EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.14.17

EPO Protest Tomorrow, Heads of Delegations Informed Regarding the Reasons

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:44 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Take a Break from Dictatorship - Go to the Demo
Take a Break from Dictatorship – Go to the Demo

Summary: EPO workers are attempting to explain to Heads of Delegations, who have so far (with few exceptions) been complicit and protective of Battistelli, why they must take immediate action

“The next demo of EPO staff is in Munich on Wednesday,” told us a reader about tomorrow, “12.30h in front of the Isar building.” The above image was produced to promote this demonstration, which we mentioned here several days ago.

“Open letter [got sent] to the Delegations of the EPO’s Administrative Council,” we were separately told. It cites Techrights in a few places. “Time to put an end to the deterioration of the European Patent system” is the title and we reproduce it below:

Open letter – by email to the Heads of Delegation

13 March 2016

Copies to: Competent Ministries of the Member States

EPO-FLIER Team
epoflier@runbox.com

Time to put an end to the deterioration of the European Patent system

Dear Heads and Members of the Delegations to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation, dear Chairman,

Following debates in the Netherlands1, the French2 and the Bavarian3 parliaments, the social conflict at the EPO has become the subject of discussions at government level. French2,4 and Dutch5 ministers have publicly criticised Mr Battistelli for his intimidating and destructive management style. The Dutch Foreign Minister said in a recent letter: “If no visible improvements take place in the short term in the relations within the EPO, I see no other option but to discuss the situation at a high political level with the member states of the European Patent Organisation.”

The situation has not improved. On the contrary, the working atmosphere has become even more toxic. Proposed new house and security rules will, if they enter into force, entitle security staff to seize and search bags, phones and laptops of employees at any time6,7. They will also prohibit the dissemination of posters and flyers. Assemblies of more than 25 persons will require management permission. Additionally, a further reform aimed at weakening the staff representation even more has been prepared8,9.

Mr Battistelli can manage the Office without respecting staff’s fundamental rights and international labour law standards while he enjoys the privileges and immunities accorded to diplomatic agents under the Vienna Convention. But these privileges and immunities are inseparable from the right of the host state to declare any diplomatic staff member persona non grata or not acceptable “at any time and without having to explain its decision”10. From this, it flows that the host states have a special responsibility for the employees of guest organisations. At this point, it is worth noting that the delegations of the EPO’s major host states, Germany and The Netherlands, voted in favour of the strike rules (which violate Article 11 of the ECHR) and the Social Democracy reform. While it can be assumed that they were originally misguided by the president’s presentation (with the help of the German vice-president DG511) of these reforms, in the meantime, these host states must have realised that the reforms have in fact undermined labour rights, and contributed to the current crisis12 in the European Patent Organisation.

The social reforms and management by intimidation, in combination with unrealistic and arbitrary production targets, have had the effect of introducing de facto changes to the European Patent Convention (EPC) through the back door13. The European Patent Organisation has thus broken its legal contract not only with staff but also with its stakeholders (companies and consumers), including the applicants, who finance the patent system.

According to the president, these reforms were necessary to serve the EPO’s “customers” better. However, a recent independent survey14 conducted by the well-respected German legal magazine JUVE revealed that this is far from the case: firstly, less than half of the survey’s participants were happy with the current quality of the European patent examination process. Only one in 25 considers the president’s efficiency strategy useful. The survey also showed an alarming level of mistrust in Mr Battistelli (zero percent confidence rating), with the majority of respondents calling for his resignation.

Last but not least, the survey shows that a quality erosion has taken place. Low quality patents create legal uncertainty for patent applicants and their competitors. Legal uncertainty hinders investments and leads to increased litigation, which is a drag on the economy15. Seen in this light, the president’s announcement on 7 March 2017 of a 40% increase in patent grants in 2016 is alarming. It is difficult to believe that such a surge in productivity could be achievable without a drop in quality. Asserted low quality patents are equivalent to a tax on innovation since the costs are passed on to the consumers16.

The findings of the JUVE survey are in contrast with the EPO’s own quality statistics. Due to a built-in conflict of interest, the ISO-9001-certified quality measuring system for the
procedure at the EPO indicates an excellent quality, no matter what the actual quality of the product is17. Furthermore, the EPO’s quality audit department (DQA) reports direct to the president. There, Mr Battistelli measures his own quality. The Administrative Council should consider transferring DQA activities to an independent institution in order to establish a more reliable quality measuring system. This could be a first step in the direction to regain the trust of the users of the patent system.

Accept your responsibility for safeguarding a patent system that delivers the quality required by the European public and do no longer support HR policies that are unfit for an intergovernmental organisation in the 21st century.

Make sure to select the right new person for the job.

With our best regards,

The EPO-FLIER team

a group of concerned staff of the EPO who wish to remain anonymous due to the prevailing harsh social climate and absence of the rule of law at the European Patent Office

______
1 https://www.suepo.org/documents/43960/56042.pdf
2 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/03/epo_president_disgrace_to_france/
3 https://www.suepo.org/documents/43906/55980.pdf
4http://www.richardyung.fr/francais-de-l-etranger/questions-au-gouvernement-francais-etranger-cote-circonscription/4219-question-orale-sur-la-degradation-du-climat-social-au-sein-de-loeb-reponse-du-gouvernement.html
5 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/07/come_in_battistelli_your_time_is_up/
6 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/03/euro_patent_office_interpol_phones_and_laptops/
7 Circulars GCC/DOC 4/2017 (physical security), GCC/DOC 6/2017 (information security) and GCC/DOC 5/2017 (house rules)
8 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/31/battistelli_tries_again_to_break_epo_union/
9 http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/sc17027cl.pdf
10 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961
11 CA/PV 136 Minutes of the 136 th Administrative Council meeting (June 2013), page 21/48
12 B28/2/16 (02.02.2016): “The Board qualified the situation as a crisis – a view challenged by the President.”
13 Open Letters of 22 June 2016 and 11 October 2016; http://epostaff4rights.org/openletters.html
14 https://suepo.org/public/ex17003cp.pdf (German); https://suepo.org/public/ex17003cpe.pdf (English)
15 http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/295542-fixing-why-uspto-issues-low-quality-patents-should-be
16 http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC103321/jrc103321 online version.pdf
17 http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/sc16170cp.pdf

As we explained here before, even ILO’s staff union (the ILO Staff Union as it’s called) supports the staff of the EPO, seeing what kind of abuse they’re subjected to. How much longer can all these injustices go on for? It’s damaging Europe’s reputation in the world.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/10/2017: Purism Against ME, Pop!_OS Ready

    Links for the day



  2. US Patents Appeal Board Attacked by the Patent 'Industry', Defended by Federal Courts, and Dodged by Patent Trolls

    PTAB, the branch or the 'court' responsible for eliminating bad patents, is coming under attacks from those who rely on poor patent quality and receives praises from everyone else, as usual



  3. In the United States, the Patent 'Industry' is a Dying Breed and China Adopts This Destructive Force

    The decaying patent microcosm, or the pipeline of low-quality patents and frivolous lawsuits these entail, loses its grip on the US; China, much to the astonishment of people who actually create things, is attempting to attract that ruinous microcosm (which preys on real, producing companies)



  4. Microsoft and Nokia's Patent Trolls by Proxy: First Conversant, Now Provenance Asset Group Holdings LLC

    Microsoft's shell game with patents (passing Android-hostile patents to trolls) carries on and publishers funded by these trolls offer the details, albeit vaguely and with obvious spin



  5. Anonymous Professionals Speak of Benoît Battistelli's Destruction of the EPO, But Why Does the Media Turn a Blind Eye?

    Everyone in the circles of EPO staff and EPO stakeholders knows that dysfunction has become the norm; European media, however, remains suspiciously silent about what otherwise would be a major European scandal (bigger than FIFA or Dieselgate)



  6. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part III: More Details About Caixa Geral de Depósitos, Former Employer of Campinos

    The side of Campinos which he prefers to conceal, or rather his association with a rather notorious Portuguese bank



  7. UPC Looks Like More of a Distant Dream (or Nightmare) as Germany Adds Another Two Months' Delay

    The likelihood that the UPC will be altogether scuttled is growing as delays keep piling up and more complaints are being filed by public interest groups (as opposed to Team UPC, which hoped to shove the UPCA down everyone's throats behind closed doors)



  8. Patent Trolls Roundup: BlackBerry, Dominion Harbor, IPNav, IP Bridge

    A quick review of recent news regarding patent trolls or entities which resemble (and sometimes feed) these



  9. Battistelli's Destruction of the EPO is Bad for Everyone, Even Patent Attorneys

    The collapse of the European patent system, owing primarily to Battistelli's totalitarian style and deemphasis on patent quality, means that "the war is lost," as one professional puts it



  10. Links 19/10/2017: Mesa 17.2.3, New Ubuntu Release, Samsung Flirts With GNU/Linux Desktops

    Links for the day



  11. Some of the USPTO's Most Ridiculous Patents Are Scrutinised by “Above the Law” While Dennis Crouch Attempts to Tarnish Alice

    Controversies over patent scope and level of novelty required for a patent; as usual, public interest groups try to restrict patent scope, whereas those who make money out of abundance of patents attempt to remove every barrier



  12. Microsoft's Software Patents Aggression in Court (Corel Again)

    Microsoft's tendency to not only abuse the competition but also to destroy it with patent lawsuits as seen in Corel's case



  13. The Spanish Supreme Court Rejects the EPO's “Problem and Solution Approach” While Quality of European Patents Nosedives

    European Patents (EPs) aren't what they used to be and their credibility is being further eroded and even detected as such



  14. Europe is Being Robbed by Team Battistelli and the UPC/PPH Would Make Things Worse

    The European Patent Office (EPO) has put litigation at the forefront, having implicitly decided to no longer bother with proper patent examination and instead issue lots of patents for judges and lawyers to argue about (at great expense to the public)



  15. Team UPC Continues to Promote Illusion of UPC Progress Where There's None

    The core members of Team UPC in the UK spread obvious falsehoods in the media, probably in an effort to attract 'business' (consultation regarding something that does not exist)



  16. António Campinos: A True EPO Reformer or More of the Same?

    More unfortunate reminders that Campinos and Battistelli don't quite diverge on the big issues, they're just more than two decades apart in age (but the same nationality)



  17. Juve Has Confirmed That António Campinos is French

    The relationship between Campinos and Battistelli has a nationality aspect to it, not even taking into account the interpersonal connection which goes a long way back



  18. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part II: António Campinos at Banco Caixa Geral de Depósitos

    A look at the largely-hidden banking career of the next President of the EPO and the career of the person who competed with him for this position



  19. SUEPO to the Media, Regarding Campinos: “No Comment, It’s Too Dangerous”

    António Campinos, who is Benoît Battistelli's chosen successor at the EPO, as covered by German media earlier this month



  20. Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Willing to Work With Campinos But Foresees Difficulties

    New message from SUEPO regarding Battistelli's successor of choice (Campinos)



  21. Links 18/10/2017: GTK+ 3.92, Microsoft Bug Doors Leaked

    Links for the day



  22. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part I: Introduction

    Some new details about Mr. Campinos, who is Battistelli’s successor at the EPO



  23. Confessions of EPO Insiders Reveal That European Patents (EPs) Have Lost Their Legitimacy/Value Due to Battistelli's Policies

    A much-discussed topic at the EPO is now the ever-declining quality of granted patents, which make or break patent offices because quality justifies high costs (searches, applications, renewals and so on)



  24. Patent Firms From the United States Try Hard to Push the Unitary Patent (UPC), Which Would Foment Litigation Wars in Europe

    The UPC push seems to be coming from firms which not only fail to represent public interests but are not even European



  25. In the Age of Alice and PTAB There is No Reason to Pursue Software Patents in the United States (Not Anymore)

    The appeal board in the US (PTAB) combined with a key decision of the Supreme Court may mean that even at a very low cost software patents can be invalidated upon demand (petition) and, failing that, the courts will invalidate these



  26. IAM is Wrong, the Narrative Isn't Changing, Except in the Battistelli-Funded (at EPO's Expense) Financial Times

    The desperate attempts to change the narrative in the press culminate in nothing more than yet another misleading article from Rana Foroohar and some rants from Watchtroll



  27. The Federal Circuit Continues Squashing Software Patents

    Under the leadership of Sharon Prost the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues its war on software patents, making it very hard to remember the last time it tolerated any



  28. SUEPO Representatives Like Elizabeth Hardon Vindicated as Battistelli's Detrimental Effect on Patent Quality is Widely Confirmed

    Feedback regarding the awful refusal to acknowledge patent quality crisis at the EPO as well as the appointment of a President so close to Battistelli (who most likely assures continuation of his policies)



  29. Links 17/10/2017: KDE Frameworks 5.39.0, Safe Browsing in Epiphany

    Links for the day



  30. Judge Bryson Rules Against Allergan After It Used Native American Tribes to Dodge Scrutiny of Patents (IPRs); Senator Hatch Does Not Understand IPRs

    Having attempted to dodge inter partes reviews (IPRs) by latching onto sovereign immunity, Allergan loses a key case and Senator Hatch is meanwhile attempting to water down IPRs albeit at the same time bemoaning patent trolls (which IPRs help neutralise)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts