EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.17.09

Off Topic: Politics of Software (and Everything Else)

Posted in Humour at 8:34 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A lot of people seem surprised by the news that Obama exchanged standards for lock-in (Microsoft). But none of this should be shocking and the candidacy/parties do not matter. That’s just how this system is intended to be run.

Corporocracy map

“Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won’t leave you alone.”

Richard Stallman

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. aeshna23 said,

    January 17, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    Gravatar

    You are simply wrong here. Elections matter, but the public only focuses on a few detail and the political elite only respond on those issues quickly. And anyway, the political elite isn’t thinking that differently than the masses. About the only issue that I’m aware that you can really show a huge difference between the views of political elite and the masses in the United States is illegal immigration and in that particular case, the elites take the leftist stance. That they take the leftist side when they differ makes nonsense of the evil corporate control paranoia theories like Chomsky et al. Admittedly, the corporation agree with the leftist stance in this particular case, but if we are to posit corporate control of dialog to get this result, we’d have to believe that the corporate media promoted Chomsky as the leftist spokesman just to promote illegal immigration and we are getting into what is clearly crazy land.

    And if Roy read political sites like he does tech website, he’d find out that support for Linux and Open Source and opposition to it are completely uncorrelated with political stance. When discussion turn to operating systems on right-wing websites and left-wing websites, you’ll find that roughly the same argument occurs.

  2. Friend said,

    January 18, 2009 at 2:57 am

    Gravatar

    Reminds me of a quote from Metal Gear Solid 4

    Big Boss: Boss… you were right. It’s not about changing the world. It’s about doing our best to leave the world… the way it is.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 18, 2009 at 4:09 am

    Gravatar

    aeshna23,

    People are rarely offered choice wrt issues that matter — policies. It’s mostly branding.

  4. Needs Sunlight said,

    January 18, 2009 at 5:48 am

    Gravatar

    @aeshna23: wrong about change, there was a lot of hard and fast effort done to eliminate standards-based streaming.

    The crap they worked so hard to pound through only reaches a fraction of the US computer-using population, albeit a large fraction, but significantly less than the whole. Thus it is deliberately exclusionary and against openness and democracy.

    Of the streaming methods that can reach 100% of the computer-using population, most tools are even open source. Though you can have open standards even without open source, if “pork” is required of the project.

    Right now, Quicktime and MPEG are the way to support democracy. Theora streams should be offered on the side to further the growth of a useful open video standard.

    In some cases change is bad, as we see in the incoming administration’s change away from open standards and protocols for online communication. Staying with open standards and protocols for video streaming would allow the potential to reach 100% of the computer-using population, rather than just some of it.

  5. Needs Sunlight said,

    January 18, 2009 at 5:54 am

    Gravatar

    Given that there are no technical benefits to using MSFT crap for the inauguration and only disadvantages, one wonders if a case for sedition can be built against those involved.

    After all, what’s happening here is a case of an external and, some would say, hostile interest grabbing control over public communications and positioning itself as gate-keeper and bottle neck between the citizens of the US and their elected officials.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 18, 2009 at 6:08 am

    Gravatar

    This seems like a classic case of using codecs and/or DRM as a lock-in. I’ll post some antitrust exhibits about that soon.

    “In one piece of mail people were suggesting that Office had to work equally well with all browsers and that we shouldn’t force Office users to use our browser. This Is wrong and I wanted to correct this,” said Bill Gates [PDF]

  7. SR said,

    January 18, 2009 at 6:49 am

    Gravatar

    I doubt, with all of the important work ahead of him, that Obama is even aware of the streaming format of his inauguration. I’d even go so far to say that it’s the *furthest* thing from his mind.

    Sure, it’s issue #1 in the minds of tunnel-visioned zealouts who measure him by this, but this is a storm in a tea-cup.

    And suggesting sedition only makes one sound like a world-class jackass. On the priority list for fixing America, streaming format for an event that will also be on every channel on the tele is pretty low, and some of these arguments border on the sublimely absurd ;-)

    And furthermore, suggesting some “I’ll scratch your back, you scratch mine” relationship because of streaming format is unfounded, unsupported by *any* fact, libelous, ill-researched, ill-thought, and frankly, so absurd I’m having a hard time putting the absurdity into meaningful words…

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 18, 2009 at 7:20 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not Obama himself, but he’s the front man in a party. It’s the administration which is elected, not the person (a public face or “branding” slant in the elections).

    This criticism has nothing to do with Obama or Democrats; it’s to do with an inherently broken system and procurement that is irrational and discriminatory.

  9. Andre said,

    January 18, 2009 at 11:42 am

    Gravatar

    Having industry hearings of the government on youtube, forget about the flash format and open standards for now, would be a great contributions to transparency of governance.

    It makes sense to campaign for these small and simple changes of transparency matters that do shift power.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 18, 2009 at 11:44 am

    Gravatar

    You’re assuming that the Tube is open for participation.

    Opening of the process ought to be broader.

    The Democrats have already made some discouraging appointments.

  11. Paul Gaskin said,

    January 19, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Obama is an inspiring leader, but perhaps not the kind of strong leader I admire. Obama doesn’t want to focus on the underlying struggle which gained him the office.

    Hugo Chavez is a strong leader. He says what he means and means what he says. He’s not afraid to fight, nor does he fail to acknowledge the bitter struggle.

    I still feel a general goodwill towards Obama, even though he’s done and said so many disappointing things before his first day as president.

    My patience will eventually wear out if he doesn’t do something different from previous administrations.

    The Democrats have been Republicans for decades now, and we don’t need another god-damned Republican. We elected a Democrat (D), we didn’t vote for a Republican.

    The government doesn’t even bother to pretend to represent us. They treat us like “noblemen” treat peasants. Will that change with Obama?

  12. s.plisskin said,

    January 20, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    Gravatar

    It doesn’t matter who you vote for now because the elites have infiltrated all political parties with radicals posing as moderates. Money says who gets coverage in the media owned by these elites. They select and groom leaders years in advance.

    The only way you can make real change is to convince yourselves and your friends to get deeply involved in politics and parties and force your candidates through by selecting candidates right for the job and who you know isn’t in the pocket of the elites.

    Unfortunately the people who are most attracted to power are psychotic sociopathic control freaks with delusions of grandeur. The rest of us just want to live peaceful lives.

    The only change you will see from Obama is that he will be much better at hiding his evil malice than Dick and Bush ever were. You will gladly follow your new messiah onto the FEMA trains.

    Use Gnu/Linux because the elite want you to use Windows/OSx.

What Else is New


  1. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  2. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  3. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  4. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  5. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  6. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  7. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  8. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  9. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  10. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  11. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  12. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  13. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  14. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  15. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  16. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  17. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  18. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  19. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  20. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  21. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  22. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  23. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  24. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  25. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)



  26. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day



  27. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects



  28. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.



  29. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?



  30. Microsoft and Proprietary Software Vendors a Financial Boon for the Linux Foundation, But at What Cost?

    The Linux Foundation is thriving financially, but the sources of income are diversified to the point where the Linux Foundation is actually funded by foes of Linux, defeating the very purpose or direction of such a nonprofit foundation (led by self-serving millionaires who don't use GNU/Linux)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts