03.13.16

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO Under Benoît Battistelli: Nepotism, Misinformation, Poor Patent Quality, Terrible Working Conditions, and Increase in Prices

Posted in America, Asia, Europe, Patents at 6:45 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Descending to Chinese standards on integrity, quality, and human rights

EPO President Benoît Battistelli and SIPO Commissioner Tian Lipu
EPO President Benoît Battistelli and SIPO Commissioner Tian Lipu (even the red flags match). Credit: EPO Web site.

Summary: A look at the ugly legacy of Battistelli, who has turned an Office with international reputation into a ‘factory’ like the USPTO or SIPO (in China)

THE EPO has not been doing a good job preserving its reputation when it let software patents slip in (from the back door) and later, based on a leaked document, started treating patent applications in a discriminatory fashion and an embarrassing manner. “There is nothing in the EPC which allows the EPO to handle applications differently,” wrote this person earlier today.

Based on a lot of sources, some of which chose to do this publicly, EPO 'results' are bunk and some rightly suggest that an external audit of these ‘results’ is urgently needed. As this little poem put it earlier today:

C ould it be I’m getting pendantic?
O r is granting patents so romantic?
O ver embellishment of the statistics
K nown now for years by realistics
E xternal audit,lay the books bare
D oes this AC really care?

It might not be enough to do an external investigation into the union-busting activities; the Office as a whole needs to come under outside scrutiny. Moreover, verification of the so-called ‘results’ is desperately required. Some EPO examiners (choosing to comment anonymously for their own protection) admit that examination quality is poor now, especially under Battistelli. As one person put it earlier today (sarcastically):

Please forgive me if my post is a bit off topic. I have to tell it.

I’m one of the few “fossiles” left in The Hague. Those who started more than 30 years ago, performing searches through mountains of paper and providing both the colleagues in München and our applicants with prior art indicating the novelty destroying “X” documents and the position of the competitors.

Then came BEST, with its holy 14% productivity increase, together with the non-written rule: “Find anything against claim 1, and don’t waste your time looking for the other claims.” What was passed over is that following this dirty search many applicants were able to restore novelty after the first communication. And so, a new search was then required. At least for those of us having a bit of professional pride left, and of course for free. Farewell state of the art. Farewell complete searches. Cut the corners and hurry up.

Thanks to ISO 9001, the quality at the EPO improved far beyond any hope. Short ago, I’ve had the traditional new-year meeting with my director. Here is what I learned. Quality millesime 2016 is having no search or examination files in the red list (read “delayed”), no more than 3 published patents older than 6 months awaiting to be classified, no grants from a colleague in the examining division awaiting signature since more than 2 weeks. Highly important matters, as one can imagine. But not for inventors, not for the applicants and not for all those who pay for our work. The content of the search report/search opinion/communication interests NOBODY. Copy/paste an article of the Süddeutsche and it will reach the representative unnoticed. Like a fig leaf hiding the attributes of a horny satyr, our search strategies are now made public. Useless nonsense in terms of quality as only those who want to see can see. And being blind is so convenient for an examiner eager to reach a high productivity. How many times, as chairman, have I seen the sentence “the preparation process being novel then the product is novel too”. But thanks to ISO 9001 we are the champions of the world.

Gloria in excelcis Battistelli.

“This all ends up looking less like Europe of old and more like the US,” another person wrote, noting:

In my experience, ECFS has resulted in some EPO examiners becoming more and more inclined to take a superficial view of compliance with the provisions of the EPC, and to go for as many “easy wins” as possible.

The result? More patents of questionable validity and, worst of all, more patents with claims that are completely unclear. This means more (and much harder) work, and greater expense, for third parties seeking to clear the way.

This might just be acceptable if the OD was a reliable arbiter, diligently weeding out the dodgy claims that somehow made it through the coarse filter of examination. However, given the number of times that my eyebrows have been raised when reading 1st instance decisions, I don’t think that the OD can be relied upon to deliver justice often enough.

This all ends up looking less like Europe of old and more like the US – with a significant percentage of dodgy patents being granted and with 3rd parties being reluctant to challenge due to the high costs and uncertainties involved. Perhaps we can live with that. However, should the management of the EPO really be the ones deciding that this is where we end up? It does not seem the most democratic way of proceeding.

Quality at the USPTO is horrible and it’s not surprising that the number of patents is soaring, not because of growth in innovation. China is more or less the same. On the 1st of April (and it’s not a joke) the EPO will be increasing fees, in spite of its poor service, as D Young & Co wishes to remind us right now, noting: “Not all fees are increasing and where they are, compared with past rises, the increases are relatively small (2% maximum).”

In short, EPO in its current state of affairs grants patents sparingly, distorts statistics about patents, increases patent fees, treats applications from large corporations as a matter of priority and so on. How can Battistelli tell (with a straight face) to the Administrative Council that he has done an acceptable job? As we shall show later tomorrow, Battistelli is on his way out (high probability as there are already succession plans).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Walking Like the Talking, Acting Like One's Preaching

    It has now been about 2 years since lock-downs in the world's Western nations were first loosened or lifted; we've thankfully taken advantage of all that commotion (persistent flux; we've not solved the underlying issues) to expand beyond and Web and become self-hosted wherever possible



  2. IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 01, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, July 01, 2022



  3. EPO Steering Off the Road, Just Like the Drunken Son of António Campinos, Who Crashed the Car and Begged for Impunity

    With the EPO rapidly turning into a corrupt dynasty of rogue politicians, lawyers and bankers (not scientists) we must turn to constitutions and treaties that they knowingly violate with impunity



  4. Koch Operatives Working to Shape Patent Law in Favour of Monopolies and Oligarchs

    Patent systems are being hijacked by monopolists and plutocrats for their financial gain and protectionism; it's a longstanding issue because it begets constitutional violations (glossed over by bought or installed "Justices", which is another creeping threat, especially in light of recent developments in the US Supreme Court and patently, manifestly illegal actions by Team UPC)



  5. At the EPO, “Online” Means Microsoft Windows Only (“Unitary Patent” Also Limited to Microsoft Customers!)

    The EPO's "special" (corrupt) relationship with Microsoft is a major liability for Europe; does one need to adopt back doors and US surveillance to interact with the EPO?



  6. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XXII — 'Mr. GitHub Copilot' Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley Pleads Guilty After Assaulting Women

    Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley from Microsoft GitHub (the man behind the GPL violation machine called “Copilot”) has “pled guilty to get deferred sentence”



  7. Links 01/07/2022: Russians Switching to GNU/Linux, New WINE Release

    Links for the day



  8. Links 01/07/2022: More Widespread Calls to Delete GitHub

    Links for the day



  9. [Meme] President Crybaby

    EPO President António Campinos, who constantly assaults the EPO’s staff, has portrayed himself as a poor victim of “hostile” staff (reversal of narratives)



  10. People Are Very Angry That Campinos Was Left in Positions of Power Without Any Competition and in Spite of Failing to Fulfill Essential Goals

    As predicted, people are infuriated by the decision of the Administrative Council to give Campinos several more years to destroy the EPO and its reputation (while moreover pushing a totally illegal and unconstitutional patent court system, which severely harms the image of the European Union)



  11. Microsoft Windows is a 'Burning Platform' (Both on the Server Side and the Client Side)

    'Burning platform' is a derogatory term from Microsoft's Elop; ironically, today's 'burning platform' is actually Windows, even if the corporate media isn't talking about that



  12. Links 01/07/2022: Nitrux 2.2.1 and Raspberry Pi Pico W Chatter

    Links for the day



  13. Links 01/07/2022: Wayland 1.21.0 and SteamOS 3.3 Beta

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 30, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 30, 2022



  15. [Meme] EPO Election (Auction)

    The corruption at the EPO did not end with Benoît Battistelli‘s departure; it’s still deepening



  16. Links 01/07/2022: Condres OS 1.0 and Microsoft Losing More Share in Web Servers

    Links for the day



  17. Published 10 Minutes Ago: IRCNow by Aaron Lin

    This talk was uploaded moments ago. “Of the users, by the users, for the users…”



  18. Links 30/06/2022: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 2

    Links for the day



  19. Links 30/06/2022: Pine64 Has RISC-V-Based Raspberry Pi Rival, Pico W Introduced

    Links for the day



  20. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 29, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 29, 2022



  21. It's 2022 and Installing Software in GNU/Linux Has Never Been Easier

    GNU/Linux is easy to use and extend; the above demonstrates how new software gets installed, removed, and updated in KDE Neon



  22. Sitting Down Less

    Avoiding long periods of sitting down is important for one's health, especially in sedentary lifestyles or jobs



  23. Microsoft Windows Market Share in Russia in 2022: Down From 55% to 50% in 5 Months

    As June ends (last day today) let’s examine the rapid demise of Windows in Russia, even before the exodus media speaks of this week (an ongoing story)



  24. European Patent Office is a Kakistocracy Illustrated

    Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos aren’t just a “dark era” for the EPO; they might in fact be the end of the EPO, having made corruption the “new normal” or “new ways of working”



  25. [Meme] EPO Rewarding Corruption Instead of Upholding the Law and Protecting the European Patent Convention (EPC)

    Wednesday proved that the EPO actively guards corruption and protects Team Battistelli from scrutiny; instead of standing for patent law the EPO under António Campinos stands for overt violations of the law; national delegates are fine with it as long as they’re personally rewarded for complicity



  26. Links 29/06/2022: Collabora Online Developer Edition 22.05 and HPLIP 3.22.6

    Links for the day



  27. Links 29/06/2022: Ubuntu Touch OTA-23

    Links for the day



  28. Cautionary Tales About an António Campinos-Run EPO

    The EPO is basically doomed under António Campinos because he abandoned the law for short term monetary gains (e.g. granting fake software patents under the guise of “4IR”), assuring the demise of the institution, which can no longer attract employees that meet the standard strictly required under the EPC, begetting outsourcing which only worsens everything



  29. Sustainability of Crime at the European Patent Office (EPO), Europe's Second-Largest Institution

    The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation has voted for corruption; it wants violations of the law to carry on for several more years and it all boils down to money (they get paid more if they support breaches of laws, constitutions, and treaties)



  30. EPO is “Building a Team of C and D Players”

    This pretty well describes what happened to the EPO under Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts