EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.01.11

More Sex Scandals at Microsoft

Posted in Site News at 12:13 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Long hair

Summary: A “£10 million High Court battle” and dismissal give visibility to yet another shameful pattern of behaviour inside Microsoft

SEX SCANDALS are not unusual at Microsoft. There are recent examples even of alleged orgies. According to a couple of different source from the UK, this is getting litigious: [via]

A culture of “excessive drunkeness” and lewd behaviour among senior staff at Microsoft in Britain has apparently been laid bare in a £10 million High Court battle between its UK chief and his former second in command.

And separately:

Negus denied allegedly planting a smacker on a workmate at WPC in Atlanta in 2009 in full view of attendees, but when additional information came to light he was dismissed, Microsoft said in its claim, quoted in a report by Bloomberg.

One needs to be somewhat of a sociopath to work for a convicted monopolist with a proven history of crime. It’s like seeking a job at Blackwater, it’s not “just a business”. That’s why many people do refuse to work for Microsoft. There is ethics mismatch. It’s not that Microsoft turns people into sociopaths, it just tends to attract sociopaths. It’s a cultural thing.

“By May of 1994, Gates’s patience was growing so thin that not even a public relations pro like Pam Edstrom could muzzle him.”

Jennifer Edstrom

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

4 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    September 1, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Given your connecting of sex scandals with the moral level of those who work for the developer of the OS, the comments of Richard Stallman must really bother you. From his own site:

         —–
         I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms
         children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based
         on cases which aren’t voluntary, which are then stretched by
         parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby
         is maturing.
         —–
         If people are seriously concerned not to let children have
         sex in making porn films, they could use the approach that
         has succesfully eliminated cruelty to animals in films. You
         have seen the statements certifying that “no animals were
         harmed in making this film.” There could be a similar
         certification that “no minors had sex or were nude with
         adults in making this film.”
         —–
         Internet filtering in schools blocks access to educational
         materials. While that article focuses on blockage of the
         educational materials that prudes would admit, porn is also
         very important for education. Blocking adolescents’ access to
         porn, or keeping them ignorant of sex in any way, is likely
         to stunt their emotional growth and make them vulnerable to
         mistakes that can hurt them badly.
         —–
         It is absurd to punish anyone for having sex with someone of
         age 15 — it is normal for Americans of age 15 to have sex.
         —–
         The concept of “sexual interference with a human corpse” is
         curious. All a corpse can do is decay, so the only possible
         kind of interference is to prevent its decay. Thus, “sexual
         interference” ought to mean playing with the corpse’s
         genitals while injecting embalming fluid, or while putting it
         into a refrigerator. However, I doubt that the censors
         interpret this term rationally. They will have cooked up an
         excuse for some twisted interpretation of the term.

         This censorship cannot be justified by protecting corpses
         from suffering. Whatever you do to a corpse, it can’t suffer,
         not even emotionally.
         —–

    After all, Roy, if you are to be consistent, you must think that all who work on GNU< at the very least, must share or at least support such repulsive views.

    Right?

    No double standard from you!

  2. Michael said,

    September 2, 2011 at 11:29 am

    Gravatar

    Looking here: http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/irc-log-social-01092011.html OR http://goo.gl/Zy9k8

    I see Roy is denying Stallman said the above things… or saying that when he did they were taken out of context. Well, here are the links to Stallman’s own site where he says these things. You may need to use the find feature of your browser to find the quotes (control+F on most browsers)- the pages are long.

    http://stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html

    Dutch pedophiles have formed a political party to campaign
    for legalization.

         I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms
         children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based
         on cases which aren’t voluntary, which are then stretched by
         parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby
         is maturing.

    Yes: Stallman is supporting a political party that wants to campain for the legalization of pedophilia. And clicking on Stallman’s own link, we get this: http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/dutch-paedophiles-to-launch-political-party-1.279664 OR http://goo.gl/PVkle

    Dutch paedophiles are launching a political party to push for
    a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and
    the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals.

    Yes… *that* is what Stallman is supporting! Nothing taken out of context… and no commentary on my part needed to see how repulsive that is.

    http://stallman.org/archives/2010-may-aug.html

         If people are seriously concerned not to let children have
         sex in making porn films, they could use the approach that
         has succesfully eliminated cruelty to animals in films. You
         have seen the statements certifying that “no animals were
         harmed in making this film.” There could be a similar
         certification that “no minors had sex or were nude with
         adults in making this film.”

    Those are Stallman’s *exact* words. On his own site.

    http://stallman.org/archives/2010-jan-apr.html

         Internet filtering in schools blocks access to educational
         materials. While that article focuses on blockage of the
         educational materials that prudes would admit, porn is also
         very important for education. Blocking adolescents’ access to
         porn, or keeping them ignorant of sex in any way, is likely
         to stunt their emotional growth and make them vulnerable to
         mistakes that can hurt them badly.
         
    Yes: Stallman is saying that porn is important to education and that kids should have access to it in *schools*, and to block it will “stunt their emotional growth”.

    No twisting of his words, Roy. Those are Stallman’s words on his own site.

    http://stallman.org/archives/2008-may-aug.html

         It is absurd to punish anyone for having sex with someone of
         age 15 — it is normal for Americans of age 15 to have sex.

    http://stallman.org/articles/extreme.html

         The concept of “sexual interference with a human corpse” is
         curious. All a corpse can do is decay, so the only possible
         kind of interference is to prevent its decay. Thus, “sexual
         interference” ought to mean playing with the corpse’s
         genitals while injecting embalming fluid, or while putting it
         into a refrigerator. However, I doubt that the censors
         interpret this term rationally. They will have cooked up an
         excuse for some twisted interpretation of the term.

         This censorship cannot be justified by protecting corpses
         from suffering. Whatever you do to a corpse, it can’t suffer,
         not even emotionally.

    Once again, Roy’s claims of my being dishonest are proved to be lies on his part. Stallman said exactly what I attributed to him. And there is a lot more…

    http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/StallmanQuotes.txt

  3. twitter said,

    September 2, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    Gravatar

    You may need to use the find feature of your browser to find the quotes (control+F on most browsers)- the pages are long.

    I’d prefer to read the whole thing, thanks, so that I’ll know how you have taken things out of context in your smear. I don’t see how you can compare the alleged controversial statements of one person to the demonstrated organizational depravity of a whole company. Statements are not actions so the two are not comparable.

    Michael Reply:

    Do you have a problem with Stallman’s words? I do.

    When Roy vilifies MS over *accusations* as he ignores Stallman’s repulsive BS, it proves he is biased.

    By the way, are you Roy using a different name? Just curious.

What Else is New


  1. Patent Quality (Not Numbers) as an Asset: Oppositions, Appeals and Rejections at the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli wants a rubber-stamping operation (like INPI) rather than a functional patent office, but oppositions at the Office prove to be fruitful and many erroneously-granted patents are -- by extrapolation -- already being revoked (affecting, in retrospect, Battistelli's so-called 'results')



  2. Links 19/1/2018: Linux Journalism Fund, Grsecurity is SLAPPing Again

    Links for the day



  3. The EPO Ignores This Week's Decision Which Demonstrates Patent Scope Gone Awry; Software Patents Brought Up Again

    The worrisome growth of European Patents (EPs) — a 40% jump in one year in spite of decline in the number of patent applications — is a symptom of the poor judgment, induced largely by bad policies that impede examiners’ activities for the sake of so-called ‘production’; this week's decision regarding CRISPR is another wake-up call and software patents too need to be abolished (as a whole), in lieu with the European Patent Convention (EPC)



  4. WesternGeco v ION Geophysical (at the US Supreme Court) Won't Affect Patent Scope

    As WesternGeco v ION Geophysical is the main if not sole ‘major’ patent case that the US Supreme Court will deal with, it seems safe to say that nothing substantial will change for patent scope in the United States this year



  5. Links 18/1/2018: MenuLibre 2.1.4, Git 2.16 Released

    Links for the day



  6. Microsoft, Masking/Hiding Itself Behind Patent Trolls, is Still Engaging in Patent Extortion

    A review of Microsoft's ugly tactics, which involve coercion and extortion (for businesses to move to Azure and/or for OEMs to preload Microsoft software) while Microsoft-connected patent trolls help hide the "enforcement" element in this whole racket



  7. Patent Prosecution Highway: Low-Quality Patents for High-Frequency Patent Aggressors

    The EPO's race to the bottom of patent quality, combined with a "need for speed", is a recipe for disaster (except for litigation firms, patent bullies, and patent trolls)



  8. Press Coverage About the EPO Board Revoking Broad's CRISPR Patent

    Even though there's some decent coverage about yesterday's decision (e.g. from The Scientist), the patent microcosm googlebombs the news with stuff that serves to distract from or distort the outcome



  9. Links 17/1/2018: HHVM 3.24, WordPress 4.9.2

    Links for the day



  10. No Patents on Life (CRISPR), Said EPO Boards of Appeal Just a Few Hours Ago

    Broad spectacularly loses its key case, which may soon mean that any other patents on CRISPR too will be considered invalid



  11. Only Two Weeks on the Job, Judge Patrick Corcoran is Already Being Threatened by EPO Management

    The attack on a technical judge who is accused of relaying information many people had already relayed anyway (it was gossip at the whole Organisation for years) carries on as he is again being pushed around, just as many people predicted



  12. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  13. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  14. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  15. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat



  16. EPO Management and Team UPC Carry on Lying About Unified Patent Court, Sinking to New Lows in the Process

    At a loss for words over the loss of the Unitary Patent, Team UPC and Team Battistelli now blatantly lie and even get together with professional liars such as Watchtroll



  17. China Tightens Its Knot of Restrictive Rules and Patents

    Overzealous patent aggressors and patent trolls in China, in addition to an explosion in low-quality patents, may simply discourage companies from doing production/manufacturing there



  18. Microsoft's Patent Racket Has Just Been Broadened to Threaten GNU/Linux Users Who Don't Pay Microsoft 'Rents'

    Microsoft revisits its aggressive patent strategy which it failed to properly implement 12 years ago with Novell; it wants to 'collect' a patent tax on GNU/Linux and it uses patent trolls to make that easier



  19. EPO Scandals Played a Considerable Role in Sinking the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    Today's press coverage about the UPC reinforces the idea that the EPO saga, culminating in despicable attacks on Patrick Corcoran (a judge), may doom the UPC once and for all (unless one believes Team UPC)



  20. J Nicholas Gross Thinks Professors Stop Being Professors If They're Not Patent Extremists Like Him

    The below-the-belt tactics of patent trolls and their allies show no signs of abatement and their tone reveals growing irritation and frustration (inability to sue and extort companies as easily as they used to)



  21. The US Supreme Court Has Just Denied Another Chance to Deal With a Case Similar to Alice (Potentially Impacting § 101)

    There is no sign that software patents will be rendered worthwhile any time in the near future, but proponents of software patents don't give up



  22. Litigation Roundup: Nintendo, TiVo, Apple, Samsung, Huawei, Philips, UMC

    The latest high-profile legal battles, spanning a growing number of nations and increasingly representing a political shift as well



  23. Roundup of Patent News From Canada, South America and Australia

    A few bits and pieces of news from around the world, serving to highlight patent trends in parts of the world where the patent offices haven't much international clout/impact



  24. Links 15/1/2018: Linux 4.15 RC8, Wine 3.0 RC6

    Links for the day



  25. PTAB is Being Demeaned, But Only by the Very Entities One Ought to Expect (Because They Hate Patent Justice/Quality)

    The latest rants/scorn against PTAB -- leaning on cases such as Wi-Fi One v Broadcom or entities like Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Apple etc. -- are all coming from firms and people who profit from low-quality patents



  26. If Ericsson and Its Patent Trolls (Like Avanci and Unwired Planet) Cannot Make It, the Patent Microcosm Will Perish

    The demise of patent-asserting/patent assertion business models (trolling or enforcement by proxy) may see front groups/media supportive of it diminishing as well; this appears to be happening already



  27. European Patent Office Causes Physical Harm to Employees, Then Fires Them

    Another one (among many) EPO documents about the alarming physical wellbeing of EPO employees and the management’s attitude towards the issue



  28. Battistelli Was Always (Right From the Start and Since Candidacy) All About Money

    “I have always admired creative people, inventors, those who, through their passion and their work, bring about scientific progress or artistic evolution. I was not blessed with such talent myself,” explained the EPO‘s President when pursuing his current job (for which he was barely qualified and probably not eligible because of his political work)



  29. “Under the Intergovernmental EPC System It is Difficult to Speak of a Functional Separation of Powers”

    An illustration of the glaring deficiency that now prevails and cannot be tolerated as long as the goal is to ensure democratic functionality; absence of the role of Separation of Powers (or Rule of Law) at the EPO is evident now that Battistelli not only controls the Council (using EPO budget) but also blatantly attacks the independence of the Boards of Appeal



  30. The Patent Microcosm Thinks It's Wonderful That IP3 is Selling Stupid Patents, Ignores Far More Important News

    IP3, which we've always considered to be nothing but a parasite, does what it does best and those who love stupid patents consider it to be some sort of victory


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts