EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.10.17

Team UPC Still Twists and Fabricates Statements to Make It Seem Like Unitary Patent is Happening Soon

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:43 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

In an effort to resurrect the UPC, which is in a limbo, a retreat to “alternative facts”

Halloween decorations

Summary: The Unified Patent Court (UPC), a terrible system which was envisioned and covertly constructed by those who stand to benefit/profit from injunctions and trolling, is not going anywhere, but media which is dominated by Team UPC would have us believe otherwise

THE EPO, aided by IAM these days, still spreads the UPC agenda. It’s also aided by IP Kat, which is now dominated by the most hardcore elements of Team UPC. The end result is a lot of misinformation from those who stand to benefit from such misinformation.

“The end result is a lot of misinformation from those who stand to benefit from such misinformation.”The most hardcore elements of Team UPC are lying. They lie a lot. Routinely. Then there’s Bristows. It’s an element or firm which is probably falsifying UK-IPO statements and is now trying to salvage something in Estonia. It’s James Boon’s turn. Estonia was mentioned in relation to the UPC last year, though it’s not a large stakeholder at all. It barely has a say on the matter. What about the UK or Germany? Well, they’d rather not say. What about France? The patent microcosm keeps pretending that the UPC is coming soon because of the election of Macron. See what’s in this new post which says: “The focus this year is the role of patents in Standard Setting Organizations and Agreements. The upcoming European Unified Patent Court (UPC) is heaving in the background. This week’s French election signals to me that UPC will move forward and likely begin operation in 2018.”

How on Earth? What does that have to do with UPC? That France isn’t leaving the EU? That alone? Statements like “signals to me” are better rephrased as “I hope” (“because I would profit from it”). Battistelli’s political party actually lost the election; it didn’t make it past the first round even!

“The most hardcore elements of Team UPC are lying. They lie a lot. Routinely.”Yesterday we found this tweet about an article whose headline is a self-serving lie. It claims that UK-IPO “confirms” a “UK ratification” of UPC, but they said “future steps”, not “ratification”. They confirmed nothing. This is a distrotion of words again — one we can compare to what Managing IP and Bristows did a couple of months ago!

The relevant part says this: “A spokesperson for the UK’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) told Out-Law.com that while some work has already been undertaken towards UK ratification, it will be for “the next government” to complete “future steps”.”

But it doesn’t say what the headline says. They’re lobbying. They twist words again.

Watch what German elements of Team UPC are saying: “Packed house this morning for our breakfast session on #UPC and #Opt-Out. @ahaertel is giving a concise overview.”

“They’re lobbying. They twist words again.”It looks like a room full of people in suits, not technical people like scientists and engineers, so we assume that it’s just another patent microcosm echo chamber, or a ‘circle-jerk’ of UPC hopefuls.

A UPC critics cites this talk with “Conclusion: The UPC/UP system is moving closer to becoming a reality,” but it’s more of a wish than a reality. This links to Bond Dickinson LLP‏, whose post says: “The announcement on 28 November 2016 that the UK intends to ratify the Agreement suggests that the political appetite for the UPC/UP regime is still present, notwithstanding Brexit.”

But that was before several serious setbacks, including the upcoming election. Why do they not mention this? Well, it’s a business site, not a news site. They try to sell something!

Ultimately, the Web has been polluted with a bunch of “alternative facts” about UPC and one can easily be fooled by them, especially gullible politicians who don’t understand patents, patent trolls, etc.

“The system worked more or less OK before Battistelli and his UPC fantasy came along. It’s time to oust both.”The system has thus far worked fine for European businesses, but probably not too well for foreign giants that want to sue European businesses (with help of European lawyers). The UPC is not needed; what is instead needed is high-quality patent examination and judges who are adjuncts to the EPO. It is a damn shame that Battistelli is killing the EPO's appeal boards, undermining the prospects of justice itself and leaving it all to ruinous, expensive litigation (magnified by UPC). As one law firm put it the other day: “The European Patent Office (EPO) appeals board has considered the standard of proof required to show that an internet disclosure had been made available to the public before the priority date of a patent, and is prior art.”

Nowadays, the boards are so grossly understaffed (by design) — and are being thoroughly weakened by the month — that we assume little/few oppositions/appeals will happen. Instead, Battistelli is turning the EPO into a production line of low-quality patents, hoping to fuel disputes at a Unitary Patent Court. The privatisation model is, defund something, make it fail, wait for the public to get angry and then demand an alternative. This is perhaps how this French politician hopes to ‘sell’ the UPC to stakeholders, even at the expense of appeal boards. The system worked more or less OK before Battistelli and his UPC fantasy came along. It’s time to oust both.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments

  1. john said,

    May 11, 2017 at 8:35 am

    Gravatar

    In the Isar building, everybody still prepares for the UPC. Apparently they know something which you don’t.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    That depends on what “prepares” means in practical terms. No doubt they assume it will happen one day, especially those living in the bubble of Fröhlinger and Battistelli. These “preparations” (like “preparing” a court in the UK two years ago) are usually part of the lobbying strategy, raising exit barriers (exiting/withdrawing from the UPC plans).

  2. john said,

    May 12, 2017 at 2:38 am

    Gravatar

    What they think is that nobody can stop them and if nobody stops them it will simply happen.

    Note that I am neither criticizing your efforts nor suggesting you scale them down. But who is going to stop Battistelli victorious march?

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You have just described exactly how I know they feel.

    Battistelli’s “victorious march” at the moment is just photo-ops in a country without many EPs (can anyone check how many in Argentina?).

    john Reply:

    They have steadily implemented their plan for the past 3-4 years. Why would they feel any different? More importantly: you did not answer the question: who will stop them?

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    If you are alluding to UPC proponents (more like a ‘conspiracy’) as “they”, well… we slowed them down for years and it’s getting to the point where it’s untenable or at least expensive for them to carry on. They are pouring a lot of resources into it and lose credibility with clients, who have been told for years the UPC would start “real soon now!”

    john Reply:

    Why would they care if it is expensive? It is not their money. You don’t realize that the EPO produces half a billion Euro in profits every year, more than one million Euro every day.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I was talking about firms (like Bristows). You would not be so happy a client if they gave you false hopes and eventually the UK got no UPC at all.

What Else is New


  1. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part II: António Campinos at Banco Caixa Geral de Depósitos

    A look at the largely-hidden banking career of the next President of the EPO and the career of the person who competed with him for this position



  2. SUEPO to the Media, Regarding Campinos: “No Comment, It’s Too Dangerous”

    António Campinos, who is Benoît Battistelli's chosen successor at the EPO, as covered by German media earlier this month



  3. Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Willing to Work With Campinos But Foresees Difficulties

    New message from SUEPO regarding Battistelli's successor of choice (Campinos)



  4. Links 18/10/2017: GTK+ 3.92, Microsoft Bug Doors Leaked

    Links for the day



  5. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part I: Introduction

    Some new details about Mr. Campinos, who is Battistelli’s successor at the EPO



  6. Confessions of EPO Insiders Reveal That European Patents (EPs) Have Lost Their Legitimacy/Value Due to Battistelli's Policies

    A much-discussed topic at the EPO is now the ever-declining quality of granted patents, which make or break patent offices because quality justifies high costs (searches, applications, renewals and so on)



  7. Patent Firms From the United States Try Hard to Push the Unitary Patent (UPC), Which Would Foment Litigation Wars in Europe

    The UPC push seems to be coming from firms which not only fail to represent public interests but are not even European



  8. In the Age of Alice and PTAB There is No Reason to Pursue Software Patents in the United States (Not Anymore)

    The appeal board in the US (PTAB) combined with a key decision of the Supreme Court may mean that even at a very low cost software patents can be invalidated upon demand (petition) and, failing that, the courts will invalidate these



  9. IAM is Wrong, the Narrative Isn't Changing, Except in the Battistelli-Funded (at EPO's Expense) Financial Times

    The desperate attempts to change the narrative in the press culminate in nothing more than yet another misleading article from Rana Foroohar and some rants from Watchtroll



  10. The Federal Circuit Continues Squashing Software Patents

    Under the leadership of Sharon Prost the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues its war on software patents, making it very hard to remember the last time it tolerated any



  11. SUEPO Representatives Like Elizabeth Hardon Vindicated as Battistelli's Detrimental Effect on Patent Quality is Widely Confirmed

    Feedback regarding the awful refusal to acknowledge patent quality crisis at the EPO as well as the appointment of a President so close to Battistelli (who most likely assures continuation of his policies)



  12. Links 17/10/2017: KDE Frameworks 5.39.0, Safe Browsing in Epiphany

    Links for the day



  13. Judge Bryson Rules Against Allergan After It Used Native American Tribes to Dodge Scrutiny of Patents (IPRs); Senator Hatch Does Not Understand IPRs

    Having attempted to dodge inter partes reviews (IPRs) by latching onto sovereign immunity, Allergan loses a key case and Senator Hatch is meanwhile attempting to water down IPRs albeit at the same time bemoaning patent trolls (which IPRs help neutralise)



  14. Rumours That António Campinos Initially Had No Competition at All (for Battistelli's Succession) Are Confirmed

    Succession at the EPO (mostly French) shows that there's little room for optimism and Battistelli's people are too deeply entrenched in the upper echelons of the EPO



  15. EPO Stakeholders Complain That the New Chairman Does Not Grasp the Issues at the EPO (or Denies These)

    Some information from inside the EPO’s Administrative Council, whose Chairman is denying (at least to himself) some of the core issues that render the EPO less competitive in the international market



  16. Another Misleading Article Regarding Patents From Rana Foroohar at the Financial Times

    In an effort to promote the agenda of patent maximalists, many of whom are connected to the Financial Times, another deceiving report comes out



  17. Monika Ermert's Reports About the Crisis at the EPO and IP Kat's Uncharacteristically Shallow Coverage

    News from inside the Council shows conflict regarding the quality of European Patents (granted by the EPO under pressure from top-level management)



  18. Patent Troll VirnetX a Reminder to Apple That Software Patents Are a Threat to Apple Too

    VirnetX, a notorious patent troll, is poised to receive a huge sum of money from Apple and Qualcomm is trying to ban Apple products, serving to remind Apple of the detrimental impact of patents on Apple itself



  19. Links 16/10/2017: Linux 4.14 RC5, Debian 9.2.1, End of LibreOffice Conference 2017

    Links for the day



  20. The Systematic Erosion of Workers' Rights and Holidays at the EPO Goes Years Back

    The legitimacy of the staff's concerns at the EPO, having seen basic labour safeguards being shredded to pieces by Battistelli for a number of years (predating even the escalation of the conflict)



  21. Articles in English and German Speak About the Decline in Quality of European Patents (Granted by the EPO)

    Heise and The Register, two sites that have closely watched EPO affairs for a number of years, speak about the real problem which is declining patent quality (or rushed examination) -- a recipe for frivolous litigation in Europe



  22. Software Patents and Patent Trolls Not a Solved Issue, But the US is Getting There

    A media survey regarding software patents, which are being rejected in the US in spite of all the spin from law firms and bullies such as IBM



  23. US Patent Trolls Are Leaving and the Eastern District of Texas Sees Patent Cases Falling by More Than Half

    The decline of patent aggression in the US and the patent microcosm's response to Justices, having ruled in TC Heartland, curtailing patent trolls



  24. Qualcomm's Nightmares Are Getting Worse as Antitrust Questions Are Raised and Assessed

    Qualcomm is getting itself deeper in trouble as fines pile up and its multi-billion dollar dispute with Apple isn't getting it anywhere



  25. Forget About Apple; Two of the Leading Phone Makers (Samsung and Huawei) Are Bickering Over Patents

    Massive Android OEMs, Huawei and Samsung, are in a big patent dispute and this time, for a change, China is a legal battleground



  26. Tim Heberden From the Glasshouse Advisory is Throwing Stones in a Glasshouse to Create Patent Litigation

    IAM's latest lobbying, aided by the patent microcosm, for a climate of feuds and disputes (to line the pockets of the litigation 'industry')



  27. Access to Medicine is More Important Than Patents

    Some of the latest news about patents that impede/deny access to crucial medication; strategic litigation from the generics sector, seeking to invalidate patents and then offer low-cost alternatives



  28. Links 14/10/2017: Windows Breaks Dutch Law, Wine 2.19 Released

    Links for the day



  29. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Supported by Congress, a Federal Judge, Soon to be Supported by the Supreme Court Too?

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is still widely defended, except by the patent microcosm which likes (and profits from) patent trolls and litigation Armageddon



  30. Patents Are Turning BlackBerry and Nokia, Which Used Android, Into Anti-Android Fronts That Tax Android OEMs

    The Canadian BlackBerry has sued BLU in the US only to compel it to pay 'protection' money; Nokia's patents are being scattered to trolls, which are doing something similar (without risking litigation themselves)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts