EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.10.18

The Demise of East Texan Courts and the Ascent of PTAB, Alice and a SCOTUS-Compliant CAFC May Mean That US Software Patents Are Officially ‘Dead’

Posted in America, Australia, Patents at 5:08 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

In the US and in Australia we’re seeing signs that software patents have been left behind, whereas SIPO (China) and the EPO remain stuck in the past

Sam Houston
Sam Houston, going back to away from Houston?

Summary: Companies come to grips with the need to divest and distance themselves from abstract patents; such patents are simply not tolerated by courts anymore (even if patent offices continue granting many such patents for the sake of profit)

THE USPTO is the world’s most influential patent office, so it’s hardly a surprise that we dedicate so much time (and words) to it. We watch it very closely.

“Courts in East Texas (the Eastern District of Texas, abbreviated TXED/EDTX) aren’t getting anywhere near the filings they used to get.”Yesterday we saw this article about patents on cars — surely a physical thing. What about software patents? As we wrote yesterday, some continue to be granted. But do courts accept them? If so, which courts? After TC Heartland we’ve been seeing different district courts getting involved (before the Federal Circuit is even invoked).

“The inventive concept appears to be based almost exclusively in the software. That is, the invention is a system in which software is used to do something different with signal generators than what was done before – the software enables the clinician to program the signal generator to send high-frequency signals, whereas in prior systems the software enabled the clinician to program the signal generator to send lower-frequency signals.”
      –New Judgment
Courts in East Texas (the Eastern District of Texas, abbreviated TXED/EDTX) aren't getting anywhere near the filings they used to get. We mean lawsuit filings in the docket, not patent applications or Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs). Here’s yesterday’s example from the Eastern District of Texas, one wherein:

The court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment that its wireless communication patent was not invalid for improper inventorship on the grounds that defendant could not identify a purported inventor.

With some double negation there it may be hard to digest, but ever since TC Heartland (summer of 2017) the number of lawsuits collapsed even further; there’s not much assurance of positive results for the plaintiffs, who are often classic patent trolls.

“…ever since TC Heartland (summer of 2017) the number of lawsuits collapsed even further; there’s not much assurance of positive results for the plaintiffs, who are often classic patent trolls.”The Australian Financial Review has meanwhile published this article about Rokt’s highly misguided lawsuit. Bruce Buchanan is angry at IP Australia (Australia’s patent office) because Australia correctly rejects software patents (it should!). From the article:

Former Jetstar chief executive and current CEO of fast-growing Australian marketing technology start-up Rokt Bruce Buchanan has hit out at IP Australia for discouraging innovation through its approach to software patents, saying the government agency doesn’t properly understand the tech industry.

Rokt is considered to be one of the country’s next potential tech unicorns, having raised $34.5 million in venture funding last year, but is heading to a court battle with IP Australia over a patent it attempted to lodge to protect a method it has developed to sequence messaging between retailers and shoppers in e-commerce transactions.

So in Australia — like in the US — software patents are hopeless. They’re not even worth pursing. We recently wrote several dozens of articles about court decisions and legislation in Australia. They’re moving well away from software patents — a fact that only upsets those who bet their ‘farm’ on patent litigation (with software patents).

“They’re moving well away from software patents — a fact that only upsets those who bet their ‘farm’ on patent litigation (with software patents).”We have meanwhile found this new article from Mass Device. It’s about “Nevro’s patent spat with Boston Scientific” — a spat which seems to involve nothing but software patents. “The inventive concept appears to be based almost exclusively in the software,” the Judge rightly asserted, rejecting the claims. Here’s the relevant part, in the judge’s own words:

“The inventive concept appears to be based almost exclusively in the software. That is, the invention is a system in which software is used to do something different with signal generators than what was done before – the software enables the clinician to program the signal generator to send high-frequency signals, whereas in prior systems the software enabled the clinician to program the signal generator to send lower-frequency signals. Yet, in most of the asserted system claims, there is no mention of the programming function – no mention of the one aspect of the system that is actually inventive,” he wrote.

They are trying to pass off algorithms as “medical” (we gave several examples over the past month alone). I’ve seen these tricks in my profession, I saw that in Patrick Corcoran's last decision 4 years ago and it’s a trick that all patent examiners need to become familiar with. US patent number 10,000,000 uses a similar trick and should therefore be invalidated, based on Alice/Section 101. If all one does is pick some signals/inputs from some “devices” and then processes that using a computer program, this program is then still abstract; the “devices” (which the program is oblivious to) do not add a “physical” element to the patent. In fact, they’re irrelevant to it because they’re not at all part of the supposed “innovation” or “inventive step”.

“If one is unable to demonstrate that the skin itself is a human invention (it’s not, it’s just part of life/nature), then we’re likely dealing here with that same old loophole and judges won’t fall for it (not in higher courts anyway).”2 patents of ARANZ Medical have just been bragged about [1, 2] in yesterday’s press release, perhaps attempting to conflate programs with “skin” (or “skin surface”).

If one is unable to demonstrate that the skin itself is a human invention (it’s not, it’s just part of life/nature), then we’re likely dealing here with that same old loophole and judges won’t fall for it (not in higher courts anyway).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/9/2018: Qt 5.12 Alpha , MAAS 2.5.0 Beta, PostgreSQL CoC

    Links for the day



  2. Today's European Patent Office (EPO) Works for Large, Foreign Pharmaceutical Companies in Pursuit of Patents on Nature, Life, and Essential/Basic Drugs

    The never-ending insanity which is patents on DNA/genome/genetics and all sorts of basic things that are put together like a recipe in a restaurant; patents are no longer covering actual machinery that accomplishes unique tasks in complicated ways, typically assembled from scratch by humans; some supposed 'inventions' are merely born into existence by the natural splitting of organisms or conception (e.g. pregnancy)



  3. The EPO Has Quit Pretending That It Cares About Patent Quality, All It Cares About is Quantity of Lawsuits

    A new interview with Roberta Romano-Götsch, as well as the EPO's promotion of software patents alongside CIPA (Team UPC), is an indication that the EPO has ceased caring about quality and hardly even pretends to care anymore



  4. Qualcomm's Escalating Patent Wars Have Already Caused Massive Buybacks (Loss of Reserves) and Loss of Massive Clients

    Qualcomm's multi-continental patent battles are an effort to 'shock and awe' everyone into its protection racket; but the unintended effect seems to be a move further and further away from 'Qualcomm territories'



  5. Links 17/9/2018: Torvalds Takes a Break, SQLite 3.25.0 Released

    Links for the day



  6. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Helps Prevent Frivolous Software Patent Lawsuits

    PTAB with its quality-improving inter partes reviews (IPRs) is enraging patent maximalists; but by looking to work around it or weaken it they will simply reduce the confidence associated with US patents



  7. Abstract Patents (Things One Can Do With Pen and Paper, Sometimes an Abacus) Are a Waste of Money as Courts Disregard Them

    A quick roundup of patents and lawsuits at the heart of which there's little or no substance; 35 U.S.C. § 101 renders these moot



  8. “Blockchain” Hype and “FinTech”-Like Buzzwords Usher in Software Patents Everywhere, Even Where Such Patents Are Obviously Bunk

    Not only the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) embraces the "blockchain" hype; business methods and algorithms are being granted patent 'protection' (exclusivity) which would likely be disputed by the courts (if that ever reaches the courts)



  9. Qualcomm's Patent Aggression Threatens Rationality of Patent Scope in Europe and Elsewhere

    Qualcomm's dependence on patent taxes (so-called 'royalties' associated with physical devices which it doesn't even make) highlights the dangers now known; the patent thicket has grown too "thick"



  10. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Are Still Desperate to Crush PTAB in the Courts, Not Just in Congress and the Office

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) improve patent quality and are therefore a threat to those who profit from spurious feuding and litigation; they try anything they can to turn things around



  11. IAM, Watchtroll and the EPO Still Spread the Mentality of Patent Maximalism

    The misguided idea that the objective (overall) should be to grant as many monopolies as possible (to spur a lot of litigation) isn't being challenged in echo chamber 'events', set up and sponsored by think tanks and pressure groups of the litigation 'industry'



  12. Watchtroll and Other Proponents of Patent Trolls Are Trying to Change the Law Outside the Courts in Order to Bypass Patent Justice

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) voids almost every software patent — a reality that even the most zealous patent professionals have come to grips with and their way of tackling this ‘problem’ is legislative, albeit nowhere near successful (so far)



  13. Links 16/9/2018: Windows Plays 'Nice' Again, Elisa Music Player 0.3 Beta and Latte Dock 0.8.1

    Links for the day



  14. Slamming Courts and Judges Won't Help the Patent Maximalists; It Can Only Make Things Worse

    Acorda Therapeutics sees its stock price dropping 25% after finding out that its patent portfolio isn't solid, as affirmed by the Federal Circuitn(CAFC); the only way out of this mess is a pursuit of a vastly improved patent quality, thorough patent examination which then offers legal certainty



  15. Patent Trolls Are Still Active and Microsoft is Closely Connected to Many of Them

    A roundup of patent trolls' actions in the United States; Microsoft is connected to a notably high number of these



  16. Advancements in Automobile Technology Won't be Possible With Patent Maximalism

    Advancements in the development of vehicles are being discouraged by a thicket of patents as dumb (and likely invalid) as claims on algorithms and mere shapes



  17. Battistelli “Has Deeply Hurt the Whole Patent Profession, Examiners as Well as Agents” and Also the Image of France

    A French perspective regarding Battistelli's reign at the EPO, which has not really ended but manifests itself or 'metastasises' through colleagues of Battistelli (whom he chose) and another French President (whom he also chose)



  18. António Campinos Needs to Listen to Doctors Without Borders (MSF) et al to Salvage What's Left of Public Consent for the EPO

    Groups including Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and Médecins du Monde (MdM) have attempted to explain to the EPO, with notoriously French-dominated leadership, that it’s a mistake to work for Gilead at the expense of the public; but António Campinos is just another patent maximalist



  19. The Max Planck Institute's Determination on UPC's (Unitary Patent) Demise is Only “Controversial” in the Eyes of Rabid Members of Team UPC

    Bristows keeps lying like Battistelli; that it calls a new paper "controversial" without providing any evidence of a controversy says a lot about Bristows LLP, both as a firm and the individuals who make up the firm (they would not be honest with their clients, either)



  20. Links 15/9/2018: Wine 3.16, Overwatch's GNU/Linux (Wine) 'Ban', New Fedora 28 Build, and Fedora 29 Beta Delay

    Links for the day



  21. Max Planck Institute Pours More Water on the Dying Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Max Planck Institute gives another sobering reality check for Team UPC to chew on; there's still no sign of any progress whatsoever for the UPC because even Team UPC appears to have given up and moved on



  22. EPO Seals Many Death Sentences With Acceptance of EP 2604620

    Very disappointing news as EP 2604620 withstands scrutiny, assuring that a lot of poor people will not receive much-needed, life-saving treatments



  23. Links 13/9/2018: Compiz Comeback, 'Life is Strange: Before the Storm'

    Links for the day



  24. Now We Have Patents on Rooms. Yes, Rooms!

    The shallow level of what nowadays constitutes "innovation" and merits getting a patent for a couple of decades



  25. EPO Granted a Controversial European Patent (Under Battistelli) Which May Literally Kill a Lot of People

    The EPO (together with CIPA) keeps promoting software patents; patents that are being granted by the EPO literally put lives at risk and have probably already cost a lot of lives



  26. Links 13/9/2018: Parrot 4.2.2, Sailfish OS Nurmonjoki, Eelo Beta

    Links for the day



  27. Patents on Life at the EPO Are a Symptom of Declining Patent Quality

    When even life and natural phenomena are deemed worthy of a private monopoly it seems clear that the sole goal has become patenting rather than advancement of science and technology; media that's controlled by the patent 'industry', however, fails to acknowledge this and plays along with privateers of nature



  28. Defending the World's Most Notorious Patent Trolls in an Effort to Smear the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is an Utterly Poor Strategy

    The 'case' for patent maximalism is very weak; those who spent years if not decades promoting patent maximalism have resorted to attacks on judges, to defense of trolls like Intellectual Ventures, defense of patent scams, and ridiculous attempts to call victims of patent trolls "trolls"



  29. The Belated Demise of Propaganda Sites of the Litigation 'Industry'

    Sites that promote the interests of Big Litigation (patent trolls, patent law firms etc.) are ebbing away; in the process they still mothball the facts and push propaganda instead



  30. Links 11/9/2018: OpenSSL 1.1.1, Alpine Linux 3.8.1, Copyright Fight in EU

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts