EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.17.10

Unsubstantiated Takeover Rumours

Posted in Microsoft, Rumour, Search at 12:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

America Online logo

Summary: Why Microsoft will not manage to grab yet another Internet giant, not any time soon anyway

CONSOLIDATION sounds like a nice word, but usually it means removal of choice and that’s not necessarily a good thing. Microsoft has already eliminated the second search engine in all sorts of nefarious ways. Microsoft never bought Yahoo! It just achieved a sort of hijack from the inside. The company is now run by many former executives of Microsoft.

Well, one reader from Brazil told us about reports like this one yesterday:

AOL Inc. and several private-equity firms are exploring making an offer to buy Yahoo Inc., according to people familiar with the matter, devising a bold plan to marry two big Internet brands facing steep challenges.

Considering rumours/speculations that turned out to be false regarding Adobe takeover, Nokia takeover, and even AOL [1, 2, 3], it’s probably a case of boy crying “Wolf!”

Microsoft cannot afford to buy anything significant anymore (it would require borrowing more money), so for anything significant to happen here is unlikely unless the takeover is indirect. As Cringely put it:

If you think AOL actually intends to buy Yahoo, you are wrong. That story hit the press this week but it’s a ruse to motivate Google exactly as I explained a few days ago. AOL has neither the money nor the motivation to buy Yahoo, which is analogous to a bus company buying a poorly-managed airline. AOL just wants to make Google jealous.

In other Yahoo! news, it’s harmed by Google’s Instant despite revamp attempts. Is Yahoo! still developing a search engine? Why bother anymore? Won’t Microsoft just devour the whole thing?

To Microsoft, Yahoo! is just a tool now, just like SCO was once a tool. Now it’s just dead:

SCO’s stock is now back up to 7 cents, up from 2 cents or maybe less — I don’t track it closely — and 7 is where it’s been hovering most of the time for the last few months. Do people really make money from these little dips and surges? What a life that must be. That is actually a fraction of a penny higher than the stock sold for on the day SCO filed for bankruptcy. Go figure.

There’s a long list of companies that ended up as corpses outside Microsoft’s lair. Which one will Microsoft exploit next?

“On the same day that CA blasted SCO, Open Source evangelist Eric Raymond revealed a leaked email from SCO’s strategic consultant Mike Anderer to their management. The email details how, surprise surprise, Microsoft has arranged virtually all of SCO’s financing, hiding behind intermediaries like Baystar Capital.”

Bruce Perens

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Nate said,

    October 17, 2010 at 8:54 am

    Gravatar

    As useful a resource Techrights is to follow this sort of news, you’re also a source of unsubstantiated rumours, such as constant allusions to Microsoft’s supposedly deteriorating finances.

    “Microsoft cannot afford to buy anything significant anymore (it would require borrowing more money)”

    As much as many of us would love to believe it is true, Microsoft is NOT facing financial hardship. How can you justify stating that they cannot afford to acquire anything significant when they have 37 BILLION U.S. dollars in cash and short term investments on hand? This isn’t a figure which has gone down but one which has gone up from the year prior reports. The debt figures you would point out are but a small fraction of that amount.

    Microsoft isn’t becoming any smaller as a company either. From the year ago reports, Microsoft’s total assets have risen by 8 BILLION U.S. dollars, while their total equity rose by 7 BILLION U.S. dollars. All of this is very clearly on record with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

    From the year ago report, Microsoft’s total revenue has gone up; their gross profit has gone up; their net income has gone up. Microsoft’s growth may not be what it used to be, their future prospects might not be bright, but to paint their finances as if they are dire is either naive or dishonest.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Take a look at this page. Things are not as simple as it would have journalists believe.

    Nate Reply:

    I’ve probably read (or at least skimmed) most of those posts, as I follow your RSS feed “religiously.”

    The reason I made the comment above is because I have not found your posts I’ve read about Microsoft’s finances to be very persuasive. For example, the post you link to above makes a big deal about the fact that Microsoft hasn’t made an acquisition yet this year. So what? Neither has Red Hat. In fact, Red Hat is currently in the midst of their longest run without an acquisition since they made their first in 1999. Red Hat is arguably stronger now than it has ever been and is growing like crazy.

    I think it is disingenuous to make claims that Microsoft “can’t afford” to make an acquisition, and especially that they would HAVE TO borrow money in order to do so when Microsoft currently has enough CASH money in their pocket to make ANY BUT ONE of the acquisitions they’ve made since their first in 1987. That’s acquisitions they could practically make at a moment’s notice. That’s not counting what’s possible if they were to adjust their short term investments, which I believe would be typical for a company making an acquisition.

    Finally, you don’t seem to understand that debt can be rational. Why is Microsoft borrowing money when they have the money, you might ask? If you are genuinely interested in knowing an answer, you should consider that it is a business decision, and that business decisions tend to be made with the goal of maximizing profit, which Microsoft has obviously been successful in doing to some extent. Microsoft currently has 31 billion USD in short term investments they can pull from, but they don’t. Why? One potential reason is that the interest rates they are paying on loans they take out are lower than the return rates they are realizing on those investments. This is basic economics. (I do have a minor in Economics, for whatever that is worth.) One of my professors in the economics department at the university I graduated from told us how, after all these years, he still owes a bunch of money on his student loans (despite that he makes a very comfortable salary at a top university and could pay them off at any time). He makes the minimum payments each month, and he says he’ll still be paying off those loan when he dies. This isn’t an indication that he is in bad financial shape, or that he is forced to keep that debt, but rather an indication that he made a rational economic decision based upon opportunity costs. His loans are locked at a low interest rate, and paying them off will not save him as much money as he will make putting the money to use elsewhere.

    My point is that your posts on that topic seem to be based more upon wishful thinking than on rational consideration. Maybe I’ve missed something. I’ll watch your posts on the subject more carefully. Perhaps you will agree to do the same?

    twitter Reply:

    The company has squandered all advantages and is clearly on the rocks. Just a few years ago the company claimed to have $60 billion in cash and zero debt. That they now have billions of dollars in debt and claim to have far less cash means they have flushed a great deal of money down the toilet. I started a little Microsoft Death Watch a few years ago to track these developments, but it is pointless because Microsoft lies about everything they do. As several hushed up former employees prove, Microsoft especially lies about money. If Microsoft has built up any cash reserve, they have done so by axing about ten thousand employees and all manner of monopoly supporting divisions. Calls from Wall street to basically follow Judge Jackon’s anti-trust wishes and their continued low stock valuation tell the story better than I can. Microsoft is well known as the poorest performing tech stock. The only wishful thinking that can go on is Microsoft thinking they can compete with free or sell thousand dollar computers like it was 1995. It smells like Enron or Worldcom to me.

    I don’t expect them to last much longer because their primary money makers, Windows and Office, are poor performers in every sense. Vista, Windows 7 and several versions of Office have all been resoundingly rejected by the market and rival systems have held proffits very low. Almost everything else they do loses heaps of money, yet the company continues to axe programmers, so they won’t be able to fix their software. Their choke hold on the US retail is costing their partners a fortune. Their next quarterly report will be amusing.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It’s not just that they axe employees. Many of them are paid less (fewer benefits and working on visa/overseas in Asia).

    To me, some things just don’t add up. Windows revenue declined and now there’s this:

    Microsoft’s operating margins for the Windows operating system business have declined from an estimated 77% in 2006 to around 68% in 2009. We expect this margin decline to continue over our forecast period as netbooks and Windows sales in emerging markets account for a bigger share of Microsoft’s sales mix.

    Nate Reply:

    “That they now have billions of dollars in debt and claim to have far less cash means they have flushed a great deal of money down the toilet.”

    Not necessarily. You should report back to us with the other relevant figures Microsoft reported at that time, if you have easy access to that information, so that it will be clear whether that is the case.

    Say that I start with a million dollars in cash and no debt, but then I buy a factory and equipment and then have only 200 thousand dollars in cash and 50 thousand dollars in debt. If my total equity at that point is greater than or equal to the original million dollars, I haven’t squandered anything.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft has investments, assets, and reserves. It also has debt. Novell is the same. It’s still not the ideal position to be in, especially if the debt keeps growing (Microsoft, unlike Novell) and the assets lose value (both Novell and Microsoft).

    twitter Reply:

    Microsoft would be in great shape if Vista 7 and Office were productive assets instead of universally loathed failures. As things are, they can’t afford to spend their monopoly rents on Kin, Zune, Bong, employees and a host of other advert “squirting” stuff that’s gotten the axe. What’s worse is for them is the emergence of cheap, portabe computers and that people are starting to understand software freedom. Microsoft can’t maintain their non free software model when retail prices dip below $200 per computer and that is the future for most people. Apple and the telcos are doing a wonderful job of demonstrating just how bad non free software can be on those devices. Even if Microsoft had the technical ability to compete they won’t succeed because the corporate culture is so arrogant, greedy and malicious. This conversation is an exercise in restating the obvious.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Nate has raised legitimate points which are worth addressing for others to whom the answers require further discussion. Being challenged is an OK thing.

    twitter Reply:

    I disagree that there’s a legitimate argument here. Nate has disregarded facts and a consensus opinion that stretches from Time Magazine to Wall Street, to groundlessly accuse Techrights of “wishful thinking”. I’ve watched long time Windows users sigh over the poor quality of Vista and Windows 7, Microsoft’s inability to keep up basic function is that obvious. Most Microsoft people still see Windows as “the center of the universe” and that makes them think Microsoft is eternal. Creating this irrational belief is the only thing Microsoft ever did well, but the illusion faded for most technical people years ago. Steve’ Ballmer’s ranting and raving has not turned things around. The next few quarterly reports will prove the financial failure of Windows 7 and that will pretty much seal the company’s fate.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This new departure is an early clue.

  2. Nate said,

    October 18, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    Gravatar

    twitter,

    You’re arguing a separate topic, and you’re arguing with people who agree with your overall point.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I think he misidentified a sceptic.

What Else is New


  1. It Certainly Looks Like Microsoft is Already Siccing Its Patent Trolls, Including Intellectual Ventures, on Companies That Use Linux (Until They Pay 'Protection' Money)

    News about Intellectual Ventures and Finjan Holdings (Microsoft-funded patent trolls) reinforces our allegations -- not mere suspicions anymore -- that Microsoft would 'punish' companies that are not paying subscription fees (hosting) or royalties (patent tax) to Microsoft and are thus in some sense 'indebted' to Microsoft



  2. Links 24/3/2017: Microsoft Aggression, Eudyptula Challenge Status Report

    Links for the day



  3. Bernhard Rapkay, Former MEP and Rapporteur on Unitary Patent, Shoots Down UPC Hopes While UPC Hopefuls Recognise That Spain Isn't Interested Either

    Germany, the UK and Spain remain massive barriers to the UPC -- all this in spite of misleading reports and fake news which attempted to make politicians believe otherwise (for political leverage, by means of dirty lobbying contingent upon misinformation)



  4. Links 23/3/2017: Qt 5.9 Beta, Gluster Storage 3.2

    Links for the day



  5. The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Has Just Buried an Innocent Judge That Battistelli Does Not Like

    An innocent judge (never proven guilty of anything, only publicly defamed with help from Team Battistelli and dubious 'intelligence' gathering) is one of the forgotten casualties of the latest meeting of the Administrative Council (AC), which has become growingly complicit rather than a mere bystander at a 'crime' scene



  6. Nepotism at the European Patent Office and Suspicious Absence of Tenders for Big Projects

    Carte blanche is a French term which now perfectly describes the symptoms encountered in the European Patent Office, more so once led by a lot of French people (Battistelli and his friends)



  7. “Terror” Patent Office Bemoans Terror, Spreads Lies

    Response to some of the latest utterances from the European Patent Office, where patently untruthful claims have rapidly become the norm



  8. China Seems to be Using Patents to Push Foreign Companies Out of China, in the Same Way It Infamously Uses Censorship

    Chinese patent policies are harming competition from abroad, e.g. Japan and the US, and US patent policy is being shaped by its higher courts, albeit not yet effectively combating the element that's destroying productive companies (besieged by patent trolls)



  9. 22,000 Blog Posts

    A special number is reached again, marking another milestone for the site



  10. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  11. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  12. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  13. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  14. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  15. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  16. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)



  17. “Then They Came For Me—And There Was No One Left To Speak For Me.”

    The decreasing number of people who cover EPO scandals (partly due to fear, or Battistelli's notorious "reign of terror") and a cause for hope, as well as a call for help



  18. As Expected, the Patent Microcosm is Already Interfering, Lobbying and Influencing Supreme Court Justices

    The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is preparing to deliver some important decisions on cases with broad ramifications, e.g. for patent scope, and those who make money from patent feuds are attempting to alter the outcome (which would likely restrict patent scope even further, based on these Justices' track record)



  19. Intellectual Ventures -- Like Microsoft (Which It Came From) -- Spreads Patents to Manifest a Lot of Lawsuits

    That worrisome strategy which is passage of patents to active (legally-aggressive) trolls seems to be a commonality, seen across both Microsoft and its biggest ally among trolls, which Microsoft and Bill Gates helped create and still fund



  20. What the Patent Microcosm is Saying About the EPO and the UPC

    Response to 3 law firms and today's output from them, which serves to inform or misinform the European public at times of Big Lies and fog of (patent) war, revealing the true nature of 21st century asymmetric patent warfare and lobbying



  21. Tough Day for the EPO's Media/Press/PR Team, Trying 'Damage Control' After Important Techrights Publications

    In an effort to save face and regain a sense of legitimacy the EPO publishes various things belatedly, and only after Techrights made these things publicly known and widely discussed



  22. Links 21/3/2017: PyPy Releases, Radeon RX Vega, Eileen Evans at Linux Foundation

    Links for the day



  23. In IAM, Asian Courts That Deliver Justice Are “Unfriendly” and Asian Patent Trolls Are Desirable

    Rebuttal or response to the latest pieces from IAM, which keeps promoting a culture of litigation rather than sharing, collaboration, negotiation, and open innovation



  24. At EPO “I Have the Feeling That Lowering Quality is Part of a Concerted Plan.”

    Growing concern about patent quality at the EPO -- a subject which causes managers to get rather nervous -- is now an issue at the forefront



  25. EPO Reduces the World to Just Seven Nations to Bolster an Illusion of Growing 'Demand' for European Patents

    The unscientific -- if not antiscientific -- attitude of the European Patent Office (EPO) continues to show with the arrival of yet more misleading 'infographics' (disinfographics would be a more suitable term)



  26. Letter to Angela Merkel Expresses Concerns About Impact of EPO Scandals on Germany and Its Image

    Dr. Angela Merkel, arguably the most powerful woman in the world, is being warned about the consequences of Germany ignoring (and hence facilitating) the abuses of Benoît Battistelli



  27. EPO Caricature: Low Patent Quality Not an Achievement

    A new cartoon about the legacy of Battistelli, which ruins both inventors and staff (examination) while handing money to abusers



  28. Are Lithuania and Latvia the Latest Additions to the List of Benoît Battistelli's Vassal States?

    Benoît Battistelli's 'back room' deals came at an interesting, strategic time and the Office uncharacteristically kept quiet about these



  29. Links 20/3/2017: Linux 4.11 RC3, OpenSSH 7.5 Released

    Links for the day



  30. Supposedly 'Pampered' Prisoners Are Still Prisoners of the EPO

    Response to those gross and familiar attempts to portray patent examiners, not politicians who trample all over them, as the cause of all the problems at the EPO


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts