EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.13.17

Countries With a Dozen European Patents Are an Easy Photo-Op ‘Sell’ for Battistelli While the EPO’s Demise is Largely Ignored by the Patent Microcosm

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pretending all is fine and dandy won’t make it so

Trump's Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme
Reference: Trump’s Truck Photo Op Becomes Popular Meme

Summary: Behind the façade of legitimacy, the EPO suffers from an incompetent, insecure and delusional boss, whose actions will almost certainly lead to the collapse of both the Office and the entire Organisation (whose founding document he routinely shreds to pieces)

THE EPO scandals refuse to end. It’s almost as though Battistelli wants to lose leadership to the USPTO not just in terms of quality of patents but also quality of staff (people are walking away and the EPO is visibly desperate for applications).

“All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).”The other day we saw the latest Battistelli photo-op (warning: epo.org link). As usual, nobody important was in that photo-op. Respectable individuals want nothing to do with Battistelli. It’s likely to turn out to be as much as a ‘trophy’ as an old photo-op with Jimmy Savile. All photo-ops can backfire one day, especially if they are suggestive of a bond between individuals (public officials typically).

Battistelli is visiting or appealing to south America again; we saw this coming and wrote about it some days ago. Somebody told us about the Argentina visit. We decided to check how many EPs Argentina has. Well, that’s 13 patents last year (page through to granularity level/page 6 and be warned that it’s another epo.org link). Cuba and Monaco (the other two ‘darlings’ of Battistelli) are adjacent to Argentina with 12 patents each. That’s utterly minuscule compared to the United States with 21,939, Germany with 18,728 and Japan with 15,395.

“The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk.”What is the purpose of these visits? Why need they always throw in Battistelli’s photo-ops? Like a king building his personal portfolio/legacy, he has taken over the entire Web site. epo.org now looks like the site of some Sultanate, with Battistelli’s face and quotes showing up everywhere. We are not joking. It’s like he never intends to leave the EPO and it’s almost as though he views himself as “benevolent dictator for life”. Is this man insane? Donald Trump has done something similar and the press berates him for it.

One reader recently told us, “we are all aware that a big amount of transparency would quickly sanitize the EPO.”

Well, that’s because the EPO has plenty of closets full of skeletons; they are brought out belatedly, ushering in accountability.

“It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality.”The EPO’s mania (or maniac) puts the EPO at existential risk. This, in turn, puts many European businesses at risk. Someone recently published “Putting the Pedal to the Metal at the EPO”, cross-posting an article we remarked on several days ago. It’s clear that Battistelli’s plan is to kill the goose for all its eggs, even if that death means that no more eggs will ever come out. Examiners may become redundant as early as next year. What happens then? There are scary speculations about that

It is meanwhile all too obvious/easy to see that Battistelli is not interested in quality. To him, quality is just a barrier or a nuisance. The Boards of Appeal (all the boards in fact) have been thoroughly destroyed by Battistelli, but a new piece from Marks & Clerk ignores this reality by looking back at this older case:

The Board of Appeal concluded that “all due care” had not been exercised by the applicant, for two reasons. Firstly, the applicant’s system for docketing filing information did not cross-check to confirm that data had been entered into the system. An independent and effective docketing system requires a cross-check that new information is input into the system, in addition to a check that the information input into the system is correct. Secondly, the applicant had ignored the email from its European attorney notifying it that the application would be withdrawn if the renewal fee (plus a surcharge) was not paid by a specified date.

European attorneys are not cheap and a couple of days ago the EPO suggested hiring them, perhaps knowing that applicants are discriminated against without them (we covered examples of that in the past, supported by leaked communications). “Seek a patent attorney’s advice,” the EPO wrote, having made things complicated enough for everyone (that they need to hire outside help at rates of about $300/hour).

If the resultant patent (EP) is not even legitimate — for it resulted from shoddy/hurried assessment — what would it be worth? It would be worse than useless.

There is another new article from Marks & Clerk (these two were published a few hours apart) and it conveniently ignores the fact that the European Patent Convention (EPC) too has long been disregarded by crazy Battistelli; he’s a serial violator, a repeat offender, yet nobody at the Council seems to mind.

Here is what Marks & Clerk wrote:

A recent decision by the EPO’s Boards of Appeal, T 1846/11, concerns an appeal filed by Rigaku Corporation (appellant) against the decision of the examining division, refusing European patent application no. 04012578.3.

This decision deals with the importance of ensuring that correct authorisations are obtained for legal practitioners to act on behalf of an applicant in EPO proceedings.

The European Patent Convention (EPC) draws a clear distinction between professional representatives (ie qualified European Patent Attorneys) and legal practitioners (qualified practitioners in a contracting state who are entitled to act in patent matters and having his place of business in that state). Examples of legal practitioners include Rechtsanwalt in Germany and solicitors and barristers in the UK. Under the EPC, legal practitioners may represent an applicant in proceedings before the EPO in the same way as professional representatives as long as the relevant authorisation is obtained from the applicant and submitted at the EPO.

Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution? When judges who are independent are subjected to illegal actions by Battistelli? And mock ‘trials’? Even defamation?

“Can one seriously expect the EPC to be taken seriously when the President himself shreds it? Is the EPO still a lawful institution?”Suffice to say, the EPO’s Boards of Appeal represent just one Battistelli scandal among so many. IP Kat used to cover the subject, but it does not anymore. Now it actively helps Battistelli and yesterday it yielded this new post from Katfriend Heiko Sendrowski (BASF). Isn’t it great? Corporate patent attorneys now write the ‘news’. “The Board of Appeal,” he wrote, “emphasized that each document must be interpreted by respecting the context of each part thereof to determine its true meaning. The claims of the prior art document according to the Board chiefly serve to define the subject matter for which protection is sought. The skilled person thus understands that claims may artificially combine (and omit) features of an invention to maximize scope of protection such that claims may not “truly correspond to the technical teaching of the document” (see sec. 3.8). In the present case, all examples required a further technical feature (“user intervention”). The skilled person would thus understand that the claims of D2 do not unambiguously disclose an embodiment without the additional feature (see sec. 3.9). The appeal was therefore allowed given that the subject matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step.”

So much about pertinent details regarding the Boards of Appeal yet nothing in months about EPO scandals. So much for “popular source of material, comment and amusement for IP owners, practitioners, judges, students and administrators [which] does not carry paid advertising and does not subscribe to any online advertising services” (the authors just advertise their own interests/employers).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part II: António Campinos at Banco Caixa Geral de Depósitos

    A look at the largely-hidden banking career of the next President of the EPO and the career of the person who competed with him for this position



  2. SUEPO to the Media, Regarding Campinos: “No Comment, It’s Too Dangerous”

    António Campinos, who is Benoît Battistelli's chosen successor at the EPO, as covered by German media earlier this month



  3. Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Willing to Work With Campinos But Foresees Difficulties

    New message from SUEPO regarding Battistelli's successor of choice (Campinos)



  4. Links 18/10/2017: GTK+ 3.92, Microsoft Bug Doors Leaked

    Links for the day



  5. The Darker Past of the Next President of the EPO - Part I: Introduction

    Some new details about Mr. Campinos, who is Battistelli’s successor at the EPO



  6. Confessions of EPO Insiders Reveal That European Patents (EPs) Have Lost Their Legitimacy/Value Due to Battistelli's Policies

    A much-discussed topic at the EPO is now the ever-declining quality of granted patents, which make or break patent offices because quality justifies high costs (searches, applications, renewals and so on)



  7. Patent Firms From the United States Try Hard to Push the Unitary Patent (UPC), Which Would Foment Litigation Wars in Europe

    The UPC push seems to be coming from firms which not only fail to represent public interests but are not even European



  8. In the Age of Alice and PTAB There is No Reason to Pursue Software Patents in the United States (Not Anymore)

    The appeal board in the US (PTAB) combined with a key decision of the Supreme Court may mean that even at a very low cost software patents can be invalidated upon demand (petition) and, failing that, the courts will invalidate these



  9. IAM is Wrong, the Narrative Isn't Changing, Except in the Battistelli-Funded (at EPO's Expense) Financial Times

    The desperate attempts to change the narrative in the press culminate in nothing more than yet another misleading article from Rana Foroohar and some rants from Watchtroll



  10. The Federal Circuit Continues Squashing Software Patents

    Under the leadership of Sharon Prost the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues its war on software patents, making it very hard to remember the last time it tolerated any



  11. SUEPO Representatives Like Elizabeth Hardon Vindicated as Battistelli's Detrimental Effect on Patent Quality is Widely Confirmed

    Feedback regarding the awful refusal to acknowledge patent quality crisis at the EPO as well as the appointment of a President so close to Battistelli (who most likely assures continuation of his policies)



  12. Links 17/10/2017: KDE Frameworks 5.39.0, Safe Browsing in Epiphany

    Links for the day



  13. Judge Bryson Rules Against Allergan After It Used Native American Tribes to Dodge Scrutiny of Patents (IPRs); Senator Hatch Does Not Understand IPRs

    Having attempted to dodge inter partes reviews (IPRs) by latching onto sovereign immunity, Allergan loses a key case and Senator Hatch is meanwhile attempting to water down IPRs albeit at the same time bemoaning patent trolls (which IPRs help neutralise)



  14. Rumours That António Campinos Initially Had No Competition at All (for Battistelli's Succession) Are Confirmed

    Succession at the EPO (mostly French) shows that there's little room for optimism and Battistelli's people are too deeply entrenched in the upper echelons of the EPO



  15. EPO Stakeholders Complain That the New Chairman Does Not Grasp the Issues at the EPO (or Denies These)

    Some information from inside the EPO’s Administrative Council, whose Chairman is denying (at least to himself) some of the core issues that render the EPO less competitive in the international market



  16. Another Misleading Article Regarding Patents From Rana Foroohar at the Financial Times

    In an effort to promote the agenda of patent maximalists, many of whom are connected to the Financial Times, another deceiving report comes out



  17. Monika Ermert's Reports About the Crisis at the EPO and IP Kat's Uncharacteristically Shallow Coverage

    News from inside the Council shows conflict regarding the quality of European Patents (granted by the EPO under pressure from top-level management)



  18. Patent Troll VirnetX a Reminder to Apple That Software Patents Are a Threat to Apple Too

    VirnetX, a notorious patent troll, is poised to receive a huge sum of money from Apple and Qualcomm is trying to ban Apple products, serving to remind Apple of the detrimental impact of patents on Apple itself



  19. Links 16/10/2017: Linux 4.14 RC5, Debian 9.2.1, End of LibreOffice Conference 2017

    Links for the day



  20. The Systematic Erosion of Workers' Rights and Holidays at the EPO Goes Years Back

    The legitimacy of the staff's concerns at the EPO, having seen basic labour safeguards being shredded to pieces by Battistelli for a number of years (predating even the escalation of the conflict)



  21. Articles in English and German Speak About the Decline in Quality of European Patents (Granted by the EPO)

    Heise and The Register, two sites that have closely watched EPO affairs for a number of years, speak about the real problem which is declining patent quality (or rushed examination) -- a recipe for frivolous litigation in Europe



  22. Software Patents and Patent Trolls Not a Solved Issue, But the US is Getting There

    A media survey regarding software patents, which are being rejected in the US in spite of all the spin from law firms and bullies such as IBM



  23. US Patent Trolls Are Leaving and the Eastern District of Texas Sees Patent Cases Falling by More Than Half

    The decline of patent aggression in the US and the patent microcosm's response to Justices, having ruled in TC Heartland, curtailing patent trolls



  24. Qualcomm's Nightmares Are Getting Worse as Antitrust Questions Are Raised and Assessed

    Qualcomm is getting itself deeper in trouble as fines pile up and its multi-billion dollar dispute with Apple isn't getting it anywhere



  25. Forget About Apple; Two of the Leading Phone Makers (Samsung and Huawei) Are Bickering Over Patents

    Massive Android OEMs, Huawei and Samsung, are in a big patent dispute and this time, for a change, China is a legal battleground



  26. Tim Heberden From the Glasshouse Advisory is Throwing Stones in a Glasshouse to Create Patent Litigation

    IAM's latest lobbying, aided by the patent microcosm, for a climate of feuds and disputes (to line the pockets of the litigation 'industry')



  27. Access to Medicine is More Important Than Patents

    Some of the latest news about patents that impede/deny access to crucial medication; strategic litigation from the generics sector, seeking to invalidate patents and then offer low-cost alternatives



  28. Links 14/10/2017: Windows Breaks Dutch Law, Wine 2.19 Released

    Links for the day



  29. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Supported by Congress, a Federal Judge, Soon to be Supported by the Supreme Court Too?

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is still widely defended, except by the patent microcosm which likes (and profits from) patent trolls and litigation Armageddon



  30. Patents Are Turning BlackBerry and Nokia, Which Used Android, Into Anti-Android Fronts That Tax Android OEMs

    The Canadian BlackBerry has sued BLU in the US only to compel it to pay 'protection' money; Nokia's patents are being scattered to trolls, which are doing something similar (without risking litigation themselves)


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts