely, recommend best of breed? No. They’ll simply parrot the MS dogma they sold their soul to learn by rote.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Gravatar

    C’mon, do you think anyone with any length of time at MS is going to *ever* mention or, less likely, recommend best of breed?

    They seem to “recommend best of breed” in house though.

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/25/buying-linux-for-advantage/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/18/hotmail-cio-stuart-scott/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/04/novell-harnesses-microsoft/

    Sheesh.

  8. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    Gravatar

    C’mon, do you think anyone with any length of time at MS is going to *ever* mention or, less likely, recommend best of breed? No. They’ll simply parrot the MS dogma they sold their soul to learn by rote.

    If that’s all they know, then most likely they’ll recommend Microsoft Technologies. I don’t really understand what you’re arguing, because aside from absurd generalizations such as “no-hopers”, we’re agreeing on the same basic principal. What I don’t agree with, however, is that there is absolutely a direct malicious intent in every instance when someone leaves Microsoft to pursue another opportunity.

  9. Gentoo User (and proud of it) said,

    December 2, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft hires no-hopers fresh out of school. They have no tech skills or they would be aware of the company and its products.

    Just out of curiosity, how many “no-hopers” from Microsoft have you met?

    I’ve never met anyone from Microsoft other than online, but even from reading their blogs I’ve honestly never had that impression of any them.

    (The ominous-looking text in RED that Roy Schestowitz attaches to all my comments accuses me of engaging in “witch hunts”. Consider that in the context of the comments here and ask yourself if you need to be best buddies with Roy in order to avoid being branded for doing essentially the same thing)

    Note: comment arrived from a witch hunter that does not even use GNU/Linux.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 3, 2008 at 7:00 am

    Gravatar

    Ian, it’s mostly a matter of probabilities.

  11. Mr. Redmond said,

    December 13, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    Gravatar

    Becta are not so friendly to the FBI, the FBI have been saying for a while that IWF and CEOP, don’t really do anything, and that Brit schools are flooding Japan with toilet-cam material, and changing room stuff. Becta is a religion that believes the IWF do anything worth doing.

    “The Governments of the US and Russia need to up their game and stem the tide of child pornography leaving their virtual shores because it is putting children across the world at risk.”‘

    LIke bomb Wiki? Becta & IWF should lobby to take the child porn-cams out of Brit primary schools and leave the real policing to the FBI, who it has to be aid, provides its services free of charge to the UK.

What Else is New


  1. Links 8/4/2020: Tails 4.5, Septor 2020.2, GNOME Money Awards and Mozilla's New CEO

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 07, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 07, 2020



  3. GitHug - A Guest Article by Thomas Grzybowski

    "Now, if Azure revenue has increased 72%, but the gross revenue in this category has only increased 25%, that means that the other components, primary GitHub, are actually a substantial negative."



  4. Links 7/4/2020: Firefox 75, Python 2.7.1 RC1

    Links for the day



  5. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIV: Media Owned and Controlled by Law Firms Did Not Properly Cover the Decision of the German Constitutional Court (FCC)

    We take another look at the shallow if not deliberately misleading coverage in sites that are literally owned and run by law firms, for the benefit of law firms rather than informing the public



  6. The Media Paints Bill Gates as the Man Who Will Save the World While Seattle's Police Department Obstructs Access to Documents About Pedophilia Arrest at His Home

    We're still unable to receive even one single page of the police report about arrest for pedophilia at the home of Bill and Melinda Gates; the media says nothing about this and instead it paints Gates as a national or international hero



  7. IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 06, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, April 06, 2020



  8. Software Patents Remain Junk Patents in the United States (Not Enforceable), Whereas the EPO Keeps Granting Them and Promoting Them

    We take note of the positive outcomes in the US, where courts continue to reject software patents, but in Europe the largest patent office, which sought to replace all the courts, still acts as if patent law does not exist and patents can be endlessly printed irrespective of their merit (or validity as judged by actual courts)



  9. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIII: A Death Worth Celebrating and Many Lies Worth Debunking

    We take stock of positive responses to the decision made by the German constitutional court (FCC) 2.5 weeks ago; we also explain why it has taken so long to piece together firm-by-firm scoresheet for UPC lies



  10. GitHub is Moving the Free Software Movement Into “Check”

    GitHub's growing levels of control over Free software projects (GitHub itself is proprietary and Microsoft-controlled) ought to alarm the community; it's a lot worse than most people care to acknowledge, based on weeks of detailed analysis of GNU/Linux distros



  11. Links 6/4/2020: New Red Hat CEO, elementary OS Hera Updates

    Links for the day



  12. When the Decision is OK and the Judge's Motivations Are Also OK

    Justice Huber made the right call; but the bullies and charlatans who conspired to undermine laws and constitutions will never be satisfied



  13. The Fall of the UPC - Part XII: Doing the Unthinkable by Blaming the Judge's (Justice's) Wife?

    Team UPC and its media partners never cease to amaze us; anybody who stands in their way is either portrayed as a Russian stooge or too ignorant to be worth talking to



  14. The Fall of the UPC - Part XI: Lies Told by Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) in Süddeutsche Zeitung

    Today we look at misleading claims (or lies) published by Süddeutsche Zeitung after the Germans' constitutional court (FCC) had pointed out the obvious, namely that UPC ratification would be in violation of the German constitution



  15. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 05, 2020



  16. Links 5/4/2020: MindSpore, Covid-19 Projects and More

    Links for the day



  17. EPO is Just Like Some Cruel Political Party and Not a Patent Office

    The "cabal" which runs today's EPO (even the word "Mafia" seems suitable here) isn't acting -- not even remotely -- like a patent office; it's a patent-printing operation ("protection money" as income) that uses shallow political stunts to manufacture consent with the EU's 'generous' assistance



  18. Digitalisation and Digital Technologies as a Ploy to Justify Illegal Software Patents

    Say "hello" to the next weasel word/s; from the "hey hi" hype wave we've now moved to something "digital" (which can mean just about anything, including algorithms of all sorts)



  19. The Fall of the UPC - Part X: How We Shall Catalogue UPC Lies

    The cult that Team UPC became (one member lying to another member, maintaining a false version of reality) will be judged based on underlying facts, not lying about facts; we start with a token of contempt for IP Kat and Bristows LLP (there are overlaps)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 04, 2020



  21. Major Revelation: Microsoft Blackmail Against LAMP (GNU/Linux and Free Stacks for Servers) Goes At Least 16 Years Back, Predating the Novell Patent Deal

    (Techno-)Anthropological analyses of Microsoft's patent war on Free/libre software must take into account what Microsoft did to MySQL, a Swedish company at the time



  22. Links 4/4/2020: Sparky 5.11, Firefox 74.0.1, POCL 1.5

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, April 03, 2020



  24. Links 3/4/2020: Ubuntu Beta, GNOME 3.36.1, ExTiX LXQt Mini, NetBSD 8.2 Released

    Links for the day



  25. Digital Communication, Digitalisation and Videogaming Among the EPO's Latest Smokescreens for Illegal and Abstract Patents on Algorithms

    The EPO keeps liaising with the EU to promote patents which EU officials have themselves said were illegal; to make matters worse, the EPO's violations of its own laws inspire the United States to do the same



  26. Emotional Blackmail for Illegal Software Patents

    Semantic tactics the European Patent Office (EPO) uses to promote software patents in Europe and may theoretically use in the future (satire)



  27. Clear Linux is to GNU/Linux What Clearly Defined is to Open Source

    The idea that we need Intel to take GNU/Linux ‘mainstream’ is ludicrous; as OSDL co-founder (now succeeded in the flesh of the Corporate Linux Foundation), Intel is more about Linux (with DRM, “secure boot” and everything that lets it be remotely controlled) than about GNU and it’s not too keen on GPL (copyleft), either



  28. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 02, 2020



  29. Links 2/4/2020: Linux 5.6.2, Qt Creator 4.11.2, LineageOS ROM Based on Android 10

    Links for the day



  30. OIN in 2020 Resembles Linux Foundation in 2020 (Corporate Front Group Piggybacking the Linux Brand)

    We regret to say that the Open Invention Network seems not to care at all about Software Freedom; to make matters worse, it is a proponent of software patents and a voice for companies like IBM and Microsoft, not the "Community" it fancies misrepresenting


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts