EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Netgear CEO: “Microsoft is Over – Game Over – From My Point of View.”

Posted in GNU/Linux, Hardware, Microsoft at 11:39 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Netgear switch

Summary: In the area of devices Microsoft is totally lost

“Microsoft is over – game over – from my point of view,” Netgear co-founder Patrick Lo was quoted as saying several days ago. Steve Ballmer, one of the last remaining senior executives (along with Mundie, as many of the rest fled), needs to explain financial oddities and following “Microsoft Death Watch” (series of posts) Wayne does a number on him. Among the problems listed is the surge of Linux in devices — either small- or medium-sized:

Power requirements are an issue. Windows is designed for top of the line hardware, not some pokey little ARM chip, so it’s not usable. Because most of the new applications we are going to see over the next couple of years will use ARM. Remember hearing that Google TV is being put back a year? It’s being put back because governments want low powered TV sets, and Google made the mistake of specifying X86 hardware. X86 isn’t low power. So Google had to switch to ARM, which while itself wasn’t difficult (since the software was running on the Linux kernel, which works fine on ARM), is delaying the project.

Dave Methvin has this little game of words with KIN and KINect. When it comes to small devices — as Vista Phony 7 [sic] helps show — Microsoft does not matter.

Torus Trooper - Game Over

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. Neken said,

    February 2, 2011 at 5:42 pm


    *cough* Windows 8 on ARM *cough*



    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Snakes on a plane.

    So what’s the point?

    Neken Reply:

    His point is : “Power requirements are an issue. Windows is designed for top of the line hardware, not some pokey little ARM chip, so it’s not usable. Because most of the new applications we are going to see over the next couple of years will use ARM.”

    Microsoft is releasing Windows 8 that runs on ARM.
    His point is invalid.
    Can’t see why I had to explain this.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It’s mostly vapourware and even Microsoft boosters have been laughing at it. See for example:


    twitter Reply:

    That’s not an explanation so much as it is an unsupported and ridiculous assertion. If you are in the mood to explain things on Microsoft’s behalf, you might begin by explaining Microsoft’s dreadful ARM and mobile reputation. All of the company’s efforts have been technical and market failures, from PDAs to Zune and danger and KIN. Are we to expect the software to get better because they changed the name again? To paraphrase a Microsoft training document, if you believe in Microsoft’s mobile efforts you probably sleep with decades old teeth under your pillow.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It must have been this internal Microsoft document [PDF] which also says: ‘Ideally, use of the competing technology becomes associated with mental deficiency, as in, “he believes in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and OS/2.”‘

  2. twitter said,

    February 2, 2011 at 7:44 pm


    Lo is off base when he praises Apple, “the closed platform has been successful for Apple because they’ve been so far ahead as thought leaders because of Steve Jobs.” Apple’s runaway success came due to deals with coercive monopoly publishers and telco companies that gave Apple exclusive/favorable access to RIAA music and telco data networks. GNU/Linux developers displayed video phone wristwatches back in 1999 and projects like OpenZaurs foreshadowed most of what Apple wanted to do, years in advance. The price Apple users paid for their music and data networks was the last fig leafs of their software freedom. Apple is now pushing iPod style lockdown back onto their desktops with projects like the iPad, which is basically a scaled down all in one iMac. The efficiency of Apple’s software is in direct proportion to Apple’s exploitation of free software.

    Thanks for catching the Microsoft footnote. I’m going to add it to my Microsoft Death Watch.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Wayne “The Mad Hatter” has a list with the same title.

  3. girts said,

    February 3, 2011 at 3:32 am


    Microsoft is not game over if they will embrance open source technology model!

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    They can’t. Their business model is currently incompatible.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Business models can be changed. All you need is a single share to get the floor.

    What’s stopping you?

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Innovator’s dilemma.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Can you not afford a single share, Roy? Surely if you want Microsoft to change you would be willing to fight for it? Am I wrong? Would you rather stay here on your non-important website pretending to be important to the world, or do you want to actually fight the good fight?

    From what I have seen thus far, I don’t think you are capable, not even a little.

    You would probably choke on the call, wouldn’t you?

    twitter Reply:

    They don’t listen to him here, why would they listen to him there? The company will embrace free software, one way or another, sooner or later, or it will cease to exist. I’d be happier with them crashing and burning in a way that would make the failure of non free software painfully obvious. Roy is under no obligation to help them and probably deserves compensation for all of the TEs that have come here to make trouble and waste time.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft is not the only company which uses these tactics.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Nice excuses for inaction, twitter.

    twitter Reply:

    I’m active enough, just in ways that you and Microsoft don’t like.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Now you make assumptions about me. LOL Yet you imply that *I* am a troll?

    If you want to fight Microsoft, man up and do it.

    twitter Reply:

    I’m sure, with all of your Likewise and Microsoft friends, you are aware of some of my work.

    techwrongs Reply:

    You are nothing but an anonymous internet account to me. You could comment that you were Richard Stallman, and no-one would believe you.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You are nothing but an anonymous internet account to me.

    Now you know how I feel about you.

    techwrongs Reply:

    “Now you know how I feel about you.”

    Oh, you feel something for me?

    I’m flattered.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I don’t even know who you are.

    techwrongs Reply:

    “I don’t even know who you are.”

    I am the community, Roy.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:


  4. Clanky said,

    February 3, 2011 at 5:10 pm


    Yeah, it’s easy to see how with their paltry 80% + of the desktop market that Microsoft have no chance of survival. Before you know it Linux will reach 2% of desktops and then it will be the year of the linux desktop.

    Come on guys, put your efforts into making linux succeed by being better, no amount of pretending that Microsoft is dying is going to make it happen and when they eventually do die (as all companies must at some point) no amount of bullshit internet posts is going to make it happen any faster.

    It’s like the kings new clothes, everyone seems to be afraid to be the one to stand up and shout “fucking hell, Linux is naked”.

    As for the original article, I think arm could actually be a good thing for Linux, but I hope that people will be talking about Linux on arm because it is good rather than because it is not as bad as whatever Windows implementation is designed for it.

    When you talk about nothing but Windows and Microsoft you make them the standard by which everything else is judged, maybe some of the other posters on here are right and you are being paid by microsoft to discredit the entire FOSS community, now that would be epic trolling! :D

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Oh, look. A person who mocks GNU/Linux claims that others — those who do not mock GNU/Linux — “are being paid by microsoft to discredit the entire FOSS community”.

    Sigh. Go back to Lins*x.

    techwrongs Reply:

    “Oh, look. A person who mocks GNU/Linux claims that others — those who do not mock GNU/Linux — “are being paid by microsoft to discredit the entire FOSS community”.

    Sigh. Go back to Lins*x.”

    Way to troll there, Roy. He had pretty good points, but you immediately dismissed them because you refuse to see the forest for the trees.

    If you want to be taken seriously, you should be a bigger man. This post reeks of drool. Did you drool while you wrote it?

    Are you paid by Microsoft to discredit FOSS, Roy? Your utter lack of intellectual response to Clanky above indicates that you may not have the intellectual capacity to do anything but troll your own site.

    How sad.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    If you want to be taken seriously, you should be a bigger man. This post reeks of drool. Did you drool while you wrote it?

    With attitude like this you deserve no response.

    techwrongs Reply:

    “With attitude like this you deserve no response.”

    Way to play your man card there. There is no response because I am right, and you can’t prove that I am not right.

    You are so full of yourself that you have destroyed your own credibility. I’m not going anywhere, Roy. As long as you post lies, and deceitful, derogatory statements, I’ll be here to call you out on them.

    Welcome to your new world, Roy.

    twitter Reply:

    Nice threat, “Welcome to your new world, Roy.” It is apparent that you consider yourself a full time pest.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    My world is more real than yours, Mr. Wrongs.

    techwrongs Reply:

    “Mr. Wrongs.”

    I love this name, please, keep using it.

    “Nice threat”

    A threat implies intent of harm, I am not here to harm anyone. Just the opposite. I am here to help inform people of Roys lies.

    It is simple to make me go away. Just be honest.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The point was that you are an anonymous coward dismissing others for being anonymous.

    twitter Reply:

    The troll is up early. I wonder how late they will labor here.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I think it runs on rage and not on a buck.

    techwrongs Reply:

    The point is that you cannot defend your statements made on your website without using deception. You practice the very same practices that you decry Microsoft of using.

    Roy, you are no better than your enemy. Your dishonesty harms us all.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You fail to provide examples. Just vague accusations.

    techwrongs Reply:

    There are many examples scattered through the comments for your readers to find. As I said, I didn’t expect an ego booster such as yourself to ever understand it. I much prefer leading you into showing the truth to them yourself.

    The readers will make their own decisions.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    There are many examples scattered through…

    That’s what SCO said…

    techwrongs Reply:

    “That’s what SCO said…”

    Yes, that’s what SCO said. Except, in this case the evidence is in my comments.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The ‘evidence’ that was shot down.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Except for the fact that you haven’t actually done that yet. Perhaps in your mind, but in the comments? No.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    In the comments. You may passionately disagree with me, but all your shouting doesn’t constitute a better argument.

    techwrongs Reply:

    Fair enough, if you’ll agree to stop calling me a troll perhaps we can have a constructive conversation.

    You still have yet to prove that I am wrong in any statement that I have made.

What Else is New

  1. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019

  2. 5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

    One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)

  3. Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

    The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?

  4. Things That Cannot Be Said

    The limits on what we can say are mostly defined by what sources permit us to say publicly (for the sake of source protection)

  5. Fake European Patents (on Algorithms) Leading to Fake Embargoes

    Law firms have gotten their way in Germany; instead of supporting the productive workers the patent system is nowadays promoting the litigation 'industry' and it ought to be corrected

  6. From Moderate Advice to FUD and Misinformation: The Case of a VPN Vulnerability (CVE-2019-14899)

    What should have been a trivial bugfix in a variety of operating systems and bits of software — both proprietary and Free software — somehow became anti-Linux FUD, clickbait and worse

  7. Dangerous Thinker

    Society oughtn't be alarmed by people who say unusual things; it should be wary and sceptical of those corporations ever so eager to silence such people

  8. Unitary Patent (UPC) Died Along With the Credibility of Managing IP and the Rest of the UPC Lobby

    It is pretty astounding that Team UPC (collective term for people who crafted and lobby for this illegal construct) is still telling us lies, even in the absence of underlying supportive facts, and pressure groups disguised as "news sites" latch onto anything to perpetuate an illusion of progress (even in the face of a growing number of major barriers)

  9. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 06, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 06, 2019

  10. Links 7/12/2019: Fedora 31 Elections Results, Lots of Media Drama Over VPN Bug

    Links for the day

  11. Links 6/12/2019: DRM in GNU/Linux and Sparky Bonsai

    Links for the day

  12. The EPO Rejects Innovation

    The EPO ceased caring about the needs of scientists whose work involves invention; instead, EPO management crafts increasingly lenient guidelines that yield illegal European Patents (not compatible with the EPC) that heavily-besieged EPO judges are unable to stop

  13. Startpage CEO Robert Beens in 'Damage Control' Mode, Trying to Get Startpage Relisted After Selling to a Massive Surveillance Company

    PrivacytoolsIO is being lobbied by the CEO of Startpage to relist Startpage, based on no actual refutations at all

  14. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 05, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 05, 2019

  15. Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

    Links for the day

  16. Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

    The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')

  17. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019

  18. Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

    Links for the day

  19. Google Tightens Its Noose

    Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs

  20. Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

    Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)

  21. We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

    Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)

  22. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 03, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 03, 2019

  23. Links 3/12/2019: elementary OS 5.1 Hera, Plasma 5.17.4, Firefox 71

    Links for the day

  24. Laundering the Reputation of Criminals: That's an Actual Job

    An important reminder that the manufactured, paid-for (media is being bribed) image of Bill Gates is the product of the PR industry he enlisted to distract from his endless crimes

  25. 'Priceless' Tickets to the EPO's Back End and Team UPC

    CIPA's and the EPO's event (later this week) is more of the same; the EPO exists not to serve European businesses but a bunch of law firms and their biggest clients (which usually aren't even European)

  26. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 02, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 02, 2019

  27. New EPO Leak Shows That the Rumours and Jokes Are Partly True and We Know Who 'Runs the Show'

    Europe’s second-largest institution is so profoundly dysfunctional, a reprehensible kakistocracy of tribalism, money-grabbing career-climbing autocrats and possibly major fraud; today’s leak looks at what motivated and enabled the formation and latest incarnation of “Team Campinos”

  28. Links 2/12/2019: Linux Mint 19.3 Beta, DPL Sam Hartman Talks About SystemD

    Links for the day

  29. What Former Debian Project Leader (Second to the Late Ian Murdock) Thinks About SystemD in Debian GNU/Linux

    Now that Debian is debating and voting on diversity in the technical sense the thoughts of Bruce Perens merit broader audience/reach

  30. Free/Libre Software Will Eventually Become the Norm, 'Open Source' is Just Proprietary Software Trying to 'Buy Time'

    More people are starting to ask questions about Free software while “Open Source” languishes (people can see it’s just a mask for proprietary software); it was a two-decade delaying tactic that’s wearing off (people see GitHub and the OSI/Linux Foundation for what they really are)

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts