EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.11.18

Statistics About Patents in the US Are Encouraging as These Suggest Ongoing Improvements

Posted in America, Patents at 8:19 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Statistics based on hard facts tell a lot more than law firms with a financial objective and appeal to authority like “innovation” myths

Statistics

Summary: Activity at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is up, the Federal Circuit is supportive of PTAB’s activities, and patent trolls lose their patents (which is all they really have)

AT THE EPO there are severe issues that have been further exacerbated by an oppressive regime. At the USPTO, by contrast, things are improving (except for ‘professional’ litigators like patent trolls). How do we know? Just look at the hard numbers. The EPO is running out of patent applications (the number is decreasing) while granting them at an alarming rate which indicates sloppy (rushed due to pressure from management) examination. Contrariwise, numbers are up at the USPTO and examination becomes stricter. PTAB is getting involved.

“The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 219 (73.99%) cases,” a very large law firm said the other day. That figure used to be ~79% in 2016 and early 2017 (maybe by a slightly different criterion or definition other than “on every issue”). But it’s still very high. It means that in 3 out of 4 cases a high court fully justifies decisions made by PTAB. That’s a very high affirmation rate and serves to prove PTAB’s competence.

Here’s one paragraph with some more statistics, which are hard for lawyers to manipulate because they’re derived directly (and exhaustively, not from a cherry-picked sample) from the “data”, which is unambiguous court decisions:

Through January 15, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided 296 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 219 (73.99%) cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 34 (11.49%) cases. A mixed outcome on appeal, where at least one issue was affirmed and at least one issue was vacated or reversed, occurred in 31 (10.47%) cases.

Here’s more: “Of the 296 PTAB appeals it has considered thus far, the Federal Circuit has issued Rule 36 affirmances in 136 (45.95%) cases. The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 160 (54.05%) cases.”

It’s infeasible for this court to look into every single appeal and also issue a written decision/determination for each; we’re talking about thousands per year! Overall, what we’re seeing here is very good. Think of it as patents cleanup. They garden the database of patents, removing from it patents that simply do not belong there.

Here’s another new bit of statistics: “Group 1600 patent challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board hit an all-time high last year, reveals a report from Fish & Richardson.”

Managing IP says “PTAB smashes record in 2017″ (by “record” it means all-time high, in line with the overall trend at PTAB).

PTAB is worth guarding because it’s under attack by the litigation ‘industry’. Public support for PTAB is necessary and later in the weekend we’ll say more about that.

Michael Loney has some more statistics about PTAB. “Petition filing at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board was up slightly in January,” he wrote. PTAB sets new records every year, so this is hardly surprising. To quote:

In January 137 petitions were filed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This was up slightly on 134 in December 2016.

Last year, an average 149.9 petitions were filed a month.

Anticipat, which is clearly anti-PTAB, wrote that “January 29, 2018 was a very quiet day for ex parte appeals decisions at the PTAB. Especially as two of the four decisions were interference judgments. Here is the executive summary of the 4 issued decisions” (there’s a picture/chart there).

Unified Patents, a firm which helps eliminate bad patents through PTAB, reported 3 days ago that it had gone after a troll which we wrote about a year ago. As Unified Patents put it: “On February 8, 2018, Unified, represented by Haynes and Boone, filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 9,462,074 owned and asserted by Sound View Innovations, LLC, a well-known NPE. The ’074 patent, directed to “caching techniques to support streaming media storage and distribution in a network,” has been asserted in multiple cases against such companies as Facebook and Hulu.”

Unified Patents also goes after a Hailo patent (last mentioned here a year ago) and it is succeeding so far. To quote a post from 5 days ago:

On February 6, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted trial on all challenged claims in an IPR filed by Unified against U.S. Patent 5,973,619, owned and asserted by Hailo Technologies, LLC, a subsidiary of Red Dragon Innovations, LLC and well-known NPE. The ’619 patent, directed to a taxi dispatch and payment system, has been asserted in multiple district court cases against such companies as Uber and Lyft.

Notice how Unified Patents specifically targets patent trolls. Who would say that it’s a bad thing? Only defenders of patent trolls, whom we’ll name later in the weekend (they really hate Unified Patents).

Professor Risch, whom we respect (he used to write a lot about patent trolls), takes note of the latest data from Lex Machina. It’s behind a sort of paywall (if you can afford it/willing to lose anonymity), but he summarises it as follows: “The @LexMachina year in review has a lot of useful data in it (and it reviews more than a year in a lot of areas) [] Data from @LexMachina Report on Litigation shows that number of patent defendants sued was lowest in 10 years – lower than 2008 levels.”

That is very good news. Litigation should only be a last resort, unless one is purely in the litigation ‘industry’ (as patent trolls are). Speaking of patent trolls, one of them blogged about the above data, noting that the “Eastern District of Texas still the top venue but new cases drop 48%” (consistent with what we saw and noted last year).

To quote:

“The Supreme Court’s decision on TC Heartland v. Kraft dramatically changed the landscape of U.S patent law by ending the dominance of Judge Rodney Gilstrap and the Eastern District of Texas and leveling the playing field for defendants,” said Owen Byrd, General Counsel and Chief Evangelist at Lex Machina. “Practicing patent law is now a whole new ballgame, with new districts, judges, law firms and attorneys rising to prominence – all of which underscores an even greater need for legal analytics to understand the behaviors and track records of opposing attorneys and presiding judges.”

Patent trolls are very concerned to be set adrift from the Eastern District of Texas, which they have become so reliant on (“reprehensible” people like Rodney Gilstrap).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  2. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  3. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  4. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  5. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  6. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  7. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  8. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  9. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  10. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  11. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  12. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  13. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  14. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  15. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts



  16. Microsoft Has Left RPX, But RPX Now Pays a Microsoft Patent Troll, Intellectual Ventures

    The patent/litigation arms race keeps getting a little more complicated, as the 'arms' are being passed around to new and old entities that do nothing but shake-downs



  17. UPC Has Done Nothing for Europe Except Destruction of the EPO and Imminent Layoffs Due to Lack of Applications and Lowered Value of European Patents

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is merely a distant dream or a fantasy for litigators; to everyone else the UPC lobby has done nothing but damage, including potentially irreparable damage to the European Patent Office, which is declining very sharply



  18. Links 17/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.4, Wine 3.2, Go 1.10

    Links for the day



  19. Patent Trolls Are Thwarted by Judges, But Patent Lawyers View Them as a 'Business' Opportunity

    Patent lawyers are salivating over the idea that trolls may be coming to their state/s; owing to courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) other trolls' software patents get invalidated



  20. Microsoft's Patent Moves: Dominion Harbor, Intellectual Ventures, Intellectual Discovery, NEC and Uber

    A look at some of the latest moves and twists, as patents change hands and there are still signs of Microsoft's 'hidden hand'



  21. Links 15/2/2018: GNOME 3.28 Beta, Rust 1.24

    Links for the day



  22. Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

    An upcoming debate about Battistelli's attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter



  23. The EPO is Being Destroyed and There's Nothing Left to Replace It Except National Patent Offices

    It looks like Battistelli is setting up the European Patent Office (EPO) for mass layoffs; in fact, it looks as though he is so certain that the UPC will materialise that he obsesses over "validation" for mass litigation worldwide, departing from a "model office" that used to lead the world in terms of patent quality and workers' welfare/conditions



  24. IBM is Getting Desperate and Now Suing Microsoft Over Lost Staff, Not Just Suing Everyone Using Patents

    IBM's policy when it comes to patents, not to mention its alignment with patent extremists, gives room for thought if not deep concern; the company rapidly becomes more and more like a troll



  25. In Microsoft's Lawsuit Against Corel the Only Winner is the Lawyers

    The outcome of the old Microsoft v Corel lawsuit reaffirms a trend; companies with deep pockets harass their competitors, knowing that the legal bills are more cumbersome to the defendants; there's a similar example today in Cisco v Arista Networks



  26. The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

    Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation



  27. Speech Deficit and No Freedom of Association at the EPO

    True information cannot be disseminated at the EPO and justice too is beyond elusive; this poses a threat to the EPO's future, not only to its already-damaged reputation



  28. No, Britain is Not Ratifying 'Unitary' Anything, But Team UPC Insinuates It Will (Desperate Effort to Affect Tomorrow's Outcome)

    Contrary to several misleading headlines from Bristows (in its blog and others'), the UPC isn't happening and isn't coming to the UK; it all amounts to lobbying (by setting false expectations)



  29. The EPO's Paid Promotion of Software Patents Gets Patent Maximalists All Excited and Emboldened

    The software patents advocacy from Battistelli (and his cohorts) isn't just a spit in the face of European Parliament but also the EPC; but patent scope seems to no longer exist or matter under his watch, as all he cares about is granting as many patents as possible, irrespective of real quality/legitimacy/merit



  30. Andrei Iancu Begins His USPTO Career While Former USPTO Director (and Now Paid Lobbyist) Keeps Meddling in Office Affairs

    The USPTO, which is supposed to be a government branch (loosely speaking) is being lobbied by former officials, who are now being paid by private corporations to help influence and shape policies; this damages the image of the Office and harms its independence from corporate influence


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts