EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.13.17

Countries With a Dozen European Patents Are an Easy Photo-Op ‘Sell’ for Battistelli While the EPO’s Demise is Largely Ignored by the Patent Microcosm

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pretending all is fine and dandy won’t make it so

Trump's Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme
Reference: Trump’s Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme

Summary: Behind the façade of legitimacy, the EPO suffers from an incompetent, insecure and delusional boss, whose actions will almost certainly lead to the collapse of both the Office and the entire Organisation (whose founding document he routinely shreds to pieces)

THE EPO scandals refuse to end. It’s almost as though Battistelli wants to lose leadership to the USPTO not just in terms of quality of patents but also quality of staff (people are walking away and the EPO is visibly desperate for applications).

“All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).”The other day we saw the latest Battistelli photo-op (warning: epo.org link). As usual, nobody important was in that photo-op. Respectable individuals want nothing to do with Battistelli. It’s likely to turn out to be as much as a ‘trophy’ as an old photo-op with Jimmy Savile. All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).

Battistelli is visiting or appealing to south America again; we saw this coming and wrote about it some days ago. Somebody told us about the Argentina visit. We decided to check how many EPs Argentina has. Well, that’s 13 patents last year (page through to granularity level/page 6 and be warned that it’s another epo.org link). Cuba and Monaco (the other two ‘darlings’ of Battistelli) are adjacent to Argentina with 12 patents each. That’s utterly minuscule compared to the United States with 21,939, Germany with 18,728 and Japan with 15,395.

“The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk.”What is the purpose of these visits? Why need they always throw in Battistelli’s photo-ops? Like a king building his personal portfolio/legacy, he has taken over the entire Web site. epo.org now looks like the site of some Sultanate, with Battistelli’s face and quotes showing up everywhere. We are not joking. It’s like he never intends to leave the EPO and it’s almost as though he views himself as “benevolent dictator for life”. Is this man insane? Donald Trump has done something similar and the press berates him for it.

One reader recently told us, “we are all aware that a big amount of transparency would quickly sanitize the EPO.”

Well, that’s because the EPO has plenty of closets full of skeletons; they are brought out belatedly, ushering in accountability.

“It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality.”The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk. This, in turn, puts many European businesses at risk. Someone recently published “Putting the Pedal to the Metal at the EPO”, cross-posting an article we remarked on several days ago. It’s clear that Battistelli’s plan is to kill the goose for all its eggs, even if that death means that no more eggs will ever come out. Examiners may become redundant as early as next year. What happens then? There are scary speculations about that

It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality. To him, quality is just a barrier or a nuisance. The Boards of Appeal (all the boards in fact) have been thoroughly destroyed by Battistelli, but a new piece from Marks & Clerk ignores this reality by looking back at this older case:

The Board of Appeal concluded that “all due care” had not been exercised by the applicant, for two reasons. Firstly, the applicant’s system for docketing filing information did not cross-check to confirm that data had been entered into the system. An independent and effective docketing system requires a cross-check that new information is input into the system, in addition to a check that the information input into the system is correct. Secondly, the applicant had ignored the email from its European attorney notifying it that the application would be withdrawn if the renewal fee (plus a surcharge) was not paid by a specified date.

European attorneys are not cheap and a couple of days ago the EPO suggested hiring them, perhaps knowing that applicants are discriminated against without them (we covered examples of that in the past, supported by leaked communications). “Seek a patent attorney’s advice,” the EPO wrote, having made things complicated enough for everyone (that they need to hire outside help at rates of about $300/hour).

If the resultant patent (EP) is not even legitimate — for it resulted from shoddy/hurried assessment — what would it be worth? It would be worse than useless.

There is another new article from Marks & Clerk (these two were published a few hours apart) and it conveniently ignores the fact that the European Patent Convention (EPC) too has long been disregarded by crazy Battistelli; he’s a serial violator, a repeat offender, yet nobody at the Council seems to mind.

Here is what Marks & Clerk wrote:

A recent decision by the EPO’s Boards of Appeal, T 1846/11, concerns an appeal filed by Rigaku Corporation (appellant) against the decision of the examining division, refusing European patent application no. 04012578.3.

This decision deals with the importance of ensuring that correct authorisations are obtained for legal practitioners to act on behalf of an applicant in EPO proceedings.

The European Patent Convention (EPC) draws a clear distinction between professional representatives (ie qualified European Patent Attorneys) and legal practitioners (qualified practitioners in a contracting state who are entitled to act in patent matters and having his place of business in that state). Examples of legal practitioners include Rechtsanwalt in Germany and solicitors and barristers in the UK. Under the EPC, legal practitioners may represent an applicant in proceedings before the EPO in the same way as professional representatives as long as the relevant authorisation is obtained from the applicant and submitted at the EPO.

Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution? When judges who are independent are subjected to illegal actions by Battistelli? And mock ‘trials’? Even defamation?

“Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution?”Suffice to say, the EPO’s Boards of Appeal represent just one Battistelli scandal among so many. IP Kat used to cover the subject, but it does not anymore. Now it actively helps Battistelli and yesterday it yielded this new post from Katfriend Heiko Sendrowski (BASF). Isn’t it great? Corporate patent attorneys now write the ‘news’. “The Board of Appeal,” he wrote, “emphasized that each document must be interpreted by respecting the context of each part thereof to determine its true meaning. The claims of the prior art document according to the Board chiefly serve to define the subject matter for which protection is sought. The skilled person thus understands that claims may artificially combine (and omit) features of an invention to maximize scope of protection such that claims may not “truly correspond to the technical teaching of the document” (see sec. 3.8). In the present case, all examples required a further technical feature (“user intervention”). The skilled person would thus understand that the claims of D2 do not unambiguously disclose an embodiment without the additional feature (see sec. 3.9). The appeal was therefore allowed given that the subject matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step.”

So much about pertinent details regarding the Boards of Appeal yet nothing in months about EPO scandals. So much for “popular source of material, comment and amusement for IP owners, practitioners, judges, students and administrators [which] does not carry paid advertising and does not subscribe to any online advertising services” (the authors just advertise their own interests/employers).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/2/2018: Qt Roadmap for 2018, Calculate Linux 17.12.2

    Links for the day



  2. As Expected, Bristows and Others Already Lying About UPC Status in Germany, But Doing This Anonymously (to Dodge Accountability for Lies)

    In their characteristic fashion, firms that created the UPC for their self-enrichment purposes, along with publishers/writers who deem it their role to promote the UPC and set up lobbying events for the UPC, look for ways to downplay if not intentionally distort what happened in Germany yesterday



  3. Further Attacks on EPO Staff and the Appeal Boards; Former EPO Boards of Appeal Member Speaks About EPO Scandals

    In the process of devaluing EPO workers and perhaps preparing them for a large round of layoffs information is also revealed about further repressions against the independence of the Boards of Appeal



  4. End of the UPC Lobby and Withdrawal of UPCA May Seem Imminent

    The Unitary Patent fantasy (of mass litigation firms) is coming to an end; in fact, the German government and courts (Bundesverfassungsgericht to be specific) now deem the complaint to be admissible and thus likely legitimate in spite of many attempts to shoot it down



  5. EPO's Board 28 Spikes Article 53 in CA/3/18, Apparently After Battistelli Withdrew It

    The latest plot twist, as odd as that may seem, is that the attack on the rights of thousands of workers (many of whom are rumoured to be on their way out) is curtailed somewhat, at least for the time being



  6. Links 21/2/2018: Apper 1.0, New Fedora ISOs

    Links for the day



  7. Rumour: European Patent Office to Lay Off a Significant Proportion of Its Workforce

    While the Administrative Council of the EPO praises Battistelli for his financial accomplishments (as laughable as it may seem) a lot of families stuck in a foreign country may soon see their breadwinner unemployed, according to rumours



  8. The Patent Trolls' Lobby, Bristows and IAM Among Others, Downplays Darts-IP/IP2Innovate Report About Rising If Not Soaring Troll Activity in Europe

    Exactly like last year, as soon as IP2Innovate opens its mouth Bristows and IAM go into "attack dog" mode and promote the UPC, deny the existence or seriousness of patent trolls, and promote their nefarious, trolls-funded agenda



  9. Links 20/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.5, Qt 5.11 Alpha, Absolute 15.0 Beta 4, Sailfish OS 2.1.4 E.A., SuiteCRM 7.10

    Links for the day



  10. Replacing Patent Sharks/Trolls and the Patent Mafia With 'Icons' Like Thomas Edison

    The popular perceptions of patents and the sobering reality of what patents (more so nowadays) mean to actual inventors who aren't associated with global behemoths such as IBM or Siemens



  11. The Patent Trolls' Lobby is Distorting the Record of CAFC on PTAB

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), which deals with appeals from PTAB, has been issuing many decisions in favour of § 101, but those aren't being talked about or emphasised by the patent 'industry'



  12. Japan Demonstrates Sanity on SEP Policy While US Patent Policy is Influenced by Lobbyists

    Japan's commendable response to a classic pattern of patent misuse; US patent policy is still being subjected to never-ending intervention and there is now a lobbyist in charge of antitrust matters and a lawyer in charge of the US patent office (both Trump appointees)



  13. The Patent Microcosm's Embrace of Buzzwords and False Marketing Strives to Make Patent Examiners Redundant and Patent Quality Extremely Low

    Patent maximalists, who are profiting from abundance of low-quality patents (and frivolous lawsuits/legal threats these can entail), are riding the hype wave and participating in the rush to put patent systems at the hands of machines



  14. Today, at 12:30 CET, Bavarian State Parliament Will Speak About EPO Abuses (Updated)

    The politicians of Bavaria are prepared to wrestle with some serious questions about the illegality of the EPO's actions and what that may mean to constitutional aspects of German law



  15. Another Loud Warning From EPO Workers About the Decline of Patent Quality

    Yet more patent quality warnings are being issued by EPO insiders (examiners) who are seeing their senior colleagues vanishing and wonder what will be left of their employer



  16. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  17. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  18. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  19. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  20. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  21. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  22. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  23. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  24. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  25. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  26. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  27. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  28. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  29. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  30. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts