EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.07.16

Streisand Effect Award Won by EPO: It Has Just Blocked IP Kat Blog (Updatedx7)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A leaky faucet

Summary: The European Patent Office has just blocked access to a leading IP blog, where professionals cover things of legal and technical nature about the EPO and far beyond (with over 10,000 articles in the archive)

THE EPO has just shot itself in the foot (again!), only a few days before the hugely expensive publicity stunt which includes bribed media. The Kool-Aid must flow uninterrupted.

What happens when one accesses the IP Kat blog this morning from within the EPO?

Your request was denied because of its content categorization: “Malicious Sources/Malnets”

“Not too long after the EPO banned Techrights it also sent threatening legal letters (repeatedly).”Yes, that’s right. That leading IP blog is a “Malnet”. Blogspot is “Malicious Sources”. Boys and girls, please let Google know about this “Malnet” inside its network. IP Kat must be severely published!

Humour aside, this is a badge of honour for IP Kat and it demonstrates what kind of foolish people run the EPO. Do they not foresee the backlash? Have they still no grasp of what the Streisand Effect is?

“Would EPO management be boorish enough to attempt this? Or to try to unmask commenters, as some people did before (taking Google to court)?”As far as we can tell, IP Kat is only the second to be blocked in this way. Techrights was first, so we must have done something right and so does Merpel.

Not too long after the EPO banned Techrights it also sent threatening legal letters (repeatedly). Let’s hope that IP Kat and Merpel aren’t next in the pipeline. Would EPO management be boorish enough to attempt this? Or to try to unmask commenters, as some people did before (taking Google to court)?

Update: There are now further confirmations of this, e.g. from IP Kat comments. This comment from half an hour ago states:

Since this morning, access to the IPKat is blocked from within the European Patent Office.

Users get the following message:

“Your request was denied because of its content categorization: “Malicious Sources/Malnets”.

I am sorry Merpel, I doubt you can continue to publicize your blog as “Recommended by the European Patent Office as reading material for candidates for the European Qualifying Examinations 2013″ …

The EPO’s management is so intolerant of criticism that it even turns its back on partners and forces all staff to turn their backs too. Florian Müller says: “The EPO leadership urgently needs professional help… blocking the IP Kat blog is just insane.”

The EPO has all the elements in it right now of an organisation in a state of irreversible collapse trying to pay/buy its way out, just like FIFA did last year. Paying the media and buying bogus ‘studies’ isn’t the way out. It’s the engineering of yet more scandals. This is cyclical.

Update #2: A lot of comments about this are starting to surface at the target of censorship.

After blocking IP Kat it’s clear that neither tone is the issue (Techrights is more strongly-worded and less droll than Merpel) nor malware is the issue. To quote one new comment, EPO now “makes it an offense to post on a public forum or to “damage the reputation of the Office”.” Here is the full comment:

Recent developments at the EPO are surrealistic. We have a project called “early certainty” to hire 800 examiners to tackle our backlog till 2020. We have CA56/16, which basically lets the President decide on your partner work, on any elected post one may seek, any other activity aside your work, etc… and makes it an offense to post on a public forum or to “damage the reputation of the Office”. Also: the “investigation unit” is strengthened and there is a new difference betweenn dismissals for disciplinary reasons and for incompetence I do not understand. And ipkat is censored from our Intranet as “malicious source” this morning.

What next?

As another person put it:

Desperate needs lead to desperate deeds.

And then:

I think if you read the early certainty site you’ll find that you’re not allowed to discuss it with “third parties”.

EPO has incompetent censors; they didn’t even block IP Kat correctly, as the following comment reveals:

@HelloKitty: “And ipkat is censored from our Intranet as “malicious source” this morning.”

No, it isn’t, at least not fully.
.de is, yes, even from The Hague. But I can access .nl and .co.uk from Rijswijk main.

Therefore I cannot believe the “reason” being “malware/malnet”… The .nl and .co.uk sites are identical to the .de site, besides the url used.

Here is more on that:

WOW.

Had I known before that Ipkat was a malicious source I would have never dared even having a look at it.

Luckily we have our wise president for protecting us. Than you so much!

To be on the safe side I will also destroy my laptop and smartphones at home to prevent any further malicious attack from malnets.

Adieu, naughy Merpel. Adieu Techrights. Adieu FossPatents. Ah, no. Mr Mueller is now accessible again from the EPO: he must then be a nice guy after all. I will read only his posts, but he does not publish since last May. Is it maybe time for a new post on the EPO from a nice guy?

“Maybe the EPO just isn’t blocking my blog at the moment because I haven’t blogged about their stuff in a while,” FossPatents told me in response to the above.

One person wasn’t sure if malware could be the issue, asking politely:

Any official announcement of the ban? Could it be that the ipkat site does have some form of embedded malware which the epo security is picking up? I don’t know – I’m just asking (hoping?).

Sarcastic response:

Yes, it could be, and it’s probably the same malware that also affected Techrights – it’s called “Criticising the EPO management” …

Here is a more serious response:

Weirdly enough, I cannot access ipkitten.blogspot.de for the reason mentioned above (malicious/Malnet).
ipkitten.blogspot.nl works find.
.co.uk too.
If one knows how Google (and thus blogspot) work, it become obvious that there is no malware automagically detected by the firewall software, but the reason is very fabricated. Well, it works for Munich. DG0 cannot access this site anymore. Nor the AC-members coming to Munich.

This is why this kind of censorship is very serious an issue:

Interestingly, in the recent survey conducted by SUEPO, IP blogs are considered as a relevant source of information for 45% of the respondents – far higher than the 9% for Top management and 17% for Internal communications …

https://suepo.org/documents/43311/54958.pdf

See page 19.

But I’m sure it has nothing to do with the banning of the site within the EPO …

We will update this post as more information becomes available. The press should probably cover this.

Update #3: Kieren McCarthy has just publish an article about this (it has 7 comments at the time of writing, mostly with tips on bypassing the censors). To quote McCarthy’s article:

The European Patent Office (EPO) has reacted to criticism of its latest proposals – by blocking access to a blog that raised concerns.

The thin-skinned organization has placed a block on the popular IP Kat blog, seemingly in response to critical comments about proposed reform to its independent Boards of Appeal.

In a posting last week, IP Kat described as “completely outrageous” plans to make the boards in large part self-financing, and explained why it would further undermine their independence while giving yet more power to wildly unpopular EPO president Benoit Battistelli.

As of this morning, EPO staff who try to access the site from work have been met with the message: “Your request was denied because of its content categorization: ‘Malicious Sources/Malnets’.”

Usually “malicious source” would be used to refer to a website containing malware, but in this case, the EPO management appears to view anything critical of its plans as inherently malicious.

[...]

The EPO has history with censoring critical websites: last year it both blocked and sent threatening legal letters to blog Techrights after it posted embarrassing internet documents that showed the organization was giving preferential treatment to Microsoft in its patent reviews.

Some people use Google Cache to bypass these filters, but the comments on this article suggest Google Translate. Either way, people can use mobile phones and home networks to access the same sites anyway, without any fear of being ‘caught’ by BlueCoat (potentially flagged by Battistelli’s goons), whose contract with the EPO is secret but confirmed.

Update #4: Somebody now suggests that the ban has been undone, but we cannot tell for sure and either way — irrespective of the final outcome — this is scaring staff and scaring authors at IP Kat, as the ban still has some holes in it (they might be plugged pretty soon or the whole ban revoked). One person wrote this:

The Will of the President reigns supreme.
He has blocked the IPKat from his fiefdom.
Do you think he is scared by such a bunch of pussies ?

Another bemoaned the loss of “freedom of expression at the EPO.”

As of today, it is no longer possible to access the Ipkat blog from within the EPO. So much for freedom of expression at the EPO.

Then the holes in the ban were pointed out as follows:

@Ketzeneke and others:
No, ipkitten is not fully banned.
Only the ipkitten.blogspot.de is banned.
All other country codes still work. .nl; .co.uk; .mx did still work this afternoon.
The difficulty is avoiding the automagic forwarding to “your” country code…

IPkitten could adjust their template to prevent this behaviour info on how to.
Otherwise you would ned to change your browser settings (preferred language).

As user you can add /ncr to the adress to prevent redirecting.

ipkitten.blogspot.ie/ncr should therefore show you the irish site, no mattr from where you’re accesing ipkitten.

One person suggests that the EPO’s management may have changed its mind:

Late afternoon IPKat was accessible from inside the EPO again…

Depends on which TLD… or maybe the backlash convinced EPO management to retreat and undo the ban?

“Pointless,” said this one new comment from The Register about the ban, “unless the Streisand Effect is actually what they want. All the employees have smartphones, so they can just access the site through their carrier, using the three fingers they are not using to send a message to their employers, of course.”

In relation to the subject of this post, which was sort of lost in the discussion about censorship, one person wrote:

Mr. Freyberg,
It may also be worth remembering that the EPO has supported (and still does support) examiners to sit the EQE. Indeed for some posts internally it is at least advantageous for a candidate to have passed it. Now, the President wishes to have the right to block that possible transfer from the EPO to the other side. Joined-up thinking? Or what?
While focussing on those post-EPO activities, readers may also wish to consider the effect these rules will have on internal discipline. Who will dare to not follow the party line with the knowledge that BB has an ace up his sleeve to punish dissent? A principled stand now will carry extra risk. Better to resign quietly and not rock the boat rather than stand up and be counted. Who needs a gagging order?

Another response on topic said:

Nearly 25 years ago there was a drought of applications and a program was instituted at the EPO for sending out examiners to assist industry and attorneys. Some still talk glowingly about their experience.

The times, they are a-changin’…

The EPO truly loses sight of what the patent system should be about. It also breaks laws in the process.

Update #5: As it turns out, over at The Register (not too shockingly as it’s British), people exploit this whole situation to call for Brexit, but as one person pointed out in the comments: “EPO appears to be nothing to do with the EU.” Moreover, it’s not as though the British authorities — especially the Monarchy — respect free speech any more than the EU does. In terms of privacy we’re a lot worse here. Brexit can stop the UPC, but how much will it do to change things at the EPO? Not much.

Here is a comment from someone who appears to be from the EPO:

Pathetic, but not really surprising. I’m actually amazed that we’ve been able to access IPKAT from work for as long as we have…

It just shows how petty those in charge are, and it demonstrates a remarkable level of ignorance as to how such stupid and pathetic measures are seen, by both the staff and the outside world; not that BB and his stooges care though.

A sad, sad day for those of us who work for the EPO.

As for claims that the ban might have been undone (lifted), here is a response to it:

“Late afternoon IPKat was accessible from inside the EPO again… ”

Well at least for members of the Investigative Unit who are carefully monitoring every posting.

Is The Register still accessible within the EPO ?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/07/epo_blocks_industry_blog_after_critical_post/

Not all TLDs are blocked, so that may help explain why some people cannot ‘reproduce’ the error message, so to speak.

Update #6: Streisand Effect took its toll. “In the meantime,” SUEPO says, “access to the IPKAT has been restored within the EPO.” Hopefully Merpel et al won’t self-censor after this incident.

Update #7: Kieren McCarthy of The Register has just published an article about the reversal and also mentioned the protest, which will take place tomorrow:

The organization’s problems are far from over, however. Staff intends to hold another demonstration against their management’s action this week. This time, the demonstration is in response to revised documents covering staff rights and obligations.

The revised documents, seen by The Register, provide – yet again – greater powers to EPO president Benoit Battistelli and fewer rights to everyone else. Permanent employees would effectively be gagged from making any public criticism of the organization or Battistelli (“shall abstain from any act and, in particular, any public expression of opinion which may reflect on the dignity of his office”).

We can’t help wondering if the person or group responsible for generating all this negative publicity by banning IP Kat (apparently for less than a day) will face consequences for inability to grasp concepts such as free speech, truth-telling, and the Streisand Effect. What a failure. Like we said at the very start, the EPO “shot itself in the foot (again!),” but it continues to block Techrights so McCarthy’s headline, “EPO ends news censorship,” is not entirely accurate. There’s still McCarthyism at the EPO.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. One of those... said,

    June 7, 2016 at 3:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, I could,still access ipkitten from inside the EPO, using a different tld than “.de”.

    According to https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/2402711?hl=en you can simply change the tld to one that is not blocked, and add /ncr to prevent redircting.

    If the EPO did not expand their “malicious source/malnet” block for ipkitten to all tld’s, http://ipkitten.blogspot.mx/ncr should work even from inside the EPO.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I guess that any such discussions provide the censors with pointers.

    Historically, I criticised Google a lot for these TLD hops that sometimes give away people’s location/s, potentially compromising them in all sorts of ways.

    However, I worried more that the EPO would attempt to subpoena Google for commenters’ identities (totally outside IP Kat‘s control). It happened before to others and nothing is unthinkable in today’s out-of-touch EPO management.

    For the record, the EPO never attempted DMCA takedowns, subpoenas etc. against Techrights (only takedowns with SLAPP). I would ensure there’s a canary in case it was to happen again.

    I still maintain an ‘insurance’ (sensitive material to publish) in case the EPO chooses to get nasty again.

    The clueless people who orbit Battistelli are playing with fire when they ban IP Kat. It has already earned some media attention, stealing some thunder from the Thursday extravaganza.

    I have a lot more to publish about the EPO in the coming days, probably until the next Administrative Council’s meeting.

What Else is New


  1. Raw: EPO 'Social Democracy' is Like a 1AM Vote on UPC by Only 5% of Politicians

    A reminder that the EPO's disdain for democracy goes more than three years back



  2. Amid Constitutional Court Barrier, Unitary Patent (UPC) Looks Dead Even to UPC Proponents, the EPO's UPC 'Study' Comes Under Fire

    This Thanksgiving Day is spent by Team UPC trying to prop up the UPC even though no progress whatsoever is being made and the EPO's 'study' on the UPC is said to be flawed



  3. The European Patent Office Has Become the 'Foxconn' of Patent Offices

    The demise of the EPO, which emulates patent offices that are racing to the bottom, is a life-threatening employer which now jeopardises its very existence



  4. Links 23/11/2017: Lumina and Qt Quick

    Links for the day



  5. EPO is Imploding as Benoît Battistelli Drains Out Work, Talent, and Justice

    Battistelli's vicious assault on the Office, culminating in an attack on justice and the drainage of work (declining/decreasing 'demand' for 'products') necessarily means mass layoffs and nothing to fill the vacuum left



  6. Links 22/11/2017: Qt 5.9.3 Released, FCC v the Internet

    Links for the day



  7. Patent Lawyers' Media Comes to Grips With the End of Software Patents

    The reality of the matter is grim for software patents and the patent microcosm, 'borrowing' the media as usual, tries to give false hopes by insinuating that the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) may overturn Alice quite soon



  8. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Foes Manipulate the Facts to Belittle the Impact of PTAB

    In an effort to sabotage PTAB with its inter partes reviews the patent microcosm is organising one-sided events that slam PTAB's legitimacy and misrepresent statistics



  9. Links 21/11/2017: LibreELEC (Krypton) v8.2.1 MR, Mesa 17.3.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  10. PTAB Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) Are Essential in an Age When One Can Get Sued for Merely Mocking a Patent

    The battle over the right to criticise particular patents has gotten very real and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) fought it until the end; this is why we need granted patents to be criticised upon petitions too (and often invalidated as a result)



  11. Chinese Patent Policy Continues to Mimic All the Worst Elements of the American System

    China is becoming what the United States used to be in terms of patents, whereas the American system is adopting saner patent policies that foster real innovation whilst curtailing mass litigation



  12. Links 20/11/2017: Why GNU/Linux is Better Than Windows, Another Linus Torvalds Rant

    Links for the day



  13. “US Inventor” is a “Bucket of Deplorables” Not Worthy of Media Coverage

    Jan Wolfe of Reuters treats a fringe group called “US Inventor” as though it's a conservative voice rather than a bunch of patent extremists pretending to be inventors



  14. Team Battistelli's Attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal Predate the Illegal Sanctions Against a Judge

    A walk back along memory lane reveals that Battistelli has, all along, suppressed and marginalised DG3 members, in order to cement total control over the entire Organisation, not just the Office



  15. PTAB is Safe, the Patent Extremists Just Try to Scandalise It Out of Sheer Desperation

    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which gave powers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through inter partes reviews (IPRs), has no imminent threats, not potent ones anyway



  16. Update on the EPO's Crackdown on the Boards of Appeal

    Demand of 35% increases from the boards serves to show that Battistelli now does to the 'independent' judges what he already did to examiners at the Office



  17. The Lobbyists Are Trying to Subvert US Law in Favour of Patent Predators

    Mingorance, Kappos, Underweiser and other lobbyists for the software patents agenda (paid by firms like Microsoft and IBM) keep trying to undo progress, notably the bans on software patents



  18. Patent Trolls Based in East Texas Are Affected Very Critically by TC Heartland

    The latest situation in Texas (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in particular), which according to new analyses is the target of legal scrutiny for the 'loopholes' it provided to patent trolls in search of easy legal battles



  19. Alice Remains a Strong Precedential Decision and the Media Has Turned Against Software Patents

    The momentum against the scourge of software patents and the desperation among patent 'professionals' (people who don't create/develop/invent) is growing



  20. Harm Still Caused by Granted Software Patents

    A roundup of recent (past week's) announcements, including legal actions, contingent upon software patents in an age when software patents bear no real legitimacy



  21. Links 18/11/2017: Raspberry Digital Signage 10, New Nano

    Links for the day



  22. 23,000 Posts

    23,000 blog posts milestone reached in 11 years



  23. BlackBerry Cannot Sell Phones and Apple Looks Like the Next BlackBerry (a Pile of Patents)

    The lifecycle of mobile giants seems to typically end in patent shakedown, as Apple loses its business to Android just like Nokia and BlackBerry lost it to Apple



  24. EFF and CCIA Use Docket Navigator and Lex Machina to Identify 'Stupid Patents' (Usually Software Patents That Are Not Valid)

    In spite of threats and lawsuits from bogus 'inventors' whom they criticise, EFF staff continues the battle against patents that should never have been granted at all



  25. The Australian Productivity Commission Shows the Correct Approach to Setting Patent Laws and Scope

    Australia views patents on software as undesirable and acts accordingly, making nobody angry except a bunch of law firms that profited from litigation and patent maximalism



  26. EPO 'Business' From the United States Has Nosedived and UPC is on Its Death Throes

    Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot further accelerate the ultimate demise of the EPO (getting rid of experienced and thus 'expensive' staff), for which there is no replacement because there is a monopoly (which means Europe will suffer severely)



  27. Links 17/11/2017: KDE Applications 17.12, Akademy 2018 Plans

    Links for the day



  28. Today's EPO and Team UPC Do Not Work for Europe But Actively Work Against Europe

    The tough reality that some Europeans actively work to undermine science and technology in Europe because they personally profit from it and how this relates to the Unitary Patent (UPC), which is still aggressively lobbied for, sometimes by bribing/manipulating the media, academia, and public servants



  29. Links 16/11/2017: WordPress 4.9 and GhostBSD 11.1 Released

    Links for the day



  30. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) is Rightly Upset If Not Shocked at What Battistelli and Bergot Are Doing to the Office

    The EPO's dictatorial management is destroying everything that's left (of value) at the Office while corrupting academia and censoring discussion by threatening those who publish comments (gagging its own staff even when that staff posts anonymously)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts