Bonum Certa Men Certa

Microsoft History of Exploiting Free Labour Repeats Itself

Bruised face
Partners you can't trust



WE have already warned Free software developers who are led to believe that Microsoft is genuinely interested in helping them, rather than exploiting them as usual. Those who are new to this debate are advised to read:





Microsoft is renowned (or notorious, depending one's point of view) for only exploiting developers who help Microsoft increase sales, e.g. of Windows. If those developers make some money, then Microsoft copies them and undercuts them through pricing or bundling. But there is another form of exploitation, which a reader sent us a tip about. It's about what Microsoft calls "getting IBMed."

The definition of "getting IBMed," says our reader, is "getting our 'competitors/partners' to work for us and getting our 'partners/competitors' to pay for it."

And how nicely it is illustrated in this confidential message from Bill Gates to Steve Ballmer (dated August of 1989). We append the full text at the bottom and we have just made a permanent local copy of the original court exhibit [PDF] from Comes vs. Microsoft (Iowa antitrust). One part of it says:

Windows is still not as nice as the mac and it would be easy to be a lot better. Win 3 goes a long ways but we cant get IBMed on this one.


That's from Bill Gates. He said that the Mac was better, but they needed IBM to help them reverse this, just like with Sony and Playstation. Two days ago, in the Wall Street Journal, the following article was published:

...in 2001 Sony partnered with Toshiba and IBM to create the so-called Cell processor -- a chip so powerful that it would redefine PC-scale power...

[...]

In late 2002, Microsoft approached IBM about making the chip for Microsoft's rival game console, the (as yet unnamed) Xbox 360. In 2003, IBM's Adam Bennett showed Microsoft specs for the still-in-development Cell core [...] The result was that Sony's R&D money was spent creating a component for Microsoft to use against it.


"According to this, Microsoft joined the party late and got IBM to show them the specs for the joint Sony/Toshiba CELL processor [...] only it was Sony that paid for it" says a reader.

The history that we present here is similar and the full text is below. Readers may spot repeated spelling mistakes like "basicly" and "agressive" (it's not just a typo because it's repeated separately). Here is a part about patents where Gates says:

First, we have to make sure windows isnt easy to clone for both technical  and legal reasons. Who is smart that thinks about this - patents and  such. I can do it at some point and I think we will be able to achieve ito  DOS being fairly cloned has had a dramatic impact on our pricing for DOS.  I wonder if we would have it around 30-40% higher if it wasnt cloned. I  bet we would!


Another part talks about "software evangelization" (namely "We may need to do some more software evangelization in certain catergories"). By "evangelization", does he refer to "the Slog"?

Concludes Bill Gates: "IBM never knew our plan and if they did they shouldnt like it - our old plan (DOS) which is the current financial success of the company- sell cheap to IBM and make money from everyone else."




Aug 6 21:34 1989 MAIL Page 1

From billg Sun Aug 6 21:34:05 1989 To: steveb Subject: OS strategy Date: Sun Aug 6 21:34:03 1989

I have been thinking about this in a pure MS context to understand what is important for us and then see how the IBM relationship helps with that.

ny worth $7B. Thats doubling the current valuation. We would have to more than double our profits. Let say systems has to bear the same proportion of that burden in the future as it does now and that as a group (server, mouse, lang,  and toolkits) do their share (small) with server making up for the  fact that mouse, lang and tollkits cant bear their part. That leaves  the Os part (dos, win, os/2) with a huge burden. Basicly last year  (I may get the numbers wrong) it was around $180M worldwide PROFIT.  Assuming 12m machines thats $15 PROFIT per machine or giving IBM  1/3 of the market (a little high) $22.5 per non IBM machine. We have to  drive that number up to around $45. Taking a 3 year time frame I think  windows has a lot to do with it -I can see us lowering the price  differential for "high end windows" (a nickname I have for what os/2  has to be perceived as over time) because we want to get it bootstrapped  to the point where it wont cost a lot more than windows does. This means  the price we can charge for windows will drive a lot of our future.  Now how can we get this doubling per system thing to take place.

First, we have to make sure windows isnt easy to clone for both technical  and legal reasons. Who is smart that thinks about this - patents and  such. I can do it at some point and I think we will be able to achieve it.  DOS being fairly cloned has had a dramatic impact on our pricing for DOS.  I wonder if we would have it around 30-40% higher if it wasnt cloned. I  bet we would!

Second, we have to make windows really good - not in the ways we have assig  to os/2 but in ease of use approaches and software environment richness  approaches. We will need smart people to adavnce the product - smaller,  faster for the kernel but smarter for all the interface pieces. Apple  isnt dont what they should in this area and we can. I am not saying to tilt back towards windows or even to keep particular people but rather to  keep what we have and focus it on refinement of speed/size and interface  stuff. We may need to do some more software evangelization in certain  catergories.

WE have to make windows like DOS is today - basicly new applications all are done for it and people assume it.

FInancially if we havent tied our hands we need to be able to double the oem price or go after a VERY agressive retail strategy. The things we cant afford are:

1. Not being able to improve the product freely. In other words getting into the mess that Os/2 is in. Windows is still not as nice as the mac and it would be easy to be a lot better. Win 3 goes a long ways but we cant get IBMed on this one. 2. A cheap royalty to IBM that means if other oems refuse to per system license we end up getting very little.




Aug 6 21:34 1989 MAIL Page 2

3. Transferring a lot of money to IBM. 4. Not positioning windows agressively.

If we hold windows back we wont double our oem revenues. I know os/2 is important and we need it to get UNIX apps ported and to fight the high tech and server battles. But windows is DOS for twice the price and we need it to be pervasive.

I am afraid of a structure with IBM where we are in partnership for the following reasons:  a) server businesses arent enough of a gold mine to be a huge part of  our goal. With IBMs cost structure I would like you to explain to me  how a server business can even break even.  b) I am hard core about not putting DOS/win into the financial partnership  If only IBM users buy their package or that % then a low roaylty is ok  but how do we avoid IBM holding us back on windows. Maybe I am paranoid.  c) Lan business is too fast moving to let them write all the code  d) Once os.2 takes over I see our profit per machine actually dropping  and never increasing again. This last point I meant to spend more time  on. Os/2 will dominate eventually and it should allow us at some point  to double again (is that asking too much? maybe) or at least grow per  unit more than the UNIX machines cut into the desktop market so we  grow with the market.

One question I have steve is:  Shouldnt we let the slow pace of negotiation continue? I think that is  in our best interest.  Shouldnt we force them to explain how to make money in the server business  since they are the ones who put so much into it?

IBM never knew our plan and if they did they shouldnt like it - our old plan (DOS) which is the current financial success of the company- sell cheap to IBM and make money from everyone else. I prefer an OS.2 deal like that a lot more than a joint venture. OF course it makes us sensitive to 2 phenomena I worry a lot about: a) cross selling and b) IBM increases market share. A is the worst since increases in royalties will force some oems to rely on A. I dont know how to solve that. If you feel we have to "joint venture" with IBM I think we give up growth opportunity.

SOmehow this discussion is the most important one for the companies busines future and I guess I should think about it more. In any case there are some thoughts. You can call them greedy. Its funny but I always thought other people in the company would end up pushing me to think more about thi financial upside stuff but it never happens. I was supposed to get to be a product guy with people pushing me to charge enough but when It comes to oses I feel more guilty than anyone that we dont have the clear plan to make 2x as much in oses. Os profit is our past present and future so lets you and I figure out how to double it without IBM problems. No easy job!




Comments

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft XBox Layoffs: Almost 2,000 Layoffs Became "Over 2,000"? (Over 20% of the Staff)
over 20% of staff will be let go, not counting staff that leaves voluntarily
Summer Plans in Techrights and Elsewhere
massive layoffs at Microsoft
 
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 30, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, June 30, 2025
People at the Very Top of Microsoft Know How Bad Things Really Are
There's no product that can replace the former profitability of Windows licensing and stuff that went on top of Windows
Gemini Links 01/07/2025: Mid Year and a Tour of Old Languages
Links for the day
EPO Presentation Bemoans Misuse of Slop in Decision-Making on Patents and in Classification (Which is Likely Illegal Too)
We habitually mention failed use cases of LLMs on the Web
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Confirmed, "XBox Hardware Is Dead"
It's possible that over 20% of the staff will be laid off
Links 30/06/2025: Kyrgyzstan vs Media Freedom, Dalai Lama Succession
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: Backend Programs in Gemini and Dynamic Content Without The Scripting
Links for the day
Links 30/06/2025: Zuckerberg’s Tax-Evading Scheme Harms Kids, US Copyright Office Lacks Leadership
Links for the day
Microsoft Isn't Laying Off Tens of Thousands to 'Invest' in Slop ('Hey Hi'), It's Laying Off Tens of Thousands Because It's Running Out of Money (and Willing Lenders)
the layoffs are a sign of the business failing, not "hey hi" (whatever that is) replacing staff
Intel Lays Off 20% of Its Workforce, Microsoft is Doing the Same This Year
Like a yoyo, whatever goes up will come back down
GNU/Linux Rises to New Highs in Angola, Africa in General is Abandoning Windows
Western media barely covers Microsoft layoffs in Africa, but in recent years Microsoft culled the workforce and even shut down entire operations
Destination Geminispace (in the Age of LLM Slop and Slop Images That Infest the Web and Social Control Media)
Geminispace isn't vast, but at least it is - on average - a lot "cleaner"
GNU/Linux Growing in Sierra Leone This Year
Based on what statCounter is seeing, this year there are more and more people there who adopt GNU/Linux
Serial Sloppers Gonna Slop
More sites out there ought to call out the cheaters
Quartz (qz.com) is Spam and a Slopfarm
It used to be OK. Then they fired the staff.
Links 30/06/2025: US Economic Woes, Extreme Heat
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 29, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 29, 2025
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: "The AI Hype" and New AuraGem Ask
Links for the day
Our Desktops Are Not Your Experiments, X is Not an Experiment
Breaking what already worked
Microsoft's Big Lies Regarding This Week's Mass Layoffs Have Already Begun (and They're Already Being Spread by Slopfarms)
Microsoft is the "market leader" in slop
Explaining the Full Story of SLAPPs From Microsoft Staff
For every action there is a reaction, for every attack there will be proportionate consequences
The Openwashing Shills Initiative (OSI) - Part III: IRS and Status of OSI
"They lied to the US IRS and there’s a paper trail"
IBM Red Hat's Dogmatic Fanaticism Under a Thin Veil of "Modernism"
IBM now has the audacity to paint people who don't agree as "nazis"
Microsoft's Share in Guatemala Fell From 97% to 14%
Eventually Microsoft will get stuck in a loop of layoffs, layoffs, and more layoffs
They Made Technology Scary and Taught Us That It's Innocent, Friendly, Even "Social"
Rejection of all this "apps" and "gadgets" and "Smart" (whatever that means!) status quo isn't a rejection of society
The Media is Under Attacks Partly Because There's Little Other (Remaining) Press to Speak in Its Defence
The biggest danger here is that when there's very little press or no "opposition media" left it becomes even easier to crush critics because there aren't many people left to speak about the matter
If Your Web Site is Run by Bots, Eventually Nobody Will 'Read' It Except Bots (People Don't Want to Read Slop)
Eventually people learn from mistakes
Links 29/06/2025: Microsoft Releases False/Fake Benchmarks, "Google Wants You to Watch Ads or Take Surveys to Read Articles"
Links for the day
Links 29/06/2025: Data Breaches and Online Censorship
Links for the day
Gemini Links 29/06/2025: "The Price Of Eggs" and Gemini 3D Tic Tac Toe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 28, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 28, 2025