EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Leaked: Microsoft Pays Companies to Recommend Windows

Posted in Courtroom, Deception, Dell, Microsoft, Windows at 5:43 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“<vendor> recommends Windows” is an paid-for advert, not a recommendation

Kid with laptop

SOME weeks ago we wrote about how Microsoft fakes recommendations and deceives the public. Now we have solid proof.

Let’s take it one step at a time and see how this works.

In short, Microsoft informs computer shops that if they put some Vista advertising in their newspaper advertisements (or other forms of ads), there will be money in the bank for them, paid in the form of marketing money from Microsoft.

This is how Microsoft gets all those Vista advertisements all over the place, including big OEMs. They pay you for it. It’s an advert, not a sincere recommendation. This may also explain why Dell’s adverts for Ubuntu-powered PCs are accompanied by pro-Windows messages, as Ken Stark pointed out recently (Dell was subjected to bad and exclusionary deals before).

Here is how the stunt runs. It begins with a message like this one (which we anonymised):

Hi [company name omitted]

Your company can get [amount omitted] in vouchers if you utilize [proportion omitted] by [date omitted] on a preapproved offer and post the final claim by
[another date omitted]. I have enclosed details of the promotion with this email, and am including information on how to utilise coop as well.

It would be fantastic to see you qualify for the vouchers! Given the end of life with Windows XP and the steady sales of Vista (GFK tracks that over 89% of managed retailers are selling Vista PCs to consumers), it would be great to put this towards a Vista sales incentive for your staff or channel partners.

· Terms and Conditions
· Quick Guide to running a COOP Customer Offer

Any questions, let me know.


[name of Microsoft employee omitted]

Here is the Terms and Conditions document:

OEM Cooperative Marketing Execution Promotion

If you are defined as a System Builder or a Named Account in the OEM Cooperative marketing program and have an active enrolment status, you could be eligible for vouchers which you may choose to use to support a Windows Vista PC sales incentive with your sales team.


Terms and Conditions:

1.Timing of promotion. In order to be eligible for an incentive, you must comply with the specified deadlines. Microsoft reserves the right in its sole discretion to cancel, terminate, modify, recommence or suspend either or both parts of the promotion at any time.

2.Tax. Microsoft accepts no responsibility for any tax implications that may arise from this promotion. Microsoft will not remit any taxes on your behalf, nor will it provide any tax-related documentation to you. You are solely responsible for ensuring that any taxes arising from participation in the promotion are reported and paid to the appropriate tax authority. All amounts payable by Microsoft are inclusive of GST (if any). You should seek independent tax and financial advice.

3.Microsoft’s decision final. Microsoft’s decision in relation to all aspects of this promotion is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

4.Limitation and exclusion of liability. Subject to any applicable law which cannot be excluded, Microsoft and its related bodies corporate shall not be liable for any loss, damage or injury suffered or sustained (including but not limited to direct, indirect or consequential loss or loss arising from negligence) arising directly or indirectly out of or in connection with the promotion or any incentive.

5.Microsoft’s verification right. Microsoft may choose to verify any information provided by you in connection with this promotion (including, if Microsoft chooses to do so, by contacting your end-user customers), and if Microsoft reasonably believes that you have fabricated or altered any information, then Microsoft may determine that you are ineligible for either or both incentives. You must, if requested by Microsoft, promptly provide any requested information related to the promotion or your eligibility to receive an incentive.

6.Supply of incentives. If Microsoft is unable to supply the nominated incentive, Microsoft reserves the right, subject to the written direction of any competent legal authority, to supply another incentive of greater or equal value. For incentives that have a specified validity period, Microsoft and its associated agencies and companies accept no responsibility for your failure to take advantage of the incentive prior to it becoming invalid.

7.Information submitted by you. Information submitted by you will be used to determine eligibility for one or both parts of the promotion, provide fulfilment of the promotion, and for other Microsoft internal business purposes. Except as otherwise described in these terms and conditions, information provided by you will not be shared outside of Microsoft and its subsidiaries and affiliates without your permission.

8.Your participation. You may only participate once in the promotion, and any costs associated with your participation in the promotion is your responsibility. Microsoft may terminate your involvement in the promotion and/or withhold any incentives owing to you under this promotion if it believes, on reasonable grounds, that you have:
   a.breached any of these terms and conditions;
   b.not complied with the Microsoft Code of Ethics or
   c.otherwise infringed Microsoft’s copyright or trade marks.

9.Acceptance of these terms and conditions. Your submission of such “proof of execution” as required for Promotion means that you accept and agree to comply with these terms and conditions.

Also attached is this:

HOW TO Utilize Coop*

1.Decide on an offer.

2.Create the graphics (for e-DM or fliers or both) adhering to COOP guidelines which are:
   a.Relevant Tag line such as “We recommend genuine Microsoft Office 2007 SBE.”
   b.Company’s branding (logo) and contact details (this can just be an email or URL or phone#).
   c.30% of content supporting the sale of a fully assembled system preinstalled with genuine MS OEM product(s).

3.Send to your account manager for pre-approval.

4.Your account manager sends to US CORP for official pre-approval # (up to 3 working days)

5.Receive official pre-approval # from CORP.

6.Enter plan in the online tool https://www.microsoftcoop.com/default.aspx

7.Wait for online plan to be approved.

8.Buy give-aways and save your receipts for documentation.

9.Start offer (this date must be AFTER the dates the plan and advert were pre-approved officially by corp).

10.End offer (this date must be AFTER the start date).

11.Enter final claim for activity in online tool (this date must be AFTER the end date of the planned activity where you WILL NEED the following in digital file format to upload:
   a.Advert with pre-approval number from Microsoft corporate.
   b.Invoice for specific give-aways (the invoice date must be AFTER the dates the plan and advert were pre-approved officially by corporate but before the planned start date.)
   c.Digital pictures of the give-away item in your possession.

   – Start Date: 10th Nov 2008
   – End Date: 5th Dec 2008
   – Offer: “Buy any Vista Home Premium or Ultimate PC with Office 2007 before 5th Dec AND get a free <give-away-item>

* For complete information on how to utilize coop, please reference the Co-Op Partner Guidebook available here: https://www.microsoftcoop.com/aspx/additionalResources_SB.aspx

Attached is also the guidebook [PDF], which is labeled “Microsoft Confidential” (what are they trying to hide?).

For many shops these days, business is rather slow. Microsoft is exploiting pressure and/or greed to increase mind share (perception), as vividly described in the “Effective Evangelism” document which was 'leaked' out of Microsoft during a trial.

Can the ASA be lobbied to deal with Microsoft following allegations of market deception? This clearly distorts and confuses, does it not?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. Sheldon Huelin said,

    December 1, 2008 at 6:54 pm


    As I keep reading this blog I am hating Microsoft more and more. I’ve abandoned their office software for OO and Google Docs.

  2. G. Michaels said,

    December 1, 2008 at 9:35 pm


    Congratulations Roy, you uncovered a super-secret document that details things which have been pretty much public knowledge for the past 12 years! And heck, things that pretty much every company in the planet does, but you actually manage to infuse an air of evil around it! Very good indeed.

    Your nymshifter immediately got busy and started shilling for you over at Slashdot. That was quick! Except that he uses a lot more dollar signs. Lots and lots and lots of dollar signs. It’s hilarious, really. And he wonders why so few of his submissions actually make it to the front page.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  3. Eruaran said,

    December 2, 2008 at 2:45 am


    “a super-secret document that details things which have been pretty much public knowledge for the past 12 years!”

    Its not “super secret” sure, but it is confidential (on the PDF), and many consumers are generally oblivious to the fact that the “[insert manufacturer name here] recommends” part of the ad is in itself paid advertising and not a recommendation as such.

    “pretty much every company in the planet does”

    No. Most simply give you free advertising and promotional materials (posters, dummy boxes, information cards, that sort of thing). Some companies offer incentives to promote their products, it usually involves pointing out to a mystery shopper why product X is better than product Y. And manufacturer X usually puts forward reasonable points that are actually true (otherwise its false advertising). This is not the same as blanket paid advertising that masquerades as a recommendation and must conform to a bunch of set requirements that maximize the false impression it gives the customer.

  4. Needs Sunliht said,

    December 2, 2008 at 5:43 am


    It’s been clear all along that there are payments or other holds over businesses to get them to promote MS products. In many cases, there is no earthly reason for them not to be on a search-and-destroy mission against MS products, yet the web

    Interesting that *only* those paid are the ones promoting MS.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 6:02 am


    I’ve seen people claiming that this is obvious, which it is. The evidence, however, is rare and hard to come by.

  6. AlexH said,

    December 2, 2008 at 6:25 am


    To be fair, the evidence is very much in the public domain and has been for a while.

    “Recommends Windows” is incredibly shabby, but the OEMs are party to this too.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:17 am


    I agree, Alex, but this detailed evidence is new and it shows not only Vista’s role but also the role of the OOXML trap called Office 2007.

  8. AlexH said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:38 am


    I don’t know how “new” it is; you’ve written about one small aspect of the programme which has been going on for years and doesn’t address the latest ways they manipulate their OEMs.

    What about the part where OEMs get paid when customers upgrade to Office later?

  9. helios said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:44 am


    Beautiful Roy…this is a piece of what we’ve been digging for the past 4 years. While yes, most of us intuitively knew it, having the “proof” is nice. We are close to getting the other piece of this and I’ll post it as soon as it breaks. We just have to be careful handling “our guy”. This could scare him back in but then again, there was no guarantee he was going to produce much more than he already has anyway.

    Nice shot buddy…clean and deadly.


  10. Darryl said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:52 am


    whats the difference between this and say DELL, COMPAQ.. ect. putting out their brand name to retailers, it happens, and it happens to be completey legal, right and fair.

    We (consumers) know what we want, (as opposed to FOSS, trying to give us what THEY think we want). .

    If i see a computer i look at the maker of the hardware, (ie compaq) and i look at the “SYSTEM COMPONENTS” like RAM, CPU, VIDEO and OPERATING SYSTEM” after reviewing the equipment (including OS/Software), i evaluate the price to “WHAT I GET” and make an informed decision.

    SO placing an Advertisment about MS, INTEL, COMPAQ and so on is perfectly, normal and natural, and is WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN.

    FOSS/Linux, you are so bitter, someone is better than you, and you dont like it.

    GET A CLUE, fix your quality, and increadibly stupid number of Distros, get a quality assurance policy become customer and quality focused, forget about MS and get your own house in order.

    but NO FOSS/Linux just want to destroy MS, why ?? because they cant hope to compete with them on equal terms in way of quality and consistency and you dont like it..

  11. Jo Shields said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:57 am


    but NO FOSS/Linux just want to destroy MS, why ?? because they cant hope to compete with them on equal terms in way of quality and consistency and you dont like it..

    You’re a bit dim really, aren’t you

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 8:01 am


    darryl at hotmail.com,

    whats the difference between this and say DELL, COMPAQ.. ect. putting out their brand name to retailers, it happens, and it happens to be completey legal, right and fair.

    The difference is that Microsoft uses other people’s mouths to make false recommendations. It’s akin to the “people-ready” fiasco, which was AstroTurfing.

    Microsoft pays star writers to recite slogan

  13. toe said,

    December 2, 2008 at 8:16 am


    Great article and nice to see evidence of it.

    I actually touch on this on my website http://www.ilovelinux.co.uk in which I sayt that ‘Dell recommends Windows Vista’ type ads are just clever marketing.

    There is a company over here in UK called Novatech who actually sold os free laptops and also claimed they work with Ubuntu and showed the Ubuntu logo.

    The laptops gave disappeared and all of a sudden ‘Novatech recommend Windows Vista’ has appeared on their website.

    Personally I think Vista is rubbish. http://www.vistaisrubbish.com


  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 8:25 am


    The PC I’m using at the moment I bought from Novatech a few months ago and I too was shocked to see their Web site deformed into a Microsoft marketing extravaganza (it’s like a Formula 1 car or its driver’s gear). The site no longer even mentioned GNU/Linux, but it was still possible to purchase O/S-free PCs.

  15. nomasteryoda said,

    December 2, 2008 at 9:13 am


    I appreciate this find for what it is – the truth about what Microsoft does to “force” vendors to push their products. This happens with training for Microsoft products as well.

    Just so you know, I’ve been using Linux since 1999 and have been called a Linux nutter for sure, but I can attest to the quality, stability and overall value of Linux vs. Windows. I can do anything I need with Linux and use OpenOffice for “Office” files as do many people tired of the upgrade cycle that is Microsoft.

    As for Novell, I boycotted them after the Microsoft deal. Prior to that I used SuSe for several years because it was a good Distro. I’ve since moved on to Ubuntu, Fedora and Sidux. Having a variety of Distros is something the Linux community does well, though it can be confusing to someone coming from a lock-in single OS like Windows.

    Choice is good and keeps our brains from stagnating!! Besides, I really get tired of all the Windows malware I come across when someone says, “hey, can you fix my Windows, its broken again”. I simply say sure for $50 I’ll clean it up and make the system dual-boot with a Linux distro of your choice. “Why put Linux on it?” they ask. I say because you can surf the web safely in Linux when the Windows box tanks again in 2 months because you forgot to upgrade the antivirus software definitions or clicked some nice trojan infesting pop-up window. They finish the conversation with a “Thank you so much and here’s another $50 for putting Linux on my system!!”

    Oh, if they don’t have the original windows CD, I just wipe and put a Linux distro on it. People are flexible and understand money is hard to come by these days.

  16. Ed Landaveri said,

    December 2, 2008 at 9:15 am


    Let us not forget that here in California it used to be a PC PowerSpec that it was distributed by Microcenter. It use to come wit FreeSpire (before it’s demise) and later only with Windows. The periodical advertisement that I receive every month shows them coming with Windows only. No mention about Ubuntu or OS free PC. Just the ludicrous: “PowerSpec recommends MS Vista”. Sure they were bought up also. Also to mention that during these days I have seen not any of the Ubuntu Netops on display neither at this store or it’s advertisement. It looks that MS is putting pressure not to display them or put them for sale. The same can be said regarding the other PC stores brochures. Shame on them.

  17. phil said,

    December 2, 2008 at 9:35 am


    This kind of adverting is very misleading. Here a company is offering a product that the customer is interested in buying. Rather than seal the deal and take the money, they say “but wait – you are making a mistake! You should really buy …”.

    OK, so why are you offering the other product? Why waste warehouse space on something you don’t think is good?

  18. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 10:19 am


    “Recommends Windows” is incredibly shabby, but the OEMs are party to this too. – AlexH

    This. The best way this type of activity stops, outside of legal pressure, is when the manufacturers put a stop to it.

  19. Abe said,

    December 2, 2008 at 11:16 am


    This practice has been going on for a long time, and it is a good thing that the evidence is in writing this time. The only way this will stop is when the majority of consumers are educated and enlightened about the sleazy marketing, and start taking this issue seriously. The current economic situation will help consumers to see the light and it will back fire on MS & their lackey vendors.

    Good work Roy. Publishing this evidence is how an effective way to educate the consumers but non-IT consumers rarely read such articles. Word of mouth should still be used since it is the most effective with the average John/Jane Doe.

    And for that dimwit who said FOSS/Linux guys are jealous, keep thinking that while we change the world.

  20. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 11:21 am



    I think you make a mistake assuming consumers actually care about this. Educating consumers won’t make any difference at all since:

    1. For the most part, consumers don’t care
    2. It’s the OEMs that are ultimately responsible for doing this, therefore, responsible for shutting it down.

  21. RyanT said,

    December 2, 2008 at 11:51 am


    1. For the most part, consumers don’t care

    Yes, they do. No one likes being outright lied to, and should come under more scrutiny than it has.

  22. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:06 pm


    End users don’t always choose their computers. They let geeks (sometimes their parents or children), CIOs or the shops decide for them and equipped with more information, the latter — not the consumer — can make informed choices that cull out spurious ‘recommendations’.

    I’ve seen some accusations elsewhere that this post states the obvious, but it’s not the stating; it’s the showing (of hard evidence).

  23. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:10 pm


    No one likes being outright lied to, and should come under more scrutiny than it has.

    I don’t disagree with any of that. However, I believe there is a large amount of apathy as far as an operating system goes. In my professional experience, there’s a healthy number of people that don’t even understand the concept of an operating system, let alone are consciously concerned with Microsoft advertising.

    The way I see it, to get anything changed, the OEMs will have to step up and do something about it or some type of legal issue would be brought up by a consumer advocacy group. Other than that, everyone who uses a computer will have to collectively realize what’s going on and actually care, which I don’t see happening.

  24. pcolon said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:19 pm


    It’s the tangible document you can point to. Something you can show to back up the claim. That’s what this post is giving you. Proof, not conjecture or the probability of guessing correctly.

  25. Ian said,

    December 2, 2008 at 12:32 pm


    It’s the tangible document you can point to. Something you can show to back up the claim. That’s what this post is giving you. Proof, not conjecture or the probability of guessing correctly.

    That’s fine. Others might be arguing that, but I wasn’t.

  26. Abe said,

    December 2, 2008 at 7:43 pm


    Consumers normally don’t care but they seriously do care when their pocket book gets hits.

    I wasn’t talking about the OS, I was talking about all the free/dom software they will get when running Linux as opposed to the bundle of money they have to pay up for apps when running Windows.

    I thought that was obvious.

  27. G. Michaels said,

    December 2, 2008 at 9:41 pm


    By the way Roy, you should mention this is in Australia, since the person who “leaked” this to you posts from two different ARIN IP addresses (one from BigPond, and these). Assuming it’s not a forgery, do you have something similar for the US or proof that this is done in the US?

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  28. Abbas Khan M.D. said,

    December 2, 2008 at 10:44 pm


    I’m a Doctor. Some doctors do something similar to this. It’s called kickback. They pay other doctors to forward them patients (advertise them). Now my question is that, would you rather get referred to the “BEST” oncologist (cancer doctor) if you had cancer or one that is paying your doctor to refer you to him.

    I’m assuming for most people the story changes when something important like your health or life gets involved. Yeah software is not as important as someone’s life but the correct principle is what i was trying to display here.

    In the end, the point is you don’t want someone who you trust getting paid by someone to peddle their very cruddy software (or cruddy practice).


  29. Ilde Giron said,

    December 2, 2008 at 11:02 pm


    @G. Michaels
    “Assuming it’s not a forgery, do you have something similar for the US or proof that this is done in the US?”

    Are you trying to imply that as long as they don do it in the US, it’s ok with you?

  30. G. Michaels said,

    December 2, 2008 at 11:21 pm


    No, I’m asking if they also do it in the US.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  31. GreyCells said,

    December 3, 2008 at 5:05 am


    Play Microsoft at their own game – I have yet to see:

    “[My company] does *not* recommend Microsoft Windows Vista|XP|95.”


    “[My company] recommends you avoid Microsoft Windows Vista|XP|95 like the plague.”

    on any website – now *that* would be an advertising campaign that money could not buy…

  32. Ari T. said,

    December 3, 2008 at 6:21 am


    I have never seen this document before, although I have been following this area for a few years. Thanks for posting it Roy.

  33. Merchy said,

    December 3, 2008 at 7:18 am


    Why dont some of the linux distributers do the same?

  34. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 3, 2008 at 7:25 am


    Probably ethics.

  35. Ian said,

    December 3, 2008 at 10:12 am


    Probably ethics.

    I doubt it. The reason they don’t do it is because, generally speaking, they can’t assert the kind of pressure on OEMs that Microsoft can.

  36. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 3, 2008 at 10:17 am


    That too. There’s lots of history here.

What Else is New

  1. Links 20/3/2018: GStreamer 1.14.0, Freespire 3.0, Endless OS 3.3.13

    Links for the day

  2. BIO, MDMA and PhRMA Are Pushing the PTAB-Hostile STRONGER Patents Act While IAM and Patently-O Continue to Bash PTAB

    The patent microcosm, which compares the Board to the above (crude analogy from Judge Rader and other patent extremists), is still trying to kill inter partes reviews (IPRs), in effect overlooking its own hypocrisy on the matter (they don’t want patent justice, they just want to metaphorically ‘shoot down’ the judges)

  3. 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Still Effectively Tackling Software Patents in the US, But Patent Law Firms Lie/Distort to 'Sell' These Anyway

    The assertion that software patents are still worth pursuing in 2018 is based on carefully-constructed spin which mis-frames several court decisions and underplays/downplays/ignores pretty much everything that does not suit the narrative

  4. Battistelli's EPO Became Extremely Reliant on China for Distraction and on Endless Supply of Applications (Supply Which Doesn't Exist)

    Discussion about the EPO granting machine (or patent-printing machine) and figures the way EPO management would rather the public won't ever see them; the concept that China means redemption for this patent system is as laughable as always

  5. The US International Trade Commission (USITC) Against Comcast, Courtesy of the Intellectual Ventures-Connected Rovi

    The USITC/ITC, which mostly serves to impose embargoes (sometimes in shocking defiance of PTAB decisions), is being invoked by a firm connected to the world’s largest patent troll, Intellectual Ventures

  6. Tinder/Match Group Uses Software Patents to Sue a Rival, Obviously Choosing to Sue in Texas

    Software patents are being used for leverage, but only those which were likely granted before Alice and only in courts at districts somewhere around Texas

  7. Links 19/3/2018: Linux 4.16 RC6, Atom 1.25, antiX 17.1, GNU Mcron 1.1

    Links for the day

  8. From PTAB Bashing to Federal Circuit (CAFC) Bashing: How the Patent 'Industry' Sells Software Patents

    The latest tactics of the patent microcosm are just about as distasteful as last month's (or last year's), with focus shifting to the courts and few broadly-misinterpreted patent cases (mainly Finjan, Berkheimer, and Aatrix)

  9. Patent Maximalists Keep Coming Up With New Terms and Buzzwords to Bypass the Practical Ban on Software Patents

    The fightback against Section 101 and the US Supreme Court (notably Alice) seems to concentrate on old and new buzzwords, such as "Software as a Medical Device" ("SaMD") or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" ("4IR"), which the EPO recently paid European media to spread and promote

  10. News About Patents is Often Just Advertisements Composed Directly or Indirectly by Companies That Sell Patents and Patent Services

    Infomercials are still dominant among news about patents, in effect drowning out the signal (real journalism) and instead pushing agenda that is detached from reality, pertinent facts, objective assessment, public interest and so on

  11. Blocks and Paywalls Won't Protect the Patent Trolls' Lobby From Scrutiny/Fact-Checking

    Joff Wild and Benoît Battistelli have much in common, including patent maximalism and chronic resistance to facts (or fact-checking)

  12. China Has Become Very Aggressive With Patents

    China now targets other Asian countries/firms -- more so than Western firms -- with patent lawsuits; we expect this to get worse in years to come

  13. UPC/Battistelli Booster IAM Blames Brexit Rather Than EPO Abuses

    While the EPO is collapsing due to mismanagement the boosters of Team Battistelli would rather deflect and speak about Brexit, which is itself partly motivated by such mismanagement

  14. European Commission Again Urged to Tackle Abuses at the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Rina Ronja Kari is the latest MEP attempting to compel the Commission to actually do something about the EPO other than turning a blind eye

  15. Links 18/3/2018: Wine 3.4, Wine-Staging 3.4, KDE Connect 1.8 for Android

    Links for the day

  16. TXED Courts Are Causing Businesses to Leave the District, Notably For Fear That Having Any Operations Based There is a Legal Liability

    A discussion about the infamous abundance of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (TXED/EDTX) and what this will mean for businesses that have branches or any form of operations there (making them subjected to lawsuits in that district even after TC Heartland)

  17. PTAB Hatred is So Intense Among the Patent 'Industry' That Even Scammers Are Hailed as Champions If They Target PTAB

    The patent microcosm is so eager to stop the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that it's supporting sham deals (or "scams") and exploits/distorts the voice of the new USPTO Director to come up with PTAB-hostile catchphrases

  18. The Patent 'Industry' is Increasingly Mocking CAFC and Its Judges Because It Doesn't Like the Decisions

    Judgmental patent maximalists are still respecting high courts only when it suits them; whenever the outcome is not desirable they're willing to attack the legitimacy of the courts and the competence of judges, even resorting to racist ad hominem attacks if necessary

  19. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Carries on Enforcing § 101, Invalidating Software Patents and Upsetting the Patent 'Industry' in the Process

    A quick report on where PTAB stands at the moment, some time ahead of the Oil States decision (soon to come from the US Supreme Court)

  20. Luxembourg Can Become a Hub of Patent Trolls If the EPO Carries on With Its 'Reforms', Even Without the UPC

    With or without the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is the wet dream of patent trolls and their legal representatives, the EPO's terrible policies have landed a lot of low-quality patents on the hands of patent trolls (many of which operate through city-states that exist for tax evasion -- a fiscal environment ripe for shells)

  21. The Patent 'Printing Machine' of the EPO Will Spawn Many Lawsuits and Extortions (Threats of Lawsuits), in Effect Taxing Europe

    The money-obsessed, money-printing patent office, where the assembly line mentality has been adopted and patent-printing management is in charge, is devaluing or diluting the pool of European Patents, more so with restrictions (monetary barriers) to challenging bad patents

  22. Links 17/3/2018: Varnish 6, Wine 3.4

    Links for the day

  23. Deleted EPO Tweets and Promotion of Software Patents Amid Complaints About Abuse and Demise of Patent Quality

    Another ordinary day at the EPO with repressions of workforce, promotion of patents that aren't even allowed, and Team UPC failing to get its act together

  24. Guest Post: Suspected “Whitewashing” Operations by Željko Topić in Croatia

    Articles about EPO Vice-President Željko Topić are disappearing and sources indicate that it’s a result of yet more SLAPP from him

  25. Monumental Effort to Highlight Decline in Quality of European Patents (a Quarter of Examiners Sign Petition in Spite of Fear), Yet Barely Any Press Coverage

    he media in Europe continues to be largely apathetic towards the EPO crisis, instead relaying a bunch of press releases and doctored figures from the EPO; only blogs that closely follow EPO scandals bothered mentioning the new petition

  26. Careful Not to Conflate UPC Critics With AfD or Anti-EU Elements

    The tyrannical Unified Patent Court (UPC) is being spun as something that only fascists would oppose after the right-wing, anti-EU politicians in Germany express strong opposition to it

  27. Links 15/3/2018: Qt Creator 4.6 RC, Microsoft Openwashing

    Links for the day

  28. PTAB Continues to Increase Capacity Ahead of Oil States; Patent Maximalists Utterly Upset

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sees the number of filings up to an almost all-time high and efforts to undermine PTAB are failing pretty badly -- a trend which will be further cemented quite soon when the US Supreme Court (quite likely) backs the processes of PTAB

  29. Patent Maximalists Are Still Trying to Create a Patent Bubble in India

    Litigation maximalists and patent zealots continue to taunt India, looking for an opportunity to sue over just about anything including abstract ideas because that's what they derive income from

  30. EPO Staff Has Just Warned the National Delegates That EPO's Decline (in Terms of Patent Quality and Staff Welfare) Would Be Beneficial to Patent Trolls

    The staff of the EPO increasingly recognises the grave dangers of low-quality patents -- an issue we've written about (also in relation to the EPO) for many years


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts