EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.17.10

Unsubstantiated Takeover Rumours

Posted in Microsoft, Rumour, Search at 12:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

America Online logo

Summary: Why Microsoft will not manage to grab yet another Internet giant, not any time soon anyway

CONSOLIDATION sounds like a nice word, but usually it means removal of choice and that’s not necessarily a good thing. Microsoft has already eliminated the second search engine in all sorts of nefarious ways. Microsoft never bought Yahoo! It just achieved a sort of hijack from the inside. The company is now run by many former executives of Microsoft.

Well, one reader from Brazil told us about reports like this one yesterday:

AOL Inc. and several private-equity firms are exploring making an offer to buy Yahoo Inc., according to people familiar with the matter, devising a bold plan to marry two big Internet brands facing steep challenges.

Considering rumours/speculations that turned out to be false regarding Adobe takeover, Nokia takeover, and even AOL [1, 2, 3], it’s probably a case of boy crying “Wolf!”

Microsoft cannot afford to buy anything significant anymore (it would require borrowing more money), so for anything significant to happen here is unlikely unless the takeover is indirect. As Cringely put it:

If you think AOL actually intends to buy Yahoo, you are wrong. That story hit the press this week but it’s a ruse to motivate Google exactly as I explained a few days ago. AOL has neither the money nor the motivation to buy Yahoo, which is analogous to a bus company buying a poorly-managed airline. AOL just wants to make Google jealous.

In other Yahoo! news, it’s harmed by Google’s Instant despite revamp attempts. Is Yahoo! still developing a search engine? Why bother anymore? Won’t Microsoft just devour the whole thing?

To Microsoft, Yahoo! is just a tool now, just like SCO was once a tool. Now it’s just dead:

SCO’s stock is now back up to 7 cents, up from 2 cents or maybe less — I don’t track it closely — and 7 is where it’s been hovering most of the time for the last few months. Do people really make money from these little dips and surges? What a life that must be. That is actually a fraction of a penny higher than the stock sold for on the day SCO filed for bankruptcy. Go figure.

There’s a long list of companies that ended up as corpses outside Microsoft’s lair. Which one will Microsoft exploit next?

“On the same day that CA blasted SCO, Open Source evangelist Eric Raymond revealed a leaked email from SCO’s strategic consultant Mike Anderer to their management. The email details how, surprise surprise, Microsoft has arranged virtually all of SCO’s financing, hiding behind intermediaries like Baystar Capital.”

Bruce Perens

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Nate said,

    October 17, 2010 at 8:54 am

    Gravatar

    As useful a resource Techrights is to follow this sort of news, you’re also a source of unsubstantiated rumours, such as constant allusions to Microsoft’s supposedly deteriorating finances.

    “Microsoft cannot afford to buy anything significant anymore (it would require borrowing more money)”

    As much as many of us would love to believe it is true, Microsoft is NOT facing financial hardship. How can you justify stating that they cannot afford to acquire anything significant when they have 37 BILLION U.S. dollars in cash and short term investments on hand? This isn’t a figure which has gone down but one which has gone up from the year prior reports. The debt figures you would point out are but a small fraction of that amount.

    Microsoft isn’t becoming any smaller as a company either. From the year ago reports, Microsoft’s total assets have risen by 8 BILLION U.S. dollars, while their total equity rose by 7 BILLION U.S. dollars. All of this is very clearly on record with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

    From the year ago report, Microsoft’s total revenue has gone up; their gross profit has gone up; their net income has gone up. Microsoft’s growth may not be what it used to be, their future prospects might not be bright, but to paint their finances as if they are dire is either naive or dishonest.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Take a look at this page. Things are not as simple as it would have journalists believe.

    Nate Reply:

    I’ve probably read (or at least skimmed) most of those posts, as I follow your RSS feed “religiously.”

    The reason I made the comment above is because I have not found your posts I’ve read about Microsoft’s finances to be very persuasive. For example, the post you link to above makes a big deal about the fact that Microsoft hasn’t made an acquisition yet this year. So what? Neither has Red Hat. In fact, Red Hat is currently in the midst of their longest run without an acquisition since they made their first in 1999. Red Hat is arguably stronger now than it has ever been and is growing like crazy.

    I think it is disingenuous to make claims that Microsoft “can’t afford” to make an acquisition, and especially that they would HAVE TO borrow money in order to do so when Microsoft currently has enough CASH money in their pocket to make ANY BUT ONE of the acquisitions they’ve made since their first in 1987. That’s acquisitions they could practically make at a moment’s notice. That’s not counting what’s possible if they were to adjust their short term investments, which I believe would be typical for a company making an acquisition.

    Finally, you don’t seem to understand that debt can be rational. Why is Microsoft borrowing money when they have the money, you might ask? If you are genuinely interested in knowing an answer, you should consider that it is a business decision, and that business decisions tend to be made with the goal of maximizing profit, which Microsoft has obviously been successful in doing to some extent. Microsoft currently has 31 billion USD in short term investments they can pull from, but they don’t. Why? One potential reason is that the interest rates they are paying on loans they take out are lower than the return rates they are realizing on those investments. This is basic economics. (I do have a minor in Economics, for whatever that is worth.) One of my professors in the economics department at the university I graduated from told us how, after all these years, he still owes a bunch of money on his student loans (despite that he makes a very comfortable salary at a top university and could pay them off at any time). He makes the minimum payments each month, and he says he’ll still be paying off those loan when he dies. This isn’t an indication that he is in bad financial shape, or that he is forced to keep that debt, but rather an indication that he made a rational economic decision based upon opportunity costs. His loans are locked at a low interest rate, and paying them off will not save him as much money as he will make putting the money to use elsewhere.

    My point is that your posts on that topic seem to be based more upon wishful thinking than on rational consideration. Maybe I’ve missed something. I’ll watch your posts on the subject more carefully. Perhaps you will agree to do the same?

    twitter Reply:

    The company has squandered all advantages and is clearly on the rocks. Just a few years ago the company claimed to have $60 billion in cash and zero debt. That they now have billions of dollars in debt and claim to have far less cash means they have flushed a great deal of money down the toilet. I started a little Microsoft Death Watch a few years ago to track these developments, but it is pointless because Microsoft lies about everything they do. As several hushed up former employees prove, Microsoft especially lies about money. If Microsoft has built up any cash reserve, they have done so by axing about ten thousand employees and all manner of monopoly supporting divisions. Calls from Wall street to basically follow Judge Jackon’s anti-trust wishes and their continued low stock valuation tell the story better than I can. Microsoft is well known as the poorest performing tech stock. The only wishful thinking that can go on is Microsoft thinking they can compete with free or sell thousand dollar computers like it was 1995. It smells like Enron or Worldcom to me.

    I don’t expect them to last much longer because their primary money makers, Windows and Office, are poor performers in every sense. Vista, Windows 7 and several versions of Office have all been resoundingly rejected by the market and rival systems have held proffits very low. Almost everything else they do loses heaps of money, yet the company continues to axe programmers, so they won’t be able to fix their software. Their choke hold on the US retail is costing their partners a fortune. Their next quarterly report will be amusing.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It’s not just that they axe employees. Many of them are paid less (fewer benefits and working on visa/overseas in Asia).

    To me, some things just don’t add up. Windows revenue declined and now there’s this:

    Microsoft’s operating margins for the Windows operating system business have declined from an estimated 77% in 2006 to around 68% in 2009. We expect this margin decline to continue over our forecast period as netbooks and Windows sales in emerging markets account for a bigger share of Microsoft’s sales mix.

    Nate Reply:

    “That they now have billions of dollars in debt and claim to have far less cash means they have flushed a great deal of money down the toilet.”

    Not necessarily. You should report back to us with the other relevant figures Microsoft reported at that time, if you have easy access to that information, so that it will be clear whether that is the case.

    Say that I start with a million dollars in cash and no debt, but then I buy a factory and equipment and then have only 200 thousand dollars in cash and 50 thousand dollars in debt. If my total equity at that point is greater than or equal to the original million dollars, I haven’t squandered anything.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft has investments, assets, and reserves. It also has debt. Novell is the same. It’s still not the ideal position to be in, especially if the debt keeps growing (Microsoft, unlike Novell) and the assets lose value (both Novell and Microsoft).

    twitter Reply:

    Microsoft would be in great shape if Vista 7 and Office were productive assets instead of universally loathed failures. As things are, they can’t afford to spend their monopoly rents on Kin, Zune, Bong, employees and a host of other advert “squirting” stuff that’s gotten the axe. What’s worse is for them is the emergence of cheap, portabe computers and that people are starting to understand software freedom. Microsoft can’t maintain their non free software model when retail prices dip below $200 per computer and that is the future for most people. Apple and the telcos are doing a wonderful job of demonstrating just how bad non free software can be on those devices. Even if Microsoft had the technical ability to compete they won’t succeed because the corporate culture is so arrogant, greedy and malicious. This conversation is an exercise in restating the obvious.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Nate has raised legitimate points which are worth addressing for others to whom the answers require further discussion. Being challenged is an OK thing.

    twitter Reply:

    I disagree that there’s a legitimate argument here. Nate has disregarded facts and a consensus opinion that stretches from Time Magazine to Wall Street, to groundlessly accuse Techrights of “wishful thinking”. I’ve watched long time Windows users sigh over the poor quality of Vista and Windows 7, Microsoft’s inability to keep up basic function is that obvious. Most Microsoft people still see Windows as “the center of the universe” and that makes them think Microsoft is eternal. Creating this irrational belief is the only thing Microsoft ever did well, but the illusion faded for most technical people years ago. Steve’ Ballmer’s ranting and raving has not turned things around. The next few quarterly reports will prove the financial failure of Windows 7 and that will pretty much seal the company’s fate.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This new departure is an early clue.

  2. Nate said,

    October 18, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    Gravatar

    twitter,

    You’re arguing a separate topic, and you’re arguing with people who agree with your overall point.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I think he misidentified a sceptic.

What Else is New


  1. Team UPC Calls Critics of the UPC Idiots, Deletes Their Comments, and Blocks Them

    A new low for Team UPC, which is unable to cope with reality and has begun literally mocking and deleting comments of people who speak out truths



  2. How the Opposition to CRISPR Patents at the EPO Sent Shockwaves Through the Industry

    Additional reports/coverage on the EPO (European Patent Office) revoking Broad Institute's CRISPR patent show that the issue at hand isn't just one sole patent but the whole class/family of patents



  3. Unified Patents Says That RPX, Which Might Soon be Owned by Patent Trolls, Paid Patent Trolls Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

    Unified Patents, which helps crush software patents, takes note of RPX’s financial statements, which reveal the great extent to which RPX actually helped trolls rather than stop them



  4. IAM Together With Its Partner, IIPCC, is Lobbying the USPTO to Crush PTAB and Restore Patent Chaos

    Having handled over 8,000 petitions (according to Professor Lemley's Lex Machina), PTAB champions patent quality at the USPTO, so front groups of the litigation 'industry' creep in and attempt to lobby the likely next Director of the USPTO (inciting him against PTAB, as usual)



  5. Software Patents Are Still Dropping Like Flies in 2018, Thanks to Alice v CLS Bank (SCOTUS, 2014) and Section 101 (USPTO)

    Section 101 (§ 101) is thriving in the sense that it belatedly throws thousands of patents -- and frivolous lawsuits that depend on them -- down the chute; the patent trolls and their allies in the patent microcosm are very furious and they blame PTAB for actually doing its job (enforcing Section 101 when petitioned to do so)



  6. Patent Troll Finjan Looks Like It's About to Collapse, But Patent Maximalists Exploit It for Software Patents Promotion

    Patent trolls are struggling in their use of software patents; few (if any) of their patents are upheld as valid and those that miraculously remain in tact become the subject of fascination if not obsession among trolls' advocates



  7. The Attacks on PTAB Are Slowing Down and Attempts to Shield Oneself From Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) Are Failing

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reapplies patent eligibility tests/guidelines in order to squash likely invalid patents; The litigation 'industry' is not happy about it, but its opposition to PTAB is also losing steam



  8. Links 21/1/2018: Wine 3.0 Coverage, KaOS 2018.01, Red Hat Among 'Admired Companies'

    Links for the day



  9. Blockchain Patents Are a Catastrophe in the Making as Trolls and Aggressors Accumulate Them

    As patents pertaining to blockchains continue to be granted -- even in defiance of Alice/Section 101 -- it seems likely that patent wars will sooner or later erupt, involving some large banks, IBM, and patent trolls associated with the notorious Erich Spangenberg



  10. Qualcomm/Broadcom/NXP Combination Would Become a Disastrous Patent Thicket Which Benefits Nobody

    Worried by the prospect of mega-mergers and takeovers which would put far too much market power (and monopoly through patents) in one place, governments and corporations speak out



  11. Patent Litigation in East Asia: Huawei, Samsung, HTC, Nintendo and COLOPL

    A quick look at some high-profile cases in which large Asian firms are embroiled; it seems clear that litigation activities have shifted eastwards (where actual production is done)



  12. Patent Litigation in the US is Down Sharply and Patent Trolls' Demise Has Much to Do With It

    Docket Navigator and Lex Machina both show a significant decline in litigation -- a trend which is likely to carry on now that TC Heartland is in tact (not for just half a year but a whole year) and PTAB completes another record year



  13. Cheating the US Patent System is a Lot Harder After TC Heartland

    Some new examples of tricks (and sometimes cheats) attempted by patent claimants and their representatives; it does not go as well as they hoped



  14. RPX Might Soon be Owned by Patent Troll Erich Spangenberg

    RPX, whose top executives are leaving and business is gradually dying, might end up as another 'asset' of patent trolls



  15. Patent Quality (Not Numbers) as an Asset: Oppositions, Appeals and Rejections at the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli wants a rubber-stamping operation (like INPI) rather than a functional patent office, but oppositions at the Office prove to be fruitful and many erroneously-granted patents are -- by extrapolation -- already being revoked (affecting, in retrospect, Battistelli's so-called 'results')



  16. Links 19/1/2018: Linux Journalism Fund, Grsecurity is SLAPPing Again

    Links for the day



  17. The EPO Ignores This Week's Decision Which Demonstrates Patent Scope Gone Awry; Software Patents Brought Up Again

    The worrisome growth of European Patents (EPs) — a 40% jump in one year in spite of decline in the number of patent applications — is a symptom of the poor judgment, induced largely by bad policies that impede examiners’ activities for the sake of so-called ‘production’; this week's decision regarding CRISPR is another wake-up call and software patents too need to be abolished (as a whole), in lieu with the European Patent Convention (EPC)



  18. WesternGeco v ION Geophysical (at the US Supreme Court) Won't Affect Patent Scope

    As WesternGeco v ION Geophysical is the main if not sole ‘major’ patent case that the US Supreme Court will deal with, it seems safe to say that nothing substantial will change for patent scope in the United States this year



  19. Links 18/1/2018: MenuLibre 2.1.4, Git 2.16 Released

    Links for the day



  20. Microsoft, Masking/Hiding Itself Behind Patent Trolls, is Still Engaging in Patent Extortion

    A review of Microsoft's ugly tactics, which involve coercion and extortion (for businesses to move to Azure and/or for OEMs to preload Microsoft software) while Microsoft-connected patent trolls help hide the "enforcement" element in this whole racket



  21. Patent Prosecution Highway: Low-Quality Patents for High-Frequency Patent Aggressors

    The EPO's race to the bottom of patent quality, combined with a "need for speed", is a recipe for disaster (except for litigation firms, patent bullies, and patent trolls)



  22. Press Coverage About the EPO Board Revoking Broad's CRISPR Patent

    Even though there's some decent coverage about yesterday's decision (e.g. from The Scientist), the patent microcosm googlebombs the news with stuff that serves to distract from or distort the outcome



  23. Links 17/1/2018: HHVM 3.24, WordPress 4.9.2

    Links for the day



  24. No Patents on Life (CRISPR), Said EPO Boards of Appeal Just a Few Hours Ago

    Broad spectacularly loses its key case, which may soon mean that any other patents on CRISPR too will be considered invalid



  25. Only Two Weeks on the Job, Judge Patrick Corcoran is Already Being Threatened by EPO Management

    The attack on a technical judge who is accused of relaying information many people had already relayed anyway (it was gossip at the whole Organisation for years) carries on as he is again being pushed around, just as many people predicted



  26. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  27. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  28. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  29. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat



  30. EPO Management and Team UPC Carry on Lying About Unified Patent Court, Sinking to New Lows in the Process

    At a loss for words over the loss of the Unitary Patent, Team UPC and Team Battistelli now blatantly lie and even get together with professional liars such as Watchtroll


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts