EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.13.17

Countries With a Dozen European Patents Are an Easy Photo-Op ‘Sell’ for Battistelli While the EPO’s Demise is Largely Ignored by the Patent Microcosm

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pretending all is fine and dandy won’t make it so

Trump's Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme
Reference: Trump’s Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme

Summary: Behind the façade of legitimacy, the EPO suffers from an incompetent, insecure and delusional boss, whose actions will almost certainly lead to the collapse of both the Office and the entire Organisation (whose founding document he routinely shreds to pieces)

THE EPO scandals refuse to end. It’s almost as though Battistelli wants to lose leadership to the USPTO not just in terms of quality of patents but also quality of staff (people are walking away and the EPO is visibly desperate for applications).

“All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).”The other day we saw the latest Battistelli photo-op (warning: epo.org link). As usual, nobody important was in that photo-op. Respectable individuals want nothing to do with Battistelli. It’s likely to turn out to be as much as a ‘trophy’ as an old photo-op with Jimmy Savile. All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).

Battistelli is visiting or appealing to south America again; we saw this coming and wrote about it some days ago. Somebody told us about the Argentina visit. We decided to check how many EPs Argentina has. Well, that’s 13 patents last year (page through to granularity level/page 6 and be warned that it’s another epo.org link). Cuba and Monaco (the other two ‘darlings’ of Battistelli) are adjacent to Argentina with 12 patents each. That’s utterly minuscule compared to the United States with 21,939, Germany with 18,728 and Japan with 15,395.

“The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk.”What is the purpose of these visits? Why need they always throw in Battistelli’s photo-ops? Like a king building his personal portfolio/legacy, he has taken over the entire Web site. epo.org now looks like the site of some Sultanate, with Battistelli’s face and quotes showing up everywhere. We are not joking. It’s like he never intends to leave the EPO and it’s almost as though he views himself as “benevolent dictator for life”. Is this man insane? Donald Trump has done something similar and the press berates him for it.

One reader recently told us, “we are all aware that a big amount of transparency would quickly sanitize the EPO.”

Well, that’s because the EPO has plenty of closets full of skeletons; they are brought out belatedly, ushering in accountability.

“It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality.”The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk. This, in turn, puts many European businesses at risk. Someone recently published “Putting the Pedal to the Metal at the EPO”, cross-posting an article we remarked on several days ago. It’s clear that Battistelli’s plan is to kill the goose for all its eggs, even if that death means that no more eggs will ever come out. Examiners may become redundant as early as next year. What happens then? There are scary speculations about that

It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality. To him, quality is just a barrier or a nuisance. The Boards of Appeal (all the boards in fact) have been thoroughly destroyed by Battistelli, but a new piece from Marks & Clerk ignores this reality by looking back at this older case:

The Board of Appeal concluded that “all due care” had not been exercised by the applicant, for two reasons. Firstly, the applicant’s system for docketing filing information did not cross-check to confirm that data had been entered into the system. An independent and effective docketing system requires a cross-check that new information is input into the system, in addition to a check that the information input into the system is correct. Secondly, the applicant had ignored the email from its European attorney notifying it that the application would be withdrawn if the renewal fee (plus a surcharge) was not paid by a specified date.

European attorneys are not cheap and a couple of days ago the EPO suggested hiring them, perhaps knowing that applicants are discriminated against without them (we covered examples of that in the past, supported by leaked communications). “Seek a patent attorney’s advice,” the EPO wrote, having made things complicated enough for everyone (that they need to hire outside help at rates of about $300/hour).

If the resultant patent (EP) is not even legitimate — for it resulted from shoddy/hurried assessment — what would it be worth? It would be worse than useless.

There is another new article from Marks & Clerk (these two were published a few hours apart) and it conveniently ignores the fact that the European Patent Convention (EPC) too has long been disregarded by crazy Battistelli; he’s a serial violator, a repeat offender, yet nobody at the Council seems to mind.

Here is what Marks & Clerk wrote:

A recent decision by the EPO’s Boards of Appeal, T 1846/11, concerns an appeal filed by Rigaku Corporation (appellant) against the decision of the examining division, refusing European patent application no. 04012578.3.

This decision deals with the importance of ensuring that correct authorisations are obtained for legal practitioners to act on behalf of an applicant in EPO proceedings.

The European Patent Convention (EPC) draws a clear distinction between professional representatives (ie qualified European Patent Attorneys) and legal practitioners (qualified practitioners in a contracting state who are entitled to act in patent matters and having his place of business in that state). Examples of legal practitioners include Rechtsanwalt in Germany and solicitors and barristers in the UK. Under the EPC, legal practitioners may represent an applicant in proceedings before the EPO in the same way as professional representatives as long as the relevant authorisation is obtained from the applicant and submitted at the EPO.

Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution? When judges who are independent are subjected to illegal actions by Battistelli? And mock ‘trials’? Even defamation?

“Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution?”Suffice to say, the EPO’s Boards of Appeal represent just one Battistelli scandal among so many. IP Kat used to cover the subject, but it does not anymore. Now it actively helps Battistelli and yesterday it yielded this new post from Katfriend Heiko Sendrowski (BASF). Isn’t it great? Corporate patent attorneys now write the ‘news’. “The Board of Appeal,” he wrote, “emphasized that each document must be interpreted by respecting the context of each part thereof to determine its true meaning. The claims of the prior art document according to the Board chiefly serve to define the subject matter for which protection is sought. The skilled person thus understands that claims may artificially combine (and omit) features of an invention to maximize scope of protection such that claims may not “truly correspond to the technical teaching of the document” (see sec. 3.8). In the present case, all examples required a further technical feature (“user intervention”). The skilled person would thus understand that the claims of D2 do not unambiguously disclose an embodiment without the additional feature (see sec. 3.9). The appeal was therefore allowed given that the subject matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step.”

So much about pertinent details regarding the Boards of Appeal yet nothing in months about EPO scandals. So much for “popular source of material, comment and amusement for IP owners, practitioners, judges, students and administrators [which] does not carry paid advertising and does not subscribe to any online advertising services” (the authors just advertise their own interests/employers).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What Else is New


  1. Great News: While IBM et al Try to Undermine Patent Reform the Supreme Court Deepens the Reform in TC Heartland Case

    In a unanimous decision, with the court ruling 8-0 against TC Heartland, the monkey business in East Texas (beneficial to patent trolls and large businesses that leverage software patents) may have just come to an end



  2. Speculations About Battistelli's End of Term, Campinos at EUIPO, and Failed UPC Ambitions

    Rumours and speculations surrounding the fate of the EPO's leadership now that the UPC gravy train is stuck again and Battistelli's protector, Jesper Kongstad, is about to leave



  3. Martijn van Dam is Wrong to Believe That Battistelli's Abuses Are Somehow Acceptable or Tolerable Because His Term is Possibly Ending

    Coverage of Martijn van Dam’s stance (he is the Dutch State Secretary for Economic Affairs) reveals that economic gain trumps ethics and justice, irrespective of what the law says



  4. Media and Staff Association Elections at EPO and WIPO Are Compromised

    A campaign of abuse (legal bullying) and gifting to the media, combined with a wide-ranging assault on critics who represent the interests of staff, have led WIPO and EPO down the route to totality



  5. New Documents Help Demonstrate That ILO Delivers Institutional Injustice to EPO Employees and Cushions Team Battistelli

    The International Labour Organisation Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT) delivers not justice but merely the illusion of justice, probably in defiance of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)



  6. Leaked: 2017 European Inventor Award Finalists, or Stooges Whom the Tyrant Battistelli Exploits for PR Purposes and Media Manipulation

    The stupidest ceremony in Europe (turning serious science into something sketchy such as Eurovision) is disliked among EPO staff and is exploited by the person who destroys the EPO (Benoît Battistelli) to pretend all is fine and dandy, at huge expense to the Office (as extraordinary as about 5 million Euros for a ~2-hour show)



  7. EPO: Can the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) Still Save It?

    Genuine concerns about the slow process at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the lack of progress at ILO, which coincide with weakening of the unions and threat to jobs of patent examiners (leaving ordinary Europeans more vulnerable to meritless patent lawsuits)



  8. Links 21/5/2017: Linux 3.18.53, Tizen 4.0

    Links for the day



  9. Cloudflare's Enemy is Software Patents, Not Just One Software Patent or One Patent Troll

    With a bounty of $50,000, which is likely less than the cost of legal defense, Cloudflare looks for help with its own case rather than the underlying issues that need tackling worldwide



  10. Patent Laws -- and Especially Eligibility of Software Patents -- Are Being Hijacked by Large Corporations and Their Front Groups

    Intervention by large multinational corporations and their lawyers, front groups, etc. (like the classic lobbying model) gives room for concern in multiple continents where most software development is done



  11. Links 18/5/2017: Catching Up With the Past Three Days

    Links for the day



  12. The US Supreme Court Consults USPTO Director Michelle Lee Regarding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Which is Invalidating Software Patents With CAFC's Approval

    Software patents continue to get knocked out by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) whose introduction of PTAB gave a helping hand to companies that are susceptible to abusive litigation (with bogus patents)



  13. IBM and Its Revolving Doors Lobby Are Plotting to Undermine Supreme Court Rulings to Restore Patentability of Software

    IBM has become so evil that it is now trying to steal democracy, label programmers "thieves", and basically attack the rule of law by extra-judicially overturning a Supreme Court decision



  14. 3 Years After the Alice Case at the Supreme Court the Plague of Software Patents is Easier to Cope With

    Litigation figures are down, rejection rates of software patents remain high, and only spin (e.g. cherry-picking) or constant lobbying can save those who used to profit from software patents



  15. The Attacks of Patent Trolls as Outlined in the Media This Past Week

    An outline of some of the latest troll cases to be aware of and their consequences too (e.g. software patents being used to literally shut down entire programs)



  16. Links 14/5/2017: Linux 4.12 RC1 and KDE Frameworks 5.34.0

    Links for the day



  17. Industry Giants Challenge Qualcomm's Patent Practices While the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Closely Examines Such Behavior

    Scrutiny of Qualcomm's patent aggression and coercion -- scrutiny that can profoundly change the way software patents, SEPs and FRAND are viewed -- as seen in various amicus briefs (amici) from industry giants that are affected



  18. Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette Questions Whether Patents Work When Patent Scope is Too Broad

    Citing MIT economist (and MacArthur “genius”) Heidi Williams, Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette from Stanford challenges old myths and quotes: “we still have essentially no credible empirical evidence on the seemingly simple question of whether stronger patent rights—either longer patent terms or broader patent rights—encourage research investments.”



  19. OIN is Still a Distraction Unless We Want GNU/Linux to Coexist With Software Patents (Rather Than Eliminate Those)

    Another wave of media coverage by/for the Open Invention Network (OIN) necessitates a reminder of what OIN stands for and why it is not tackling the biggest problems which Free/Open Source software (FOSS) faces



  20. Links 13/5/2017: Neptune Plasma 5 ISO, a Shift to Free (FOSS) Databases

    Links for the day



  21. Countries With a Dozen European Patents Are an Easy Photo-Op 'Sell' for Battistelli While the EPO's Demise is Largely Ignored by the Patent Microcosm

    Behind the façade of legitimacy, the EPO suffers from an incompetent, insecure and delusional boss, whose actions will almost certainly lead to the collapse of both the Office and the entire Organisation (whose founding document he routinely shreds to pieces)



  22. Our Assessment: Unitary Patent (UPC) Will Crumble Along With Battistelli's Regime at the EPO

    A reflection and an opinion on where the EPO stands and what it means for the UPC, which doesn't seem to be going anywhere (it's all talk and lobbying)



  23. The European Patent Office Has a Long History/Track Record of 'Screwing' Contractors

    The European Patent Office (EPO) appears to have quite an extensive track record/reputation for ‘screwing’ contractors and then misusing immunity to get away with it



  24. Links 12/5/2017: Wine 2.8, Kdenlive 17.04.1, NHS Windows Syndrome

    Links for the day



  25. Links 11/5/2017: New OpenShot, GIMP, and GNOME (3.24.2)

    Links for the day



  26. The Sickness of the EPO – Part IX: Using Confidential Medical Records as a Weapon Against Staff

    In defiance/violation of labour laws and medical oaths etc. the EPO is passing around medical information, either for dismissal pretexts or a sort of blackmail -- a serious abuse in its own right



  27. The EPO is in Disarray and Additional Complaints to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) May Be Imminent

    Team Battistelli reaps what it has sown, as complaints are being made to a court with “47 member states [that] are contracting parties to the Convention,” (European Convention on Human Rights) according to Wikipedia



  28. By Promoting the UPC, in Defiance of Public Will, the EPO Has Become Patent Trolls' Best Friend

    The patent–industrial complex, aided by the EPO under Battistelli's iron-fisted reign, is trying to convince us that the UPC is coming soon and that it is desirable (it's neither of those things)



  29. Links 10/5/2017: Mesa 17.1, Git 2.13, Qt Creator 4.3 RC1, MINIX 3.4 RC6

    Links for the day



  30. Team UPC Still Twists and Fabricates Statements to Make It Seem Like Unitary Patent is Happening Soon

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC), a terrible system which was envisioned and covertly constructed by those who stand to benefit/profit from injunctions and trolling, is not going anywhere, but media which is dominated by Team UPC would have us believe otherwise


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts