01.20.11

Gemini version available ♊︎

Dr. Glyn Moody Rebuts Microsoft-funded ‘Study’/Book Against Open Source Software

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Microsoft at 2:29 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Annual report by Microsoft

Summary: Many factual errors found in the Microsoft-funded book that belittles “open source” and helps Microsoft lobby governments

The unethical bunch from Redmond is back to bribing professors, as part of a business model so notorious that we thought it had been buried. We already know that the Gates Foundation keeps buying the news to make coverage more favourable towards its goals (and in order to silence the many vocal critics). Microsoft is more or less the same (but more subtle) and just like the Gates Foundation, it funds professors who will become its front men.

To repeat the points made in the previous two posts on this subject [1, 2], Microsoft had paid Josh Lerner and Mark Schankerman, who in turn produced literature which echoes Microsoft lobbyists and gives those lobbyists something academic to cite later. Microsoft’s model might go something like, pay some professors to put their names behind some particular text with particular bias, then assure buying some copies of that text for a considerable price and mail copies to CIOs or whoever needs to be persuaded by a report which only seemingly comes from independent experts. There is nothing that a corrupt monopoly abuser won’t do to secure its monopoly and the evidence of this little abuse is hard to obtain. Dr. Glyn Moody shows why it’s like hiding it behind a paywall:

Since I’ve not read the book – and I’d rather not shell out £25.95 for the dubious pleasure of discovering where the errors originate – I’ll limit myself to addressing the arguments outlined in the Economist review rather than worrying about where they originated.

Microsoft is not a charity that funds books to be more “objective”, it is obliged to serve its shareholders, i.e. to further its agenda with its money. Therefore, Moody’s detailed rebuttal (titled “There’s No FUD Like an Old FUD”) is necessary and to give just a taste of it:

But my main concern here is with the follow section:

Yet the finding that open-source advocates will like least is that free programs are not always cheaper. To be sure, the upfront cost of proprietary software is higher (although open-source programs are not always free). But companies that use such programs spend more on such things as learning to use them and making them work with other software.

Yes, it’s a variant on that old FUD that free software is not actually free (gosh, really?) that Microsoft tried about ten years ago and gave up when it realised that nobody said it was when you took into account all the factors like paying wages. But leaving aside that this, too, is hardly news to anyone, let’s just look at the central claim of the current incarnation of that FUD:

companies that use such programs spend more on such things as learning to use them and making them work with other software

So does the first part mean that learning to use a new piece of open source software is inherently harder than learning to use a new piece of proprietary software? I’ve not seen a single piece of research that suggests that. What I have seen documented is that people who are currently using Microsoft Office, say, find it harder to learn to use OpenOffice, say, than to continue using Microsoft Office. Which is, of course, a piece of wisdom that is once again firmly located at the very heart of the Land of the Bleedin’ Obvious.

So, passing swiftly on in the hope that there might be a more substantive issue here, we have the second claim: that companies spend more on making open source work with “other software”. But wait, what could that “other software” refer to? Since it’s not open source (because it’s “other”, not open source) it is clearly proprietary; so the problem comes down to making open source work with proprietary software. And why might that be?

The good news is that more and more people become aware of what Microsoft did here. “I weep for Slashdot,” wrote Gordon, “when this is considered worthy to report…”

Gordon refers to this item which shows that Slashdot caught this too and did not leave out the connection to Microsoft. As I said in my reply to Gordon, “to be fair to Slashdot, they made it very clear in the title and summary that Microsoft paid for this FUD. It harms their relationship with FOSS.”

Microsoft is trying to tell everyone (by proxy) that “open source” is bad. So why would anyone defend Microsoft’s excursions in “open source”?

“On the day of the sentencing, the gang members [Microsoft executives] maintained that they had done nothing wrong, saying that the whole case was a conspiracy by the white power structure to destroy them. I am now under no illusions that miscreants will realize that other parts of society view them that way.”

Supreme Court Justice Jackson

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 01/12/2022: NixOS 22.11 Released and Genode OS 22.11 is Ready

    Links for the day



  2. The Outdated Microsoft Worldview (Mindframe of Post-Mainframe Era): A Mindset of Windows Being Ubiquitous in the Market (and Where It Cannot be Avoided)

    It's mostly incorrect to describe Windows as something that cannot be avoided in technical occupations or something that's worth learning (or actively using)



  3. Condé Nast (Owner of Reddit and Many Other Microsoft-Funded Sites) Promoting Software Patents

    SoylentNews is boosting Condé Nast fluff, including glorification of software patents which ought not be granted at all after 35 U.S.C. § 101/Alice



  4. Twitter: Not a Platform for Activism But for AstroTurfing and Manipulation by States and Plutocracy

    More people are finding out that social control media is all about control; it is controlled by states and oligarchs, it's not a grassroots tool



  5. Links 01/12/2022: Release of Arti 1.1.0, Date for Red Hat Summit 2023

    Links for the day



  6. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, November 30, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, November 30, 2022



  7. Links 30/11/2022: Mesa 22.3, EuroLinux 9.1, and Texinfo 7.0.1

    Links for the day



  8. Links 30/11/2022: Plasma Mobile Gear 22.11

    Links for the day



  9. Links 30/11/2022: More Twitter Trouble and Tor Browser 11.5.10 (Android)

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 29, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, November 29, 2022



  11. Nat Friedman: Frauds, Software Patents, and Mass Surveillance

    The con man who helped Microsoft promote .NET/C# (inside GNU/Linux) after he had worked at Microsoft, and who later helped Microsoft engage in mass plagiarism via GitHub, is not what the innocent face seemingly projects; Nat Friedman is a very dangerous and sinister person



  12. Links 30/11/2022: Gaming on GNU/Linux With Mac PCs, onak 0.6.2 Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 29/11/2022: Proxmox 2.3 "Backup Server" and wayland-protocols 1.31

    Links for the day



  14. Links 29/11/2022: Bodhi Linux 7.0.0 Coming

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 28, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, November 28, 2022



  16. Links 29/11/2022: Whonix 16.0.9.0 and SalixLive Xfce 15.0

    Links for the day



  17. António Campinos Could Not Possibly Choose a Worse Time to Show Solidarity With Communist China

    The Unified Patent Court or "Unitary Patent" gets promoted in the same blog post or news item that celebrates dictatorship; that seems appropriate given the nature of the Unified Patent Court, which is a gross violation of laws and constitutions in a high-level institutional way



  18. Blogs Are Better and Gemlogs (Blogs Over Gemini) May be Best

    There seems to be a growing and already-widespread realisation that Twitter sucks and some people rightly suggest that we pivot back into blogging (Twitter is often blamed for the demise of blogs)



  19. Links 28/11/2022: Snal Linux 1.24 and Thunderbird Android Update

    Links for the day



  20. Links 28/11/2022: OpenRGB 0.8 and Introduction of KIO AFC

    Links for the day



  21. Links 27/11/2022: Linux 6.1 RC 7

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, November 27, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, November 27, 2022



  23. Links 27/11/2022: Rocky Linux 9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Links 27/11/2022: Pinafore Born

    Links for the day



  25. Spamnil Seems to Have Quit Paying for Clickfraud Bots to Fake His 'Popularity'

    Based on the past month, Spamnil seems to have stopped (at least temporarily) relying on bots to fake his alleged popularity; through the Linux Foundation he has done great damage since the destruction of Linux.com, now a defunct site



  26. Better Let the 'Ad' 'Industry' (Spying Galore) Just Collapse

    To recover reputation Phoronix will need to quit the heavy, obtrusive, privacy-violating ads and the corporate 'gifts' that evidently and demonstrably changed the site's direction



  27. 2023 Will be a Pivotal Year for Techrights

    As we quickly approach the last month of the year, here's a look back at a wonderful year for Techrights (but not for the world in general) and a look at the year ahead



  28. IRC Proceedings: Friday, November 26, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 26, 2022



  29. Links 27/11/2022: EasyOS 4.5.2 and Pixel Wheels 0.24.0

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft is the Problem, Not the Solution

    The media is doing anything it can to suppress discussion about the national or international security crisis caused by Microsoft; instead, some publishers go as far as lionising Microsoft, portraying it as the 'Jesus' of computer security


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts