EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.10.17

Team UPC Still Twists and Fabricates Statements to Make It Seem Like Unitary Patent is Happening Soon

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:43 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

In an effort to resurrect the UPC, which is in a limbo, a retreat to “alternative facts”

Halloween decorations

Summary: The Unified Patent Court (UPC), a terrible system which was envisioned and covertly constructed by those who stand to benefit/profit from injunctions and trolling, is not going anywhere, but media which is dominated by Team UPC would have us believe otherwise

THE EPO, aided by IAM these days, still spreads the UPC agenda. It’s also aided by IP Kat, which is now dominated by the most hardcore elements of Team UPC. The end result is a lot of misinformation from those who stand to benefit from such misinformation.

“The end result is a lot of misinformation from those who stand to benefit from such misinformation.”The most hardcore elements of Team UPC are lying. They lie a lot. Routinely. Then there’s Bristows. It’s an element or firm which is probably falsifying UK-IPO statements and is now trying to salvage something in Estonia. It’s James Boon’s turn. Estonia was mentioned in relation to the UPC last year, though it’s not a large stakeholder at all. It barely has a say on the matter. What about the UK or Germany? Well, they’d rather not say. What about France? The patent microcosm keeps pretending that the UPC is coming soon because of the election of Macron. See what’s in this new post which says: “The focus this year is the role of patents in Standard Setting Organizations and Agreements. The upcoming European Unified Patent Court (UPC) is heaving in the background. This week’s French election signals to me that UPC will move forward and likely begin operation in 2018.”

How on Earth? What does that have to do with UPC? That France isn’t leaving the EU? That alone? Statements like “signals to me” are better rephrased as “I hope” (“because I would profit from it”). Battistelli’s political party actually lost the election; it didn’t make it past the first round even!

“The most hardcore elements of Team UPC are lying. They lie a lot. Routinely.”Yesterday we found this tweet about an article whose headline is a self-serving lie. It claims that UK-IPO “confirms” a “UK ratification” of UPC, but they said “future steps”, not “ratification”. They confirmed nothing. This is a distrotion of words again — one we can compare to what Managing IP and Bristows did a couple of months ago!

The relevant part says this: “A spokesperson for the UK’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) told Out-Law.com that while some work has already been undertaken towards UK ratification, it will be for “the next government” to complete “future steps”.”

But it doesn’t say what the headline says. They’re lobbying. They twist words again.

Watch what German elements of Team UPC are saying: “Packed house this morning for our breakfast session on #UPC and #Opt-Out. @ahaertel is giving a concise overview.”

“They’re lobbying. They twist words again.”It looks like a room full of people in suits, not technical people like scientists and engineers, so we assume that it’s just another patent microcosm echo chamber, or a ‘circle-jerk’ of UPC hopefuls.

A UPC critics cites this talk with “Conclusion: The UPC/UP system is moving closer to becoming a reality,” but it’s more of a wish than a reality. This links to Bond Dickinson LLP‏, whose post says: “The announcement on 28 November 2016 that the UK intends to ratify the Agreement suggests that the political appetite for the UPC/UP regime is still present, notwithstanding Brexit.”

But that was before several serious setbacks, including the upcoming election. Why do they not mention this? Well, it’s a business site, not a news site. They try to sell something!

Ultimately, the Web has been polluted with a bunch of “alternative facts” about UPC and one can easily be fooled by them, especially gullible politicians who don’t understand patents, patent trolls, etc.

“The system worked more or less OK before Battistelli and his UPC fantasy came along. It’s time to oust both.”The system has thus far worked fine for European businesses, but probably not too well for foreign giants that want to sue European businesses (with help of European lawyers). The UPC is not needed; what is instead needed is high-quality patent examination and judges who are adjuncts to the EPO. It is a damn shame that Battistelli is killing the EPO's appeal boards, undermining the prospects of justice itself and leaving it all to ruinous, expensive litigation (magnified by UPC). As one law firm put it the other day: “The European Patent Office (EPO) appeals board has considered the standard of proof required to show that an internet disclosure had been made available to the public before the priority date of a patent, and is prior art.”

Nowadays, the boards are so grossly understaffed (by design) — and are being thoroughly weakened by the month — that we assume little/few oppositions/appeals will happen. Instead, Battistelli is turning the EPO into a production line of low-quality patents, hoping to fuel disputes at a Unitary Patent Court. The privatisation model is, defund something, make it fail, wait for the public to get angry and then demand an alternative. This is perhaps how this French politician hopes to ‘sell’ the UPC to stakeholders, even at the expense of appeal boards. The system worked more or less OK before Battistelli and his UPC fantasy came along. It’s time to oust both.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments »

  1. john said,

    May 11, 2017 at 8:35 am

    Gravatar

    In the Isar building, everybody still prepares for the UPC. Apparently they know something which you don’t.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    That depends on what “prepares” means in practical terms. No doubt they assume it will happen one day, especially those living in the bubble of Fröhlinger and Battistelli. These “preparations” (like “preparing” a court in the UK two years ago) are usually part of the lobbying strategy, raising exit barriers (exiting/withdrawing from the UPC plans).

  2. john said,

    May 12, 2017 at 2:38 am

    Gravatar

    What they think is that nobody can stop them and if nobody stops them it will simply happen.

    Note that I am neither criticizing your efforts nor suggesting you scale them down. But who is going to stop Battistelli victorious march?

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You have just described exactly how I know they feel.

    Battistelli’s “victorious march” at the moment is just photo-ops in a country without many EPs (can anyone check how many in Argentina?).

    john Reply:

    They have steadily implemented their plan for the past 3-4 years. Why would they feel any different? More importantly: you did not answer the question: who will stop them?

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    If you are alluding to UPC proponents (more like a ‘conspiracy’) as “they”, well… we slowed them down for years and it’s getting to the point where it’s untenable or at least expensive for them to carry on. They are pouring a lot of resources into it and lose credibility with clients, who have been told for years the UPC would start “real soon now!”

    john Reply:

    Why would they care if it is expensive? It is not their money. You don’t realize that the EPO produces half a billion Euro in profits every year, more than one million Euro every day.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I was talking about firms (like Bristows). You would not be so happy a client if they gave you false hopes and eventually the UK got no UPC at all.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What Else is New


  1. Great News: While IBM et al Try to Undermine Patent Reform the Supreme Court Deepens the Reform in TC Heartland Case

    In a unanimous decision, with the court ruling 8-0 against TC Heartland, the monkey business in East Texas (beneficial to patent trolls and large businesses that leverage software patents) may have just come to an end



  2. Speculations About Battistelli's End of Term, Campinos at EUIPO, and Failed UPC Ambitions

    Rumours and speculations surrounding the fate of the EPO's leadership now that the UPC gravy train is stuck again and Battistelli's protector, Jesper Kongstad, is about to leave



  3. Martijn van Dam is Wrong to Believe That Battistelli's Abuses Are Somehow Acceptable or Tolerable Because His Term is Possibly Ending

    Coverage of Martijn van Dam’s stance (he is the Dutch State Secretary for Economic Affairs) reveals that economic gain trumps ethics and justice, irrespective of what the law says



  4. Media and Staff Association Elections at EPO and WIPO Are Compromised

    A campaign of abuse (legal bullying) and gifting to the media, combined with a wide-ranging assault on critics who represent the interests of staff, have led WIPO and EPO down the route to totality



  5. New Documents Help Demonstrate That ILO Delivers Institutional Injustice to EPO Employees and Cushions Team Battistelli

    The International Labour Organisation Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT) delivers not justice but merely the illusion of justice, probably in defiance of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)



  6. Leaked: 2017 European Inventor Award Finalists, or Stooges Whom the Tyrant Battistelli Exploits for PR Purposes and Media Manipulation

    The stupidest ceremony in Europe (turning serious science into something sketchy such as Eurovision) is disliked among EPO staff and is exploited by the person who destroys the EPO (Benoît Battistelli) to pretend all is fine and dandy, at huge expense to the Office (as extraordinary as about 5 million Euros for a ~2-hour show)



  7. EPO: Can the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) Still Save It?

    Genuine concerns about the slow process at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the lack of progress at ILO, which coincide with weakening of the unions and threat to jobs of patent examiners (leaving ordinary Europeans more vulnerable to meritless patent lawsuits)



  8. Links 21/5/2017: Linux 3.18.53, Tizen 4.0

    Links for the day



  9. Cloudflare's Enemy is Software Patents, Not Just One Software Patent or One Patent Troll

    With a bounty of $50,000, which is likely less than the cost of legal defense, Cloudflare looks for help with its own case rather than the underlying issues that need tackling worldwide



  10. Patent Laws -- and Especially Eligibility of Software Patents -- Are Being Hijacked by Large Corporations and Their Front Groups

    Intervention by large multinational corporations and their lawyers, front groups, etc. (like the classic lobbying model) gives room for concern in multiple continents where most software development is done



  11. Links 18/5/2017: Catching Up With the Past Three Days

    Links for the day



  12. The US Supreme Court Consults USPTO Director Michelle Lee Regarding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Which is Invalidating Software Patents With CAFC's Approval

    Software patents continue to get knocked out by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) whose introduction of PTAB gave a helping hand to companies that are susceptible to abusive litigation (with bogus patents)



  13. IBM and Its Revolving Doors Lobby Are Plotting to Undermine Supreme Court Rulings to Restore Patentability of Software

    IBM has become so evil that it is now trying to steal democracy, label programmers "thieves", and basically attack the rule of law by extra-judicially overturning a Supreme Court decision



  14. 3 Years After the Alice Case at the Supreme Court the Plague of Software Patents is Easier to Cope With

    Litigation figures are down, rejection rates of software patents remain high, and only spin (e.g. cherry-picking) or constant lobbying can save those who used to profit from software patents



  15. The Attacks of Patent Trolls as Outlined in the Media This Past Week

    An outline of some of the latest troll cases to be aware of and their consequences too (e.g. software patents being used to literally shut down entire programs)



  16. Links 14/5/2017: Linux 4.12 RC1 and KDE Frameworks 5.34.0

    Links for the day



  17. Industry Giants Challenge Qualcomm's Patent Practices While the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Closely Examines Such Behavior

    Scrutiny of Qualcomm's patent aggression and coercion -- scrutiny that can profoundly change the way software patents, SEPs and FRAND are viewed -- as seen in various amicus briefs (amici) from industry giants that are affected



  18. Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette Questions Whether Patents Work When Patent Scope is Too Broad

    Citing MIT economist (and MacArthur “genius”) Heidi Williams, Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette from Stanford challenges old myths and quotes: “we still have essentially no credible empirical evidence on the seemingly simple question of whether stronger patent rights—either longer patent terms or broader patent rights—encourage research investments.”



  19. OIN is Still a Distraction Unless We Want GNU/Linux to Coexist With Software Patents (Rather Than Eliminate Those)

    Another wave of media coverage by/for the Open Invention Network (OIN) necessitates a reminder of what OIN stands for and why it is not tackling the biggest problems which Free/Open Source software (FOSS) faces



  20. Links 13/5/2017: Neptune Plasma 5 ISO, a Shift to Free (FOSS) Databases

    Links for the day



  21. Countries With a Dozen European Patents Are an Easy Photo-Op 'Sell' for Battistelli While the EPO's Demise is Largely Ignored by the Patent Microcosm

    Behind the façade of legitimacy, the EPO suffers from an incompetent, insecure and delusional boss, whose actions will almost certainly lead to the collapse of both the Office and the entire Organisation (whose founding document he routinely shreds to pieces)



  22. Our Assessment: Unitary Patent (UPC) Will Crumble Along With Battistelli's Regime at the EPO

    A reflection and an opinion on where the EPO stands and what it means for the UPC, which doesn't seem to be going anywhere (it's all talk and lobbying)



  23. The European Patent Office Has a Long History/Track Record of 'Screwing' Contractors

    The European Patent Office (EPO) appears to have quite an extensive track record/reputation for ‘screwing’ contractors and then misusing immunity to get away with it



  24. Links 12/5/2017: Wine 2.8, Kdenlive 17.04.1, NHS Windows Syndrome

    Links for the day



  25. Links 11/5/2017: New OpenShot, GIMP, and GNOME (3.24.2)

    Links for the day



  26. The Sickness of the EPO – Part IX: Using Confidential Medical Records as a Weapon Against Staff

    In defiance/violation of labour laws and medical oaths etc. the EPO is passing around medical information, either for dismissal pretexts or a sort of blackmail -- a serious abuse in its own right



  27. The EPO is in Disarray and Additional Complaints to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) May Be Imminent

    Team Battistelli reaps what it has sown, as complaints are being made to a court with “47 member states [that] are contracting parties to the Convention,” (European Convention on Human Rights) according to Wikipedia



  28. By Promoting the UPC, in Defiance of Public Will, the EPO Has Become Patent Trolls' Best Friend

    The patent–industrial complex, aided by the EPO under Battistelli's iron-fisted reign, is trying to convince us that the UPC is coming soon and that it is desirable (it's neither of those things)



  29. Links 10/5/2017: Mesa 17.1, Git 2.13, Qt Creator 4.3 RC1, MINIX 3.4 RC6

    Links for the day



  30. Team UPC Still Twists and Fabricates Statements to Make It Seem Like Unitary Patent is Happening Soon

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC), a terrible system which was envisioned and covertly constructed by those who stand to benefit/profit from injunctions and trolling, is not going anywhere, but media which is dominated by Team UPC would have us believe otherwise


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts