EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.14.18

Automotives, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Industry 4.0 Among the Buzz Terms Used to Bypass Alice and the EPC Nowadays

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 10:37 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The next generation of “over the Internet” or “on a computer”

Trimaran chart
The EPO’s examination division inspects prior art/dossiers. But does that do the job or just wrongly reinforces that idea (assuming consistency in terminology)?

Trimaran
Source: Presentation from Steffen Wolf [PDF]

Summary: In order to make prior art search a lot harder and in order to make software patents look legitimate (even in various courtrooms) the patent microcosm and greedy patent offices embrace buzzwords

THE EPO does not formally permit software patents. The USPTO still grants some, but like the EPO it requires that people disguise the ‘invention’ being software. This can be accomplished in all sorts of ways; first of all, they don’t use the word “software” and instead use words like “invention” along with mumbo-jumbo like “technical effect”. That in its own right can help mislead examiners who work in a rush with unrealistic quotas/demands.

“What happens when notorious buzzwords (which typically lack any concrete meaning) are introduced?”The images above, extracted from a staff survey (responses in English and German [PDF] and an old presentation from Steffen Wolf of the EPO), remind us of how EPO workers assess (or assessed) prior art etc. Some of them used to complain that semi-automated (or human-aided algorithms) would fail to identify prior art because of homonyms and synonyms. It requires an actual domain expert to assess.

What happens when notorious buzzwords (which typically lack any concrete meaning) are introduced? That seems to be happening a lot these days. Case of point? This new IAM interview which is promotion of an upcoming IAM event (for the patent microcosm). Like the EPO, these people use words like “Internet of Things/Industry 4.0 realm” (whatever that practically means; that typically alludes to old-fashioned devices with an on-board Internet/networking stack). That’s exactly how EPO management promotes software patents without uttering the term “software patents”. IAM added: “IP chief at ThyssenKrupp Stephan Wolke spoke to IAM about the importance of IP strategy and how the IP landscape is likely to develop over the coming years. Discover more here ahead of his session at IPBC Europe…”

“No concern for actual quality anymore; it’s all about numbers (e.g. of patents and lawsuits).”So they’ll just carry on promoting software patents; they’ll just abstain from the term itself. These terms are mostly helpful for legal (or litigious) reasons; these new terms also complicate prior art search. What we’re left with is more litigation. See the USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset and the USPTO Patent Prosecution Research Data. No concern for actual quality anymore; it’s all about numbers (e.g. of patents and lawsuits). This is not what patents came to exist for.

Things have gotten so bad that Microsoft lobbying has just made it into IP Watch. Incredible. It’s a form of lobbying for software patents (under the guise of “AI”), just like at Watchtroll 3 days ago. Jones Day’s Andrea Weiss Jeffries, Emily J. Tait and Jason M. Garr also wrote about “Protecting Artificial Intelligence IP”. Never mind if “Artificial Intelligence” is a branch of algorithms, i.e. software patents in this context.

“Like we said a decade ago, one way to put an end to patent trolling is to target the weapon they most typically use: software patents”This is worrying as nearly nobody in the mainstream/corporate media even bothers pointing that out. The media is still dominated by patent law firm (as far as articles about patents are concerned). They even repost their articles across several domains to dominate and increase visibility. Their conclusion: “AI today is less about imagined scenarios in the far-distant future and more about real-world applications happening right now or on the horizon. Organizations having a robust and well-thought-out AI protection strategy in place will be best positioned to enforce their IP rights when infringement and misappropriation occur and, better yet, to prevent unlawful conduct before it occurs. Trade secrets and copyright provide unique protection for IP that cannot be achieved by patents alone.”

Well, patents on software (e.g. “AI”) aren’t even valid under Section 101.

We expect to see many more of these buzzwords in the coming months or years; it’s a relatively new trend in the patent world. We’ve just mentioned (in the previous article) how blockchains are used too, along with other novel-sounding terms. How about this new article from the National Law Review? Greedy patent lawyers from the firm Foley & Lardner LLP (salivating over the prospects of lawsuits) describe particular trolls as “Patent Assertion Entities” (PAEs) and speak of LOT:

As a middle ground, most of the automakers have joined the LOT Network, which directs its members to develop license agreements that prevent assertion of the licensed patents by Patent Assertion Entities against any other LOT members. Similarly, a large complement of automakers and suppliers have also joined Unified Patents, which provides a mutual defense by challenging the validity of patents asserted against its members. Whereas a non-practicing entity may traditionally seek small quick settlements from many companies, when the targets all group together in one of these membership organizations, the leverage shifts as all of the companies share the same burden that each use to handle individually. These organizations have shown a strong propensity to align their members and reduce litigation. However, it remains to be seen if the good will developed from sharing in the attacks from non-practicing entities will hold up when a major patent challenge arises between two members of these organizations.

Unified Patents, RPX and so on profit more when many patent trolls (or PAEs) become active. That’s just their business model. Citing some numbers from RPX, United for Patent Reform wrote in the past week: “According to RPX Corp., of the 46 patent suits filed Monday, 27 were filed by patent trolls. That’s 59%.”

On another (later) day it wrote: “According to RPX Corp., of the 22 patent suits filed yesterday, 18 were filed by patent trolls. That’s 82%.”

A lot of these involved software patents, probably the large majority of these. Like we said a decade ago, one way to put an end to patent trolling is to target the weapon they most typically use: software patents (doesn’t matter if these are framed as “AI” or whatever). There’s a logistical reason which explains why trolls are attracted to such patents.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  3. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  4. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  5. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  6. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  7. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  8. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  9. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  10. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  11. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  12. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  13. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  14. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  15. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything



  16. As Expected, the Bill Gates Propaganda Machine is Trying to Throw/Put Everyone off the Scent of Jeffery Epstein's 'Incestuous' Ties With Gates

    Media ownership up on display; it's amplifying false claims for a whole month, whereas truth/correct information gets buried before a weekend is over



  17. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 14, 2019



  18. [ES] El Kernel de Linux está introduciendo Open Source Privative Software

    Linux, el kernel, continúa su trayectoria o el camino hacia convertirse en software propietario de código abierto (OSPS).



  19. Linux Foundation Board Meeting

    More sponsored keynotes and tweets — like more sponsored articles (or “media partners”) — aren’t what the Linux Foundation really needs



  20. Links 14/10/2019: Linux 5.4 RC3, POCL 1.4, Python 3.8.0

    Links for the day



  21. This Week Techrights Crosses 26,000 Posts Milestone, 3 Weeks Before Turning 13 (2,000+ Posts/Year)

    A self-congratulatory post about another year that's passed (without breaks from publishing) and another milestone associated with posting volume



  22. No Calls to "Remove Gates" From the Board (Over a Real Scandal/Crime), Only to "Remove Stallman" (Over Phony Distraction From the Former)

    Jeffrey Epstein's connections to Bill Gates extend well beyond Gates himself; other people inside Microsoft are closely involved as well, so Microsoft might want to cut ties with its co-founder before it becomes a very major mess



  23. “The Stupidest [Patent/Tax] Policy Ever”

    It’s pretty clear that today’s European patent system has been tilted grossly in favour of super-rich monopolists and their facilitators (overzealous law firms and ‘creative’ accountants) as opposed to scientists



  24. Meme: Software Patents at the EPO

    The evolution of “technical effect” nonsense at the EPO



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 13, 2019



  26. Firm of Microsoft's Former Litigation Chief Uses Microsoft-Connected Patent Lawsuit Against GNU/Linux (GNOME Foundation) for New Breed of FUD Campaigns

    The patent troll of Bill Gates and Nathan Myhrvold has fed a patent troll that's attacking GNU/Linux and a firm owned by Microsoft's former litigation chief says it proves "Open Source Software Remains a Target"



  27. "Widespread Adoption" (Did You Mean: Takeover by Monopolies?)

    "Quite a few of them are people that would rather replace David with Goliath, just because he's bigger. Quite a few are already taking money from Goliath."



  28. Links 13/10/2019: Red Hat CFO Fired and KDE Plasma 5.17 Preparations

    Links for the day



  29. Bill's Media Strategy Amid GatesGate

    There are many ways by which to game the media’s news cycle — an art mastered by the groper in chief



  30. Hard-Core Micro-Soft

    The word "core" is increasingly being (mis)used to portray user-hostile proprietary software as something more benign if not "open"


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts