EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.04.10

The BBC’s Anti-Internet Pro-Microsoft Revisionist Propaganda

Posted in Apple, Deception, IBM, Microsoft, Videos at 10:19 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Blue E

Summary: The BBC rewrites history to tell a truly deceiving story which does a disservice to the broadcaster

THE previous post (titled “Computer History Development Timeline“) was put there for a reason. It precedes yet another case of the MSBBC (occupied by many former Microsoft employees [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]) rewriting history in a most shameful way that made one of our readers very upset. He wrote a detailed analysis of this new programme.

It is worth pointing out that the BBC has been accused many times before of rewriting/distorting Microsoft history. The new programme about the Internet is a one-hour piece which shows another example of the BBC glorifying Bill Gates (we have other examples). This ought to make people skeptical about anything they read in the Beeb about Bill, who sometimes even writes for the Beeb. To give just a sample of external links:

Internal links include:

A lot of people trust the BBC, so the broadcaster has great responsibility and it should not be allowed to temper with history. But that’s exactly what it’s doing right now.

Microsoft BBC

Our reader and I had some conversations prior to the preparation of a detailed dissection of the BBC’s new programme. “Please watch the BBC video and note down who appears,” he said, “and in what order.

“Same with companies and logos. As far as I can see, there is no mention of Paul Allen or Steve Jobs. Or the Mozilla people or the TCP/IP people. See that I’m getting at? Where are the real pioneers? How can you make a program on the Internet without mentioning Apple or IBM or Novell or… remember all the other smaller desktop companies that were around before the IBM-PC?”

As far as I can tell, they never mentioned Netscape. Are they out of this world? I watched the programme two nights ago and our reader is right. But please, readers are encouraged to verify for themselves. It is there freely available on iPlayer, which relates to another Microsoft scandal that we wrote about in:

Our reader says: “This video is making me very angry as I listen and transcribe it. Get a load of this from 10:58, talking about libertarianism, the ‘free’ software movement and shots of hippies smoking joints. Must have been done deliberately.

“I can imagine the script instructions: Instead of an interview with real Internet pioneers, let’s type up some stuff about libertarianism and cross fade that with joint smoking hippie types. What a total disgrace.”

“No Google, no Cerf,” I pointed out to the reader. “I noticed that. Just hippies versus those evil “Web giants”…and a fake hypothesis.”

“Yeah,” says our reader, “the whole thing could have been typed up at Redmond. Take careful notice of the images that go with the text. Tokesmoking hippies and free anarchist web types, versus Bill Gated who invented “Internet Explorer” to save the Web for commerce.

“There never was any such dichotomy.”

It sometimes seems like this so-called ‘documentary’ was not about the Internet. It’s about those “evil anarchists” and their “crazy” agenda from which we are saved.

“You gotta get as many people as possible to comment on that propaganda piece,” said our readers and I personally agree because pissed me off too. It’s like an anti “Freetard” programme, thinly veiled as something else. It also established revisionism by selection and omission, with implicit emphasis and inane sound bites.

Here are some transcriptions and comments that our reader added to them:

Who pioneered the WEB

Well, according to the BBC, it was Tim Berners-Lee, (0:39) “the man who Invented the web” and Bill Gates. While the former did actually do something amazingly inventive, Bill Gates contribution is less clear. At (2:12) a giant Internet Explorer logo pops up, totally filling the screen. I would have thought a mention of Mozilla and NCSA would have been a more appropriate place to start.

(2:44) “In this series, I’ll be meeting all the pioneers, and key players. Everybody from Google to Facebook, Twitter to Amazon. The people who helped bring about this seemingly unstopable leveling of power, culture and values, that’s having such an impact on all our daily lives “

Of the above, only Google could be described as a pioneers.

(3:04) And cut to our second ‘web pioneer’, guess who, Bill Gates of Microsoft for an authoritative description of the impact of the Web. This from the man who missed the boat, at least three times, the Web, online commerce and Search technology.

“Well, the Web is how mankind communicates nowadays”

They then immediately cut to Steve Wozniak of Apple, a true pioneer of the desktop revolution and the Internet.

“It’s like the Internet is like a brain, it’s the smartest Brain in the world”

In case you don’t get it yet, in priority of who contributed the most, Berners-Lee followed by Bill Gates followed by Steve Wozniak.

(3:15) A flash of the Wikipedia site as Al Gore pops up, “it is an empowering tool that has more potential than any other human civilisation has ever developed”

OK, Al Gore, while not actually inventing the Internet, did actually help to vote in funding. Something the video could have mentioned here. The whole thing suffers from this, light and fluffy sound-bytes and lacking in dept.

(3:22) Next up Mark Zuckerberg, the co-founder of Facebook. Let’s give him his due, the concept of a social network is creative. But a pioneer of the Web, come on, you can not be serious here.

Yet some more words of wisdom from Bill Gates:

“The world is going to keep getting more and more open. There’s going to be more information available about… about everything”

Apart from Steve Wozniak and Tim Berners-Lee, no one else mentioned up to now has done any real pioneering. Unless I missed it?

(3:28) A big shot of the Google logo and cross fade to Stephen Fry

“This as astounding technology and we should just take a moment to celebrate the power and the reach that it gives us”

From section 31:32, a big mention of ‘piracy’, but absolutely *no* mention of Torvalds or the Open Source contribution. It’s as if history has been erased!!

(3:40) “This is the story of the Web.”

Problem is, no it isn’t.

[fast forward]

(10:58) Images of hippy drugged out types from the sixties. According to the video, the ‘Web’ was inspired by counter-culture, hippy idealistic, libertarianism and then goes on to link this to the “free software” movement. While managing to not once mention Open Source and the people making money from it. I don’t believe it!

(11:07) “The leveling ambitions of the online world can be traced back to the counter-culture of the nineteen sixties and the epicenter of this hippy idealism, San Francisco”

(11:18) a shot of a street sign “ASHBURY – 1500 – HAIGHT”. Wasn’t that where Charles Manson used hang out?

(11:25) Cut to an old Alan Wicker documentary: “No one knows what’s happening in San Francisco. But this is where it’s at, traditional home of the wayout. Today, Mecca of happy hippies who are cracking the smooth silhouette of American materialism with that ultimate weapon – with love.

(11:45) “Amidst the ferment a particular strand of a philosophy known as libertarianism began to take root. It was a mix of both left and right wing ideas and rejected state control, the legal system and censorship. While emphasising the importance of individual free will”

All the while the narrator is saying this, there are close-ups of hippy types smoking what appears to be joints. What a co-incidence, isn’t it?

(12:03) “And while the counter-cultural dream would fade away in the real world, in the nineteen seventies it found an unlikely place where these ideals would flourish. Previously had been the preserve of governments, the military and large corporations. But now for the first time, smaller cheaper models began to put the technology in the hands of the people. And something remarkable happened, this counter cultural libertarianism found a new home on what was the early Internet”

(12:42) Cut to Andrew Keen, author of “The Cult of the Amateur”. Not a fan of the new technology.

“The most concrete legacy of the counter-culture is the Internet. The values, the organisation, the rebellion, the resistance to authority were all encapsulated in the Internet”

[fast forward]

“In this world before the Web, if you went online, you were walled into small corners of cyberspace. To create the Web as we now know it would take someone to write a common language that would link the data stored on computers around the planet. A man who would invert the World Wide Web”

(23:46) “I invented the web just because I needed it, really. Because it was so frustrating and didn’t exist,” says Tim Berners-Lee

[fast forward]

(27:55) A quote from Bill Gates

“The dream that everybody wanted to be connected, you know that goes way-way back. It’s about letting people share information”

Curiously enough in his book “the road ahead”, the Internet is given scant mention. And according to the Wikipedia entry on Windows. Consumer versions of Windows were originally designed without a network connection and Windows NT and its successors were not initially designed with Internet security in mind.

(29:14) “The Web is more than just an empowering tool, it’s deliberately structured in a way that resists authority… The Web was designed to give all users equal access. You don’t need permission to visit web sites or create one. And when you are on the Web, there are no governments generating rules and regulations. There is no center and no controlling authority. It’s the ultimate leveling.

“What we had was the development of the Wide World Web was a technological solution built at CERN that meshed with the hippy dream. Little wonder then that the Web was set on a collision course with conventional notions of social order and hierarchy”

(30:06) “The revolutionary thing is that it let people be very free. It constrained them as little as possible. It allows you to publish what ever you like. It allows you to publish it in any format. But the really important thing was it could be done on a server without asking anybody else, without having to register…” [Lee]

(30:22) “For most of Western history you had an authority framework that was vertical. God on top and you on the bottom and Dad and the Pope and the King somewhere in that great white column. And suddenly authority as a technical matter and as a political matter was horizontal”

(30:45) “I mean when you listen to people like Berners-Lee and all the rest of the crowd. They idealise this notion, for the first time in human history, we’ve created something without a center, it can’t be controlled. Well the reason we created it was because these people were opposed to the notion of hierarchy and authority. So it wasn’t an accident, they created their idealogical wet dream” [Andrew Keen]

(31:12) “And there was one final thing that turned the Web into a kind of kryptonite threatening to subvert society and the twentieth century economic model. It was given away for free”

(31:32) “Tim Berners-Lee is someone who invented something of unbelievable power. But has turned his back on any kind of profiting from it. think we should celebrate not just his ingenuity but the World Wide Web worked because he opened it up, because it was free for all to use. It’s true Open Source in that sense and he should be daily thanked by everybody who gets any pleasure or profit out of the World Wide Web for that supreme act of generosity, selflessness and idealism” [Stephen Fry]

[fast forward]

(32:22) “But the very success of the Web would rouse a giant. The idea that it was a creative space where all could participate equally would quickly be confronted by a very different model that say the Web as a place to buy and sell rather than to share”

Notice the implication that only Microsoft spotted the commercial possibilities of the Web and notice also how the argument is presented as a division between Microsoft and the commercial Web versus drug toking libertarians.

[fast forward]

(33:00) “The year was 1975 Pink Floyd was on the radio, Jaws was at the Cinema and the Vietnam war had just finished. But it was also the year that a young Harvard dropout named Bill Gates arrived in Albuquerque New Mexico. Gates had come to New Mexico to work for a small company called MITS. And thirty years ago some of MITS biggest customers were amateur rocket enthusiasts… MITS soon moved on to more sophistic electronics creating the earliest affordable home computer the ALTAIR 8800. Helping to set in train the revolution that would lead to the wired world of today”

A better candidate for when it all began would be 1972 when Robert Kahn successfully demonstrated the ARPANET, the precursor to the Internet. Electronic mail or e-mail was also introduced in that year.

(34:18) “The personal computer was the template on which the web had to be created. You had to have millions of these common machines in order for it to make any sense”

Except Berners-Lee of CERN created it on a NEXT machine and used it to connect physicists (IIRC). Why is there no mention of Apple in any of this?

(34:32) “Bill Gates was developing BASIC, a programming language for the ALTAIR. He saw the potential to make big money from software at a time when most personal computer users were hobbyists who gave it away for free”

Except most software was ‘free’ at the time, when you bought the hardware you got a copy of the source as well. And it’s ironic he would later complain about piracy as the Altair Basic was based on Decus BASIC the source of which Gates had obtained from a DEC users group.

http://63.249.85.132/open_source_license.htm

[fast forward]

(35:11) “When he found out that hobbyists from the homebrew club in California, were making pirated copies he was furious”

You won’t believe it, they then cut to Steve Wozniak, admitting that they pirated the ALTAIR software at his homebrew club.

(35:22) “Well we had a copy, one copy of the tape our club library had bought, purchased. And one member of the club took that tape and borrowed it for two weeks and when he came back he brought back like four copies and we got a letter from Bill Gates all upset, you know copyright, you’re copying software and you shouldn’t. Because basically you know, hey you have to pay for what you use” [Steve Wozniak]

I wonder if the WOZ realized he was in an anti-piracy commercial for Microsoft?

(35:43) “When we started Microsoft, some people were copying the BASIC tape. I said in a letter, hey we’ll write more software if more people pay us. Something should be free and something should be payed for”

This from Bill “show me the source” Gates ? How much royalties did Microsoft pay BASIC?

(35:57) “Twenty years later Bill Gates and Microsoft would return to stage this battle online. The software for the Wide World Web had been given away for free. Because Tim Berners-Lee like earlier pioneers believed the online world should be about an ideal of sharing. For Bill Gates and others like him it was simply the biggest business opportunity of the century”

A bit of a distortion, especially coming from a journalist with ten years’ experience. The software is licensed and sold. There are various provisors that restrict you from imposing onerous conditions on your customers. There are a number of licenses that allow you no not have to pass on your own source code.

(36:24) Another shot of the Internet Explorer logo… with MSN in the top right corner.

(36:39) Another logo, ‘Microsoft on the Web’

(36:40) Another shot of Internet Explorer, with a voice over mentioning business. No shots of any Redmonites smoking tokes ;)

“Before the Web, the Internet was administrated by a public body and businesses was banned.This was only overturned in 1994. And these two opposing ideologies would slug it out and battle for the soul of the online world”

Erroneously giving the impression that Microsoft and “Internet Explorer” had something to do with opening the Internet up to the commercial sector… Microsoft saves the Internet from the hippies. And I thought the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) had something to do with commercialising the Internet. At least I remember working for some at the time.

(37:06) “The most significant conflict began in 1995, when Microsoft launched “Internet Explorer”, and set out to beat all competition. They effectively forced computer manufacturers to sell machines with it pre-installed. From nowhere Microsoft ended up with more then ninety percent of the market”

They did a lot more than that, you should take a look at the comes documents on Groklaw.

http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2007021720190018

(37:51) “But the legal battle wasn’t just about Microsoft. It was about two completely different ideas of what the Web should be”

The following over a screenshot of Netscape, but viewed in the Internet Explorer :)

(38:00) “I think right from the beginning there are kinda two competing views about the Web playing out which still play out now. One is that the Web is this home for collaboration, for sharing for allowing information to be free. For people being able to create thing together on ‘open platforms’ and sharing ideas. And that’s embedded in the kind of hippy geek culture of homebrew computer club, right at the start of this in nineteen seventies (1970) And then there is another, which is the kind of Bill Gates/Microsoft corporate view, wait a minute, how do you pay the mortgage”

(38:32) And cut to a humongous START logo.

Still no mention of the Apple, IBM, or Compaq, who made a bundle out of the IBM PC. Remember if IBM had managed to prevent the clone market, there would be no Compaq or Microsoft!

While the below is spoken a big ‘START DISCOVERING’ appears on screen followed by (38:49) a big ‘MICROSOFT Where do you want to go today’ followed by a big ‘START LEARNING’ followed by the Windows XP desktop. All Microsoft copyrighted symbols. Talk about unsublimated advertising :)

(38:43) “A legal ruling meant Microsoft had its wings clipped. But the commercial ideology it represented was in the ascendant. And in this the era of the dot com boom it seemed the Web was ripe for business exploitation. But soon would shift once more”

(38:59) “As Internet Explorer popularised the Web, bringing millions online. People began to learn what the web could do for better or worse”

Excuse me, Internet Explorer didn’t populerise the Web. The Web popularized browsers. Namely Mozilla Netscape. Reason being that ‘Internet Explorer’ didn’t exist at the time. As neither did a Windows IP stack.

Twenty years on from the invention of the World Wide Web, Dr Aleks Krotoski looks at how it is reshaping almost every aspect of our lives. Joined by some of the web’s biggest names – including the founders of Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft, and the web’s inventor – she explores how far the web has lived up to its early promise.

In the first in this four-part series, Aleks charts the extraordinary rise of blogs, Wikipedia and YouTube

Where’s Paul Allen in all of this, is he even given a mention?

In summary, the BBC has spread truly inaccurate claims which make the ludicrous suggestion that the Web became centralised like the mainstream media, so all those “crazy anarchists” should just give up. It almost attributes some imaginary notion of “triumph of business on the Web” to Bill Gates, which is utterly ridiculous and made implicit more than explicit.

Speaking of lies and revisionism, we recently redid our page about the Gartner Group — a corruptible group which Mark Hinkle (Zenoss executive) made fun of a few days ago by linking to the following video (a spoof as shown below). I also participated in a television documentary (to be shown in French TV, Swiss TV, and maybe US TV) on the subject. Analyst groups are essentially liars for sale and it sure seems like the BBC is not much better. It’s just sad that there are few sources left to rely on. They rewrite history.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    February 4, 2010 at 11:09 am

    Gravatar

    Disappointed very much that CERN had no mention and that NCSA Mosaic, upon which even MSIE was built, was forgotten. The two students Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina kicked off something big with their open source graphical browser.

    Vint Cerf, Paul Vixie, and many, many others need a mention.

    If computer security is brought up, then contemporaries like Theo DeRaadt and Bruce Schneier need the spotlight. However, the father of Internet security was Eugene ‘spaf’ Spafford.
    http://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~tripunit/spaf-analogies.html

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Is this video accessible outside the UK?

    Myfraudsoft Reply:

    No, I tried and this is what it says:

    “Currently BBC iPlayer TV programmes are available to play in the UK only, but all BBC iPlayer Radio programmes are available to you. Why?

    If you are in the UK and see this message please read this advice.

    Go to Radio channels home page”

    Dennis Murczak Reply:

    Nope.

    “Currently BBC iPlayer TV programmes are available to play in the UK only, but all BBC iPlayer Radio programmes are available to you. Why?

    If you are in the UK and see this message please read this advice.

    Go to Radio channels home page”

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    We might work on transcribing the whole thing.

    Myfraudsoft Reply:

    Do they mention first edition Bill Gates’s book “The Road Ahead” (1995) where he completely ignored/omitted the Internet and stated something like, “MSN is the future of networking”?

    (Back then MSN was supposed to be MS’s own global network, not yet another ISP).

  2. uberVU - social comments said,

    February 5, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by glynmoody: Really glad I didn’t waste my time watching”The Virtual Revolution” – http://bit.ly/abEVyf but hey, it’s the BBC, what do you expect, facts?…

What Else is New


  1. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  2. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  3. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts



  4. Microsoft Has Left RPX, But RPX Now Pays a Microsoft Patent Troll, Intellectual Ventures

    The patent/litigation arms race keeps getting a little more complicated, as the 'arms' are being passed around to new and old entities that do nothing but shake-downs



  5. UPC Has Done Nothing for Europe Except Destruction of the EPO and Imminent Layoffs Due to Lack of Applications and Lowered Value of European Patents

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is merely a distant dream or a fantasy for litigators; to everyone else the UPC lobby has done nothing but damage, including potentially irreparable damage to the European Patent Office, which is declining very sharply



  6. Links 17/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.4, Wine 3.2, Go 1.10

    Links for the day



  7. Patent Trolls Are Thwarted by Judges, But Patent Lawyers View Them as a 'Business' Opportunity

    Patent lawyers are salivating over the idea that trolls may be coming to their state/s; owing to courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) other trolls' software patents get invalidated



  8. Microsoft's Patent Moves: Dominion Harbor, Intellectual Ventures, Intellectual Discovery, NEC and Uber

    A look at some of the latest moves and twists, as patents change hands and there are still signs of Microsoft's 'hidden hand'



  9. Links 15/2/2018: GNOME 3.28 Beta, Rust 1.24

    Links for the day



  10. Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

    An upcoming debate about Battistelli's attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter



  11. The EPO is Being Destroyed and There's Nothing Left to Replace It Except National Patent Offices

    It looks like Battistelli is setting up the European Patent Office (EPO) for mass layoffs; in fact, it looks as though he is so certain that the UPC will materialise that he obsesses over "validation" for mass litigation worldwide, departing from a "model office" that used to lead the world in terms of patent quality and workers' welfare/conditions



  12. IBM is Getting Desperate and Now Suing Microsoft Over Lost Staff, Not Just Suing Everyone Using Patents

    IBM's policy when it comes to patents, not to mention its alignment with patent extremists, gives room for thought if not deep concern; the company rapidly becomes more and more like a troll



  13. In Microsoft's Lawsuit Against Corel the Only Winner is the Lawyers

    The outcome of the old Microsoft v Corel lawsuit reaffirms a trend; companies with deep pockets harass their competitors, knowing that the legal bills are more cumbersome to the defendants; there's a similar example today in Cisco v Arista Networks



  14. The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

    Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation



  15. Speech Deficit and No Freedom of Association at the EPO

    True information cannot be disseminated at the EPO and justice too is beyond elusive; this poses a threat to the EPO's future, not only to its already-damaged reputation



  16. No, Britain is Not Ratifying 'Unitary' Anything, But Team UPC Insinuates It Will (Desperate Effort to Affect Tomorrow's Outcome)

    Contrary to several misleading headlines from Bristows (in its blog and others'), the UPC isn't happening and isn't coming to the UK; it all amounts to lobbying (by setting false expectations)



  17. The EPO's Paid Promotion of Software Patents Gets Patent Maximalists All Excited and Emboldened

    The software patents advocacy from Battistelli (and his cohorts) isn't just a spit in the face of European Parliament but also the EPC; but patent scope seems to no longer exist or matter under his watch, as all he cares about is granting as many patents as possible, irrespective of real quality/legitimacy/merit



  18. Andrei Iancu Begins His USPTO Career While Former USPTO Director (and Now Paid Lobbyist) Keeps Meddling in Office Affairs

    The USPTO, which is supposed to be a government branch (loosely speaking) is being lobbied by former officials, who are now being paid by private corporations to help influence and shape policies; this damages the image of the Office and harms its independence from corporate influence



  19. Links 14/2/2018: Atom 1.24, OSI Joins UNESCO

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO Now Censors the Central Staff Committee Like It Used to Censor SUEPO

    The EPO's Central Staff Committee (CSC) is now being treated as poorly as SUEPO several years ago (when it was threatened to remove publications from its site or face severe action)



  21. Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls, Xerox, and Andrei Iancu

    A roundup of news pertaining to Microsoft-connected entities and their patent activity this month; Director Iancu is only loosely connected to one of them (he fought against it)



  22. The Campaign to Subvert the US Patent Office by Misrepresenting Its Successes

    Figureheads of the patent microcosm (firms that profit from patent chaos) are still meddling in affairs which they intentionally mis-portray, conflating innovation with number of patents and so on



  23. Almost All Patent Lawsuits in China Are Filed by the Chinese, But IAM (Cherry) Picks the Exception

    China's patent office (SIPO) is a pretty one-sided office where Mandarin patents get filed primarily by local firms and lawsuits too are filed by local firms; IAM, however, found a "man bites dog" slant



  24. Congratulations to Cloudflare on Beating Patent Troll Blackbird Technologies

    After nearly a year in the court (no doubt an expensive exercise for Cloudflare) the Northern District of California finally dismisses the lawsuit, deeming the underlying claims “[a]bstract ideas [which] are not patentable”



  25. Watch Out for Buzzwords That Are Used to Mask Patents on Software, Even in Europe

    The EPO now exploits EPO budget for advocacy of software patents; It's troubling as it was traditionally the 'job' of the patent 'industry' and moreover it reveals an EPO so adrift from law and order that it's a Bavaria-based pariah acting with impunity, posing a threat to software development in the whole of Europe



  26. EPO Opposition to CRISPR Patents Has Wide-Ranging and Far-Reaching Impact, But Mind Not the Lobbyists

    The patent maximalists who strive to bring patent trolls and limitless patents to Europe are losing their battle; this is, for the most part, owing to courageous European examiners who say "no" to patents that aren't justified



  27. Links 13/2/2018: Rise of the Tomb Raider on GNU/Linux, KDE 5.43.0, Qt 5.10.1

    Links for the day



  28. Denialists of Patent Trolls Are at It Again

    The patent trolls' lobby (sites like IAM and Watchtroll or Koch-funded scholars) want us to think that patent trolls are just a myth that can be dismissed and ignored; sadly for these lobbyists, underlying facts are not on their side



  29. Patent Maximalists Won't Get Their Way and UPC Will Likely Never Happen (Even After Battistelli)

    The incautious optimism from the patent 'industry', trying to convince us all that expansion of patent scope and litigation would be a boon to innovation, faces growing resistance; contrary to what the patent microcosm is saying, it's extremely unlikely that the UK and Germany will ratify the Unified Patent Court (UPC), i.e. open the door for patent trolls in Europe



  30. Links 12/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC1, ZFS Back in Focus

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts