EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.09.09

Mono Critique Almost a Taboo in Ubuntu Forums, Ideas, Bugs, and Mailing Lists

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Ubuntu at 5:41 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“I saw that internally inside Microsoft many times when I was told to stay away from supporting Mono in public. They reserve the right to sue”

Robert Scoble, former Microsoft evangelist

Summary: There is no route through which to communicate with Ubuntu regarding the Mono problem

IN the Ubuntu Web site where ideas are being proposed, some appointed moderators were seen diverting people who raise concerns about Mono to bug reporting sections. But Jeff Enns makes the fair point that: “you are not describing a bug with mono. The forums would be a better place for discussion, not bug reports. Thank you.” Tony Manco spotted this one yesterday.

“[P]eople who voice concerns about Mono are sent around in loops and their freedom of expression is hence compromised.”So basically, people who voice concerns about Mono are sent around in loops and their freedom of expression is hence compromised. It’s the same in the forums and even in the mailing lists (although raising the issue more politely would not hurt). Thanks to Tony Manco for noticing and notifying about this. Those who express dissatisfaction with the inclusion of Mono by default* are treated as though they are enemies. But why? By whom?

A Microsoft-born company (well, created by former Microsoft employees**) that advances Mono further is now given a spot in OStatic. Their article is not about their advancement of Mono***, but it does show how Microsoft can intersect with channels of communication about Free/open source software.

Another one of our readers says that Miguel de Icaza “FUDS Google Chrome. He’s concerned that it might violate the LGPL.” Here is part of his message:

We are on a similar situation with Moonlight where we ended up distributing proprietary codecs for VC1 (also MPEG-LA licensed) instead of the open source ffmpeg.

Today our answer for those that want to use ffmpeg (and it is my personal choice as well, since I rather dogfood open source software) is to compile Moonlight from source code and use the ffmpeg code themselves instead of depending on proprietary codecs to be installed.

The codecs that the user relies on are imposed by the publisher, not chosen by the receiver. This means that pretending that Microsoft Moonlight is fine without Microsoft binaries is purely deceit. It ought to be added that APIs too (e.g. Silverlight) can be a patent liability, with or without codecs.
______
* Choice is fine, but to force patent liability upon people is plainly dangerous, maybe irresponsible.
** MindTouch was last mentioned here as it helps a certain Microsoft land grab.
*** There is at least one Microsoft employee who is even working directly on Mono.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

22 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    June 9, 2009 at 7:21 am

    Gravatar

    I’m concerned that there’s been an upturn in de Icaza interviews and quotes. M$ marketing companies usually only pull his chain when they need him to make noise or distraction. Recently, an editor tried to piggy-back him into a summary with respectable people.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The same goes for Mono (and Moonlight) at a less personal level.

    Remember that Microsoft said that Silverlight is not available for GNU/Linux because of Novell’s work. Regulators would have otherwise forced Microsoft to properly support GNU/Linux, so it’s not as though Novell saved the day. It only keeps a proper (first-class and indemnified) port of Silverlight away.

    Mackenzie Reply:

    You say that as if a version of Silverlight released for Linux would be DFSG-free, like Moonlight is. Yeah, right! This way, we get Free Software, not proprietary junk.

    Also:
    The general concensus on that Ubuntu mailing list thread is that there are currently no good, let alone BETTER, GTK replacements for those applications. If you want them to be replaced, write something worth replacing them with. Whinging doesn’t cut it.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You say that as if a version of Silverlight released for Linux would be DFSG-free, like Moonlight is. Yeah, right! This way, we get Free Software, not proprietary junk.

    Microsoft cannot distribute software for GNU/Linux and say “touch this and we’ll sue you.” If someone clones it, then it’s another story. See the Moonlight covenant for details.

    The general concensus on that Ubuntu mailing list thread is that there are currently no good, let alone BETTER, GTK replacements for those applications. If you want them to be replaced, write something worth replacing them with.

    Mono applications being better is a fallacy. And by neglecting ‘non-Mono’ applications (through exposure to userbase) you guys are leading to self-fulfilling prophecies.

    Mackenzie Reply:

    Uh…why can’t Microsoft distribute closed-source software for Linux?

    It is not a fallacy. Look at your Mono alternatives list. Do you honestly believe that GThumb can do everything (and more!) that F-Spot can do? I guess you took the TARDIS for a spin and grabbed some amazingly good version of GThumb that actually has features from 2015.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Uh…why can’t Microsoft distribute closed-source software for Linux?

    I said the opposite. They can. Like Adobe Flash.

    Bear in mind that Moonlight is not Silverlight. It’s hardly intended to be on par in legal and technical terms.

    Do you honestly believe that GThumb can do everything (and more!) that F-Spot can do?

    I have never used F-Spot myself (I install kde-desktop on all my Ubuntu machines), but based on what I hear, F-Spot is not a leader in its league.

    By the way, I don’t know who Fink is. If rude messages/language are used when linking here, it’s not to be attributed to me and I don’t control this, either. And thanks for debating this, Mackenzie. It needs an open discussion because there are eternally unanswered questions and TomTomVFAT as precedence.

    Like all of you folks, my goal is to spread GNU/Linux and I like Ubuntu. But I fear that you refuse to see obstacles simply because you don’t want them to be obstacles. It neither about will nor faith; it’s about the facts.

    Chris Reply:

    > If you want them to be replaced, write something worth replacing them with. Whinging doesn’t cut it.

    This will never happen cause then those sad fuckers actually would have to do something productive instead of insulting other peoples work.

    And we all know that’s a no go for boy & his shills.

  2. Juan Pablo Angamarca said,

    June 9, 2009 at 10:51 am

    Gravatar

    Mark Shuttleworth himself said that Ubuntu wouldn’t live under the fear of threat until it arises. Maybe that could be a valid position *for the time being*, but they should start doing something about the threat that comes along with Mono *now*. I have Mono installed on my Ubuntu machine, just for one application: Gnome Subtitles. And I do that just because there’s no other subtitling software that works properly on my machine. I wish someone would do with Gnome Subtitles what the Gnote team did. I think Gnome Subtitles is the only application that outperforms any other patent encumbered-free application, and it would be nice to see an effort to replace it too.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Mark Shuttleworth himself said that Ubuntu wouldn’t live under the fear of threat until it arises.

    He thanked me for information that I sent him last month regarding Moonlight. They are at least listening. For what it’s worth, PJ from Groklaw also criticised that stance of Mark Shuttleworth (the context being Mono).

    Juan Pablo Angamarca Reply:

    Yeah, they are at least listening. It would be awful to not even have a response. They should do what Fedora and Debian are doing.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    A lot of people mistake “remove from default installation” for “remove from repository”.

  3. DOUGman said,

    June 9, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Gravatar

    I use Ubuntu derivatives as well, the ONLY mono application that I use is Gnome Desktop. I do know that there are other terminal clients applications available, but I have never taken the time to do any sort of comparison, perhaps I should, based on how much more bloated Tomboy was as opposed to G-Note.

    On another note, pun intended. I have have been using Basket Notepad for almost a year now and in my opinion it is very good.

    http://basket.kde.org/

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I’m surprised we didn’t have it on the list already. I’ve just added it.

  4. Aaron Fulkerson said,

    June 9, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy,

    Thanks for the link-love on my post about Collaborative Networks (http://cli.gs/cn). I think you might also appreciate a post I wrote about enterprise open source at the MindTouch Blog: http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2009/04/22/80-of-the-functionality-for-500-of-the-cost/

    At MindTouch we employ what I think of as an open core business model. I write about this here: http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2009/04/22/an-open-core-licensing-model/

    I think you’ll be pleased to know MindTouch saves a penguin for every upgrade of MindTouch core: http://ostatic.com/blog/upgrade-mindtouch-or-the-penguin-gets-it :-)

    Finally, has it ever occurred to you that Mono could actually be subversive to the Microsoft business model and revenue generation? #justsayin

  5. eet said,

    June 10, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Gravatar

    This whole blog entry is nothing but whining about a free process of forming of opinion where Anti-Mono agitators don’t get any special preferred treatment.

  6. Marcus Koze said,

    June 10, 2009 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    Why would they be agitators ? Why should we welcome software from m$ and it’s accolites without a single “hmm”, as you, the mono-defenders wish would happen ? as i;ve said it, i’ll say it again: unlike the claims that FOSS (Linux and other projects) violates some hundreds of m$ patents, i truly think this mono *is* a “trojan-horse” for m$ and “poor” little novell to milk some cash in courts and as a side-effect, slow the adoption of free-software (at least).

    As far as i stand, you can take your slice of mono and go into your dark corner on your windoze machine & do whatever you want.

    And to Ubuntu/Canonical… at least open up some discussion channels and talk about the issues… if so many worry about it, why not listen, as you always did ?

  7. eet said,

    June 10, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Gravatar

    According to you every programmer that doesn’t work on Linux is an MS-accolite, hm?

    Well, do whatever you feel like, and good luck for your search of the last of that dying race – the mono-less distributions. You are part of a very vocal but nonetheless shrinking minority; bear your fate like a man and cut back a bit on the cursing-and-whining part.

  8. Marcus Koze said,

    June 10, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Gravatar

    By accolites i’ve meant Novell and the other companies that became slaves of Micromoft. (yes, no quotes around the _slaves_ word, that’s how i see them… would you disagree ?)

    I didn’t mean at all to say something like that (“According to you every programmer that doesn’t work on Linux is an MS-accolite, hm? “) , sorry if it sounds like so, told you about my not-so-good english.

    Roy Bixler Reply:

    Your English seems fine to me.

  9. eet said,

    June 10, 2009 at 9:49 am

    Gravatar

    ‘Slaves of Microsoft’ – give me a break… How old are you? This is not ‘Lord of the Rings’…

  10. Marcus Koze said,

    June 10, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, slaves. No, this isn’t Lord of the Rings, but what m$ does these days (i mean more ferociously than they used to) isn’t quite from this world… or do you find their acts suitable for the old excuse of “they’re a company and companies are set to make money” ? If so, feel free to go your way, in my fantasy world they’d end up hanged, shot, poised, sliced and then thrown in an active volcano.

    Regarding my age, i’m not some next-door-kid, trust me. When i say slaves, i mean those companies that went into “agreements” with micromoft don’t have their original identities anymore… instead playing blindingly according to the will of m$, from what i see…

    Anyway, eet, in the end you’re an advocate of mono, probably arguing with “productivity”, i’m a guy protesting against it because… well, i’ve iterated my reasons above too many times … let’s see who’s right (time will show us)

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Anyway, eet, in the end you’re an advocate of mono..

    A better description would be “protester against this Web site”. It is best not to feed the trolls.

What Else is New


  1. 22,000 Blog Posts

    A special number is reached again, marking another milestone for the site



  2. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  3. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  4. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  5. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  6. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  7. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  8. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)



  9. “Then They Came For Me—And There Was No One Left To Speak For Me.”

    The decreasing number of people who cover EPO scandals (partly due to fear, or Battistelli's notorious "reign of terror") and a cause for hope, as well as a call for help



  10. As Expected, the Patent Microcosm is Already Interfering, Lobbying and Influencing Supreme Court Justices

    The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is preparing to deliver some important decisions on cases with broad ramifications, e.g. for patent scope, and those who make money from patent feuds are attempting to alter the outcome (which would likely restrict patent scope even further, based on these Justices' track record)



  11. Intellectual Ventures -- Like Microsoft (Which It Came From) -- Spreads Patents to Manifest a Lot of Lawsuits

    That worrisome strategy which is passage of patents to active (legally-aggressive) trolls seems to be a commonality, seen across both Microsoft and its biggest ally among trolls, which Microsoft and Bill Gates helped create and still fund



  12. What the Patent Microcosm is Saying About the EPO and the UPC

    Response to 3 law firms and today's output from them, which serves to inform or misinform the European public at times of Big Lies and fog of (patent) war, revealing the true nature of 21st century asymmetric patent warfare and lobbying



  13. Tough Day for the EPO's Media/Press/PR Team, Trying 'Damage Control' After Important Techrights Publications

    In an effort to save face and regain a sense of legitimacy the EPO publishes various things belatedly, and only after Techrights made these things publicly known and widely discussed



  14. Links 21/3/2017: PyPy Releases, Radeon RX Vega, Eileen Evans at Linux Foundation

    Links for the day



  15. In IAM, Asian Courts That Deliver Justice Are “Unfriendly” and Asian Patent Trolls Are Desirable

    Rebuttal or response to the latest pieces from IAM, which keeps promoting a culture of litigation rather than sharing, collaboration, negotiation, and open innovation



  16. At EPO “I Have the Feeling That Lowering Quality is Part of a Concerted Plan.”

    Growing concern about patent quality at the EPO -- a subject which causes managers to get rather nervous -- is now an issue at the forefront



  17. EPO Reduces the World to Just Seven Nations to Bolster an Illusion of Growing 'Demand' for European Patents

    The unscientific -- if not antiscientific -- attitude of the European Patent Office (EPO) continues to show with the arrival of yet more misleading 'infographics' (disinfographics would be a more suitable term)



  18. Letter to Angela Merkel Expresses Concerns About Impact of EPO Scandals on Germany and Its Image

    Dr. Angela Merkel, arguably the most powerful woman in the world, is being warned about the consequences of Germany ignoring (and hence facilitating) the abuses of Benoît Battistelli



  19. EPO Caricature: Low Patent Quality Not an Achievement

    A new cartoon about the legacy of Battistelli, which ruins both inventors and staff (examination) while handing money to abusers



  20. Are Lithuania and Latvia the Latest Additions to the List of Benoît Battistelli's Vassal States?

    Benoît Battistelli's 'back room' deals came at an interesting, strategic time and the Office uncharacteristically kept quiet about these



  21. Links 20/3/2017: Linux 4.11 RC3, OpenSSH 7.5 Released

    Links for the day



  22. Supposedly 'Pampered' Prisoners Are Still Prisoners of the EPO

    Response to those gross and familiar attempts to portray patent examiners, not politicians who trample all over them, as the cause of all the problems at the EPO



  23. Insulting Reversal of Narratives at the EPO: Team Battistelli as the Victim

    At times of great oppression against staff, in clear defiance of the law in fact, journalists are being asked (or expected) to view the oppressor as the victim, even when this oppressor drives people to suicide



  24. Battistelli's EPO Copies China -- Not the US -- When it Comes to Patenting Software and Expanding Patent Scope

    A detailed explanation of some of the latest reports from China and the US, serving to show that one opens up to software patents whereas the other shuts the door on them (and guess whose lead the EPO is taking)



  25. What IAM Says About AST, RPX, Ericsson, and IBM

    IAM, the trolls' mouthpiece (also the EPO's mouthpiece, but that's another story), provides updates on trolls and troll-like entities, but further commentary is needed to clarify and counterbalance the promotional language



  26. Apple and Microsoft, Two Patent Aggressors That Habitually Attack GNU/Linux Distributors, Get Sued by a Patent Troll, Soverain IP

    Putting in perspective the latest high-profile (in the press at least) lawsuits filed by a notorious troll, which this time around chose as its targets two patent aggressors that deserve no sympathy because of their own actions



  27. What's OIN Doing While Microsoft is Siccing Patent Trolls on Azure Competitors' Customers?

    Microsoft's patent litigation strategy has become clearer, and patents-centric efforts such as OIN offer no defence against such a strategy, which attempts to pressure everyone to flock to Microsoft for 'protection' (from Microsoft itself)



  28. “EPO Continues to Grant Software Patents”

    The longstanding concern about the granting of software patents at the EPO (typically disguised as a "device") as reinforced by T 0625/11



  29. Links 19/3/2017: Linux Sightings, What's Wrong With Microsoft, and Death of Docker

    Links for the day



  30. Governance Crisis at EPO Deepens After Latest Meeting of the Administrative Council, Necessitating Urgent Outside Intervention

    he EPO's Administrative Council continues to be subservient to -- and without any authority over -- Team Battistelli with its endless mischief and endless power grab, including unbridled money grab


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts