10.09.09

Glyn Moody on European Commission’s Inability to Defend Free Software in Face of Microsoft Lies

Posted in Antitrust, Deception, Europe, Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft at 9:19 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Analysis of the ways in which Microsoft rules out Free software, hoping that by means of illusion it will simply go away

WE were not pleased with the European Commission’s decision regarding Microsoft. It is all being done in a rush, and thus it’s done poorly. It’s very typical. Glyn Moody, who is familiar with these matters, has gotten around to looking at the details and he comments on the fact that Microsoft had the Commission approve discrimination of Free software.

Now, the phrase “compatible with Open Source Licenses” is pretty vague. Does that include the GNU GPL, for instance? If it doesn’t, it’s a weak undertaking, but if it does, it could be significant. Similarly, what exactly “nominal upfront fee” means, and whether it is per project and truly negligible, are questions that will need to be answered before that undertaking can be judged.

As Groklaw correctly pointed out, what are these payments for anyway? Software patents are illegal in Europe. The Commission is being bamboozled here, again.

Moody also points out that Microsoft is lying about the growing market share of Free software.

Er, what, like the browser sector, where Firefox now has nearly 24% market share worldwide, and Microsoft’s share is decreasing? Or Apache’s 54% in the Web server world, where Microsoft’s share is decreasing? Or GNU/Linux’s 88% market share of the top 500 supercomputers in the world, where Microsoft’s share is static?

It is typical for Microsoft to do this. By belittling the impact of Free software, Microsoft hopes that it will convince developers, manufacturers and shops to steer away from supporting GNU/Linux, for example. In the case of the Commission, if Microsoft can convince regulators that Free software is a negligible factor, then a settlement can rule out any degree of season. █

“It’s nice for you to admit your guys are running scared [of Free software]. They should be.”

–The sum of Microsoft’s fears

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink Mail Send this to a friend

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New

Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network
Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)
Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

Links for the day
To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany
Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

Links for the day
Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)
The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised
Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

Links for the day
The EPO and the USPTO Are Granting Fake Patents on Software, Knowing That Courts Would Reject These

Office management encourages applicants to send over patent applications that are laughable while depriving examiners the freedom and the time they need to reject these; it means that loads of bogus patents are being granted, enshrined as weapons that trolls can use to extort small companies outside the courtroom
CommunityBridge is a Cynical Microsoft-Funded Effort to Show Zemlin Works for 'Community', Not Microsoft

After disbanding community participation in the Board (but there are Microsoft staff on the Board now) the "Linux Foundation" (or Zemlin PAC) continues to take Microsoft money and polishes or launders that as "community"
Links 14/3/2019: GNOME 3.32 and Mesa 19.0.0 Released

Links for the day
EPO 'Results' Are, As Usual, Not Measured Correctly

The supranational monopoly, a monopoly-granting authority, is being used by António Campinos to grant an insane amount of monopolies whose merit is dubious and whose impact on Europe will be a net negative
Good News Everyone! UPC Ready to Go... in 2015!

Benoît Battistelli is no longer in Office and his fantasy (patent lawyers' fantasy) is as elusive as ever; Team UPC is trying to associate opposition to UPC with the far right (AfD) once again
Links 13/3/2019: Plasma 5.15.3,Chrome 73 and Many LF Press Releases

Links for the day
In the Age of Trumpism EFF Needs to Repeatedly Remind Director Iancu That He is Not a Judge and He Cannot Ignore the Courts

The nonchalance and carelessness seen in Iancu's decision to just cherry-pick decisions/outcomes (basically ignoring caselaw) concerns technologists, who rightly view him as a 'mole' of the litigation 'industry' (which he came from)
Links 12/3/2019: Sway 1.0 Released, Debian Feuds Carry On

Links for the day
Microsoft is Complaining About Android and Chrome OS (GNU/Linux) Vendor Not Paying for Microsoft Patents (Updated)

Microsoft, which nowadays does the patent shakedown against GNU/Linux by proxy, is still moaning about companies that don’t pay ‘protection’ money (grounds for antitrust action or racketeering investigation)
Watchtroll Has Redefined "Trolls" to Mean Those Who Oppose Software Patents (and Oppose Trolls), Not Those Who Leverage These for Blackmail Alone

The controversial change to 35 U.S.C. § 101 guidance is being opposed by the public (US citizens who oppose American software patents), so patent maximalists like Janal Kalis (“PatentBuddy”) and extremists like Gene Quinn (Watchtroll) want us to believe that the public is just “EFF” and cannot think for itself
EPO's Latest 'Results' Show That António Campinos Has Already Given Up on Patent Quality and is Just Another Battistelli

The patent-granting machine that the EPO has become reports granting growth of unrealistic scale (unless no proper examination is actually carried out)
Links 11/3/2019: Linux 5.0.1, Audacity 2.3.1, GNU Coreutils 8.31

Links for the day
US Patent Law Currently Not Changing Much and Software Patents Are Still in Limbo

Surveying the news, as we still meticulously do (even if we don't write about it), it seems clear that American courts hardly tolerate software patents and proponents of such patents are losing their voice (or morale)
EPO Examiner: “I Have Been Against Software Patents and Eventually 3/4 of My Job is Examining Software Patent Applications.”

Overworked examiners aren't being given the time, the tools and the freedom to reject patents, based on prior art, patent scope and so on; it is beginning to resemble a rubber-stamping operation, not an examining authority
Europe Will Pay a High Price for Software Patents Advocacy by António Campinos in Europe's Patent-Granting Authority

EPO President António Campinos — like Iancu at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) — is still promoting software patents in Europe even though such patents are clearly detrimental to Europe’s interests
António Campinos -- Like His Father -- Lacks Support From Colleagues, Endorsed Only From the Top

History lessons from Wikileaks
Links 10/3/2019: GNU and GNOME Releases

Links for the day
Koch Brothers' Oil Money is Poisoning Academia and Distorting Scholarly Work/Research on Patents

Meddling in patent law by the Kochs, the oil tycoons who can be seen everywhere Conservative think tanks are, shows no signs of abatement
From Patents on Chewing Gum to Toothpaste Patents: How the EPO Came to Focus on Speed and Volume, Not Quality

There’s still no proper quality control in place for European Patents — a severe problem which will only further exacerbate the legal uncertainty associated with all European Patents
European Patent Office Press Releases (Two in Two Days) Are Disguised as 'News' and Tell the Opposite of the Truth

The Office under the 'new' and 'improved' leadership of António Campinos seems to be repeating the mistakes of Battistelli by discrediting anything it says; its press releases, characteristically dubbed "news" for some reason, bear no resemblance to reality and are detached from facts EPO insiders have long known
Links 9/3/2019: International Women’s Day, QtLottie

Links for the day
António Campinos Will Not Tackle Any of the Lingering Issues at the European Patent Office

A man of his war (or his master's war) rather than his word, Mr. Campinos makes it abundantly clear that patent quality issues are off the agenda and corruption persists without it ever being tackled