EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.12.15

The European Patent Office is a Lobby Organisation, Was and Still is Lobbying for Expansion of Patent Scope (Also to Software) Through UPC

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:38 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: The European Patent Office (EPO) has historically been stepping outside the area of its authority and is still doing so right now, particularly when it comes to the Unitary Patent

THE EPO is widely misunderstood. We mean that in a bad way. A lot of people honestly believe that the EPO is a good idea badly or poorly implemented, or that change of management alone would resolve all the issues.

According to this site, serving as a puff piece platform for Benoît Battistelli, the EU ‘unitary’ patent is less than a year away. To quote their summary: “Matthew Newman, senior correspondent for MLex market insight, is joined by Benoît Battistelli, president of the European Patent Office (EPO) to discuss the new and long-awaited ‘unitary’ patent and how it will help boost investment and innovation in Europe.”

“A lot of people honestly believe that the EPO is a good idea badly or poorly implemented, or that change of management alone would resolve all the issues.”Well, not sure what they mean by “senior correspondent”, we deem the whole thing a sort of hogwash, like a media "presence" campaign. It was spread online with soft messages like “EuropeanPatentOffice’s President discusses the long-awaited #UnitaryPatent” (“long-awaited” by who?).

The FFII’s President has responded by saying that “the only thing the Unitary Patent will boost is patent litigation and patent filings.”

Linking to this Unitary Patent (or UPC) Web site, a City of London-based patent lawyers’ site (MIP) wrote: “Here they are at last: the final #UPC Rules of Procedure” (see attachment in there)

“Well, not sure what they mean by “senior correspondent”, we deem the whole thing a sort of hogwash, like a media “presence” campaign.”“Just the 142 pages,” they added, “happy reading!”

Happy for who? For lawyers. It’s not even of any (or much) value to patent examiners, boards, and so on. The London-based courts, as we showed here before, are being set up before Brexit/referendum. There is a push for finalisation by the patent lawyers, who are fast-tracking it so as to make reversal more difficult. The management of the EPO has been doing the same thing. This isn’t democracy, it’s more like a coup. Citizens aren’t even being consulted.

Coming up on December 28th is a talk by Reinier Bakels, Iga Bałos, and Józef Halbersztadt. Speaking at the popular CCC (in Germany), they will give a lecture titled “Software and business method patents: call for action”

“It’s not even of any (or much) value to patent examiners, boards, and so on.”To quote their abstract: “Ten years after the rejection of the European software patent directive by the European Parliament, the software patent problem still is not over. Political action is required.”

Reinier Bakels is well known for his work under the FFII, e.g. this one. The FFII has been warning about software patents for a very long time and its current President once took note of the “EPO CII microsite”. It’s no longer there, but it’s worth recalling what it used to say. Here is how the EPO microsite justified its selling of software patents: “As with all inventions, computer-implemented inventions are only patentable if they have technical character and solve a technical problem, are new, and provide an inventive technical contribution to the prior art.”

“What ever happened to separation of powers and executive branches?”The EPO called these CII (an alternative name for those controversial software patents, making them sound more sophisticated) and the address of the microsite used to be http://cii.european-patent-office.org/.

The site first appeared in 2005 (around the time of the famous vote on the matter) and it vanished some time between February 2007 and November 2007 (when it was already gone), based on the snapshots taken by the Web Archive.

Here is the page in question before in vanished and here is a screenshot of it:

EPO on CII

Well, in 2008 it already redirected, later (soon thereafter) to just vanish. Here is a screenshot:

EPO on CII

“The EPO lobbied Brussels,” we have learned from the FFII’s President, Benjamin Henrion. Here is how the EPO lobbied Brussels, based on MIP again:

Sant and his team are taking part in a working group of the EU Council that was formed after the Competitiveness Council approved the Community patent agreement on March 3.

As Henrion put it at the time: “So the EPO sends lobbyists to Brussels, who then take part in Council working groups.”

Around that time,”lobbying and influencing [of] the legislators” was alleged by Benjamin Henrion (see the original photo from Henrion, which we have digitally enhanced to make it a little more legible).

EPO lobbying

Has anything changed since then?

Well, judging by the EPO’s lobbying for the UPC these days, it is still the same [1, 2], only the names have changed a little. As we have shown here before, citing experts, the UPC will likely bring with it software patents.

What ever happened to separation of powers and executive branches? Well, the EPO isn’t just a tyranny inside Eponia. It tries to expand its breadth of influence as far as Brussels, still. Why is this tolerated and when will the public interest finally be considered?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. EPO Management Looks for New and 'Innovative' Ways to Exploit Scientists and Distract From EPO Corruption

    EPO management is desperate for puff pieces, having just produced some greenwashing nonsense (about a dozen press items about this non-event) and now a bunch of self-promotional videos



  2. Before the New York Times Did a Number on Donald Trump It Changed Bill Gates' Tune

    When you speak strictly through a spokesperson it often means you're lying and/or hiding something; the Gates enigma remains unsolved more than a year later



  3. Links 28/9/2020: Linux 5.9 RC7, Review of Linuxfx 10.6, OpenSSH 8.4

    Links for the day



  4. Speaking Through Spokespeople is a Sign of Weakness, Such as Non-Denying and False Denials (or: Bill Gates Never Denied His Connections to MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein)

    Big liars lie shamelessly; the biggest liars lie through proxies and today we examine the evasive tactics of Bill Gates and his associates (who were closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein but refuse to even talk about that, except indirectly)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 27, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, September 27, 2020



  6. Accounting for Debconf 19 Travel... in 2020

    A deeper look or analysis of Debian expenditures, which grew more than twicefold for travel last year



  7. Don't Let Microsoft Make 'Open Source' Synonymous With Proprietary Monopoly GitHub

    Now that the OSI works for Microsoft instead of Open Source (no, GitHub isn’t Open Source; it’s inherently against Open Source) we need to understand the modus operandi and learn from old mistakes



  8. Links 27/9/2020: Puppy Linux 9.5, Nitrux 1.3.3

    Links for the day



  9. Public Relations and Tolerance Stunts Are Very, Very Cheap

    It's 2020 and people are asked to focus on superficial aspects of corporations rather than anything of substance (like the effects on society at large, notably exploitation and long-term harm)



  10. Open to Everything

    It always starts with good intentions...



  11. The OSI's President Apparently Does Not Know That His Own Employer (Salesforce) Works for ICE

    The hypocrisy (or double standard) of the OSI’s President is astounding; taking salaries paid in part by ICE budget (Salesforce works for ICE and similarly evil agencies) while protesting in a proprietary software platform of Microsoft (GitHub) about ICE (all this whilst actively participating in it regardless)



  12. [Meme] Communist Tactics

    To Microsoft, Linux is communism until Microsoft controls it (and then runs over it to crush it, the typical modus operandi)



  13. OSI President: Most or Half of the OSI's Money (Even Individual Donors' Money) Goes to a Microsoft-Led Initiative

    The OSI has turned from advocate of "Open Source" (a disingenuous attempt to set aside Free/libre software) to advocate of Microsoft and GitHub in just 3 years (since taking Microsoft's money/bribes)



  14. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, September 26, 2020



  15. The 24/7 'Tech' Worker (Babysitter of User-hostile Computing) and 'Expensive' Programmer

    The rights of workers are being reduced to nothing (many in their older years made redundant), even in an occupation that is indirectly responsible for automating and thus deprecating jobs in many other occupations



  16. Why Techrights is Totally Unexcited About the New Owner of Linux Journal

    Linux Journal might soon become an anti-Linux site (veiled hostility) if Slashdot's editorial preferences are anything to go by (Slashdot has just seized control of Linux Journal)



  17. The Cheapening of the Programmer is a Threat to Human Rights of All Computer Users

    From the era of computer experts (down to the low level of computing with transistors), mathematicians, physics gurus and respected technicians we've come to orders-following, user-apathetic engineers who are overworked, grossly underpaid, and way too fearful of raising ethical concerns (voicing disagreement can result in prompt dismissal, followed by perpetual unemployment) and this ensures digital oppression without checks and balances



  18. Links 26/9/2020: Wine 5.18, FreeBSD 12.2-BETA3 and Debian 10.6 Released

    Links for the day



  19. 'Appeal to Novelty' as a Lever for Proprietary Software Monopolies, Bloat (Planned Obsolescence) and More Surveillance

    Novelty is generally fine, but in many cases products are developed iteratively (not cumulatively) not to advance society or to objectively improve services, only to increase control over people (because emergent ‘freemium’-like business models nowadays revolve around addiction and subjugation, e.g. ‘brain-farming’ and manipulation of minds)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 25, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, September 25, 2020



  21. Microsoft Windows is Obsolete

    The so-called 'leak' of old Windows code (almost 20 years old) is rather meaningless and useless; the world is moving past Windows, plus old Windows code cannot be used (due to the licence) and is barely used anymore, even in binary form



  22. [Meme] Conflating Critics of Corporate/Class Abuse With Womanisers and Chauvinists (and Now Doing the Same to Influential Women)

    It's regretful to see real victims of discrimination having their grievances and legitimate causes hijacked by opportunistic corporate media, which rallies a bunch of Internet trolls while oligarchs sponsor the whole thing, emboldening attacks on critics of powerful people (the likes of Jordan Peterson are a distraction; even women are nowadays being targeted using the very same tricks)



  23. Losing the Battle for Rights/Justice, Freedom/Liberty, and Emancipation Potential

    We're losing our most basic rights amid transition to "digital"; too little is being done to push back against this worrisome trend, which necessarily means reduction in both our freedom and our fundamental human rights



  24. Response to Eric Raymond (ESR) on “Last Phase of the Desktop Wars”

    Eric Raymond (ESR) talks about Microsoft's "embrace"; but there are many misunderstandings and misconceptions in his blog post, as we'll explain patiently, based on known facts



  25. Links 25/9/2020: Calibre 5.0, Fedora 33 Beta Days Away, Snap Setback

    Links for the day



  26. Faking 'Progress' to Distract From True Justice or From a Full, Meaningful Reform

    Activism for truly meaningful change doesn't stop at superficialities and cosmetic changes (which merely give a false sense/impression of accomplishment, resulting in inaction); we need to regularly consider how to dismantle injustice, not based on the criteria set by oligarchs-owned media, rallying gullible mobs to appease only big egos



  27. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 24, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, September 24, 2020



  28. Richard Stallman: New Interview About Privacy (Published This Morning)

    “The last few months have put data protection back in the spotlight. During a crisis of this kind, do we have to choose between safety and privacy? We talked about this with Richard Stallman, digital privacy activist and the founder of the Free Software Movement,” RT says



  29. Links 25/9/2020: PostgreSQL 13, DragonFly 5.8.2 and Python 3.8.6

    Links for the day



  30. Code of Ethics Versus Code of Conduct in Action

    Reprinted from Daniel Pocock's Web site


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts